Files
PaperClipAI/server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts
T
DottaandPaperclip 505e1a5582 feat(cases): add persistent workflows with same-task agent handoffs (#16959)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work.
> - An agent workflow needs persistent facts and a safe way to transfer
work.
> - Creating a task for each phase splits the objective, discussion,
workspace, and review policy.
> - A case can retain the facts while one primary task moves between
agents.
> - Transfers must survive process failure and preserve private access,
budgets, and completion gates.
> - This pull request adds durable case handoffs, native case tools, and
read-only case pages.
> - Prompts describe the workflow. Existing task controls decide when
work can run and finish.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Problem or motivation**

Prompt-driven agent teams need a persistent record that can move through
triage, implementation, verification, and correction. Ordinary
reassignment does not provide a durable instruction, safe release
barrier, or recoverable delivery receipt for an agent handing off its
own running task.

**Proposed solution**

Extend standalone cases with one primary task, a descriptive phase,
retained access sources, and a handoff ledger. Apply assignments after
source execution and workspace settlement. Deliver each transfer through
the existing durable wake queue. Provide `create_case`, `read_case`,
`update_case`, and `handoff_case` in the native runner. Creation
requires kickoff and explicit workflow text. An explicit handoff to
`done` closes the case when normal task completion is accepted.

**Alternatives considered**

Do not add a workflow engine, filesystem queue, configured state graph,
or one task per phase. The workflow document combines transition prose
with an optional Mermaid `stateDiagram-v2` map. The server does not
execute the diagram. The Pipelines experiment removed on master stays
removed.

**Roadmap alignment**

This extends Agent Reviews and Approvals, Enforced Outcomes, Bounded Run
Recovery, and Activity Log attribution. Existing approval, review,
budget, privacy, workspace, and responsible-user rules remain
authoritative.

Related work: [ordinary handoff wake
recovery](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/15019). This
feature adds a separate persisted case-handoff receipt and release
barrier.

## What Changed

- Add case routing fields, retained access sources, durable handoff
history, delivery leases, and replay-safe migrations.
- Keep the same primary task across agent phases. Preserve each
returning agent's own session and the task's workspace.
- Fence outgoing mutations, wait for provider and workspace release, and
recover delivery without duplicate task comments or runs. Recheck
current assignment permissions as the original caller before applying a
delayed transfer. Scope a run Stop to that run’s own handoff intents, so
repeated old Stop requests preserve newer work. Cancelling terminal
intent without a source run also requires fenced current task ownership,
including native retries and preparation with an old checkout. For Cloud
callers, revalidate current stack membership with an uncached Cloud RPC
and derive owner elevation from the current managed setting.
- Keep case reads, documents, assets, Audit, and live events inside
retained task/project permissions.
- Add native case creation/read/update/handoff tools. Store required
workflow text and initial documents on the first task. Page oversized
case facts and referenced document bodies through the dedicated tool
with bounded UTF-8 JSON, current routing versions, snapshot conflicts,
and current source authorization on every page.
- Add read-only case lists and detail pages, task-style list controls,
compact dotted field tables, linked handoff tasks, and case filters in
Audit.
- Add native/legacy integration tests, migration/restart tests, browser
coverage, and bounded live receipt fixtures. Extend the trusted sandbox
condition to cover the new subscription fixture profile.
- Hide obsolete paused-agent warnings on completed or cancelled task
threads.
- Synchronize the company-switch settings test with React effects after
a CI failure. Preserve its security assertions and production remount
behavior.

## Verification

The branch directly includes master `9ef434fe79`. The required `ci /
verify` and `ci / e2e` gates pass on head `765fccd67c`. [Current-head
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39464348614)
passes typecheck, build, tests, and all eight browser shards. Security
checks pass. [Greptile gives this exact head
5/5](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/16959#issuecomment-6291156549),
with no unresolved review threads. The optional Paperclip Review check
remains queued because its assigned agent is paused. It is not a
required branch check. No check result was overridden.

Local workspace typecheck and build pass after the master merge, along
with database migration checks, token gates, map checks, Storybook
catalog checks, and the Copilot profile identity check. Standard builds
refresh Runner vendor output. Focused checks pass 2,008
API/paging/context tests and 7 strict case protocol tests. The final
commit changes one test fixture only; its ten tests, UI typecheck, and
token gates pass. No production source changed in that commit.

On current head `765fccd67c`, all **194 critical workflow tests**
executed and passed with no skipped tests in those files:

- 38 Stop/ownership tests, including board completion intent, native
retries, stale Stop, and preparation with an old checkout.
- 2 actual legacy process/HTTP handoff tests, including scratch failure,
a closed-stdio child that continues writing, and recovery through a
fresh worker after the process group stops.
- 5 migration tests, including SQL column metadata, preserved null
authority context, and all six prior-numbering receipts.
- 3 process-settlement and 5 scratch tests.
- 88 handoff-service, 18 heartbeat handoff, and 21 native case-tool
integration tests.
- 7 bounded case/document-read projection tests and 7 strict
protocol-contract tests.

The current CI checkout was `fed65d49`, merging `765fccd67c` into master
`9ef434fe79`. Its new document regressions reconstruct exact
Unicode/escaped bodies and revisions through real native authority and
authenticated HTTP with generic API tools disabled. They cover
case-owned, primary-task, and linked-task documents; routing on every
page; stale document snapshots; access loss and unlinking;
unrelated/foreign/private sources; system documents; and quarantined
content. Active-task document tools retain their existing behavior.
These are current-head test results from the first CI attempt; the
browser-only retry did not rerun these suites.

The full `64fdd3403f` CI failed one separate settings test: after a
company switch, it observed an unsettled API-key draft. The production
component and test were unchanged from prior green source. Production
switches remount both keyed settings layers; the test directly reused an
unkeyed view and used a timer tick instead of waiting for React effects.
The final commit replaces that fixture synchronization with React `act`.
The exact secret-clearing assertions and all timeouts remain unchanged.
The original assertion failure remains recorded; no unchanged retry was
used. The narrow unchanged baseline and fixed fixture each pass 10
tests.

The upstream result-paging merge preserves case capture namespaces and
current asset privacy. Its API integration suite executed 39 of 41 tests
successfully, with two skipped; the optional assigned-result PRP
integration test was skipped. Neither skipped suite is counted in the
194 critical tests or as live provider proof.

All 361 upstream migration entries and SQL bodies remain unchanged. Six
case migrations follow master as 0363–0368 with identical SQL hashes.
Official Drizzle generators produced the combined metadata and five
retained snapshots. Generation reports no schema changes, and the
snapshot drift test passes. The earlier `ce361ae5d0` CI passed on
attempt 1, including its then-current 179 critical tests. Fresh review
later identified unusable document references with generic API tools
disabled; the bounded document reads and ten additional authenticated
HTTP tests address that finding.

The full local `pnpm test:run` attempt was cancelled after this Mac
exhausted PostgreSQL semaphore capacity; it is **not** counted as a
pass. Later database attempts also stopped before assertions or skipped,
including one sandbox socket denial. Two original stale-Stop regressions
did reproduce the bug against the old source. A REST serialization
assertion passed after two preserved database-startup failures. No test
timeout was increased. All 194 assertions listed above executed and
passed in current-head CI. The complete 385-file, 3,963-test UI shard
also passed after the fixture repair.

A configured-provider receipt workflow passed 13 backend checks across
triage → implementation → verification → correction → done, using one
task and four work runs. The saved receipt is revision 2 with total 6
USD; case and task both closed. The original canonical attempt remains
failed because its browser assertion confused the terminal destination
with completed-task tooltips. The corrected full browser verifier passed
on the same retained database and original runs, with no additional
provider calls. The last clean-build browser readback is on
`6a86c54a53`; later changes affect recovery, authorization, bounded
reads, and settlement. Accounted work cost is a $1.010574 rate-card
estimate; provider billing and setup-probe usage are unavailable.

