<!-- entire-trail-link-start --> https://entire.com/gh/paperclipai/-/trails/175/changes/paperclip/175 <!-- entire-trail-link-end --> ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Operators configure each agent through several settings tabs. > - Operators also need one complete, editable configuration document. > - The document must retain each resource service's access and validation rules. > - This pull request defines the `paperclip/v1` Agent YAML format and adds an Advanced editor. > - The editor previews changes, rejects stale core writes, and explains partial saves. > - Operators can edit agent settings in one place and verify the saved state after reload. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #2219. Related settings work: #10974. **Problem or motivation** Agent configuration spans profile, runtime, instructions, skills, tools, channels, permissions, secrets, keys, and revision history. Operators cannot inspect and edit those settings as one versioned YAML document. **Proposed solution** Add an Advanced agent tab with a YAML editor. Define a shared document schema. Read and write resources through their existing APIs. Separate editable settings, explicit commands, and read-only observed state. **Alternatives considered** A raw agent-row editor would omit related resources. A generic database update would bypass resource ownership. The editor therefore uses the existing resource contracts and records partial results when a later request fails. **Roadmap alignment** This extends the shipped agent configuration capability. It relates to easy AGENTS.md configuration, multi-harness teams, governed tool access, and secrets management. Stored credentials remain redacted. This format is an editable settings view; it does not add company portability or provider consent. ## What Changed - Add the `paperclip/v1` Agent document schema and format documentation. - Add the Advanced route, sidebar entry, YAML editor, validation, change summary, save progress, and reload recovery. - Cover core settings, instruction files, skill pins, tool installs/profiles/policies, channels, permissions, secret operations, API keys, and revision restore. - Add private-keyed configuration revisions checked under the agent write lock. Read the current key through its owner so file-based rotation does not require restarting the server. Preserve unchanged secret markers at their original paths. - Retain drafts and returned credentials after partial saves. Require reload before retrying commands. Prevent duplicate submissions. Keep new key tokens visible through rename and disable saves with an empty change plan. - Send only changed channel settings. Require explicit intent for shared profile edits. Load destination instruction files when changing their location. - Update Storybook fixtures, verification maps, and regression tests. Add browser acceptance through real APIs and PostgreSQL. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` passes. - `pnpm build` passes. - The focused UI suite passes all 50 tests. The API/revision helper suites pass all 93 tests. - All 65 lifecycle tests pass with a dedicated PostgreSQL database. They exercise real row locks, redaction, revision history, audit, and company access. - All six browser acceptance cases pass. They check saved settings and clears, secret redaction, key creation/revocation, stale drafts, lost-response recovery, instruction relocation, revision restore, and key-token retention through rename. The tests use real resource APIs and storage. The MCP target uses the existing local provider fixture. No model run or provider login is claimed. - Signing-key regressions cover both environment changes and real in-place key-file rotation. The protected database save/fencing cases pass after removing the cache. A local measurement of 1,000 file-backed revision calculations took 48 ms. - `pnpm check:token-gates`, `node scripts/check-maps.mjs`, and Storybook catalog checks pass. - The full [PR CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40725425470) passes on `34ed97bbf9`: all 48 jobs, including all eight browser shards. Greptile is 5/5 on this commit, with no unresolved review threads. This final commit refreshes CI after a runner-routing fallback; its source tree matches `fb4cf488cf`. - Paperclip Review and Superagent Security Scan ended neutral because their external agents did not complete a valid assessment/receipt. Superagent passed on `fb4cf488cf`, which has the identical source tree. One request to retry the final scan returned HTTP 404. Neither check reports a code finding. - The local full-suite attempt was blocked by host System V semaphore exhaustion. Acceptance and lifecycle verification used an isolated PostgreSQL 18 container. Earlier CI runners were interrupted. A local combined run hit hook/test timeouts; the full 88-test route file passed after the builds finished. The final full CI run passes. Earlier failure logs and browser traces remain retained outside the repository. To run the browser regression: ```sh pnpm exec playwright test --config tests/e2e/playwright.config.ts tests/e2e/agent-configuration.spec.ts ``` ## Risks - Multi-resource saves are sequential. Earlier operations can remain saved if a later operation fails. The editor reports the completed steps and requires reload. - Core settings and managed instruction files have atomic revision/hash checks. Other unversioned resource writes and external supporting files retain a race window after preflight. - Shared profile definitions affect other bindings. The editor requires `updateSharedDefinition: true` for those edits. - The editor follows native service normalization and experimental settings. Canonical reload can add generated access profiles or mask environment values. - New editor dependencies require the repository's normal automated lockfile update. This pull request does not edit the lockfile or add a database migration. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The exact current model version was not exposed. The work used reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser automation. Earlier work in this chat used the configured Codex model before a model switch; its exact model ID and context window were not exposed. The current context window size is also not exposed. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
22 KiB
Hiring, agent configuration, and organization — agent access
Product map: Hiring, agent configuration, and organization.
