mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-07 16:11:46 +02:00
DottaandPaperclip
7cf0d3ebb0
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents often run against managed workspace runtime services, including reusable Paperclip dev servers > - A running process and an open root URL are not enough to prove the Paperclip API is actually ready > - If the API health endpoint is still failing, agents can reuse a service that looks alive but cannot safely serve the board or API clients > - This pull request makes Paperclip dev runtime readiness probe the resolved `/api/health` endpoint > - The benefit is that runtime service reuse waits for the same health signal operators and agents depend on ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No matching public GitHub issue was found. Public duplicate search found no open PR for "workspace runtime health readiness". Bug report: ### What happened? A managed Paperclip dev runtime service could satisfy HTTP readiness at the exposed base URL even when the Paperclip health endpoint was returning an unhealthy status. ### Expected behavior Paperclip dev runtime services should not be considered ready until their health endpoint succeeds. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Start a workspace runtime service named `paperclip-dev` whose base URL responds successfully. 2. Make that same service return HTTP 503 from `/api/health`. 3. Ask Paperclip to ensure the runtime service for a run. 4. Observe that the service can be reused even though the API health endpoint is not ready. ### Paperclip version or commit Current `origin/master` before this PR. ### Deployment mode Local workspace runtime service management. ## What Changed - Resolve Paperclip dev runtime readiness checks to the service health URL before polling. - Surface readiness errors with the actual health URL that failed. - Add a regression test that fails when `/api/health` returns HTTP 503 even if the service process is running. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts` — 81 tests passed. - `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD` — passed. ## Risks - Low to medium risk. This tightens readiness for Paperclip dev runtime services, so a service that previously looked ready while unhealthy will now fail fast instead of being reused. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, tool-enabled shell workflow. Exact hosted model variant and context window were not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>