Copilot profile 49 passed the unchanged seven-fixture private protocol
pack (46/46 checks, no retries) and the product file-edit canary after
master's completion-replay change. All 60 bound implementation hashes
remain unchanged on the current source. Historical profile-47/48
identities and results remain intact. See the [profile-49 compatibility
record](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/codex/persistent-case-handoffs/doc/plans/2026-10-20-copilot-completion-recovery-compatibility-v49.json).
This is bounded compatibility evidence, not a fresh full matrix,
installed-package product test, or Daytona rollout.

Preserved CI failures and retries:

- On `20662930ac`, Slack managed setup failed a five-second success
assertion after reload. Its test/application path was unchanged from a
prior green head. One unchanged-source retry passed all 25 tests in that
shard; no source or timeout changed.
- On `9402b4f17a`, two CI workers received shutdown signals at 15:24:19
UTC. Neither log had an assertion failure before interruption. One
unchanged-source retry of each passed all Runner static checks and all
32 tests in browser shard 6; both aggregates passed. The next head,
`7b4374edaf`, passed all CI without retries.
- On `295f289b5a`, serialized shard 9 timed out during its first
device-login test, then the next test found an active login lease.
Direct login/test paths were unchanged from a prior green head. Cold
import plus a timed-out async body using the next test's mutable
actor/store is the supported fixture-race explanation; no request trace
proves that sequence. The original failure remains recorded. One
unchanged-source retry passed all 294 tests in 19 files, including all
41 device-login tests. No login source or timeout changed. The
subsequent `ce361ae5d0` CI passed without retries.
- On `64fdd3403f`, one company-switch settings assertion observed an
unsettled draft. The final test-only commit uses React `act` without
changing assertions, timeouts, or production code. On `765fccd67c`, all
ten settings tests and the complete 385-file, 3,963-test UI shard
passed.
- On `765fccd67c`, browser shard 3 completed the split-handoff
assertions, then cleanup received HTTP 500 from run cancellation after a
one-second PostgreSQL row-lock timeout. The extra chat run was reporting
completed work while teardown began. Cleanup stopped before restoring a
global experiment flag, causing a later assertion to fail. Relevant
production and test paths are unchanged from an earlier green commit.
Stop's lock order is consistent, and no nested self-lock was found; the
exact PostgreSQL blocker was not recorded. One unchanged-shard retry
passed. The original failure, trace, and downstream flag failure remain
recorded. No Stop implementation, cleanup assertion, or timeout changed.
The retry supports intermittent cleanup contention; it does not identify
the original blocking transaction.


## Risks

- Local process transfers require host-owned PID/group absence. Missing
or uncertain termination evidence keeps delivery pending, independently
of scratch setup.
- Handoff admission and task cancellation share execution ownership. New
regression tests cover temporary holds, late source writes, and
uncertain provider termination.
- Retained private sources use an intersection of existing permissions.
This intentionally fails closed when a source is missing or an existing
task cannot preserve that boundary.
- Migrations add tables and indexes. They preserve master history and
can replay over prior feature installs. Migration 0368 adds nullable
internal authorization provenance with no default or authority backfill.
Historical transfers still awaiting release without this context fail
closed; an operator must cancel them and request a new handoff.
- Delayed Cloud handoffs depend on the current Cloud membership RPC. An
unavailable, ambiguous, expired, or mismatched response holds the
handoff for retry; it does not reuse cached authority or grant access.
- Bounded reads reload and reauthorize the selected projection per page.
Underlying work grows with the data size and number of pages. Changed
data or routing requires restarting from offset zero without the old
snapshot.
- Phase names and workflow diagrams remain advisory. They do not satisfy
review or approval gates.
- This is a large, cross-cutting PR. The maintainer requested one PR for
the whole feature; the commits separate data, runtime, UI, and
qualification work.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with tool use, code execution, and delegated
code review. The exact deployment model ID and context-window size were
not exposed in the session. Live fixture agents used the explicitly
configured provider model recorded in their test evidence.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-20 12:46:14 -05:00