Feature ID: agents.
Review date: 2026-10-12. Source commit: 58e16dbddfc9c8d0cf60867f9d9847f0feda055b.
Native REST transport reconciled in this change; see the
shared transport contract.
This is a source-reviewed baseline of representative operations and known gaps. Each capability needs operation-level review before its entire scope can be qualified. No live agent execution is claimed. Follow the map contract for format, permission checks, evidence and maintenance.
Scoped runner-default source review: 2026-10-12 at
eee0534154eaf5d0d3f2bbc97c1e24d86f34a5a5, limited to creation/configuration,
approval activation, built-in provisioning and import preservation described
below. The original baseline commit above still governs unrelated entries; this
update does not claim operation-complete review or live agent verification.
hire
Capability ID: agents/hire.
Review: baseline.
API: present — representative operation IDs:
POST /api/companies/{companyId}/agent-hires.POST /api/companies/{companyId}/agents.
Agent access: partial — Native hire_agent; REST / CLI agent; runtime inheritance for
native hires.
Creation requests can use runner: auto | paperclip | legacy; the server resolves
and persists execution configuration. Claude Auto selects the native ACPX profile
on qualified macOS and GNU/Linux x64/ARM64 targets; unknown environment
qualification remains Legacy. Darwin SSH defaults to Legacy while preserving
explicit native assets and saved execution. Saved runner/model/provider overrides survive edits
and approval activation. This selection does not grant connection access or
bypass hiring authorization. Source: runner resolver.
Policy: Agent creation/configuration uses action grants, resource policies and change consent; some controls require a board actor.
The early wizard record (setupId on create) and completion of that record
(setupAgentId on hire) require a board actor and company-scoped creation
permission. Its creator can finish their own inactive setup with that permission;
changing another person's setup requires configuration permission.
Creation retries reuse only records owned by the caller. Returning a completed
record also requires the normal agent-read and configuration-read checks.
An unfinished record keeps compatibility status paused with a
setup hold and cannot receive API keys or authenticate with keys or JWTs.
Its standard grants apply at hire. Authorized completion retries recover the
same record and approval without changing the submitted configuration.
Normal agent-authored hiring keeps its existing approval policy.
An agent-owned plugin may prepare the draft and leave its lifecycle in
verifying while that setup hold remains. Only bounded Core-issued setup probes
can run there. The creator's company creation permission also covers configuring
and retrying their draft during preparation or stopping; other actors still require the
ordinary configuration permission. This is a board wizard path, not new agent
execution or probe authority. Lifecycle and component regressions cover these
transitions; no permitted-agent or live-provider journey is claimed here.
Companies requiring hire approval keep drafts paused and allocate no agent-owned
resource before approval. Selecting an account there is pending verification,
not approval or execution authority.
The creation boundary resolves the request-level runner before adapter validation
and credential normalization. Omitted/automatic new Codex selection uses the
qualified target's default; explicit Legacy is retained. Disabled adapters and
external overrides affect new selection, while missing credentials/runtime or
incompatible settings remain errors. Existing agents and reviewed pending hires
retain their recorded execution. Native hire_agent explicitly inherits its
caller's runtime and remains subject to permission and credential restrictions;
it is not an arbitrary host-configuration or login tool. REST/CLI creation and
hire runner options use the shared request contract.
Evidence: source-only — implementation at
the reviewed commit above.
Scoped Evidence: source-only — creation policy,
runner resolution,
native hire binding,
frozen approval activation
and same-harness import preservation
at the scoped commit. No permitted-agent journey was executed for this map update.
Verification: not-run — exercise a listed permitted operation with actual agent
credentials/run context; inspect its result and applicable persistence/attribution.
Assert the relevant denied actor, owner, company or mode from Policy. Review the
remaining operations before qualifying the whole capability.
