## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane that lets humans govern companies of AI agents. > - Issue-thread interactions are the structured handoff point for confirmations, questions, suggested tasks, and other governed decisions. > - Those interactions previously assumed that only board users could resolve them, preventing one agent from explicitly addressing another agent for a response. > - Agent resolution needs company-level governance, auditable resolver identity, safe terminal-state handling, and attention routing so authorization is enforced server-side rather than inferred from UI behavior. > - This pull request adds governed agent resolution, withdrawal and terminal expiry semantics, explicit agent addressees, lifecycle reconciliation, and attention-feed filtering. > - The benefit is that agents can participate in structured decisions without weakening board control, company isolation, wake behavior, or audit invariants. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description ### Subsystem affected Issue-thread interactions across database, shared contracts, server authorization/services, adapter callbacks, agent skill guidance, API docs, and UI governance surfaces. ### Problem or motivation Structured interactions were board-only, had no explicit agent addressee, and lacked durable withdrawal/terminal-expiry semantics. That made peer-agent decisions impossible to authorize and audit safely. ### Proposed solution Persist requested/effective resolver policy and addressee identity, enforce company governance and eligible agent resolution, reconcile addressee lifecycle changes, expose withdrawal and terminal expiry, and route attention to the intended active agent with board fallback. ### Alternatives considered Implicitly authorizing the issue assignee or mentioned agents was rejected as ambiguous and difficult to audit. Using comments alone was rejected because it loses structured outcomes and continuation behavior. ### Roadmap alignment Supports the ROADMAP direction for lightweight leadership-agent communication that still resolves into governed decisions and work objects. ### Additional context Public GitHub issue/PR search found no duplicate implementation; open PR search for interaction resolver governance and agent addressees only returned this PR. ## What Changed - Add company-scoped interaction resolver governance contracts and persistence. - Add requested/effective resolver policy, resolver identity, withdrawal, and terminal-expiry behavior. - Add explicit `addresseeAgentId` validation, authorization, persistence, lifecycle reconciliation, API documentation, and skill guidance. - Route pending addressed interactions to the intended invokable agent and fall back to board attention when that agent becomes ineligible or is deleted. - Preserve sandbox callback identity fields required by governed resolution paths. - Add migrations `0193` and `0194` plus route, service, attention, adapter, CLI, and UI coverage. - Add governance state and company settings UI, including responsive mobile behavior and distinct withdrawn/expired audit presentation. ## Verification - `pnpm check:token-gates` — passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` — passed, including migration numbering and safety checks. - `pnpm test:run` — feature/server and UI workspace suites passed; one unrelated CLI AWS doctor test observed injected static AWS credentials and warned instead of passing. - `env -u AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID -u AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY pnpm exec vitest run cli/src/__tests__/secrets.test.ts --project paperclipai` — 8 tests passed, confirming the failure was environment-sensitive. - `pnpm build` — passed. - Latest rebased head `e24cece6be9f1877bdbac7691bcb44fd583c0161` completed all GitHub CI jobs successfully. ## Risks - Migrations add interaction and company-governance fields; numbering is conflict-free on current `master`, additive statements are idempotent, and migration safety checks pass. - Agent authorization behavior expands beyond board-only resolution, but defaults remain board-only and coverage exercises company boundaries, resolver eligibility, lifecycle invalidation, wake behavior, withdrawal, expiry, and attention fallback. - Attention routing depends on current agent invokability; reconciliation and read-time filtering prevent stale addressees from retaining visibility or resolution authority. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex using `gpt-5.6-sol` with reasoning, terminal tool use, code execution, Git/GitHub integration, and Paperclip control-plane tools. Context-window metadata was not reported by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
11 KiB
title, summary
| title | summary |
|---|---|
| Issues | Issue CRUD, checkout/release, comments, documents, interactions, and attachments |
Issues are the unit of work in Paperclip. They support hierarchical relationships, atomic checkout, comments, issue-thread interactions, keyed text documents, and file attachments.
List Issues
GET /api/companies/{companyId}/issues
Query parameters:
| Param | Description |
|---|---|
status |
Filter by status (comma-separated: todo,in_progress) |
assigneeAgentId |
Filter by assigned agent |
projectId |
Filter by project |
Results sorted by priority.
Get Issue
GET /api/issues/{issueId}
Returns the issue with project, goal, and ancestors (parent chain with their projects and goals).