3915 lines
135 KiB
TypeScript

import express from "express";
import request from "supertest";
import { getTableName } from "drizzle-orm";
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
import { HttpError } from "../errors.js";
vi.mock("../services/fast-responses.js", () => ({
enqueueFastResponse: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
}));
vi.mock("../services/execution-blocker.js", () => ({
getExecutionBlocker: vi.fn(async () => null),
}));
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
getByIdForUpdate: vi.fn(),
assertCheckoutOwner: vi.fn(),
update: vi.fn(),
addComment: vi.fn(),
getDependencyReadiness: vi.fn(),
getCurrentScheduledRetry: vi.fn(),
findMentionedAgents: vi.fn(),
listWakeableBlockedDependents: vi.fn(),
getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion: vi.fn(),
getRelationSummaries: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockAccessService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
canUser: vi.fn(),
decide: vi.fn(),
hasPermission: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockHeartbeatService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
wakeup: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
getRun: vi.fn(async () => null),
getActiveRunForAgent: vi.fn(async () => null),
cancelRun: vi.fn(async () => null),
}));
const mockAgentService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
list: vi.fn(),
resolveByReference: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(async () => undefined));
const mockTxInsertValues = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(async () => undefined));
const mockTxInsert = vi.hoisted(() =>
vi.fn(() => ({ values: mockTxInsertValues })),
);
const mockTx = vi.hoisted(() => ({
insert: mockTxInsert,
}));
const mockDbSelectOrderBy = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(async () => []));
const mockDbSelectWhere = vi.hoisted(() =>
vi.fn(() => ({
orderBy: mockDbSelectOrderBy,
then: (
onFulfilled: (rows: unknown[]) => unknown,
onRejected?: (reason: unknown) => unknown,
) => Promise.resolve([]).then(onFulfilled, onRejected),
})),
);
const mockDbSelectFrom = vi.hoisted(() =>
vi.fn((_table: unknown) => ({ where: mockDbSelectWhere })),
);
const mockDbSelect = vi.hoisted(() =>
vi.fn(() => ({ from: mockDbSelectFrom })),
);
const mockDb = vi.hoisted(() => ({
select: mockDbSelect,
transaction: vi.fn(async (fn: (tx: typeof mockTx) => Promise<unknown>) =>
fn(mockTx),
),
}));
const mockFeedbackService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
listIssueVotesForUser: vi.fn(async () => []),
saveIssueVote: vi.fn(async () => ({
vote: null,
consentEnabledNow: false,
sharingEnabled: false,
})),
}));
const mockInstanceSettingsService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
get: vi.fn(async () => ({
id: "instance-settings-1",
general: {
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
},
})),
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(async () => ["company-1"]),
}));
const mockRoutineService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
}));
const mockIssueThreadInteractionService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
expirePendingInteractionsForTerminalIssue: vi.fn(async () => []),
expireRequestConfirmationsSupersededByComment: vi.fn(async () => []),
expireStaleRequestConfirmationsForIssueDocument: vi.fn(async () => []),
listForIssue: vi.fn(async () => []),
}));
const mockIssueRecoveryActionService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getActiveForIssue: vi.fn(async () => null),
}));
const mockIssueTreeControlService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getActivePauseHoldGate: vi.fn(async () => null),
}));
const mockExternalObjectService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
syncCommentSafely: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
syncIssueSafely: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
}));
const mockObserveCrossIssueInfluence = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
const mockCrossIssueInfluenceLimitError = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
const mockCrossIssueInfluenceRunContextError = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
const mockRunnerGoalService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
projection: vi.fn(async () => null),
act: vi.fn(),
}));
vi.mock("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry", () => ({
trackAgentTaskCompleted: vi.fn(),
trackErrorHandlerCrash: vi.fn(),
}));
vi.mock("../telemetry.js", () => ({
getTelemetryClient: vi.fn(() => ({ track: vi.fn() })),
}));
vi.mock("../services/queued-interaction-response.js", () => ({
hasQueuedInteractionResponse: vi.fn(async () => false),
}));
vi.mock("../services/access.js", () => ({
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
}));
vi.mock("../services/activity-log.js", () => ({
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
}));
vi.mock("../services/agents.js", () => ({
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
}));
vi.mock("../services/feedback.js", () => ({
feedbackService: () => mockFeedbackService,
}));
vi.mock("../services/heartbeat.js", () => ({
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
}));
vi.mock("../services/instance-settings.js", () => ({
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
}));
vi.mock("../services/issues.js", () => ({
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
}));
vi.mock("../services/routines.js", () => ({
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
}));
vi.mock("../services/runner-goals.js", () => ({
runnerGoalService: () => mockRunnerGoalService,
RunnerGoalActionError: class RunnerGoalActionError extends Error {},
RunnerGoalConflictError: class RunnerGoalConflictError extends Error {},
}));
vi.mock("../services/index.js", () => ({
companyService: () => ({
getById: vi.fn(async () => ({ id: "company-1" })),
}),
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
companySkillService: () => ({
completeTestRunForIssue: vi.fn(async () => null),
}),
documentAnnotationService: () => ({
remapOpenThreadsForDocument: async () => [],
}),
documentService: () => ({}),
executionWorkspaceService: () => ({}),
feedbackService: () => mockFeedbackService,
goalService: () => ({}),
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
issueRecoveryActionService: () => mockIssueRecoveryActionService,
issueReferenceService: () => ({
deleteDocumentSource: async () => undefined,
diffIssueReferenceSummary: () => ({
addedReferencedIssues: [],
removedReferencedIssues: [],
currentReferencedIssues: [],
}),
emptySummary: () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
listIssueReferenceSummary: async () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
syncComment: async () => undefined,
syncDocument: async () => undefined,
syncIssue: async () => undefined,
}),
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
issueThreadInteractionService: () => mockIssueThreadInteractionService,
issueTreeControlService: () => mockIssueTreeControlService,
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
projectService: () => ({}),
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
workProductService: () => ({}),
}));
vi.mock("../services/external-objects.js", () => ({
externalObjectService: () => mockExternalObjectService,
}));
vi.mock("../services/cross-issue-influence-limit.js", () => ({
observeCrossIssueInfluence: mockObserveCrossIssueInfluence,
crossIssueInfluenceLimitError: mockCrossIssueInfluenceLimitError,
crossIssueInfluenceRunContextError: mockCrossIssueInfluenceRunContextError,
}));
function createApp() {
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
return app;
}
async function installActor(
app: express.Express,
actor?: Record<string, unknown>,
) {
const [{ issueRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
import("../routes/issues.js"),
import("../middleware/index.js"),
]);
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
(req as any).actor = actor ?? {
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
companyIds: ["company-1"],
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
};
next();
});
app.use("/api", issueRoutes(mockDb as any, {} as any));
app.use(errorHandler);
return app;
}
async function normalizePolicy(input: {
stages: Array<{
id: string;
type: "review" | "approval";
participants: Array<
{ type: "agent"; agentId: string } | { type: "user"; userId: string }
>;
}>;
}) {
const { normalizeIssueExecutionPolicy } =
await import("../services/issue-execution-policy.js");
return normalizeIssueExecutionPolicy(input);
}
function makeIssue(
status:
| "backlog"
| "todo"
| "done"
| "blocked"
| "cancelled"
| "in_progress"
| "in_review",
) {
return {
id: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
companyId: "company-1",
status,
assigneeAgentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
assigneeUserId: null,
createdByUserId: "local-board",
identifier: "PAP-580",
title: "Comment reopen default",
};
}
function makeIssueUpdateReceipt(
existing: ReturnType<typeof makeIssue>,
patch: Record<string, unknown>,
) {
const fields = Object.fromEntries(
Object.entries(patch).filter(
([key]) => key !== "actorAgentId" && key !== "actorUserId",
),
);
const changes = Object.fromEntries(
Object.entries(fields)
.filter(
([key, value]) =>
!Object.is(existing[key as keyof typeof existing], value),
)
.map(([key, value]) => [
key,
{ from: existing[key as keyof typeof existing], to: value },
]),
);
return { ...existing, ...fields, changes };
}
function agentActor(agentId = "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222") {
return {
type: "agent",
agentId,
companyId: "company-1",
source: "agent_key",
runId: "run-1",
};
}
async function waitForWakeup(assertion: () => void) {
await vi.waitFor(assertion);
}
function createAgentReviewPolicy(reviewerAgentId: string) {
return normalizePolicy({
stages: [
{
id: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
type: "review",
participants: [{ type: "agent", agentId: reviewerAgentId }],
},
],
});
}
function createReviewIssue(policy: NonNullable<Awaited<ReturnType<typeof normalizePolicy>>>, reviewerAgentId: string) {
return {
...makeIssue("todo"),
status: "in_review",
assigneeAgentId: reviewerAgentId,
executionPolicy: policy,
executionState: {
status: "pending",
currentStageId: policy.stages[0].id,
currentStageIndex: 0,
currentStageType: "review",
currentParticipant: { type: "agent", agentId: reviewerAgentId },
returnAssignee: {
type: "agent",
agentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
},
completedStageIds: [],
lastDecisionId: null,
lastDecisionOutcome: null,
},
};
}
function createScheduledRetry() {
return {
runId: "retry-run-1",
status: "scheduled_retry",
agentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
agentName: "CodexCoder",
retryOfRunId: "source-run-1",
scheduledRetryAt: new Date("2026-05-18T14:00:00.000Z"),
scheduledRetryAttempt: 1,
scheduledRetryReason: "transient_failure",
error: null,
errorCode: null,
};
}
describe("issue comment reopen routes", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks();
mockIssueService.getById.mockReset();
mockIssueService.getByIdForUpdate.mockReset();
mockIssueService.assertCheckoutOwner.mockReset();
mockIssueService.update.mockReset();
mockIssueService.addComment.mockReset();
mockIssueService.getDependencyReadiness.mockReset();
mockIssueService.getCurrentScheduledRetry.mockReset();
mockIssueService.findMentionedAgents.mockReset();
mockIssueService.listWakeableBlockedDependents.mockReset();
mockIssueService.getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion.mockReset();
mockAccessService.canUser.mockReset();