For this scope, compare automatic and explicit Legacy creation, assert foreign company/environment and missing-grant denials, then compare pending approval configuration across restart and activation. An unrelated edit/import update must not change existing execution; a new package without a runner choice receives creation defaults. Do not count a board call or component test as agent evidence.
Gaps: Identity/persona hiring works. Operator account login and sensitive adapter/environment configuration are separate guarded actions.
The runner request does not grant new account, environment-probe or native API fallback authority; see validation access and environment administration. Full access qualification remains not run.
instructions
The operator's Advanced YAML editor uses the existing configuration GET/PATCH
operations plus the owning instructions, skills, tools, channels, permissions,
secrets, API key, and revision APIs. It does not add aggregate write authority;
each request retains its own company and actor checks. Resource reads fail closed.
Observed inherited access/history is read-only. Multi-resource writes are
sequential, with preflight comparison and explicit partial-failure recovery;
Core configuration, managed files, and entry revisions enforce their existing
atomic revision/hash preconditions. External supporting files and other
unversioned resource writes retain a race window after preflight. Configuration reads include the complete redacted, revisioned fields
and configurationRevision; writes accept an optional
expectedConfigurationRevision, checked again under the write lock. A stale
write returns 409. Revision-guarded writes preserve unchanged redacted values
at their original paths. Configuration read/configure authority, company scope,
instruction-path restrictions, environment/account checks, revision history, and
activity attribution still apply. YAML does not expose a permission-grant or
lifecycle mutation shortcut. See the format.
Capability ID: agents/instructions.
Review: baseline.
API: present — representative operation IDs:
GET /api/agents/{id}/instructions-bundle/file.GET /api/agents/{id}/project-accessandPOST /api/agents/{id}/project-accessare board-only. The POST requiresagents:create, checks selected projects in the same company, and adds IDs under an agent row lock. It preserves existing containment, audits new grants and rejects pending-approval agents. Agent keys cannot use this route to grant themselves access; a read-only board viewer receivescanManage: false. Saving never creates a run or wakeup.PUT /api/agents/{id}/instructions-bundle/file.PATCH /api/agents/{id}with an explicitrunner: "paperclip"upgrade.POST /api/agents/{id}/qualify-runnerto qualify the saved effective sandbox before upgrading or testing an existing native runner.PATCH /api/agents/{id}withruntimeSettings: { harness, model?, aiConnection?, expected: { model, aiConnection } }for a narrow roster edit. Each request handles one agent; the UI batches at most four writes and collects per-agent outcomes.
Agent access: available — Native read/update/history/restore instruction tools; REST /
CLI.
Policy: Agent creation/configuration uses action grants, resource policies and change consent; some controls require a board actor.
The roster intent preserves unrelated settings, rejects stale model/connection previews and harness changes, and checks the full execution configuration under the lifecycle write lock. It uses the same configuration, company, credential, environment, and consent checks as other edits. It adds no agent permission or credential fallback. Pool and externally managed agents use their existing configuration surfaces. Board browser verification does not qualify agent access.
The existing-agent upgrade notice for Claude, Codex, and Grok Build uses this configuration PATCH. It does not
grant configuration, account, or environment access. The server resolves the
saved settings under normal company/configuration authorization. Grok migration preserves
the effective legacy search setting. Task model/effort overrides retain the
agent's account binding and tool policy without granting extra account access. Obsolete Claude
tuning fields are removed with configurationWarnings; security incompatibilities
remain errors. Unqualified sandbox upgrades first use the agent-scoped
POST /api/agents/{id}/qualify-runner under the same agent_config:update
authorization as saving the upgrade. The server resolves the saved computer;
expectedEnvironmentId rejects stale state and cannot select another computer.
Qualification checks company binding, returns only its receipt, and audits within
the agent's company. General instance environment probes still require instance
admin. An existing native agent's clean configuration Test uses the same
saved-computer qualification before its runtime test. A current proof is reused;
a missing or stale proof requires a real successful probe and verified cleanup.
Draft settings and target changes do not qualify another computer. No probe runs
merely on page load. Operator browser evidence does not
qualify the agent permission paths for this operation.
Evidence: source-only — implementation at
the reviewed commit above.
Verification: not-run — exercise a listed permitted operation with actual agent
credentials/run context; inspect its result and applicable persistence/attribution.
Assert the relevant denied actor, owner, company or mode from Policy. Review the
remaining operations before qualifying the whole capability.