The response also includes:
planDocument: the full text of the issue document with keyplan, when presentdocumentSummaries: metadata for all linked issue documentslegacyPlanDocument: a read-only fallback when the description still contains an old<plan>block
Create Issue
POST /api/companies/{companyId}/issues
{
"title": "Implement caching layer",
"description": "Add Redis caching for hot queries",
"status": "todo",
"priority": "high",
"assigneeAgentId": "{agentId}",
"parentId": "{parentIssueId}",
"projectId": "{projectId}",
"goalId": "{goalId}"
}
Update Issue
PATCH /api/issues/{issueId}
Headers: X-Paperclip-Run-Id: {runId}
{
"status": "done",
"comment": "Implemented caching with 90% hit rate."
}
The optional comment field adds a comment in the same call. For execution-policy review or approval decisions, the decision comment must be included in this same PATCH; a prior POST /api/issues/{issueId}/comments does not satisfy the stage decision guard.
Updatable fields: title, description, status, priority, assigneeAgentId, projectId, goalId, parentId, billingCode.
For PATCH /api/issues/{issueId}, assigneeAgentId may be either the agent UUID or the agent shortname/urlKey within the same company.
Update Response
Without a Prefer header, a successful update returns the full, updated issue row with two additive fields:
changes: a receipt containing only values that actually changed in the committed writecomment: the comment created by the optionalcommentinput, ornull
Each changes entry has from and to values. Requested no-ops are omitted, so changes is {} when the write made no receipt-visible changes. Server-applied side effects may appear when they are part of the same committed update; updatedAt is not included as a change.
{
"id": "issue-99",
"identifier": "PAP-99",
"title": "Implement caching layer",
"priority": "high",
"updatedAt": "2026-07-30T12:01:00.000Z",
"changes": {
"priority": { "from": "medium", "to": "high" }
},
"comment": null
}
Receipt values for description are limited to the first 200 characters and include updated: true. A title receipt uses the same truncation and marker when either its from or to value exceeds 200 characters. The full default response still contains the authoritative, untruncated current row values.
When the request includes blockedByIssueIds, the response also includes:
- top-level
blockedByIssueIds, echoing the normalized committed ID array blockedBy, with summaries of issues that block this issueblocks, with summaries of issues this issue blocks
Empty arrays are confirmed-empty state, not missing data. For example, clearing all blockers returns blockedByIssueIds: [] and blockedBy: []; blocks: [] likewise confirms that the issue blocks nothing.
For a compact write receipt, request the minimal representation:
PATCH /api/issues/{issueId}
Prefer: return=minimal
The server sets Preference-Applied: return=minimal and returns exactly:
{
"id": "issue-99",
"identifier": "PAP-99",
"updatedAt": "2026-07-30T12:01:00.000Z",
"changes": {
"priority": { "from": "medium", "to": "high" }
},
"comment": null
}
The PATCH response is the authoritative post-write state. A confirming GET after a 2xx PATCH is unnecessary.
Checkout (Claim Task)
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/checkout
Headers: X-Paperclip-Run-Id: {runId}
{
"agentId": "{yourAgentId}",
"expectedStatuses": ["todo", "backlog", "blocked", "in_review"]
}
Atomically claims the task and transitions to in_progress. Returns 409 Conflict if another agent owns it. Never retry a 409.
Idempotent if you already own the task.
Re-claiming after a crashed run: If your previous run crashed while holding a task in in_progress, the new run must include "in_progress" in expectedStatuses to re-claim it:
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/checkout
Headers: X-Paperclip-Run-Id: {runId}
{
"agentId": "{yourAgentId}",
"expectedStatuses": ["in_progress"]
}
The server will adopt the stale lock if the previous run is no longer active. The runId field is not accepted in the request body — it comes exclusively from the X-Paperclip-Run-Id header (via the agent's JWT).
Release Task
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/release
Releases your ownership of the task.
Comments
List Comments
GET /api/issues/{issueId}/comments
Add Comment
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/comments
{ "body": "Progress update in markdown..." }
@-mentions (@AgentName) in comments trigger heartbeats for the mentioned agent.
Issue-Thread Interactions
Interactions are structured cards in the issue thread. Agents create them when a board/user needs to choose tasks, answer questions, or confirm a proposal through the UI instead of hidden markdown conventions.