mockAccessService.decide.mockReset();
mockAccessService.hasPermission.mockReset();
mockHeartbeatService.wakeup.mockReset();
mockHeartbeatService.reportRunActivity.mockReset();
mockHeartbeatService.getRun.mockReset();
mockHeartbeatService.getActiveRunForAgent.mockReset();
mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun.mockReset();
mockAgentService.getById.mockReset();
mockAgentService.list.mockReset();
mockAgentService.resolveByReference.mockReset();
mockLogActivity.mockReset();
mockFeedbackService.listIssueVotesForUser.mockReset();
mockFeedbackService.saveIssueVote.mockReset();
mockInstanceSettingsService.get.mockReset();
mockInstanceSettingsService.listCompanyIds.mockReset();
mockRoutineService.syncRunStatusForIssue.mockReset();
mockIssueThreadInteractionService.listForIssue.mockReset();
mockIssueRecoveryActionService.getActiveForIssue.mockReset();
mockIssueTreeControlService.getActivePauseHoldGate.mockReset();
mockExternalObjectService.syncCommentSafely.mockReset();
mockExternalObjectService.syncIssueSafely.mockReset();
mockObserveCrossIssueInfluence.mockReset();
mockCrossIssueInfluenceLimitError.mockReset();
mockCrossIssueInfluenceRunContextError.mockReset();
mockTxInsertValues.mockReset();
mockTxInsert.mockReset();
mockDbSelect.mockReset();
mockDbSelectFrom.mockReset();
mockDbSelectWhere.mockReset();
mockDbSelectOrderBy.mockReset();
mockDb.transaction.mockReset();
mockTxInsertValues.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
mockTxInsert.mockImplementation(() => ({ values: mockTxInsertValues }));
mockDbSelectOrderBy.mockResolvedValue([]);
mockDbSelectWhere.mockImplementation(() => ({
orderBy: mockDbSelectOrderBy,
then: (
onFulfilled: (rows: unknown[]) => unknown,
onRejected?: (reason: unknown) => unknown,
) => Promise.resolve([]).then(onFulfilled, onRejected),
}));
mockDbSelectFrom.mockImplementation((table) => {
const name = getTableName(table as Parameters<typeof getTableName>[0]);
if (name === "case_handoffs") return { where: vi.fn(() => ({
orderBy: vi.fn(() => ({ limit: vi.fn(async () => []) })),
})) };
if (name === "heartbeat_runs") return { where: vi.fn(() => {
const query = mockDbSelectWhere();
return { ...query, limit: vi.fn((count: number) => Promise.resolve(query).then(rows => rows.slice(0, count))) };
}) };
return { where: mockDbSelectWhere };
});
mockDbSelect.mockImplementation(() => ({ from: mockDbSelectFrom }));
mockDb.transaction.mockImplementation(
async (fn: (tx: typeof mockTx) => Promise<unknown>) => fn(mockTx),
);
mockIssueService.getByIdForUpdate.mockImplementation(async () =>
mockIssueService.getById(),
);
mockHeartbeatService.wakeup.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
mockHeartbeatService.reportRunActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
mockHeartbeatService.getRun.mockResolvedValue(null);
mockHeartbeatService.getActiveRunForAgent.mockResolvedValue(null);
mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun.mockResolvedValue(null);
mockExternalObjectService.syncCommentSafely.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
mockExternalObjectService.syncIssueSafely.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
mockObserveCrossIssueInfluence.mockResolvedValue({
allowed: true,
mode: "log_only",
count: 1,
cap: 20,
enforceAt: "2026-08-11T00:00:00.000Z",
});
mockCrossIssueInfluenceLimitError.mockImplementation(
(decision: { count: number; cap: number }) => ({
error: `Cross-issue influence cap exceeded: this run is limited to ${decision.cap} cross-issue comments or updates`,
details: {
code: "cross_issue_influence_cap_exceeded",
count: decision.count,
cap: decision.cap,
},
}),
);
mockCrossIssueInfluenceRunContextError.mockImplementation(
() =>
new HttpError(
403,
"Agent issue comments and updates require a valid heartbeat run so cross-issue influence can be contained",
{ code: "cross_issue_influence_run_context_required" },
),
);
mockLogActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
mockFeedbackService.listIssueVotesForUser.mockResolvedValue([]);
mockFeedbackService.saveIssueVote.mockResolvedValue({
vote: null,
consentEnabledNow: false,
sharingEnabled: false,
});
mockInstanceSettingsService.get.mockResolvedValue({
id: "instance-settings-1",
general: {
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
},
});
mockInstanceSettingsService.listCompanyIds.mockResolvedValue(["company-1"]);
mockRoutineService.syncRunStatusForIssue.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
mockIssueThreadInteractionService.listForIssue.mockResolvedValue([]);
mockIssueRecoveryActionService.getActiveForIssue.mockResolvedValue(null);
mockIssueTreeControlService.getActivePauseHoldGate.mockResolvedValue(null);
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-1",
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
companyId: "company-1",
body: "hello",
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
authorAgentId: null,
authorUserId: "local-board",
});
mockIssueService.findMentionedAgents.mockResolvedValue([]);
mockIssueService.getDependencyReadiness.mockResolvedValue({
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
blockerIssueIds: [],
unresolvedBlockerIssueIds: [],
unresolvedBlockerCount: 0,
allBlockersDone: true,
isDependencyReady: true,
});
mockIssueService.getCurrentScheduledRetry.mockResolvedValue(null);
mockIssueService.listWakeableBlockedDependents.mockResolvedValue([]);
mockIssueService.getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion.mockResolvedValue(
null,
);
mockIssueService.assertCheckoutOwner.mockResolvedValue({
adoptedFromRunId: null,
});
mockAccessService.canUser.mockResolvedValue(false);
mockAccessService.decide.mockImplementation(
async (input: { action?: string }) => {
const allowed = input.action !== "tasks:manage_active_checkouts";
return {
allowed,
action: input.action,
reason: allowed ? "allow_explicit_grant" : "deny_missing_grant",
explanation: allowed
? "Allowed by test grant."
: "Missing active checkout override.",
};
},
);
mockAccessService.hasPermission.mockResolvedValue(false);
mockAgentService.getById.mockResolvedValue(null);
mockAgentService.list.mockResolvedValue([
{
id: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
reportsTo: null,
permissions: { canCreateAgents: false },
},
{
id: "44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444",
reportsTo: null,
permissions: { canCreateAgents: false },
},
]);
mockAgentService.resolveByReference.mockImplementation(
async (_companyId: string, reference: string) => {
if (reference === "ambiguous-codex") {
return { ambiguous: true, agent: null };
}
if (reference === "missing-codex") {
return { ambiguous: false, agent: null };
}
if (reference === "codexcoder") {
return {
ambiguous: false,
agent: { id: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333" },
};
}
return {
ambiguous: false,
agent: { id: reference },
};
},
);
});
it("treats reopen=true as a no-op when the issue is already open", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("todo"));
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...makeIssue("todo"),
...patch,
}),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({
comment: "hello",
reopen: true,
assigneeAgentId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
});
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(res.body.assigneeAgentId).toBe(
"33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
);
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
action: "issue.updated",
details: expect.not.objectContaining({ reopened: true }),
}),
);
});
it("binds explicit attachments in the same transaction as a PATCH comment reassignment", async () => {
const issue = makeIssue("todo");
const id = "9af8228f-0be7-45ae-a104-6fbe0af6f1d3";
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) =>
makeIssueUpdateReceipt(issue, patch),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch(`/api/issues/${issue.id}`)
.send({
comment: "Inspect the file",
commentClientRequestId: "77777777-7777-4777-8777-777777777777",
attachmentIds: [id],
assigneeAgentId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
});
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockDb.transaction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
issue.id,
expect.not.objectContaining({ attachmentIds: expect.anything() }),
mockTx,
);
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
issue.id,
"Inspect the file",
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({ attachmentIds: [id], clientRequestId: "77777777-7777-4777-8777-777777777777" }),
mockTx,
);
});
it("rejects attachment IDs without a PATCH comment before updating or waking", async () => {
const issue = makeIssue("todo");
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch(`/api/issues/${issue.id}`)
.send({
attachmentIds: [],
assigneeAgentId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
});
expect(res.status).toBe(400);
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("does not dispatch a wake or fallback comment when transactional attachment binding fails", async () => {
const issue = makeIssue("todo");
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) =>
makeIssueUpdateReceipt(issue, patch),
);
mockIssueService.addComment.mockRejectedValueOnce(
new HttpError(409, "Attachment is already bound"),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch(`/api/issues/${issue.id}`)
.send({
comment: "Inspect",
attachmentIds: ["9af8228f-0be7-45ae-a104-6fbe0af6f1d3"],
assigneeAgentId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
});
expect(res.status).toBe(409);
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("implicitly reopens closed issues via the PATCH comment path when reassigning to an agent", async () => {
const issue = makeIssue("done");
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) =>
makeIssueUpdateReceipt(issue, patch),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({
comment: "hello",
assigneeAgentId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
});
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
expect.objectContaining({
assigneeAgentId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
status: "todo",
actorAgentId: null,
actorUserId: "local-board",
}),
);
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
action: "issue.updated",
details: expect.objectContaining({
reopened: true,
reopenedFrom: "done",
status: "todo",
}),
}),
);
});
it("resolves assignee shortnames before updating an issue", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("todo"));
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...makeIssue("todo"),
...patch,
}),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ comment: "hello", assigneeAgentId: "codexcoder" });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockAgentService.resolveByReference).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"company-1",
"codexcoder",
);
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
expect.objectContaining({
assigneeAgentId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
}),
);
});
it("rejects ambiguous assignee shortnames", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("todo"));
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ assigneeAgentId: "ambiguous-codex" });
expect(res.status).toBe(409);
expect(res.body.error).toContain("ambiguous");
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("rejects missing assignee shortnames", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("todo"));
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ assigneeAgentId: "missing-codex" });
expect(res.status).toBe(404);
expect(res.body.error).toBe("Agent not found");
