mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-22 16:51:28 +02:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
7d84b183fb
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The server manages issue execution, queued comments, and agent wake state > - Deferred wakes can pass through several failure, hold, rollback, and steering branches > - These branches had no direct tests, so a later change could fail without clear evidence > - This pull request adds characterization tests for eight uncovered branches > - The benefit is clear test evidence for future changes to deferred issue execution ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The server behavior for deferred issue-execution wakes and queued-comment steering transactions. **Current behavior** The code handles missing agents, cross-company agents, pause holds, rollback, steering outcomes, and invalid reorder sets. These branches had no direct tests. **Proposed behavior** Keep the current behavior and test each branch against the current implementation. **Reason and benefit** The tests make silent behavior changes visible. They also protect the wake queue while later work moves this logic into a dedicated module. **Breaking changes** None. This pull request changes no production code and no runtime behavior. Related public pull requests: #12671, #11168, and #10199. ## What Changed - Add tests for missing and cross-company deferred agents. - Add tests for pause-hold promotion and cancellation. - Add a test for atomic rollback when the responsible user cannot resolve. - Add tests for successful, timed-out, and rejected native steering. - Add a test for invalid queued-comment reorder input. ## Verification - Run `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-comment-wake-batching.test.ts` against an embedded Postgres database. - Run `server/src/__tests__/issue-queued-comments-routes.test.ts` against an embedded Postgres database. - Confirm that all eight new tests pass. - Confirm that the pull request CI checks pass. ## Risks Low risk. The diff changes test files only. It does not change production code, database schema, API behavior, or runtime behavior. ## Model Used Codex, GPT-5, tool use and code review support. The model did not author production code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>