mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-27 02:44:50 +01:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Isolated workspaces give each task a safe and reproducible checkout. > - The existing setup cloned the development database before an agent needed to run the app. > - This made worktree creation slower and heavier for tasks that never start a service. > - Runtime services already use one server start path for heartbeat, operator, and startup recovery flows. > - This pull request moves heavy setup to that start path and keeps worktree creation lean. > - The benefit is faster isolated workspace creation with the same reliable runtime setup when a service starts. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related pull request: #10652 covers the initial deferred database-seeding slice. This pull request supersedes it with end-to-end runtime provisioning and safe cleanup. **What existing behavior does this improve?** This improves isolated worktree creation, runtime service startup, and isolated instance cleanup. **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting: CLI worktree setup, server runtime orchestration, shared workspace contracts, and development scripts. **Current behavior** Paperclip seeds an isolated development database during worktree creation. It can also leave an isolated instance directory after workspace teardown. This work happens even when no runtime service starts. **Proposed behavior** Paperclip creates the worktree with a lean eager setup. It runs an idempotent runtime provision command before the first managed service spawn. Concurrent starts share one provision attempt. Teardown removes the isolated instance safely. **Reason and benefit** Many agent tasks only edit and test code. They do not need a running Paperclip instance. Deferring the database seed reduces workspace startup cost while preserving automatic setup for tasks that start the app. **Breaking changes** None. The new runtime provision command is optional. Existing workspace behavior is unchanged when it is absent. ## What Changed - Split Paperclip worktree setup into a lean eager script and an idempotent runtime provision script. - Added `runtimeProvisionCommand` to project, issue, realized workspace, and persisted workspace contracts. - Added a per-workspace provision mutex before local service spawn for heartbeat, operator, and startup recovery flows. - Added a persisted `provisioning` service state and the `workspace_runtime_provision` operation phase. - Kept provision time outside the service readiness timeout and made failed attempts visible and retryable. - Reclaimed isolated instance data during safe workspace teardown. - Serialized deferred database seeding across processes and bound teardown to the instance root captured in persisted workspace metadata. - Added tests for config flow, concurrency, retry, no-op behavior, readiness timing, scripts, CLI commands, and cleanup. - Documented the eager and runtime provisioning contracts. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm build` - `pnpm test:run` (server: 3,201 passed; UI: 3,345 passed; the CLI phase exposed one environment-sensitive AWS doctor assertion because the agent runtime injects static AWS credentials) - `env -u AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID -u AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY pnpm exec vitest run cli/src/__tests__/secrets.test.ts -t 'passes AWS doctor checks when non-secret provider config is present'` - Focused runtime tests cover serialized provisioning, retry after stderr failure, absent-command no-op behavior, operation logging, persisted state order, and readiness timeout exclusion. - Focused CLI and cleanup tests cover concurrent seed serialization, stale-lock fail-closed behavior, persisted instance ownership, and rewritten sibling pointers. ## Risks - A faulty runtime provision script blocks service startup. Paperclip records stderr, marks the service failed, and retries on the next start. - Concurrent service requests share an in-process provision attempt, while the seed command uses an atomic filesystem lock across processes. A stale lock fails closed and requires an operator to verify no seed is running before removing it. - Isolated instance cleanup is destructive. The cleanup service validates ownership and path containment before removal. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, `gpt-5.6-sol`, with agentic reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The service does not expose the context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
319 lines
10 KiB
TypeScript
319 lines
10 KiB
TypeScript
import express from "express";
|
|
import request from "supertest";
|
|
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
|
|
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
addComment: vi.fn(),
|
|
assertCheckoutOwner: vi.fn(),
|
|
create: vi.fn(),
|
|
findMentionedAgents: vi.fn(),
|
|
getByIdentifier: vi.fn(),
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
getRelationSummaries: vi.fn(),
|
|
getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion: vi.fn(),
|
|
listWakeableBlockedDependents: vi.fn(),
|
|
update: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockAccessService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
canUser: vi.fn(),
|
|
decide: vi.fn(),
|
|
hasPermission: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockAgentService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockExecutionWorkspaceService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockFeedbackService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
