Files
PaperClipAI/packages/shared/src/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts
T
DottaandPaperclip 1de0a3bb1e feat(mcp) [split 2/8]: add governed access contracts (#9557)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Governed MCP access spans contracts, runtime enforcement, adapters,
UI surfaces, and operator verification
> - The parity reference PR #9534 is too large for effective automated
or human review
> - The feature therefore needs a linear stack whose individual diffs
stay below the 100-file review limit
> - This pull request is split 2/8 and focuses on database schema and
shared governance contracts
> - The benefit is a standalone, testable review boundary while
preserving byte-for-byte parity at the top of the stack

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

- Related parity reference: #9534
- Problem: The governed access model needs additive persistence and
synchronized shared types before server enforcement can compile.
- Proposed solution: Adds migrations 0148–0169, tool-access and Smoke
Lab schema, shared types/validators/gallery helpers, and the minimal
compile-required contract consumers identified by boundary testing.
- Alternatives considered: keeping #9534 as one 403-file review, or
rewriting the feature to manufacture seams; both were rejected in favor
of path extraction plus compile-driven boundary moves.
- Roadmap alignment: this advances the existing governed MCP/tool-access
work already represented by #9534; it does not introduce a separate
roadmap initiative.
- Stack position: base branch is `pap10341-split/01-demo-servers`.
- Merge policy: merge bottom-up, in order, only after the complete
eight-PR stack has been reviewed and the top-of-stack parity gate
remains empty.
- Requested review: QA for migrations/validators; Greptile on every PR.

## What Changed

- Adds migrations 0148–0169, tool-access and Smoke Lab schema, shared
types/validators/gallery helpers, and the minimal compile-required
contract consumers identified by boundary testing.
- Keeps this PR below 100 changed files and independently typecheckable.
- Preserves the final tree from #9534 when combined with the other seven
stack levels.

## Verification

- `pnpm typecheck` — passed, including migration numbering and safety
checks
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db test` — passed
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared test` — passed

## Risks

- Migration or contract mistakes could affect every upper layer; all
migrations are additive/idempotent and compile consumers are included in
this boundary.
- Stack risk: merging out of order can expose incomplete layers;
mitigate by following the documented bottom-up merge policy.
- Parity risk: later edits to an intermediate branch can drift from
#9534; mitigate by re-running the empty top-of-stack diff before merge.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, exact model ID `gpt-5.4`; runtime-managed context
window; medium reasoning with repository, shell, Git, GitHub CLI, and
code-execution tools enabled.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] Internal references are omitted except the execution-plan link
explicitly required for this coordinated split stack
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge


## Stack Coordination

- Internal execution plan:
[PAP-13874](/PAP/issues/PAP-13874#document-plan)
- Parity reference: #9534
- Stack: #9556 → #9557 → #9558 → #9559 → #9560 → #9561 → #9562 → #9563
- Merge bottom-up only after full-stack review and an empty parity diff
at #9563.