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("reopens closed issues via the PATCH comment path", async () => {
const issue = makeIssue("done");
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) =>
makeIssueUpdateReceipt(issue, patch),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({
comment: "hello",
reopen: true,
assigneeAgentId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
});
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
expect.objectContaining({
assigneeAgentId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
status: "todo",
actorAgentId: null,
actorUserId: "local-board",
}),
);
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
action: "issue.updated",
details: expect.objectContaining({
reopened: true,
reopenedFrom: "done",
status: "todo",
}),
}),
);
});
it("implicitly reopens closed issues via POST comments when an agent is assigned", async () => {
const issue = makeIssue("done");
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) =>
makeIssueUpdateReceipt(issue, patch),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "hello" });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
{ status: "todo" },
);
await waitForWakeup(() =>
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
expect.objectContaining({
reason: "issue_reopened_via_comment",
payload: expect.objectContaining({
reopenedFrom: "done",
}),
}),
),
);
});
it("allows default-open non-assignee POST comments on closed issues without reopening", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("done"));
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-1",
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
companyId: "company-1",
body: "hello",
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
authorAgentId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
authorUserId: null,
});
mockAccessService.decide.mockImplementation(
async (input: { action?: string }) => ({
allowed: input.action !== "tasks:manage_active_checkouts",
action: input.action,
reason:
input.action === "issue:comment"
? "allow_visible_issue_write"
: "allow_explicit_grant",
explanation: "Allowed by the shared visible-issue write rule.",
}),
);
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "agent",
agentId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
companyId: "company-1",
source: "agent_key",
runId: "77777777-7777-4777-8777-777777777777",
}),
)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "hello" });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("allows mention-granted non-assignee agent POST comments on closed issues without reopening", async () => {
const mentionedAgentId = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("done"));
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-1",
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
companyId: "company-1",
body: "I can answer the mention without reopening.",
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
authorAgentId: mentionedAgentId,
authorUserId: null,
});
mockAccessService.decide.mockImplementation(
async (input: { action?: string }) => {
const allowed = input.action === "issue:read" || input.action === "issue:comment";
return {
allowed,
action: input.action,
reason: allowed ? "allow_issue_mention_grant" : "deny_missing_grant",
explanation: allowed
? "Allowed by a mention-scoped issue comment grant."
: "Missing permission.",
};
},
);
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), agentActor(mentionedAgentId)),
)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "I can answer the mention without reopening." });
expect(res.status, JSON.stringify(res.body)).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockAccessService.decide).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.objectContaining({ action: "issue:mutate" }),
);
});
it.each([
["resume", { resume: true }],
["reopen", { reopen: true }],
])(
// Mention grants are append-only; explicit lifecycle intent still requires mutation authority.
"denies mention-granted non-assignee agent POST comments on closed issues with %s intent",
async (_name, intent) => {
const mentionedAgentId = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("done"));
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-1",
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
companyId: "company-1",
body: "Please continue this closed issue.",
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
authorAgentId: mentionedAgentId,
authorUserId: null,
});
mockAccessService.decide.mockImplementation(
async (input: { action?: string }) => {
const allowed = input.action === "issue:read" || input.action === "issue:comment";
return {
allowed,
action: input.action,
reason: allowed
? "allow_issue_mention_grant"
: "deny_missing_grant",
explanation: allowed
? "Allowed by a mention-scoped issue comment grant."
: "Missing permission.",
};
},
);
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), agentActor(mentionedAgentId)),
)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "Please continue this closed issue.", ...intent });
expect(res.status, JSON.stringify(res.body)).toBe(403);
expect(res.body.details.code).toBe("issue_write_not_visible");
// Plan §6: name the boundary, who can act, and the sanctioned path.
expect(res.body.error).toContain("Issue visibility");
expect(res.body.error).toContain("Who can act:");
expect(res.body.details.sanctionedPath).toContain("child issue");
expect(mockAccessService.decide).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.objectContaining({ action: "issue:comment" }),
);
expect(mockAccessService.decide).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.objectContaining({ action: "issue:mutate" }),
);
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
},
);
// POST self-comment from the assignee agent on a done issue with explicit
// reopen=true is the same log-class signal — the guard must suppress reopen.
it("does not reopen via POST comment+reopen when the assignee agent is the actor on a done issue", async () => {
const assigneeAgentId = "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222";
const issue = makeIssue("done");
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) =>
makeIssueUpdateReceipt(issue, patch),
);
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-1",
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
companyId: "company-1",
body: "log line",
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
authorAgentId: assigneeAgentId,
authorUserId: null,
});
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "agent",
agentId: assigneeAgentId,
companyId: "company-1",
runId: "run-self",
}),
)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "log line", reopen: true });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
expect.objectContaining({ status: "todo" }),
);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({ reason: "issue_reopened_via_comment" }),
);
});
// Same guard on cancelled status — explicit resume must use `resume: true`,
// a log-class self-comment with `reopen: true` is not a reopen signal.
it("rejects bare agent reopen requests on cancelled issues before writing a comment", async () => {
const assigneeAgentId = "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222";
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("cancelled"));
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...makeIssue("cancelled"),
...patch,
}),
);
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-1",
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
companyId: "company-1",
body: "log line",
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
authorAgentId: assigneeAgentId,
authorUserId: null,
});
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "agent",
agentId: assigneeAgentId,
companyId: "company-1",
runId: "run-self",
}),
)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "log line", reopen: true });
expect(res.status).toBe(409);
expect(res.body.error).toBe(
"Cancelled issues must be restored through the dedicated restore flow",
);
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
expect.objectContaining({ status: "todo" }),
);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({ reason: "issue_reopened_via_comment" }),
);
});
// The guard must block explicit reopen=true + comment by the assignee agent
// on their own done issue (assignee self-comments are log lines, not reopen
// signals; explicit resume intent is delivered via `resume: true` instead).
it("does not reopen via PATCH comment+reopen when the assignee agent is the actor on a done issue", async () => {
const assigneeAgentId = "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222";
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("done"));
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...makeIssue("done"),
...patch,
}),
);
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "agent",
agentId: assigneeAgentId,
companyId: "company-1",
runId: "run-self",
}),
)
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ comment: "log line", reopen: true });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockLogActivity).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
action: "issue.updated",
details: expect.objectContaining({ reopened: true }),
}),
);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({ reason: "issue_reopened_via_comment" }),
);
});
// The guard compares against the issue's current assignee, not the requested
// one — so an admin agent reassigning a different agent's terminal issue to
// themselves with comment + reopen=true still reopens as today (AC-3).
it("still reopens a done issue via PATCH when a different agent reassigns to self with reopen=true", async () => {
const otherAgentId = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
mockAccessService.decide.mockImplementation(
async (input: { action?: string }) => ({
allowed: true,
action: input.action,
reason: "allow_explicit_grant",
explanation: "Allowed by test grant.",
}),
);
const issue = makeIssue("done");
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) =>
makeIssueUpdateReceipt(issue, patch),
);
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "agent",
agentId: otherAgentId,
companyId: "company-1",
runId: "run-other",
}),
)
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({
comment: "taking over",
reopen: true,
assigneeAgentId: otherAgentId,
});
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
expect.objectContaining({
assigneeAgentId: otherAgentId,
status: "todo",
}),
);
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
action: "issue.updated",
details: expect.objectContaining({
reopened: true,
reopenedFrom: "done",
status: "todo",
}),
}),
);
});
it("moves assigned blocked issues back to todo via POST comments", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("blocked"));
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...makeIssue("blocked"),
...patch,
}),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "please continue" });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
{ status: "todo" },
);
await waitForWakeup(() =>
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
expect.objectContaining({
reason: "issue_reopened_via_comment",
payload: expect.objectContaining({
commentId: "comment-1",
reopenedFrom: "blocked",
mutation: "comment",
}),
contextSnapshot: expect.objectContaining({
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
wakeCommentId: "comment-1",
wakeReason: "issue_reopened_via_comment",
reopenedFrom: "blocked",
}),
}),
),
);
});
it("moves in-progress issues with a scheduled retry back to todo via POST human comments", async () => {