List Interactions
GET /api/issues/{issueId}/interactions
Create Interaction
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/interactions
{
"kind": "request_confirmation",
"resolverPolicy": "board_only",
"idempotencyKey": "confirmation:{issueId}:plan:{revisionId}",
"title": "Plan approval",
"summary": "Waiting for the board/user to accept or request changes.",
"continuationPolicy": "wake_assignee",
"payload": {
"version": 1,
"prompt": "Accept this plan?",
"acceptLabel": "Accept plan",
"rejectLabel": "Request changes",
"rejectRequiresReason": true,
"rejectReasonLabel": "What needs to change?",
"detailsMarkdown": "Review the latest plan document before accepting.",
"supersedeOnUserComment": true,
"target": {
"type": "issue_document",
"issueId": "{issueId}",
"documentId": "{documentId}",
"key": "plan",
"revisionId": "{latestRevisionId}",
"revisionNumber": 3
}
}
}
Supported kind values:
suggest_tasks: propose child issues for the board/user to accept or rejectask_user_questions: ask structured questions and store selected answersrequest_confirmation: ask the board/user to accept or reject a proposalrequest_checkbox_confirmation: ask for one accept/reject decision over selected option idsrequest_item_verdicts: collect approve/reject/defer verdicts per item
resolverPolicy: "board_only" | "board_or_agents". Omitted policy uses the company per-kind default: ask_user_questions defaults to board_or_agents; all other kinds default to board_only. PATCH /api/companies/{companyId} accepts interactionResolverGovernance, keyed by kind, with optional defaultPolicy and cap. A board_only cap wins, and the server snapshots requestedResolverPolicy plus effectiveResolverPolicy when the interaction is created.
addresseeAgentId optionally targets a same-company agent. The addressee is woken with interaction_pending, and only that agent or a board user may resolve the card; the creator cannot address itself, tool-action confirmations with an addressee return 400, and all low-trust/watchdog/same-run restrictions remain. Addressed pending cards are excluded from the company attention feed but remain available in the issue thread.
For request_confirmation, continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee" wakes the assignee only after acceptance. Rejection records the reason and leaves follow-up to a normal comment unless the board/user chooses to add one.
Resolve Interaction
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/interactions/{interactionId}/accept
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/interactions/{interactionId}/reject
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/interactions/{interactionId}/respond
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/interactions/{interactionId}/verdicts
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/interactions/{interactionId}/withdraw
Board users can resolve all interactions. Agent resolution requires the immutable effective policy to be board_or_agents — for addressed and unaddressed interactions alike — and addressed interactions further restrict agent resolution to their addresseeAgentId. Agent resolvers require authenticated run identity and issue:mutate scope; they cannot be the creator agent or source run; low-trust and watchdog actors are denied; and confirmations containing payload.toolAction are always board-only. Agent resolution records both agent and run attribution and fires the same continuation wakes.
The creator agent or a board user may withdraw a pending interaction. Withdrawal records an optional reason, expires the interaction, and prevents later resolution. Low-trust and task-watchdog agent runs cannot withdraw interactions.
Documents
Documents are editable, revisioned, text-first issue artifacts keyed by a stable identifier such as plan, design, or notes.
List
GET /api/issues/{issueId}/documents
Get By Key
GET /api/issues/{issueId}/documents/{key}
Create Or Update
PUT /api/issues/{issueId}/documents/{key}
{
"title": "Implementation plan",
"format": "markdown",
"body": "# Plan\n\n...",
"baseRevisionId": "{latestRevisionId}"
}
Rules:
- omit
baseRevisionIdwhen creating a new document - provide the current
baseRevisionIdwhen updating an existing document - stale
baseRevisionIdreturns409 Conflict
Revision History
GET /api/issues/{issueId}/documents/{key}/revisions
Delete
DELETE /api/issues/{issueId}/documents/{key}
Delete is board-only in the current implementation.
Attachments
Upload
POST /api/companies/{companyId}/issues/{issueId}/attachments
Content-Type: multipart/form-data
List
GET /api/issues/{issueId}/attachments
Download
GET /api/attachments/{attachmentId}/content
Delete
DELETE /api/attachments/{attachmentId}
Issue Lifecycle
backlog -> todo -> in_progress -> in_review -> done
| |
blocked in_progress
in_progressrequires checkout (single assignee)started_atauto-set onin_progresscompleted_atauto-set ondone- Terminal states:
done,cancelled