mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-14 00:26:28 +01:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
6ed6b0754b
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The workspace recovery worker saves the files of failed runs. After each pass, it reads the time of its next deadline (`nextWorkspaceRecoveryAt`) > - That read finds the source run, its finalizer and its leases with `id::text = evidence->>'runId'`. A text comparison cannot use a key. Each exhausted hold read every run, finalizer and lease of its company > - On a hosted staging database this statement used about 4 s per call (21 calls in the sample window). The cost grows with exhausted holds multiplied by the company's run count > - The ownership reconciler's stale-continuation check (`checkStaleDroppedComments`) has the run lookup shape that #20412 fixed in the lost-wake check: one OR across the legacy context and the native column > - This pull request compares the run id as a canonical uuid, and it gives the stale-continuation check the per-binding run probes from #20412 > - The benefit is the same recovery decisions with index-driven work: 11 s to 93 ms for the deadline read on a representative local fixture ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20412 **What happened?** The workspace recovery deadline read was one of the most expensive statements that remained on a hosted staging database after the fixes in #20393, #20405, #20386, #20412, #20391 and #20400. Query statistics showed about 4 s per call. The statement text starts with `select case when (issue_recovery_actions.…`. The statement evaluates the retained-source fallback and stop-proof conditions for each recovery action. These conditions read the source run (`heartbeat_runs`), its finalizer (`native_run_finalizations`) and its leases (`environment_leases`) with `x.id::text = evidence->>'runId'`. The cast prevents the use of the primary key. PostgreSQL reads all rows of the company for each exhausted hold. The worker's discovery (`retainedWorkspaceCandidates`) uses the same conditions. The stale-continuation check matched a task's runs with `(context_snapshot->>'issueId' = issue OR native_issue_id = issue)`. With the OR, PostgreSQL can join runs only by company. It also hashed every wake request of the company for the stale-wake test. **Expected behavior** Each condition uses a key lookup. The worker and the reconciler make the same decisions for the same saved state. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Seed a company with a deep run history and a few thousand workspace recovery actions. Let a few hundred be exhausted holds that stay active. 2. Call `nextWorkspaceRecoveryAt`. 3. The call takes seconds, and its time grows with holds multiplied by runs. The benchmark below shows this. **Paperclip version or commit** Baseline: `8d2bf78323`. **Deployment mode** Server with PostgreSQL. The local proof uses disposable PostgreSQL 18.1. Staging uses hosted PostgreSQL. ## What Changed - `workspace-recovery-fallback-discovery.ts`: the source run, finalizer and lease probes compare `id = canonicalExecutionUuid(evidence->>'runId')`. The helper returns null unless the text is the canonical lowercase uuid form. Thus the probe matches exactly the rows that `id::text = evidence->>'runId'` matched. The helper already exists in `execution-identity.ts`. - `nextWorkspaceRecoveryAt` and worker discovery use these conditions. Their SQL changes only in these probes. - `checkStaleDroppedComments` reads in two stages. The first stage keeps comments that a stale-continuation cancellation dropped and that no open wake carries. The second stage applies the run probes. The run probes use the `taskRuns` helper from #20412, which is now shared by both checks. The stale-wake lookup ends with `offset 0`, so it stays a per-comment index probe. - The final `order by c.created_at limit N`, the projection and the delivery check after the query do not change. - Add `scripts/benchmark-recovery-status-checks.ts`. It loads the changed files from an explicit baseline commit and from the working tree. Before it records time, it compares every changed condition for every recovery action, the complete service results and the positional SQL rows. - Add tests: each run binding in the stale-continuation check (native, legacy, live run on either binding, wrong agent, wrong company, failed run, run outside the comment time, closed by a person, open wake). Also a test that a hold with a non-canonical saved run id is not discovered, as before. - Document both checks and the benchmark in `doc/DATABASE.md`. - No schema change, index, migration, or new startup work. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run src/__tests__/ownership-reconciliation-report.test.ts src/services/workspace-recovery-fallback.test.ts src/services/workspace-recovery-stop-proof.test.ts src/__tests__/heartbeat-held-comment-wake.test.ts --maxWorkers=1` (from `server/`). - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec tsx ../scripts/benchmark-recovery-status-checks.ts --baseline-ref=8d2bf78323 --samples=7` Benchmark setup: PostgreSQL 18.1 (embedded, local), `shared_buffers` 128 MB, `work_mem` 4 MB. All data is synthetic, with md5-hex filler. Each fixture has two companies (full size and a quarter). Two warmup rounds, then 7 timed samples for each arm, in alternating order. Each sample runs the real service function and asserts the same result. These are local SQL measurements on a shared machine, so the spread is wide. Workspace recovery deadline (`nextWorkspaceRecoveryAt`). About 8% of actions are exhausted holds that stay active. Some actions save a non-canonical (uppercase) run id. Before timing, the benchmark compares six conditions (fallback pending, due time, due; re-arm pending, due time, due) for every action of the fixture. | Fixture | Runs / actions / pending holds | Baseline median (min–max) | Treatment median (min–max) | Shared buffers | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | small | 6,500 / 255 / 36 | 50.9 ms (47–76) | 6.8 ms (6–8) | 19,133 → 1,075 | | representative | 78,750 / 3,813 / 588 | 11,098 ms (8,277–12,790) | 93 ms (35–145) | 3,493,417 → 24,902 | | deep history | 191,250 / 3,813 / 588 | 40,146 ms (31,190–52,521) | 40 ms (36–230) | 13,491,792 → 26,911 | Stale-continuation check (`checkStaleDroppedComments`). The fixture is pessimistic: more than half of recent comments on done tasks have a stale cancelled wake. The table shows statement time from `EXPLAIN ANALYZE` with default settings, and one statement run with `enable_nestloop = off` (the company-only hash plan). The result is checked as equal in both modes. | Fixture | Runs / recent comments / reported | Statement, baseline → treatment | Hash plan, baseline → treatment | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | small | 3,792 / 76 / 24 | 3.2 → 1.5 ms | 5.5 → 3.8 ms | | representative | 75,406 / 1,125 / 200 (limit) | 34 → 26 ms | 66 → 25 ms | | busy hour | 152,031 / 5,625 / 200 (limit) | 328 → 153 ms | 2,302 → 165 ms | - Neutral path: the complete stale-continuation service call stays about the same (busy hour 750 → 655 ms median). The per-comment delivery check after the query (`deliveredQueuedCommentIds`) is most of that time. This change does not touch it. ## Risks - Low risk. Every predicate keeps the same logic. Only the probe shape and the evaluation order change. The benchmark compares each changed condition for every recovery action, including non-canonical saved run ids, and the complete results of both checks. - Previous-release story: no saved state, schema or identity changes. Holds saved by older releases are read with the same rules, so they carry forward unchanged. - Rows with the same comment `created_at` have no defined order, as before. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, local PostgreSQL). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>