mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-09 16:02:36 +01:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
803cb3bfe3
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Native runs start a local `paperclip-runnerd`. After a restart, recovery may start the bootstrap again when the durable state root proves that no provider work started. > - #19665 added a proof for a graceful drain that lands after `session.open` started a fresh session and before the first turn. It requires every recorded provider process to have exited. > - OpenCode records provider startup ownership twice during `session.open`. The first record comes before launch, with `processId: null` and `processGroupId: null`. > - The proof treated `processId: null` as a process it could not prove gone. An OpenCode run drained in this window still failed with `runner_state_identity_mismatch: bootstrap_not_proven_incomplete`. > - This pull request treats a null process id as "no process yet". The benefit is that a graceful restart during OpenCode bootstrap continues automatically, as it already does for ACPX. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19665, #19524 **What happened?** A restart chaos wave sent SIGTERM to the control plane about 11 s after an OpenCode run started. The drain suspended the run. At the next boot, recovery verified that the local runner had stopped and chose `bootstrap_incomplete`. The executor then failed the run with `adapter_failed` and `runner_state_identity_mismatch: bootstrap_not_proven_incomplete`. The kept state root had: - `run.prepare` and `session.open` completed, with a freshly started session (`status: "started"`); - only `session.started`, `session.capabilities.updated` and `session.goal.snapshot` committed; - two `harness.diagnostic` events of type `provider_startup_ownership` in the runner outbox, the first with null process ids and the second with the server pid and process group; - no turn command, and the OpenCode server process had exited. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start an OpenCode task on a local runner. 2. Send SIGTERM to the control plane after `session.open` completes and before the first turn. 3. Let the control plane restart. **Expected behavior** Recovery starts the bootstrap again, and the task continues. **Actual behavior** The run fails. The task needs a manual Retry. ## What Changed - `native-bootstrap-proof.ts`: the process-id collector skips `processId`, `pid` and `processGroupId` values that are `null`. A null value records a launch that has not produced a process yet. Any other non-number value still fails the proof, and every numeric id must still be proven gone. - Tests: a red test with the OpenCode startup-ownership shape, plus counter-tests for a live OpenCode server process, a non-numeric process id, and a started turn. ## Verification - Red before the fix: "allows a fresh bootstrap after a drain once OpenCode opened its session before the first turn" failed with `expected false to be true`. Green after the fix: the `native incomplete-bootstrap evidence` block passes 36/36. - I ran the proof read-only against kept real roots: - the OpenCode drained root now returns `true`; - an OpenCode root from the same wave where a turn ran (108 events) still returns `false`; - the three roots from #19524 and #19665 still return `true`. - `native-runner-restart-recovery.integration.test.ts` and `native-restart-recovery.test.ts`: 134 passed. `tsc --noEmit -p server/tsconfig.json` passes. - Live replay: see the PR comment. ## Risks - Low. The change only skips null ids. Numeric ids still need a proven exit. Any turn, provider output, resumed session, or remote runner still fails closed. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, test execution). Default context window. Extended reasoning was available. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>