listIssueVotesForUser: vi.fn(),
|
|
saveIssueVote: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockHeartbeatService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
wakeup: vi.fn(),
|
|
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(),
|
|
getRun: vi.fn(),
|
|
getActiveRunForAgent: vi.fn(),
|
|
cancelRun: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockInstanceSettingsService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
get: vi.fn(),
|
|
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
|
|
|
|
const mockRoutineService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockDbSelectWhere = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(() => ({
|
|
then: (onFulfilled: (rows: unknown[]) => unknown, onRejected?: (reason: unknown) => unknown) =>
|
|
Promise.resolve([{ companyId: "company-1", agentId: "agent-1", contextSnapshot: null }]).then(
|
|
onFulfilled,
|
|
onRejected,
|
|
),
|
|
})));
|
|
const mockDbSelectFrom = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(() => ({ where: mockDbSelectWhere })));
|
|
const mockDbSelect = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(() => ({ from: mockDbSelectFrom })));
|
|
const mockDb = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
select: mockDbSelect,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
function registerRouteMocks() {
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/access.js", () => ({
|
|
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/activity-log.js", () => ({
|
|
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/agents.js", () => ({
|
|
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/execution-workspaces.js", () => ({
|
|
executionWorkspaceService: () => mockExecutionWorkspaceService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/feedback.js", () => ({
|
|
feedbackService: () => mockFeedbackService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/heartbeat.js", () => ({
|
|
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/instance-settings.js", () => ({
|
|
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/issues.js", () => ({
|
|
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/routines.js", () => ({
|
|
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
|
|
companyService: () => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(async () => ({ id: "company-1", attachmentMaxBytes: 10 * 1024 * 1024 })),
|
|
}),
|
|
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
|
|
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
|
|
companySkillService: () => ({
|
|
completeTestRunForIssue: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
}),
|
|
documentAnnotationService: () => ({ remapOpenThreadsForDocument: async () => [] }),
|
|
documentService: () => ({}),
|
|
executionWorkspaceService: () => mockExecutionWorkspaceService,
|
|
feedbackService: () => mockFeedbackService,
|
|
goalService: () => ({}),
|
|
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
|
|
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
|
|
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
|
|
issueReferenceService: () => ({
|
|
deleteDocumentSource: async () => undefined,
|
|
diffIssueReferenceSummary: () => ({
|
|
addedReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
removedReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
currentReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
}),
|
|
emptySummary: () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
|
listIssueReferenceSummary: async () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
|
syncComment: async () => undefined,
|
|
syncDocument: async () => undefined,
|
|
syncIssue: async () => undefined,
|
|
}),
|
|
issueRecoveryActionService: () => ({
|
|
getActiveForIssue: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
listActiveForIssues: vi.fn(async () => new Map()),
|
|
}),
|
|
issueThreadInteractionService: () => ({
|
|
listForIssue: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
expireRequestConfirmationsSupersededByComment: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
expireStaleRequestConfirmationsForIssueDocument: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
}),
|
|
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
|
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
|
|
projectService: () => ({}),
|
|
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
|
|
workProductService: () => ({}),
|
|
}));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function createApp(actor: Record<string, unknown>) {
|
|
const [{ errorHandler }, { issueRoutes }] = await Promise.all([
|
|
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
|
|
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/issues.js")>("../routes/issues.js"),
|
|
]);
|
|
const app = express();
|
|
app.use(express.json());
|
|
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
|
|
(req as any).actor = actor;
|
|
next();
|
|
});
|
|
app.use("/api", issueRoutes(mockDb as any, {} as any));
|
|
app.use(errorHandler);
|
|
return app;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function makeIssue(overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}) {
|
|
return {
|
|
id: "issue-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
projectId: null,
|
|
goalId: null,
|
|
parentId: null,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: null,
