mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-30 13:20:54 +01:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip lets people manage AI agents and their work. > - The manual AWS E2E workflow records browser and model evidence. > - Public repository Actions artifacts are not a restricted evidence store. > - Some chat evidence needs the existing private-history store. > - A target flag must not grant archive access or enable a public fallback. > - This pull request binds restricted runs to protected exact-source approval and retains their standard evidence with trusted transfer code. > - Operators can retain complete evidence without changing scanner verdicts or scenario outcomes. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Manual AWS E2E evidence retention for exact reviewed chat-feature selections. **Subsystem affected** The runner E2E manual workflow, standard evidence handoff and private-history transfer. **Current behavior** Manual cell and merged evidence use Actions artifacts. In a public repository, repository readers can download those files. Scheduled private history does not authorize a manual target to use its role. **Proposed behavior** Classify sensitive selections in the trusted workflow. Require one protected original-run approval. Verify existing private storage before target setup or model secrets. Retain scanned standard originals and final packaged results through a workflow-pinned runtime. Deny public artifact and history fallback on failure. **Reason and benefit** Preserve inspectable standard evidence in restricted storage without treating a private bucket as permission to retain credentials. **Additional context** Related source work is separate: #18067 changes paid runner routing, #18100 changes scoped input delivery, and #17888 changes report catalog parsing. This pull request does not include or revert those changes. ## What Changed - Add a trusted manual classification and exact run, attempt, workflow, target, selection and launcher approval contract. - Add a protected manual private job. Prepare a second workflow-pinned checkout and isolated publication dependencies before archive credentials. - Seal standard originals and final result bytes with exact inventories. Reject credential contamination, unscanned carriers and changed files. - Use existing immutable private-history archives and transfer receipts for cells and merged reports. Keep the existing bounds. - Use per-cell exact-key read sessions and a separate report writer. Check every inline policy against the 2,048-character STS limit. - Scan and seal fresh generated report logs and files with the actual report-step credential roots before transfer. - Require a positive nonprivate route for Actions uploads and public history. Private failures have no public fallback. Preserve normal catalog semantics for nonprivate selections with more than 32 IDs or duplicate IDs. - Authenticate generated-report fonts and every reserved trace-viewer static asset against the exact trusted producer path and bytes, including HTML and JavaScript. Keep standard cell evidence and unknown carriers closed. - Document the first eight supported IDs, deployment gates and the operator trust boundary. ## Verification - 57 new pure, actual-helper and actual-workflow-shell controls pass. - 50 affected existing workflow, routing, target and private-history controls pass. The final committed workflow security controls also pass. - Targeted helper/test and actual launcher noEmit checks pass. - `actionlint -shellcheck= -pyflakes= .github/workflows/runner-full-stack-e2e.yml` passes. - Parent `2f46336d7` required CI is green. The server 11/12 shard first failed on database cleanup/test timing and passed one bounded recheck with unchanged source. The original failure remains recorded. - The preserved docs-only parent `d721c170f` had 59 terminal, nonblocking checks and fresh Greptile 5/5. Three later review comments exposed a genuine static-report asset failure and nonprivate selector regression; their parent counterexamples remain recorded. - The reviewed parent passes 76 focused controls across nine files. The final dependency preflight successor passes all six affected controls, including two new actual `prepare` subprocess controls, and targeted helper/test noEmit. Unchanged suites were not repeated. A synthetic Node-only Playwright HTML/blob/JUnit report and the real dashboard renderer/brand stager pass the actual sealer, strict archive and immutable receipt path; only AWS transport is synthetic. No browser or product setup runs in that test. - Default cell fonts/SVGs, unknown report files, forged paths, altered static bytes, recomputed inventory tampering and registered credential matches remain rejected. Eligibility and remaining-byte checks run before body reads in both sealer and transfer validator; both independent parent read-order failures are preserved. - The pre-credential target comparison also binds the new generated-report asset helper byte for byte. A genuine tampered-dependency parent failure is preserved. - Six additional actual sealer/validator controls expose the standard-extension trace-owner bypass on the parent. All 34 affected controls pass on its correction, including the real producer/archive/receipt test; targeted noEmit passes. Ordinary dynamic report HTML outside the reserved trace directory is unchanged. - Final head `43683c4e0` passes both required gates, `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`, in normal CI run `40849916302` attempt 1. All 59 rollup checks/statuses are terminal and nonblocking (55 success, two neutral, two skipped). - Fresh exact-head Greptile is 5/5; automated