mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-22 00:30:19 +02:00
DottaandPaperclip
06d4fe3121
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The Runner exposes assigned tools to Claude through an authenticated MCP bridge. > - Claude can defer these tools and search for them before a simple task can finish. > - Title and terminal tools are common requirements for a task turn. > - This pull request marks those three tools for immediate loading by Claude. > - The remaining tools keep the SDK deferral policy and the existing access checks. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15993, #15994, #15997. **What existing behavior does this improve?** Claude Runner tool discovery during task execution. **Current behavior** Claude can use ToolSearch to discover the mandatory title and terminal tools before it answers a simple task. **Proposed behavior** Expose `set_task_title`, `paperclip_finish`, and `paperclip_block` in the first Claude request through per-tool `anthropic/alwaysLoad` metadata. Keep other tools deferred under the SDK policy. **Reason and benefit** Remove an avoidable tool discovery step without changing the model, effort, or authorization. Repeated product measurements will check the latency benefit. ## What Changed - Add closed metadata for the three essential tools only in Claude runtime hosts. - Keep incoming metadata discarded and private tools hidden. Keep other providers unchanged. - Test real bridge catalogs and provider routing. Check the pinned Claude SDK request against a loopback fixture with no paid calls. - Advance the pending Copilot source binding because it attests the shared bridge file. Preserve historical profile readers and qualification limits. ## Verification - Focused bridge, admission, profile, and effort controls: 185 passed, one skipped. Three provider-routing cases pass. - Runner TypeScript compilation passes. - The production SDK fixture loads exactly three essential tools with the change and zero in the controlled baseline. The document tool stays deferred. - Six real API-key tasks used Opus 5.5 / High in alternating order A B B A A B. Median first assistant receipt was 22.021 s baseline vs 17.060 s candidate (22.5% lower). Median total was 24.119 s vs 19.150 s (20.6% lower). ToolSearch was 3/3 baseline vs 0/3 candidate. All six tasks saved a title and accepted finish. A separate candidate follow-up resumed the same provider session and finished without ToolSearch. - Median startup was 4.786 s baseline vs 5.381 s candidate. This change does not improve startup. Three samples per version give directional evidence only. - Estimated cost for the six tasks was $0.850900800. Candidate total was $0.450341800 vs baseline $0.400559000; the first candidate wrote a new cache prefix. These rate-card estimates are not invoices. - The benchmark used source `5aed3c6a083cf8e6246815455abde3b29ecbbbac`. Rebuilding both bundles at master-reconciled head `d2da07259048c0a2bebd210c35cc0ebb3ff42c67` produced identical SHA-256 values. Baseline bundle SHA-256: `10a92c373bba4fb630bf4fefeab953d850a77cf8258bc2e94711410a73a78ecd`. Candidate: `40348fc67a3b1ae5cc1f27f933f369981d31bcdf5d1bdc7b1797968ddfe53938`. Baseline differs only by compiling the Claude preload selector as false. Fresh task sessions avoid checkpoint changes. - Full local runtime-host runs exposed credential lease collisions in existing cases. A later complete host run passed 67 cases and timed out in an existing admission-abort case; that case passes in isolation. All failures are retained. Focused controls pass. Complete Runner suites, repository typecheck, tests, browser checks, and build pass in cloud CI on this head. ## Risks - These three tool schemas add input to Claude requests. Measurements must include token usage and cost. - Copilot source identity changes because it includes the bridge source hash. It remains pending qualification. Its catalog and executable closure do not change. - The test fixture proves request shape. It does not prove real-provider latency or platform package qualification. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The exact serving model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused controls and isolated cancellation check; broad local failures are retained above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>