mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-09 07:10:34 +01:00
DottaandPaperclip
7a72caeda1
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Online workspace migration checks all local aliases before it captures a source. > - Each alias must retain its prepared runs and recovery holds in that check. > - The current reader scans the same company run table once for every alias. > - Shared Git sources repeat that scan even after the complete alias group is known. > - This pull request reads those narrow companion rows once per inspection. > - The existing owners still validate every source and recovery hold before migration can proceed. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Online source qualification repeats the prepared and finalized run query for each workspace alias. A shared Git source with four aliases makes four copies of this query. **Expected behavior** One inspection should read the complete alias group once. It must return the same source and recovery proofs, and a later inspection must read fresh rows. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create a shared Git source with four aliases and a valid settled prepared run. 2. Add a finalized companion and a recovery hold. Add a foreign-company run that names the same workspace ID. 3. Inspect the source and count companion discovery queries. Before this change, the regression sees four queries instead of one. Related public work: [source ownership guards in #19688](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/19688) and [bounded accounting closure in #19700](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/19700). ## What Changed - Read prepared and finalized companion rows in one company-scoped query after the complete alias group and foreign aliases pass validation. - Group the narrow rows by workspace ID. Keep run order and all existing source and recovery owner checks. - Add a PostgreSQL regression for proof equivalence, one scan, company isolation, and a new source obligation between inspections. - Align an existing Stop-accounting test with the durable closure deadline from #19700. Keep the incomplete debt, quiet database, cancellation, and single-charge checks. Product workers and timers are unchanged. ## Verification - Before the source change, the new PostgreSQL test passed its proof comparisons and failed because four companion scans ran instead of one. - The two workspace suites pass: 77 tests in `remote-workspace-online-source.test.ts` and `online-legacy-workspace-recovery.test.ts`. - CI exposed an old Stop-accounting assertion that expected no timer while an incomplete receipt had an intentional closure deadline. Both automatic CI attempts failed. The unchanged local variants passed, so that run did not reproduce the failure. Waiting for the real owner deadline then proved the stale assertion red. - After the test alignment, both Stop-accounting variants and all 77 workspace tests passed together: 79 tests across three files. The three unrelated Stop-recovery cases were not selected locally. Fresh CI covers the complete suites. - The affected suites cover retained recovery owners, foreign aliases, physical source locks, and changes before publication. - Tests use a disposable PostgreSQL 18.1 database. The local hook allowance is 90 seconds. Product timeout settings are unchanged. - Final head `0eed2e5062cbfb62df7f76168c27d2172fc2d7de`: [full CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42341640259) passed, with 56 successful checks and four configured skips. [Fresh Greptile review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/19735#issuecomment-6702476739) is 5/5 with no open threads. This PR makes no claim about deployed latency. ## Risks - Each inspection now holds the narrow companion rows for the complete alias group in memory. The existing alias group bound still applies. - The query keeps the same company, workspace, and sync-state predicates. There is no runtime filter, row limit, schema change, or cache between inspections. - No public command or API changes. Public documentation does not need an update. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, exact model ID `gpt-6.1-sol`. Used reasoning, code editing, shell tools, and test execution. The context window size is not exposed by this environment. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>