## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work by agents within company boundaries. > - Email tasks can run under the low-trust review preset. > - These tasks must use an isolated workspace and a sandbox. > - The default workspace strategy assumed that the project had a Git repository. > - A project without a configured workspace failed before the agent could start. > - This change gives each such task a private directory and keeps the sandbox requirement. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** An inbound email assigned to a low-trust agent failed with `git_worktree_base_not_git_checkout` when its boundary project had no configured workspace. Setup had accepted the project and sandbox. **Expected behavior** The agent can process email without a repository. Its workspace stays isolated from other tasks and the shared agent home. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Select a low-trust agent with an active sandbox and a project boundary. 2. Leave the project without a configured workspace. 3. Receive an email through AgentMail. 4. Observe that startup fails before provider work starts. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced against `5edf55d73`. **Deployment mode** Hosted staging with sandbox execution. Related: #13256 added email tasks. #13636 fixed default isolation for projects without workspaces; the explicit isolation used by low-trust tasks still needed this path. ## What Changed - Select private task directories for low-trust sandbox tasks with no configured workspace or explicit workspace strategy. - Keep each directory scoped to its company and task. Retain files across turns and reassignment and reject symlink paths and mismatched workspace reuse. - Preserve Git validation for configured workspaces and explicit strategies, plus the existing authorization and remote gates for referenced projects. - Add a startup regression and directory isolation tests. Document the supported repository-free path. ## Verification - The startup regression failed before the fix with the same Git validation error. - 260 targeted email, workspace policy, heartbeat, referenced-project and directory tests pass. - Full `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass on the latest commit. - All CI checks, including the complete sharded test suite and canary dry run, pass on `b4ccd9802b09b2e95499df72d48b4a3906b8c328`. - The final commit also passes the same server shard locally: 60 files, 1,024 passed / 6 skipped tests. The earlier all-groups local run was interrupted during follow-up edits; complete-suite verification comes from CI on the final commit. - Deployed the reviewed commit to staging and independently verified the full serving SHA. Two real Codex runs in Daytona succeeded and finalized the same private company/task workspace. The first wrote a 35-byte marker; the second read the existing file without modifying it and returned the independently verified SHA-256 `ce3bbeb44d07ca6822826d3a5945752a38d30b356d10829f3159a191e5aa92a6`. - Live runtime caveat: Codex reported a nested `bwrap` loopback permission error and used its configured escalated execution inside Daytona. The outer Daytona sandbox remained active for both runs. - The startup regression uses a real database, production trust checks, workspace persistence, sandbox lease acquisition and realization, and a fake provider. It checks reassignment and allows only an authorized referenced project. - The transfer regression runs production archive/sync-back/merge code against distinct filesystem roots: create output in one sandbox, restore it, then read and update it in a fresh sandbox. The provider I/O is emulated; live staging verification is separate. ## Risks - The new default applies only to low-trust sandbox tasks without workspace configuration. Standard agents and explicit Git strategies keep their existing behavior. - Task directories retain work across turns and consume instance storage. The change does not migrate or copy existing shared files. - No database migration or credential changes are required. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository inspection, code execution, and browser tools. The exact runtime model revision and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
13 KiB
AgentMail email connections
AgentMail is an experimental channel connection. Enable experimental chat connections, open Apps → AgentMail, select which humans and agents may use the credential, then enter an API key. In the saved connection’s Permissions page, choose Give an agent an email address. The three-step wizard selects an agent, creates or attaches an address, and reviews the setup. Selecting an agent outside the current allowed list adds that agent when setup completes. Every provider thread in that inbox has one Paperclip task. Subjects are not identifiers. The same email delivered to two connected inboxes creates two independent tasks.
Setup accepts an AgentMail API key or the saved company credential from another AgentMail connection. Organization and pod keys create an inbox-scoped runtime key. An existing inbox-scoped key can connect only its own inbox. Credentials are vaulted and resolved by the server; they are not passed to agents. An inbox can have only one non-archived Paperclip endpoint across the instance.
Verified custom domains are selectable after checking the API key. Complete DNS setup in AgentMail. Paperclip does not register domains or manage DNS.
Failed provider requests retain their HTTP status, a fixed operation name, and
an allowlisted AgentMail error code. For
example, create_inbox with missing_permission differs from limit_exceeded.