const issue = {
...makeIssue("in_progress"),
executionRunId: "retry-run-1",
};
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.getCurrentScheduledRetry.mockResolvedValue(createScheduledRetry());
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...issue,
...patch,
updatedAt: new Date(),
}),
);
mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun.mockResolvedValue({
id: "retry-run-1",
companyId: "company-1",
agentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
status: "cancelled",
});
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "I added the missing detail; please continue." });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
{ status: "todo" },
);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun).toHaveBeenCalledWith("retry-run-1", undefined, { expectedStatus: "scheduled_retry" });
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
action: "issue.updated",
details: expect.objectContaining({
status: "todo",
scheduledRetrySupersededByComment: true,
scheduledRetryRunId: "retry-run-1",
cancelledScheduledRetryRunId: "retry-run-1",
}),
}),
);
await waitForWakeup(() =>
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
expect.objectContaining({
reason: "issue_commented",
payload: expect.objectContaining({
commentId: "comment-1",
mutation: "comment",
}),
contextSnapshot: expect.objectContaining({
wakeReason: "issue_commented",
source: "issue.comment",
}),
}),
),
);
});
it.each([
["post", "queued"],
["post", "running"],
["patch", "queued"],
["patch", "running"],
] as const)("preserves a %s comment's %s retry execution", async (method, status) => {
const issue = {
...makeIssue("in_progress"),
executionRunId: "retry-run-1",
};
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.getCurrentScheduledRetry.mockResolvedValue({
...createScheduledRetry(),
status,
});
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(async (_id, patch) => ({ ...issue, ...patch }));
const app = await installActor(createApp());
const res = method === "post"
? await request(app).post(`/api/issues/${issue.id}/comments`).send({ body: "Recovery evidence is attached." })
: await request(app).patch(`/api/issues/${issue.id}`).send({ comment: "Recovery evidence is attached." });
expect(res.status).toBe(method === "post" ? 201 : 200);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(issue.id, expect.objectContaining({ status: "todo" }));
await waitForWakeup(() => expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
issue.assigneeAgentId,
expect.objectContaining({ reason: "issue_commented" }),
));
});
it.each(["post", "patch"] as const)("keeps the task active when a retry is promoted during a %s comment", async method => {
const issue = { ...makeIssue("in_progress"), executionRunId: "retry-run-1" };
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.getCurrentScheduledRetry.mockResolvedValue(createScheduledRetry());
mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun.mockResolvedValue({ id: "retry-run-1", status: "running" });
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(async (_id, patch) => ({ ...issue, ...patch }));
const app = await installActor(createApp());
const res = method === "post"
? await request(app).post(`/api/issues/${issue.id}/comments`).send({ body: "Additional context for the active run." })
: await request(app).patch(`/api/issues/${issue.id}`).send({ comment: "Additional context for the active run." });
expect(res.status).toBe(method === "post" ? 201 : 200);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun).toHaveBeenCalledWith("retry-run-1", undefined, { expectedStatus: "scheduled_retry" });
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(issue.id, expect.objectContaining({ status: "todo" }));
expect(mockLogActivity).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.anything(), expect.objectContaining({ action: "heartbeat.cancelled" }));
await waitForWakeup(() => expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
issue.assigneeAgentId, expect.objectContaining({ reason: "issue_commented" }),
));
});
it("does not move scheduled-retry issues to todo when POST comment retry cancellation fails", async () => {
const issue = {
...makeIssue("in_progress"),
executionRunId: "retry-run-1",
};
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.getCurrentScheduledRetry.mockResolvedValue(createScheduledRetry());
mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun.mockRejectedValue(
new Error("cancel failed"),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "I added the missing detail; please continue." });
expect(res.status).toBe(500);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun).toHaveBeenCalledWith("retry-run-1", undefined, { expectedStatus: "scheduled_retry" });
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockLogActivity).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({ action: "issue.updated" }),
);
});
it("keeps ordinary in-progress POST human comments in progress when no scheduled retry exists", async () => {
const issue = makeIssue("in_progress");
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "Checking in without retry state." });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.getCurrentScheduledRetry).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
);
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
await waitForWakeup(() =>
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
expect.objectContaining({
reason: "issue_commented",
}),
),
);
});
it("skips the assignee wakeup when the issue is concurrently cancelled while the comment is being written", async () => {
const app = await installActor(createApp());
// First call is the route's pre-insert fetch; second is the wake-decision
// re-fetch. A stale wake decision would use the first (open, assigned)
// snapshot instead of the second (cancelled) one.
mockIssueService.getById
.mockResolvedValueOnce(makeIssue("in_progress"))
.mockResolvedValueOnce(makeIssue("cancelled"));
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-race-cancel",
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
companyId: "company-1",
body: "Still working on this?",
});
const res = await request(app)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "Still working on this?" });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).toHaveBeenCalled();
// Give any (incorrect) fire-and-forget wakeup a moment to fire before asserting its absence.
await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 25));
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("wakes the freshly reassigned agent, not the pre-insert snapshot's assignee, when the issue is concurrently reassigned", async () => {
const app = await installActor(createApp());
const reassignedAgentId = "44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444";
mockIssueService.getById
.mockResolvedValueOnce(makeIssue("in_progress"))
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
...makeIssue("in_progress"),
assigneeAgentId: reassignedAgentId,
});
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-race-reassign",
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
companyId: "company-1",
body: "Status update",
});
const res = await request(app)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "Status update" });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
await waitForWakeup(() =>
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
reassignedAgentId,
expect.objectContaining({ reason: "issue_commented" }),
),
);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
expect.anything(),
);
});
it("keeps the comment write successful and falls back to the in-hand snapshot when the wake re-fetch fails", async () => {
const app = await installActor(createApp());
// The comment is already committed before the wake-decision re-fetch runs.
// If that best-effort re-fetch throws, the route must still return 201 for
// the persisted comment (a 5xx would invite a retry that duplicates it) and
// fall back to the in-hand snapshot so a legitimate wake isn't dropped.
mockIssueService.getById
.mockResolvedValueOnce(makeIssue("in_progress"))
.mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error("transient read failure"));
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-refetch-fail",
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
companyId: "company-1",
body: "Still here?",
});
const res = await request(app)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "Still here?" });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).toHaveBeenCalled();
await waitForWakeup(() =>
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
expect.objectContaining({ reason: "issue_commented" }),
),
);
});
it("passes validated comment presentation fields to trusted board comment writes", async () => {
const app = await installActor(createApp());
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("todo"));
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-1",
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
companyId: "company-1",
authorType: "user",
authorAgentId: null,
authorUserId: "local-board",
body: "Paperclip needs a disposition before this issue can continue.",
presentation: {
kind: "system_notice",
tone: "warning",
detailsDefaultOpen: false,
},
metadata: {
version: 1,
sections: [
{
rows: [
{
type: "key_value",
label: "Cause",
value: "successful_run_missing_state",
},
],
},
],
},
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
});
mockIssueService.findMentionedAgents.mockResolvedValue([]);
const metadata = {
version: 1,
sections: [
{
rows: [
{
type: "key_value",
label: "Cause",
value: "successful_run_missing_state",
},
],
},
],
};
const presentation = { kind: "system_notice", tone: "warning" };
const res = await request(app)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({
body: "Paperclip needs a disposition before this issue can continue.",
presentation,
metadata,
});
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
"Paperclip needs a disposition before this issue can continue.",
{
agentId: undefined,
userId: "local-board",
runId: null,
onBehalfOfUserId: undefined,
},
{
attachmentIds: undefined,
authorType: "user",
authorizationReason: "allow_board_actor",
clientRequestId: undefined,
mirrorToSlack: true,
presentation: {
kind: "system_notice",
tone: "warning",
detailsDefaultOpen: false,
},
metadata,
sourceTrust: null,
},
mockTx,
);
});
it("rejects structured comment presentation fields from agent-authenticated writes", async () => {
const app = await installActor(createApp(), agentActor());
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("todo"));
const res = await request(app)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({
body: "Hidden details",
presentation: { kind: "system_notice", tone: "warning" },
metadata: {
version: 1,
sections: [
{
rows: [
{
type: "key_value",
label: "Cause",
value: "covert_channel_attempt",
},
],
},
],
},
});
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("derives compact presentation for comments from source-scoped recovery runs", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("in_progress"));
mockDbSelectWhere.mockImplementation(() => ({
then: (
onFulfilled: (rows: unknown[]) => unknown,
onRejected?: (reason: unknown) => unknown,
) =>
Promise.resolve([
{
id: "run-1",
companyId: "company-1",
agentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
contextSnapshot: {
wakeReason: "source_scoped_recovery_action",
recoveryCause: "process_lost",
},
},
]).then(onFulfilled, onRejected),
}));
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp(), agentActor()))
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({