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: "board-user",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-1000",
|
|
title: "Workspace authz",
|
|
executionPolicy: null,
|
|
executionState: null,
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
hiddenAt: null,
|
|
...overrides,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("issue workspace command authorization", () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.resetModules();
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/access.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/activity-log.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/agents.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/execution-workspaces.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/feedback.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/heartbeat.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/instance-settings.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/issues.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/routines.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
|
|
registerRouteMocks();
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
|
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockIssueService.create.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue());
|
|
mockIssueService.findMentionedAgents.mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue());
|
|
mockIssueService.getByIdentifier.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockIssueService.getRelationSummaries.mockResolvedValue({ blockedBy: [], blocks: [] });
|
|
mockIssueService.getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockIssueService.listWakeableBlockedDependents.mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
mockIssueService.assertCheckoutOwner.mockResolvedValue({ adoptedFromRunId: null });
|
|
mockIssueService.update.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue());
|
|
mockAccessService.canUser.mockResolvedValue(true);
|
|
mockAccessService.decide.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
allowed: true,
|
|
action: "company_scope:read",
|
|
reason: "allow_test",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed by test mock.",
|
|
});
|
|
mockAccessService.hasPermission.mockResolvedValue(true);
|
|
mockAgentService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "agent-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
permissions: null,
|
|
});
|
|
mockExecutionWorkspaceService.getById.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockFeedbackService.listIssueVotesForUser.mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
mockFeedbackService.saveIssueVote.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
vote: null,
|
|
consentEnabledNow: false,
|
|
sharingEnabled: false,
|
|
});
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.wakeup.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.reportRunActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.getRun.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.getActiveRunForAgent.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockInstanceSettingsService.get.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "instance-settings-1",
|
|
general: {
|
|
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
|
|
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
mockInstanceSettingsService.listCompanyIds.mockResolvedValue(["company-1"]);
|
|
mockLogActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
mockRoutineService.syncRunStatusForIssue.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
mockDbSelect.mockImplementation(() => ({ from: mockDbSelectFrom }));
|
|
mockDbSelectFrom.mockImplementation(() => ({ where: mockDbSelectWhere }));
|
|
mockDbSelectWhere.mockImplementation(() => ({
|
|
then: (onFulfilled: (rows: unknown[]) => unknown, onRejected?: (reason: unknown) => unknown) =>
|
|
Promise.resolve([{ companyId: "company-1", agentId: "agent-1", contextSnapshot: null }]).then(
|
|
onFulfilled,
|
|
onRejected,
|
|
),
|
|
}));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects agent callers that create issue workspace runtime provision commands", async () => {
|
|
const app = await createApp({
|
|
type: "agent",
|
|
agentId: "agent-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
source: "agent_key",
|
|
runId: "run-1",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
.post("/api/companies/company-1/issues")
|
|
.send({
|
|
title: "Exploit",
|
|
executionWorkspaceSettings: {
|
|
workspaceStrategy: {
|
|
type: "git_worktree",
|
|
runtimeProvisionCommand: "touch /tmp/paperclip-rce",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
expect(res.body.error).toContain("host-executed workspace commands");
|
|
expect(mockIssueService.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects agent callers that patch assignee adapter workspace teardown commands", async () => {
|
|
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue());
|
|
const app = await createApp({
|
|
type: "agent",
|
|
agentId: "agent-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
source: "agent_key",
|
|
runId: "run-1",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
.patch("/api/issues/issue-1")
|
|
.send({
|
|
assigneeAdapterOverrides: {
|
|
adapterConfig: {
|
|
workspaceStrategy: {
|
|
type: "git_worktree",
|
|
teardownCommand: "rm -rf /tmp/paperclip-rce",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
expect(res.body.error).toContain("host-executed workspace commands");
|
|
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|