An HTTP 403 alone does not establish the cause. Missing or unrecognized codes
appear as unknown. Error-body inspection is limited to 8 KiB and one second;
malformed, larger, or stalled responses keep the original HTTP failure. Provider
messages, suggested fixes, URLs, inbox identifiers, and credentials are excluded
from these diagnostics. These diagnostics do not retry or suppress failures.
The setup and Permissions page warn that an unrestricted inbox can receive mail from anyone. Configure sender allowlists in AgentMail; Paperclip does not manage or verify them. AgentMail controls new-message and reply lists separately. The wizard recommends Paperclip’s existing Low-trust review preset and lets the operator configure a project or root-task boundary. Incoming tasks are placed inside that boundary. Low-trust execution also requires isolated workspaces and an active sandbox environment selected for the agent; setup rejects an unavailable runtime. New inbound tasks request isolated execution. The trust preset itself does not sandbox filesystem or network access. Standard agents remain selectable with a warning.
A boundary project without a configured workspace can process email in a private task directory inside the selected sandbox. It does not need a Git repository. An explicitly configured workspace strategy still applies and must be usable.
Removing the assigned agent’s saved-connection access or revoking its credential grant stops receiving and sending. Connection creation saves the vaulted binding, human grants, and agent access in one database transaction.
Receiving and task lifecycle
WebSocket is the default and needs no public HTTP URL. The server authenticates
with an Authorization header, keeping the provider key out of the connection URL
(provider handshake). The service holds a
renewable database lease, subscribes to the connected inbox, and reconnects with
backoff. Webhook mode needs the configured public HTTPS webhook base URL. Setup
registers a Paperclip-owned webhook. The raw request body is verified using Svix
before the inbox is admitted to the shared durable delivery queue.
The API key needs inbox-scoped webhook_create, webhook_read, and
webhook_delete permissions in addition to mail access. AgentMail's
"Send & read mail" preset alone cannot register a webhook. A rejected
registration while switching from WebSocket leaves live receiving active.
Both transports deduplicate by inbox, event kind, and provider message ID. A per-conversation worker lease serializes work; independent conversations can proceed concurrently. Provider messages, comments, and attachment links preserve the provider message identity. A reply to a completed task reopens it. A cancelled task retains new mail but does not wake its agent. Provider-classified spam, blocked and unauthenticated mail do not start automatic work. Recognized automatic replies can be retained in an existing conversation but do not wake an agent or create a new task.
Activation establishes the intake cutoff. Activation, reconnect, and periodic maintenance scan paginated message metadata and fetch eligible messages using a receipt-time checkpoint with a five-minute overlap. Metadata scans traverse all pages because AgentMail sorts messages by the sender's timestamp: a newly received message can have an old Date header. Message-ID deduplication makes repeated scans safe. Earlier messages in a newly active thread are imported as context without separate historical wakeups. There is no automatic historical mailbox import and no assumption of WebSocket replay.
Incoming mail wakes the selected agent through its normal task execution path, including its configured permissions and budget controls. The external sender is recorded in the email envelope; an email address never grants Paperclip membership or board authority.
Explicit email actions
Internal comments, progress, final responses, approvals, and errors never send email. Email endpoints have an explicit publication mode; shared automatic chat publication paths exclude them. Sending email does not close a task.
The task displays the email envelope, extracted reply text, full text context, attachments, and delivery outcomes. Use the normal task conversation to ask the agent to send an email or reply. There is no separate email composer or mode switch. The agent uses an explicit email action; task messages themselves are not sent as email. Reply uses Reply-To when present, otherwise the sender; reply-all must be requested. Bcc is retained in the originating envelope but is not copied to reply inputs. Remote email images are not rendered. Attachments use Paperclip's content-type, size, company, and task bounds.
An agent must own the inbox, be assigned the source task, and supply the running
source task's X-Paperclip-Run-Id at acceptance. Board actions require company
write access. Configured action policies apply to both. Authority is checked
again when the durable send executes. A new conversation creates its child task
and immutable send intent in one transaction before contacting AgentMail.