body: "Recovered the execution path.\nHanded back to the original owner.",
});
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
"Recovered the execution path.\nHanded back to the original owner.",
{
agentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
userId: undefined,
runId: "run-1",
onBehalfOfUserId: null,
},
expect.objectContaining({
attachmentIds: undefined,
authorType: "agent",
presentation: {
kind: "system_notice",
tone: "info",
title: "Recovered the execution path.",
detailsDefaultOpen: false,
density: "compact",
},
}),
mockDb,
);
});
it("leaves normal agent comments without derived presentation", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("in_progress"));
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp(), agentActor()))
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "Normal work update." });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
"Normal work update.",
{
agentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
userId: undefined,
runId: "run-1",
onBehalfOfUserId: null,
},
expect.objectContaining({ attachmentIds: undefined, presentation: null }),
mockDb,
);
});
it("keeps successful-run missing-state recovery comments fully visible", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("in_progress"));
mockDbSelectWhere.mockImplementation(() => ({
then: (
onFulfilled: (rows: unknown[]) => unknown,
onRejected?: (reason: unknown) => unknown,
) =>
Promise.resolve([
{
id: "run-1",
companyId: "company-1",
agentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
contextSnapshot: {
wakeReason: "source_scoped_recovery_action",
recoveryCause: "successful_run_missing_state",
},
},
]).then(onFulfilled, onRejected),
}));
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp(), agentActor()))
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "The run completed; here is the required summary." });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
"The run completed; here is the required summary.",
{
agentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
userId: undefined,
runId: "run-1",
onBehalfOfUserId: null,
},
expect.objectContaining({ attachmentIds: undefined, presentation: null }),
mockDb,
);
});
it("rejects invalid comment metadata before writing a comment", async () => {
const app = await installActor(createApp());
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("todo"));
const res = await request(app)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({
body: "Invalid metadata",
metadata: { version: 1, arbitrary: true },
});
expect(res.status).toBe(400);
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("does not move dependency-blocked issues to todo via POST comments", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("blocked"));
mockIssueService.getDependencyReadiness.mockResolvedValue({
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
blockerIssueIds: ["33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333"],
unresolvedBlockerIssueIds: ["33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333"],
unresolvedBlockerCount: 1,
allBlockersDone: false,
isDependencyReady: false,
});
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "what is happening?" });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
await waitForWakeup(() =>
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
expect.objectContaining({
reason: "issue_commented",
payload: expect.objectContaining({
commentId: "comment-1",
mutation: "comment",
}),
contextSnapshot: expect.objectContaining({
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
wakeCommentId: "comment-1",
wakeReason: "issue_commented",
}),
}),
),
);
});
it("does not implicitly reopen a blocked issue via PATCH when the same request wires blockers", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("blocked"));
mockIssueService.getRelationSummaries.mockResolvedValue({
blockedBy: [],
blocks: [],
});
mockIssueService.getDependencyReadiness.mockResolvedValue({
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
blockerIssueIds: [],
unresolvedBlockerIssueIds: [],
unresolvedBlockerCount: 0,
allBlockersDone: true,
isDependencyReady: true,
});
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...makeIssue("blocked"),
...patch,
}),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({
blockedByIssueIds: ["33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333"],
comment: "wired the dependency this issue is waiting on",
});
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalled();
const patch = mockIssueService.update.mock.calls[0][1] as Record<
string,
unknown
>;
expect(patch.status).toBeUndefined();
expect(patch.blockedByIssueIds).toEqual([
"33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
]);
});
it("still implicitly reopens a blocked issue via PATCH when the same request clears blockers", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("blocked"));
mockIssueService.getRelationSummaries.mockResolvedValue({
blockedBy: [],
blocks: [],
});
mockIssueService.getDependencyReadiness.mockResolvedValue({
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
blockerIssueIds: [],
unresolvedBlockerIssueIds: [],
unresolvedBlockerCount: 0,
allBlockersDone: true,
isDependencyReady: true,
});
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...makeIssue("blocked"),
...patch,
}),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({
blockedByIssueIds: [],
comment: "nothing left to wait on, please continue",
});
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalled();
const patch = mockIssueService.update.mock.calls[0][1] as Record<
string,
unknown
>;
expect(patch.status).toBe("todo");
});
it("does not implicitly reopen closed issues via POST comments when no agent is assigned", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
...makeIssue("done"),
assigneeAgentId: null,
assigneeUserId: "local-board",
});
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "hello" });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("does not implicitly reopen done issues via POST comments when the comment runId matches the issue's checkout run", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
...makeIssue("done"),
checkoutRunId: "run-same-as-actor",
executionRunId: null,
});
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
companyIds: ["company-1"],
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
runId: "run-same-as-actor",
}),
)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "Done — final note from the run that owns the issue" });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
expect.objectContaining({ status: "todo" }),
);
});
it("does not implicitly reopen done issues via POST comments when the comment runId matches the issue's execution run", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
...makeIssue("done"),
checkoutRunId: null,
executionRunId: "run-same-as-actor",
});
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
companyIds: ["company-1"],
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
runId: "run-same-as-actor",
}),
)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "Done — note from the still-active execution run" });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
expect.objectContaining({ status: "todo" }),
);
});
it("still implicitly reopens done issues via POST comments when the comment runId differs from the issue's owning run", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
...makeIssue("done"),
checkoutRunId: "run-owning",
executionRunId: "run-owning",
});
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...makeIssue("done"),
...patch,
}),
);
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
companyIds: ["company-1"],
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
runId: "run-different",
}),
)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "Real human follow-up — please reopen" });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
{ status: "todo" },
);
});
it("does not implicitly reopen done issues via the PATCH comment path when actor runId matches the issue's checkout run", async () => {
const issue = {
...makeIssue("done"),
checkoutRunId: "run-same-as-actor",
executionRunId: null,
};
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...issue,
...patch,
}),
);
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
companyIds: ["company-1"],
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
runId: "run-same-as-actor",
}),
)
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ comment: "Done — final note from the run that owns the issue" });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
expect.objectContaining({ status: "todo" }),
);
});
it("moves assigned blocked issues back to todo via the PATCH comment path", async () => {
const issue = makeIssue("blocked");
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) =>
makeIssueUpdateReceipt(issue, patch),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ comment: "please continue" });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
expect.objectContaining({
status: "todo",
actorAgentId: null,
actorUserId: "local-board",
}),
);
await waitForWakeup(() =>
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
expect.objectContaining({
reason: "issue_reopened_via_comment",
payload: expect.objectContaining({
commentId: "comment-1",
reopenedFrom: "blocked",
mutation: "comment",
}),
}),
),
);
});
it("moves in-progress issues with a scheduled retry back to todo via the PATCH comment path", async () => {
const issue = {
...makeIssue("in_progress"),
executionRunId: "retry-run-1",
};
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.getCurrentScheduledRetry.mockResolvedValue(createScheduledRetry());
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...issue,
...patch,
updatedAt: new Date(),
}),
);
mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun.mockResolvedValue({
id: "retry-run-1",
companyId: "company-1",
agentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
status: "cancelled",
});
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ comment: "Retry window is over; please continue." });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
expect.objectContaining({
status: "todo",
actorAgentId: null,
actorUserId: "local-board",
}),
);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun).toHaveBeenCalledWith("retry-run-1", undefined, { expectedStatus: "scheduled_retry" });
await waitForWakeup(() =>
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
expect.objectContaining({
reason: "issue_commented",
payload: expect.objectContaining({
commentId: "comment-1",
mutation: "comment",
}),
}),
),
);
});
it("does not move scheduled-retry issues to todo when PATCH comment retry cancellation fails", async () => {
const issue = {
...makeIssue("in_progress"),
executionRunId: "retry-run-1",
};
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.getCurrentScheduledRetry.mockResolvedValue(createScheduledRetry());
mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun.mockRejectedValue(
new Error("cancel failed"),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ comment: "Retry window is over; please continue." });
expect(res.status).toBe(500);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun).toHaveBeenCalledWith("retry-run-1", undefined, { expectedStatus: "scheduled_retry" });
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockLogActivity).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({ action: "issue.updated" }),
);
});
it("allows default-open non-assignee PATCH comments on closed issues without reopening", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("done"));