review is terminal and all technical threads are resolved. Human CODEOWNER approval remains a separate gate. Earlier source, genuine counterexamples and CI history remain preserved. - Full local build and live E2E were not run. This task prohibits local SDK/native/server builds and paid or AWS operations. Normal pull request CI must pass before merge readiness. - No existing artifact bodies, archives, media or provider reasoning were inspected. Synthetic owned fixtures prove the privacy boundaries. ## Risks - Deployment still needs the existing private bucket, role and protected environments. Both environments need the exact original-run approval variable. - Targets need the compatible handoff protocol and a separately reviewed exact launcher digest. Existing target branches do not become ready automatically. - Complete duplicated originals and packaged evidence can exceed existing archive limits. Such a transfer fails; files are not silently removed. - Required evidence omissions remain fatal to PASS. Safe failed evidence is retained with an explicit missing list and incomplete required-evidence verdict. Credential contamination still blocks all original uploads. Restricted storage does not waive PNG, HTML, blob or scanner checks. - This is operator-approved source execution. Target processes can inherit the job's OIDC request environment and may re-assume a role. Inline session attenuation is not isolation from malicious approved source. - Operator authorization must bind the actual exact source and original run. A proven administrator-controlled record may supply it without an environment reviewer UI. No new approval UI or environment change is required by this PR. - Required repository CODEOWNER review is still pending. Commented reviews and review requests are not approvals. This PR stays open and unmerged. - This PR does not deploy infrastructure, change IAM, dispatch workflows, publish report payloads, change grades or transfer prior scenario passes. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` in Codex. Used code execution, source analysis and tool calls. The host does not expose the context window size. Independent peer review used the same model family in a separate agent. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
31 lines
3.1 KiB
TypeScript
31 lines
3.1 KiB
TypeScript
import { expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
import { manualEvidenceRouting, authorizeManualCellRoute } from "./manual-private-policy.mjs";
|
|
import { MANUAL_PRIVATE_EXECUTIONS } from "./manual-private-retention.js";
|
|
vi.mock("./catalog.js",()=>({runnerMatrix:[]}));
|
|
import { parseRunnerSelectors, selectRunnerExecutions } from "./selectors.js";
|
|
import type { MatrixExecution } from "./types.js";
|
|
const env={EVENT_NAME:"workflow_dispatch",EVAL_CADENCE:"manual",TEST_RUNNER:"runs-on/fleet=paperclip-public-pr-x64/env=public-ci"};
|
|
it.each(["chat-features"," chat-features ","first-task, chat-features "])("rejects broad sensitive suite %s before credentials",suite=>expect(()=>manualEvidenceRouting({...env,SELECT_SUITE:suite})).toThrow());
|
|
it("classifies exact private IDs without granting run approval",()=>expect(manualEvidenceRouting({...env,SELECT_ID:` ${MANUAL_PRIVATE_EXECUTIONS[0]} `})).toEqual({retention:"private",executionIds:[MANUAL_PRIVATE_EXECUTIONS[0]]}));
|
|
it.each(["chat-features","chat-features.runner-opencode.local.*","chat-features.runner-opencode.local.unknown"])("rejects partial or unsupported sensitive ID %s",id=>expect(()=>manualEvidenceRouting({...env,SELECT_ID:id})).toThrow());
|
|
it("keeps selector exclusivity equal to the actual catalog producer",()=>expect(()=>manualEvidenceRouting({...env,SELECT_ID:MANUAL_PRIVATE_EXECUTIONS[0],SELECT_SUITE:" "})).toThrow());
|
|
it("retains nonprivate suite and exact-cell routes but requires a successful trusted cell guard",()=>{
|
|
expect(manualEvidenceRouting({...env,SELECT_SUITE:"first-task"})).toMatchObject({retention:"actions"});
|
|
expect(authorizeManualCellRoute("actions","first-task.runner-opencode.local.create","[]")).toBe("actions");
|
|
expect(()=>authorizeManualCellRoute("actions",MANUAL_PRIVATE_EXECUTIONS[0],"[]")).toThrow();
|
|
expect(()=>authorizeManualCellRoute(undefined,"first-task.runner-opencode.local.create","[]")).toThrow();
|
|
});
|
|
it("rejects target-selected foreign private cells and unsupported compute",()=>{
|
|
expect(()=>authorizeManualCellRoute("private",MANUAL_PRIVATE_EXECUTIONS[1],JSON.stringify([MANUAL_PRIVATE_EXECUTIONS[0]]))).toThrow();
|
|
expect(()=>manualEvidenceRouting({...env,TEST_RUNNER:"ubuntu-latest",SELECT_ID:MANUAL_PRIVATE_EXECUTIONS[0]})).toThrow();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it.each(["33-known-ids","duplicate-known-id"])("preserves actual nonprivate catalog semantics for %s through classifier and cell guard",kind=>{
|
|
const matrix=Array.from({length:33},(_,i)=>({id:`first-task.runner-opencode.local.fixture-${i}`,groups:[],suite:{id:"first-task"},profile:{id:"runner-opencode"},environment:{id:"local"},task:{id:`fixture-${i}`}} as unknown as MatrixExecution));
|
|
const ids=kind==="duplicate-known-id"?[matrix[0]!.id,matrix[0]!.id]:matrix.map(row=>row.id);
|
|
const options=parseRunnerSelectors(["--matrix-json","--max-parallel","1",...ids.flatMap(id=>["--id",id])]);
|
|
const selected=selectRunnerExecutions(options,matrix);expect(selected.length).toBe(kind==="duplicate-known-id"?1:33);
|
|
const route=manualEvidenceRouting({...env,SELECT_ID:ids.join(",")});expect(route).toEqual({retention:"actions",executionIds:ids});
|
|
for(const row of selected)expect(authorizeManualCellRoute(route.retention,row.id,"[]")).toBe("actions");
|
|
});
|