All paths below are relative to /api:
| Operation | Path |
|---|---|
| Save credential and human/agent access | POST /companies/:companyId/email/connections |
| Inspect a saved credential | POST /companies/:companyId/email/connections/:connectionId/inspect |
| List authorized inboxes | GET /companies/:companyId/email/inboxes |
| Inspect setup credentials (connection manager) | POST /companies/:companyId/email/inspect |
| Create or attach an inbox (connection manager) | POST /companies/:companyId/email/inboxes |
| Pause, resume, disconnect | POST /email/inboxes/:endpointId/control |
| Replace credentials / receiving mode | POST /email/inboxes/:endpointId/reconnect |
| Start an email child task or reply | POST /companies/:companyId/email/send |
| Read the email context of a bound task | GET /companies/:companyId/email/tasks/:issueId |
| Read delivery outcome | GET /companies/:companyId/email/deliveries/:publicationId |
| Resolve an uncertain outcome (connection manager) | POST /companies/:companyId/email/deliveries/:publicationId/resolve |
A new send request:
{
"endpointId": "<inbox-endpoint-uuid>",
"parentIssueId": "<current-task-uuid>",
"to": ["recipient@example.com"],
"cc": [],
"bcc": [],
"subject": "Question about the proposal",
"text": "Could you clarify the delivery date?",
"attachmentIds": [],
"idempotencyKey": "<new-request-uuid>"
}
A reply request uses conversationId and replyToMessageId from the bound task:
{
"endpointId": "<inbox-endpoint-uuid>",
"conversationId": "<email-conversation-uuid>",
"replyToMessageId": "<provider-message-id>",
"replyAll": false,
"text": "Thanks, that answers the question.",
"attachmentIds": [],
"idempotencyKey": "<new-request-uuid>"
}
Native runners with an active, authorized inbox receive agentmail_inboxes,
agentmail_read_thread, agentmail_send, and agentmail_delivery. The system
also installs the AgentMail skill for those agents through the normal runtime
skill path. These tools supply run authority and work independently of the
optional generic runtime API rollout. Where enabled, search_api and call_api
also expose these operations. The CLI uses the same authenticated
operations and inherits the agent run ID:
paperclipai email inboxes
paperclipai email thread "$PAPERCLIP_TASK_ID"
paperclipai email send --file email-request.json
paperclipai email reply --file email-reply.json
paperclipai email delivery '<publication-uuid>'
A 202 response includes task, conversation, and publication IDs immediately.
The publication progresses through queued, sent, delivered, failed, or uncertain.
Delivery callbacks update that publication and do not create new correspondence.
Retries reuse the same immutable request and provider idempotency key. The worker
stops automatic retries after 23 hours, conservatively inside AgentMail's 24-hour
deduplication window. An uncertain receipt can be resolved by matching its
provider message ID and Paperclip publication header, or by an operator confirming
that it was not sent. The latter marks it failed; any resend is a new explicit
action. Do not change an idempotency key just because a request timed out.
Disconnect and diagnostics
Reconnect preserves inbox and task identity. Pause stops intake and sending. Disconnect archives the local endpoint and removes its credential bindings, unreferenced vaulted credentials, and only the webhook/runtime key created by Paperclip. It never deletes the provider inbox or task history. If a revoked key prevents provider cleanup, local disconnection still completes and reports that Paperclip's provider registrations need cleanup in AgentMail.
Connection settings show state, receiving mode, catch-up time and errors. Tasks show publication failures and uncertain delivery resolution. Delivery admission, message processing and agent wakeup are separate from provider delivery and model startup; live latency measurements must distinguish those stages.
Verification and live qualification
Deterministic coverage lives in server/src/__tests__/agentmail-api.test.ts,
server/src/__tests__/email-channels.integration.test.ts, and
tests/e2e/agentmail.spec.ts. It exercises real database transactions with a fake
provider, plus browser setup and explicit task email actions.
Before labeling an installation live-qualified, use a disposable inbox and an
approved test recipient. In each transport mode, receive a message, verify one
task and one wake, send an explicit reply, and verify provider threading and
delivery. Also disconnect/reconnect, interrupt receiving, and verify catch-up.
Record provider message IDs and timestamps without copying credentials. Compare
the durable delivery received_at with the wake request time separately from
provider transit time and model startup. Automated fixtures do not constitute
live provider qualification.
Provider references: inboxes, webhook verification, idempotency, message listing, reply API.
Sandbox execution
AgentMail runs in the Paperclip control plane using its vaulted credentials. It is a REST connection, not a local-stdio MCP server. The connection health check validates the key against AgentMail; it does not launch a local command or discover MCP tools.
Agents in Daytona and other sandbox environments use the same task email actions. The sandbox callback bridge allows inbox discovery, bound-thread reads, delivery reads, and explicit sends. The controller enforces company, inbox, task/run, and action-policy checks. Mailbox setup, credential inspection, reconnect, and manual delivery resolution remain outside that sandbox API surface. Native runners use the assigned AgentMail tools through their run-bound tool channel. Neither path exposes the AgentMail provider key to the sandbox.