mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-13 15:55:46 +01:00
DottaandClaude
200c6e40e2
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - When a native run's first provider start fails before any session opens, Paperclip retries the bootstrap on the same run. Durable controller evidence proves that no provider session or provider event exists. > - A remote sandbox keeps the Runner state inside the workspace. A replacement sandbox gets that state back when the saved workspace is restored. > - When the provider refused `session.open` (for example an Anthropic 429), the Runner still suspended cleanly. Its state says `suspended`, but the provider state has no session identity. > - The same-run restart handled a Runner that never suspended. It did not handle a Runner that suspended before the provider opened a session. It failed with `runner_harness_state_mismatch: provider_identity_incomplete (provider_not_suspended)`, and the task showed "Recovery needed" without Retry. > - This pull request lets that proven restart set the unopened session aside and start the provider again. > - The benefit is that a rate-limited provider start continues by itself after the limit resets. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20627 and #20683 (other restore paths). This PR changes only the same-run bootstrap restart. **What happened?** Two ACPX Claude tasks on remote Daytona sandboxes, on staging: 1. The first attempt sent `session.open`. ACPX rejected it with `classification=provider_rate_limit` (Anthropic 429). The Runner exited with `lifecycle=suspended`. 2. Paperclip recorded `recoveryMode: bootstrap_retry`, `providerSessionEstablished: false`, `providerEventsExist: false`, and a retry after the limit reset. 3. One hour later the retry ran as `bootstrap_incomplete` on the same run, in a new sandbox with the saved workspace restored. 4. Host preparation inspected the restored Runner state. The Runner was `suspended`, but the provider had no session identity. The inspection threw `provider_identity_incomplete (provider_not_suspended)` before the bootstrap restart branch ran. 5. The run failed. The task stopped at "Recovery needed" with only inspect actions. **Expected behavior** The restart sets the unopened session aside and opens a new provider session, as it already does for a Runner that never suspended. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Restart a remote run as `bootstrap_incomplete` with a proven bootstrap restart. 2. Give the sandbox a Runner state for this run with `lifecycle: suspended` and a provider state with no session identity. 3. Prepare the host. On `master` it throws `runner_harness_state_mismatch: provider_identity_incomplete`. The new `interrupted_bootstrap_unopened` cases of `bootstraps only an untouched provider session in a $outcome workspace lease` run these steps for a created and a resumed lease. **Paperclip version or commit** `master` at `7435abcc63`. ## What Changed - During host preparation, a Runner state that is suspended with no provider session identity returns the new incomplete reason `provider_unopened`, but only when all of these hold: - the run is restarting as `bootstrap_incomplete`; - the state belongs to this same run; - the controller already recorded the bootstrap restart proof (its durable journal shows no provider turn, and the old Runner is stopped or absent). - the provider state is the one saved before any session opened (`remoteProviderStateNeverOpened`): `prepared`, no session or identity, no turn in progress, no unconfirmed exit. Only ACPX and Codex-family states qualify. - The created-lease and resumed-lease restart branches share one check (`restartableBootstrapState`) and accept `provider_unopened` exactly like `not_suspended`. They move the old session aside and claim a new, untouched session root. - Every other case still throws `provider_identity_incomplete`: another run's state, a restart without the proof, a normal resume, and close checkpointing. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.test.ts -t "bootstraps only an untouched provider session"`: 47 passed. - Red on `master`: the `created` and `resumed` `interrupted_bootstrap_unopened` cases fail with `runner_harness_state_mismatch: provider_identity_incomplete (identity_binding)`. Green with this change. - Fail-closed cases stay red-proof: `interrupted_bootstrap_unopened_unproven` (no restart proof) and `interrupted_bootstrap_unopened_other_run` (another run's state) still throw. - Full `native-session-executor.test.ts` and `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` pass. ## Risks - Low risk. The new branch needs the same proof that already authorizes a fresh bootstrap for a Runner that never suspended. The proof comes from the controller's durable journal, not from the sandbox. - The normal path is unchanged and has no added wait. - Not proven live: I did not confirm on staging that the controller recorded the restart proof for these runs. If it did not, the run still fails closed as before. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, with tool use and code execution in Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>