Gaps: Canonical entry file, revision guard, company boundary, and protected-change policy apply.
organization
Capability ID: agents/organization.
Review: baseline.
API: present — representative operation IDs:
GET /api/companies/{companyId}/org.PATCH /api/agents/{id}.
Agent access: available — list_agents/get_agent; native call_api for permitted
configuration fields; REST / CLI.
Policy: Agent creation/configuration uses action grants, resource policies and change consent; some controls require a board actor.
Evidence: source-only — implementation at
the reviewed commit above.
Verification: not-run — exercise a listed permitted operation with actual agent
credentials/run context; inspect its result and applicable persistence/attribution.
Assert the relevant denied actor, owner, company or mode from Policy. Review the
remaining operations before qualifying the whole capability.
Gaps: Reporting-line changes need configuration authorization; a title alone gives no authority.
lifecycle
Capability ID: agents/lifecycle.
Review: baseline.
API: present — representative operation IDs:
POST /api/agents/{id}/pause.POST /api/agents/{id}/resume.POST /api/agents/{id}/terminate.DELETE /api/agents/{id}permanently purges an eligible terminated/rejected agent.POST /api/agents/{id}/lifecycle/retry.GET /api/agents/{id}returns the safe failed phase/step and action inlifecycleError.
Agent access: partial — REST / native call_api resume under agent_config:update
change-grant authorization; pause and termination remain board-only.
Policy: Agent creation/configuration uses action grants, resource policies and change
consent; some controls require a board actor.
Permanent deletion is board-only. Retained case handoff references return
409 agent_case_history_retained before dependency cleanup; keep the agent terminated.
Evidence: source-only — implementation at
the reviewed commit above.
Verification: not-run — exercise a listed permitted operation with actual agent
credentials/run context; inspect its result and applicable persistence/attribution.
Assert the relevant denied actor, owner, company or mode from Policy. Review the
remaining operations before qualifying the whole capability.
Gaps: Resume has a generic native REST path. Pause and termination remain enforced actor restrictions.
built-in
Capability ID: agents/built-in.
Review: baseline.
API: present — representative operation IDs:
POST /api/companies/{companyId}/built-in-agents/{key}/provision.
Agent access: partial — REST / native fallback for eligible provisioning; built-in
routine controls require board.
Policy: Agent creation/configuration uses action grants, resource policies and change consent; some controls require a board actor.
Evidence: source-only — implementation at
the reviewed commit above.
Verification: not-run — exercise a listed permitted operation with actual agent
credentials/run context; inspect its result and applicable persistence/attribution.
Assert the relevant denied actor, owner, company or mode from Policy. Review the
remaining operations before qualifying the whole capability.
Gaps: Provisioning checks agents:create. Enabling/running its built-in routine is not the same permission path.
Scoped source review: built-in provisioning recognizes the underlying Codex harness of a native company agent. New configured provisioning resolves the runner, while unrelated reconciliation and same-harness edits retain existing execution. Verify explicit runner changes preserve compatible saved settings; the general creation/access policy above still applies. This is source-only evidence at the scoped commit, not a live provisioning result.
primary-agent
Capability ID: agents/primary-agent.
Review: baseline.
API: present — GET and PUT /api/companies/{companyId}/primary-agent/me.
Agent access: restricted — this is the authenticated human's personal
preference. Agent keys and native call_api use agent identity and are denied by
the board gate; no dedicated agent selection tool is present.
Policy: Requires board user identity, company access and active membership, except implicit-local board or instance administrator. Viewers may choose their own primary. Selection requires a same-company readable, available agent and is scoped to actor user ID; the request cannot select another user's preference. Explicit null selection is rejected; leave/termination can clear an unavailable choice. Initialization stays recorded so clearing does not silently replace it.
Evidence: source-only — reviewed on 2026-10-13 at
60bc0d5fee9a6e48db08fc016521fee3d9f57d67:
routes,
service,
provider, and
route tests.
Verification: not-run — select and read the preference as two company users;
assert isolation, wrong-company/unreadable targets, pending/terminated agent
rejection and agent-key denial. Verify replacement confirmation and fallback
precedence in the UI; inspect the cleared state after permitted leave/termination.
Gaps: No agent mutation path for another person's preference. Live human/agent access is unverified; UI fixture callbacks do not establish persistence or task and Chat default resolution.
grok-bot
Capability ID: agents/grok-bot.
Review: baseline.