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-07-14 12:57:20 -05:00

463 lines
14 KiB
TypeScript

import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
import {
acceptIssueThreadInteractionSchema,
askUserQuestionsResultSchema,
createIssueThreadInteractionSchema,
requestConfirmationPayloadSchema,
requestConfirmationResultSchema,
submitIssueThreadInteractionVerdictsSchema,
} from "./validators/issue.js";
describe("issue thread interaction schemas", () => {
it("parses request_confirmation payloads with default no-wake continuation", () => {
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
kind: "request_confirmation",
payload: {
version: 1,
prompt: "Apply this plan?",
acceptLabel: "Apply",
rejectLabel: "Revise",
rejectRequiresReason: true,
rejectReasonLabel: "What needs to change?",
declineReasonPlaceholder: "Optional: tell the agent what you'd change.",
detailsMarkdown: "The current plan document will be accepted as-is.",
supersedeOnUserComment: true,
},
});
expect(parsed).toMatchObject({
kind: "request_confirmation",
continuationPolicy: "none",
payload: {
prompt: "Apply this plan?",
acceptLabel: "Apply",
rejectLabel: "Revise",
rejectRequiresReason: true,
rejectReasonLabel: "What needs to change?",
allowDeclineReason: true,
declineReasonPlaceholder: "Optional: tell the agent what you'd change.",
supersedeOnUserComment: true,
},
});
});
it("round-trips versioned tool action payload and lifecycle metadata", () => {
const payload = requestConfirmationPayloadSchema.parse({
version: 1,
prompt: "Approve send_email?",
toolAction: {
version: 1,
actionRequestId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
invocationId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
toolName: "send_email",
toolDisplayName: "Send email",
connectionId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
applicationId: "44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444",
appDisplayName: "Gmail",
risk: "write",
previewMarkdown: "Send an email to the reviewed recipient.",
argumentsSummaryJson: '{"to":"recipient@example.com"}',
argumentsHash: "reviewed-arguments-hash",
expiresAt: "2026-07-12T16:00:00.000Z",
},
});
const result = requestConfirmationResultSchema.parse({
version: 1,
outcome: "accepted",
toolAction: {
version: 1,
status: "executed",
errorCode: null,
errorMessage: null,
updatedAt: "2026-07-12T15:05:00.000Z",
},
});
expect(payload.toolAction).toMatchObject({
version: 1,
toolDisplayName: "Send email",
risk: "write",
argumentsHash: "reviewed-arguments-hash",
});
expect(result.toolAction).toMatchObject({ version: 1, status: "executed" });
expect(requestConfirmationPayloadSchema.parse({ version: 1, prompt: "Legacy confirmation?" }).toolAction)
.toBeUndefined();
});
it("accepts issue document targets for request_confirmation interactions", () => {
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
kind: "request_confirmation",
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee_on_accept",
payload: {
version: 1,
prompt: "Accept the latest plan revision?",
allowDeclineReason: false,
target: {
type: "issue_document",
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
documentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
key: "plan",
revisionId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
revisionNumber: 2,
label: "Plan v2",
href: "/issues/PAP-123#document-plan",
},
},
});
expect(parsed.kind).toBe("request_confirmation");
if (parsed.kind !== "request_confirmation") return;
expect(parsed.payload.target).toMatchObject({
type: "issue_document",
key: "plan",
revisionNumber: 2,
label: "Plan v2",
href: "/issues/PAP-123#document-plan",
});
});
it("accepts custom targets for request_confirmation interactions", () => {
for (const href of [
"https://example.com/checklist",
"http://example.com/checklist",
"/PAP/issues/PAP-123#document-plan",
"#document-plan",
]) {
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
kind: "request_confirmation",
payload: {
version: 1,
prompt: "Proceed with the external checklist?",
target: {
type: "custom",
key: "external-checklist",
revisionId: "checklist-v1",
revisionNumber: 1,
label: "Checklist v1",
href,
},
},
});
expect(parsed.kind).toBe("request_confirmation");
if (parsed.kind !== "request_confirmation") return;
expect(parsed.payload.target).toMatchObject({
type: "custom",
key: "external-checklist",
label: "Checklist v1",
href,
});
}
});
it("parses ask_user_questions supersede flags and expired results", () => {
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
kind: "ask_user_questions",
payload: {
version: 1,
title: "Choose scope",
supersedeOnUserComment: false,
questions: [
{
id: "scope",
prompt: "Which scope should I use?",
selectionMode: "single",
options: [{ id: "small", label: "Small" }],
},
],
},
});
expect(parsed).toMatchObject({
kind: "ask_user_questions",
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
payload: {
supersedeOnUserComment: false,
},
});
expect(askUserQuestionsResultSchema.parse({
version: 1,
answers: [],
expirationReason: "superseded_by_comment",
commentId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
summaryMarkdown: null,
})).toMatchObject({
expirationReason: "superseded_by_comment",
commentId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
});
});
it("rejects unsafe request_confirmation target hrefs", () => {
const base = {
kind: "request_confirmation",
payload: {
version: 1,
prompt: "Proceed?",
target: {
type: "custom",
key: "external-checklist",
revisionId: "checklist-v1",
label: "Checklist v1",
},
},
} as const;
for (const href of [
"javascript:alert(1)",
"data:text/html,hi",
"//evil.example/path",
"file:///tmp/x",
"mailto:user@example.com",
"slack://channel?id=1",
"vscode://file/tmp/x",
"ftp://example.com/file",
]) {
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
