mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-13 15:55:46 +01:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
7fef6321fe
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The restart-chaos harness grades each wave's speed against local budgets (`wave-speed.ts`) > - The speed grade already removes restart outage time (fault start to server ready) from spans and restart recoveries > - It did not remove storage fault window time (ST1 outage, ST5 rejected credentials, and so on) > - A restart recovery that correctly waits for the store inside a storage fault window then counts as a speed breach > - This pull request removes the overlap with storage fault windows the same way, and shows the removed time on its own line > - The benefit is that storage waves fail only on real slowness, not on correct waiting ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The wave speed grade treats time spent inside a storage fault window as product slowness. **Subsystem affected** tests/restart-chaos (speed grade). **Current behavior** The ST5 waves w-20261110T050044-s503 and w-20261110T062313-s506 exited 1 on speed breaches only. Their `restart_recovery_control_plane` p95 was 62–67 s against a 4 s budget. The recoveries were inside an ST5R window and correctly waited for a valid key. **Proposed behavior** Spans and restart recoveries do not count time inside storage fault windows (from the `storage-faults.json` receipts). Restart outage and storage windows that overlap are removed once. `SUMMARY.md` shows the storage time that was removed, and `speed.json` has `storageFaultWindows` and `storageFaultRemovedMs`. **Reason and benefit** Storage waves must fail on real product failures and real slowness, not on the harness's own fault windows. ## What Changed - `wave-speed.ts`: `storageFaultWindows()` turns receipts into windows (an open window ends now). `mergeWindows()` joins overlapping windows, so `outageFreeClock()` removes shared time once. `collectWaveSpeed()` takes the storage receipts and removes their time from spans; `gradeWaveSpeed()` removes it from restart recoveries. The storage share is reported apart from the restart outage share. - `main.ts`: one line passes `storageChaos.receipts` to `collectWaveSpeed()`. - README: one paragraph in the Cloud storage section. ## Verification - `PAPERCLIP_IN_WORKTREE=false npx vitest run --config tests/restart-chaos/vitest.config.ts tests/restart-chaos/wave-speed.test.ts`: 20 pass. The 3 new tests fail before this change (`storageFaultWindows is not a function`, overlap removed twice, span not trimmed) and pass after. - `node scripts/typecheck-test-projects.mjs tests/restart-chaos` passes. ## Risks - Test harness only. No product code changes. - ST2 (slow store) windows are also removed from speed budgets. Slowness during a slow-store window is expected, so this is intended. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, with tool use and code execution in Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>