mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-28 20:21:50 +01:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
6102f8e82c
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The board tests an agent's selected runtime and AI account. > - Cloud prepares and verifies the managed Runner runtime before execution. > - Its remote ACPX preflight reports that deferred step as a warning. > - The test keeps the warning after the selected account passes its hello probe. > - The board then asks the user to fix a healthy connection. > - This change makes that specific managed step informational after account verification. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A Cloud agent's Claude connection test passes with Legacy. With Runner, the same account completes the Claude hello probe but shows "Connection needs attention." The only warning says that remote runtime preparation must occur before launch. **Expected behavior** A verified managed connection passes when its only warning concerns runtime preparation that Paperclip performs before execution. Failed authentication and actionable runtime checks retain their results. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Select a working Claude subscription on a Cloud-managed sandbox. 2. Select Runner and run the connection test. 3. Observe a successful Claude hello probe and a warning result. Related: #17961 covers managed OpenRouter model verification. #15880 adds persistent computer runtime interfaces. Neither changes this Cloud connection-test status. ## What Changed - Recognize the deferred ACPX runtime check after a provider hello or live API-key verification succeeds. - Report that check as informational for Cloud-managed sandbox connections. - Preserve every other warning and error, including unexplained warning results. - Add service regressions and document the test/launch boundary. ## Verification - Red: the healthy managed-Claude case returned `warn` after a successful hello. The regression fails before the change and passes after it. - **116 tests pass** across connection verdicts, environment-test HTTP routes and adapter registration. Scoped server TypeScript and the server build pass, including the native Runner build. - Negative cases cover rejected credentials, missing hello receipts, missing runtime packages, actionable or unexplained warnings, self-hosted instances, SSH targets and unexplained provider warning results. API-key success requires live provider re-verification. - Operator evidence confirms that the reported test lease was released with cleanup successful. The agent's saved adapter is Legacy. No saved account, agent or environment setting was changed. - A clean local install hit a frozen-lockfile `patchedDependencies` configuration mismatch. The scoped checks reuse installed workspace dependencies. The final commit has passing hosted CI, including clean-install typecheck, tests and build, and Apex 5/5 with no unresolved findings. - A cold HTTP-suite module load reached the 30-second setup limit while other checks ran. All 54 HTTP cases pass on retry, and the full focused run passes 116 tests without changing assertions or time limits. - No staging deployment is claimed. This change classifies the connection-test result; it does not claim that a native Runner hello turn was performed. ## Risks - This status change is limited to a verified Cloud-managed sandbox ACPX connection and the exact deferred check code. The provider's successful receipt is required. - Runtime package preparation and verification still execute before agent work. A connection test does not replace those launch checks. - There is no schema, permission or credential change. Local, SSH and plugin task probes keep their existing verdicts. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository inspection, tool use and code execution. The session does not expose its exact serving model ID or context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>