...base,
payload: {
...base.payload,
target: {
...base.payload.target,
href,
},
},
})).toThrow("href must be a root-relative path, same-page fragment, or http(s) URL");
}
});
it("parses request_checkbox_confirmation payloads with checkbox defaults", () => {
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
payload: {
version: 1,
prompt: "Which items should be archived?",
options: [
{ id: "item-1", label: "Draft report" },
{ id: "item-2", label: "Old screenshot", description: "Captured during QA." },
],
defaultSelectedOptionIds: ["item-2"],
minSelected: 0,
maxSelected: 2,
acceptLabel: "Archive selected",
rejectRequiresReason: true,
target: {
type: "issue_document",
key: "plan",
revisionId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
revisionNumber: 2,
},
},
});
expect(parsed).toMatchObject({
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
payload: {
allowDeclineReason: true,
defaultSelectedOptionIds: ["item-2"],
minSelected: 0,
maxSelected: 2,
},
});
});
it("rejects invalid request_checkbox_confirmation option references and bounds", () => {
const base = {
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
payload: {
version: 1,
prompt: "Which items should be archived?",
options: [
{ id: "item-1", label: "Draft report" },
{ id: "item-2", label: "Old screenshot" },
],
},
} as const;
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
...base,
payload: {
...base.payload,
options: [
{ id: "item-1", label: "Draft report" },
{ id: "item-1", label: "Duplicate" },
],
},
})).toThrow("Option ids must be unique within one checkbox confirmation");
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
...base,
payload: {
...base.payload,
defaultSelectedOptionIds: ["missing"],
},
})).toThrow("defaultSelectedOptionIds must reference existing option ids");
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
...base,
payload: {
...base.payload,
defaultSelectedOptionIds: ["item-1"],
minSelected: 2,
},
})).toThrow("defaultSelectedOptionIds must satisfy minSelected");
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
...base,
payload: {
...base.payload,
minSelected: 2,
maxSelected: 1,
},
})).toThrow("maxSelected must be greater than or equal to minSelected");
});
it("rejects unsafe request_checkbox_confirmation target hrefs", () => {
const base = {
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
payload: {
version: 1,
prompt: "Which items should be archived?",
options: [{ id: "item-1", label: "Draft report" }],
target: {
type: "custom",
key: "external-checklist",
revisionId: "checklist-v1",
label: "Checklist v1",
},
},
} as const;
for (const href of ["file:///tmp/x", "slack://channel?id=1", "vscode://file/tmp/x"]) {
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
...base,
payload: {
...base.payload,
target: {
...base.payload.target,
href,
},
},
})).toThrow("href must be a root-relative path, same-page fragment, or http(s) URL");
}
});
it("accepts empty checkbox selections and rejects duplicate selected option ids", () => {
expect(acceptIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({ selectedOptionIds: [] })).toEqual({
selectedOptionIds: [],
});
expect(() => acceptIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
selectedOptionIds: ["item-1", "item-1"],
})).toThrow("selectedOptionIds must be unique");
});
it("parses request_item_verdicts payloads with defaults", () => {
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
kind: "request_item_verdicts",
payload: {
version: 1,
prompt: "Review these generated items.",
items: [
{ id: "api", label: "API route", description: "Server submit endpoint" },
{ id: "docs", label: "Docs", previewMarkdown: "Document the route." },
],
},
});
expect(parsed).toMatchObject({
kind: "request_item_verdicts",
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
payload: {
verdicts: ["approve", "reject"],
requireReasonOn: ["reject"],
allowBulkApprove: true,
},
});
});
it("accepts request_item_verdicts defer when enabled explicitly", () => {
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
kind: "request_item_verdicts",
payload: {
version: 1,
prompt: "Review these generated items.",
items: [{ id: "api", label: "API route" }],
verdicts: ["approve", "reject", "defer"],
requireReasonOn: ["reject", "defer"],
},
});
expect(parsed).toMatchObject({
kind: "request_item_verdicts",
payload: {
verdicts: ["approve", "reject", "defer"],
requireReasonOn: ["reject", "defer"],
},
});
});
it("rejects invalid request_item_verdicts item and reason references", () => {
const base = {
kind: "request_item_verdicts",
payload: {
version: 1,
prompt: "Review these generated items.",
items: [
{ id: "api", label: "API route" },
{ id: "docs", label: "Docs" },
],
},
} as const;
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
...base,
payload: {
...base.payload,
items: [],
},
})).toThrow();
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
...base,
payload: {
...base.payload,
items: [
{ id: "api", label: "API route" },
{ id: "api", label: "Duplicate" },
],
},
})).toThrow("Item ids must be unique within one item verdict request");
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
...base,
payload: {
...base.payload,
items: Array.from({ length: 201 }, (_value, index) => ({
id: `item-${index}`,
label: `Item ${index}`,
})),
},
})).toThrow();
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
...base,
payload: {
...base.payload,
verdicts: ["approve", "reject"],
requireReasonOn: ["defer"],
},
})).toThrow("requireReasonOn must reference enabled verdicts");
});
it("rejects duplicate request_item_verdicts submit ids", () => {
expect(() => submitIssueThreadInteractionVerdictsSchema.parse({
verdicts: [
{ id: "api", verdict: "approve" },
{ id: "api", verdict: "reject", reason: "Needs revision" },
],
})).toThrow("verdict item ids must be unique");
});
});