API: present — POST /api/companies/{companyId}/grok-invitations, operator-owned Grok invitations and agent-scoped /grok-binding setup, routine, verify, stop, recover and disconnect endpoints. Direct HTTPS /mcp/runner uses fixed named-agent OAuth. Grok tools expose durable assignment operations and task-bound upload/download grants.
Agent access: available — paperclip_grok_* through the dedicated agent grant. First-party Paperclip operations execute through the shared Rust Runner. The Bot retains its own apps; Paperclip workspace and third-party app tools are unavailable.
Policy: company/agent/client/resource/authorizer binding; current manage-agent permission for consent and subsequent calls; normal task ownership, controller lease, governance, pause, revocation and recorded budget checks. Execution and file transfers require current task-bound sessions. Secret credentials remain in encrypted secret storage and are redacted from HTTP logs.
Evidence: source-only — routes, shared authority, routine receipts and Runner broker. Temporary actual-client OAuth and an outbound routine wake are qualified separately; they do not prove this candidate’s acceptance.
Verification: not-run — deployed acceptance pending; focused protocol/authorization and actual Rust backend tests; run fresh/saved setup, assigned and proactive tasks, duplicate calls, stale sessions, restart, ambiguous delivery, stop and recovery through the real client on the serving managed candidate.
Gaps: deployed two-way work and unattended first-time onboarding remain unqualified; remote termination, provider transcript streaming and usage accounting are unavailable.
api-keys
Capability ID: agents/api-keys.
Review: baseline.
API: present — GET /api/agents/{id}/keys; POST /api/agents/{id}/keys; DELETE /api/agents/{id}/keys/{keyId}.
Agent access: restricted — key listing and mutations require board identity and agent-management authority. The CLI token agent commands use authorized board context. Ordinary agent REST/native call_api and public assistant capabilities do not grant key-management authority.
Policy: getAccessibleAgent checks company access and agents:create through the shared access evaluator for reads as well as mutations. Creation rejects pending_approval and terminated agents. Keys retain the creating person’s responsibleUserId; only a hash is stored and token plaintext is returned on creation. Revocation checks that the key belongs to the selected agent. Authentication separately applies agent state, revocation, scope, and responsible-user membership intersections.
Evidence: source-only — reviewed at 9ef434fe79c57d976b8b03b14c5242db270b8320. Keys tab, key routes, key service, authentication, and CLI token commands.
Verification: not-run — Create a disposable key as a permitted authenticated board person, prove one harmless agent read, revoke, and retry the same bearer. Assert metadata persistence, once-only token display, activity, missing management permission, agent identity denial, cross-company/cross-agent IDs, ineligible targets, and missing responsible-user binding.
Gaps: Local implicit key creation does not by itself prove a usable responsible-user binding. No ordinary-agent self-management or assistant delegation path is established; browser creation and actual bearer use need live evidence.
managed-agent-setup
Capability ID: agents/managed-agent-setup.
Review: baseline.
API: present — GET and POST /api/companies/{companyId}/managed-agent-profiles. Provisioning separately calls Anthropic /v1/environments, /v1/agents, and /v1/agents/{id}/versions with operator provider credentials; --probe does not resolve a Paperclip client context or call the profile API.
Agent access: operator-only — provider qualification/provisioning uses the explicit operator CLI. Persisted profile reads/writes require board/company identity; viewer writes are denied. This does not authorize a company agent to provision external provider resources.
Policy: A profile uses an active same-company, company-scoped secret reference. Qualification requires the source-supported pinned model/version, no tools/MCP/skills/multiagent capability, and a locked no-network/no-packages environment with retention acknowledgement. Qualified configuration revisions are immutable; changed qualified configuration requires a new profile key. Provider API credentials and Paperclip profile authority are separate checks.
Evidence: source-only — reviewed at 9ef434fe79c57d976b8b03b14c5242db270b8320. Managed-agent CLI, profile routes, profile service, and runtime validation.
Verification: not-run — Compare provider and Paperclip state before/after probe, then inspect a permitted create/adopt and repeated resource reuse. Reject missing acknowledgement, unsafe resources, invalid model/version/secret/company, and viewer/agent mutations. Separately run a bounded useful task with the saved qualified profile before claiming runtime readiness.
Gaps: This is a provider-specific setup path, not qualification of every managed service or deployed environment. Mocked setup and source validation do not prove live retention, remote execution, or provider availability.