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-1",
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
companyId: "company-1",
body: "hello",
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
authorAgentId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
authorUserId: null,
});
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...makeIssue("done"),
...patch,
}),
);
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "agent",
agentId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
companyId: "company-1",
source: "agent_key",
runId: "88888888-8888-4888-8888-888888888888",
}),
)
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ comment: "hello" });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("does not move dependency-blocked issues to todo via the PATCH comment path", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("blocked"));
mockIssueService.getDependencyReadiness.mockResolvedValue({
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
blockerIssueIds: ["33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333"],
unresolvedBlockerIssueIds: ["33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333"],
unresolvedBlockerCount: 1,
allBlockersDone: false,
isDependencyReady: false,
});
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...makeIssue("blocked"),
...patch,
}),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ comment: "what is happening?" });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
expect.objectContaining({
actorAgentId: null,
actorUserId: "local-board",
}),
);
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
expect.objectContaining({ status: "todo" }),
);
await waitForWakeup(() =>
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
expect.objectContaining({
reason: "issue_commented",
payload: expect.objectContaining({
commentId: "comment-1",
mutation: "comment",
}),
}),
),
);
});
it("wakes the assignee when an assigned blocked issue moves back to todo", async () => {
const issue = makeIssue("blocked");
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...issue,
...patch,
updatedAt: new Date(),
}),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ status: "todo" });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
await waitForWakeup(() =>
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
expect.objectContaining({
source: "automation",
triggerDetail: "system",
reason: "issue_status_changed",
payload: expect.objectContaining({
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
mutation: "update",
}),
}),
),
);
});
it("wakes the assignee when a board user moves an assigned review back to todo", async () => {
const issue = makeIssue("in_review");
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...issue,
...patch,
updatedAt: new Date(),
}),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ status: "todo" });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
await waitForWakeup(() =>
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1),
);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
expect.objectContaining({
source: "automation",
triggerDetail: "system",
reason: "issue_status_changed",
payload: expect.objectContaining({
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
mutation: "update",
}),
requestedByActorType: "user",
requestedByActorId: "local-board",
contextSnapshot: expect.objectContaining({
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
source: "issue.status_change",
}),
}),
);
});
it("does not wake the assignee when the assignee agent moves its own review back to todo", async () => {
const issue = makeIssue("in_review");
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...issue,
...patch,
updatedAt: new Date(),
}),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp(), agentActor()))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ status: "todo" });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("does not enqueue a resume wake when an unassigned review moves back to todo", async () => {
const issue = { ...makeIssue("in_review"), assigneeAgentId: null };
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...issue,
...patch,
updatedAt: new Date(),
}),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ status: "todo" });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("keeps the existing backlog to todo assignee wake", async () => {
const issue = makeIssue("backlog");
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...issue,
...patch,
updatedAt: new Date(),
}),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ status: "todo" });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
await waitForWakeup(() =>
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1),
);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
expect.objectContaining({ reason: "issue_status_changed" }),
);
});
it("wakes the assignee when an assigned done issue moves back to todo", async () => {
const issue = makeIssue("done");
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...issue,
...patch,
updatedAt: new Date(),
}),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ status: "todo" });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
expect.objectContaining({
source: "automation",
triggerDetail: "system",
reason: "issue_status_changed",
payload: expect.objectContaining({
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
mutation: "update",
}),
contextSnapshot: expect.objectContaining({
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
source: "issue.status_change",
}),
}),
);
});
it("explicit same-agent resume works through the PATCH comment path", async () => {
const issue = makeIssue("done");
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) =>
makeIssueUpdateReceipt(issue, patch),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp(), agentActor()))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ comment: "please validate the follow-up", resume: true });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
expect.objectContaining({
status: "todo",
actorAgentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
actorUserId: null,
}),
);
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
action: "issue.comment_added",
details: expect.objectContaining({
commentId: "comment-1",
resumeIntent: true,
followUpRequested: true,
}),
}),
);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
expect.objectContaining({
reason: "issue_reopened_via_comment",
requestedByActorType: "agent",
requestedByActorId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
payload: expect.objectContaining({
commentId: "comment-1",
reopenedFrom: "done",
resumeIntent: true,
followUpRequested: true,
}),
}),
);
});
it("keeps generic same-agent comments on closed issues inert", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("done"));
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp(), agentActor()))
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "follow-up note without intent" });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("explicit same-agent resume comments reopen closed issues and mark the wake payload", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("done"));
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...makeIssue("done"),
...patch,
}),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp(), agentActor()))
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "please validate the follow-up", resume: true });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
{ status: "todo" },
);
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
action: "issue.comment_added",
details: expect.objectContaining({
commentId: "comment-1",
resumeIntent: true,
followUpRequested: true,
}),
}),
);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
expect.objectContaining({
reason: "issue_reopened_via_comment",
payload: expect.objectContaining({
commentId: "comment-1",
reopenedFrom: "done",
resumeIntent: true,
followUpRequested: true,
}),
contextSnapshot: expect.objectContaining({
wakeReason: "issue_reopened_via_comment",
resumeIntent: true,
followUpRequested: true,
}),
}),
);
});
it("honors explicit agent resume intent from a default-open peer as an agent-class wake", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("done"));
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...makeIssue("done"),
...patch,
}),
);
mockAccessService.decide.mockImplementation(
async (input: { action?: string }) => ({
allowed: input.action !== "tasks:manage_active_checkouts",
action: input.action,
reason:
input.action === "issue:comment" || input.action === "issue:mutate"
? "allow_visible_issue_write"
: "deny_missing_grant",
explanation: "Allowed by the shared visible-issue write rule.",
}),
);
const res = await request(
await installActor(
createApp(),
agentActor("44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444"),
),
)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "restart someone else's work", resume: true });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
{ status: "todo" },
);
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
expect.objectContaining({
requestedByActorType: "agent",
reason: "issue_reopened_via_comment",
payload: expect.objectContaining({ resumeIntent: true }),
}),
);
});
it("bounds a cross-agent reply loop: peer comments wake and assignee self-replies do not", async () => {
const agentA = "44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444";
const agentB = "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222";
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
...makeIssue("todo"),
assigneeAgentId: agentB,
});
let res = await request(await installActor(createApp(), agentActor(agentA)))
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "A asks B for input" });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
await waitForWakeup(() =>
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
agentB,
expect.objectContaining({
reason: "issue_commented",
requestedByActorType: "agent",
requestedByActorId: agentA,
}),
),
);
mockHeartbeatService.wakeup.mockClear();
res = await request(await installActor(createApp(), agentActor(agentB)))
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "B replies on B's own issue" });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
await new Promise<void>((resolve) => setImmediate(resolve));
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
...makeIssue("todo"),
assigneeAgentId: agentA,
});
res = await request(await installActor(createApp(), agentActor(agentB)))
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "B explicitly comments back on A's issue" });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
await waitForWakeup(() =>
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
agentA,
expect.objectContaining({
reason: "issue_commented",
requestedByActorType: "agent",
requestedByActorId: agentB,
}),
),
);
});
it.each([
[
"comment",
(app: express.Express) =>
request(app)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "cross-issue attempt 21" }),
],
[
"update",
(app: express.Express) =>
request(app)
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ title: "cross-issue attempt 21" }),
],
] as const)(
"fails closed when a run exceeds the cross-issue %s cap",
async (kind, sendRequest) => {
const agentA = "44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444";
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
...makeIssue("todo"),
assigneeAgentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
});
mockHeartbeatService.getRun.mockResolvedValue({
id: "run-1",
companyId: "company-1",
agentId: agentA,
responsibleUserId: null,
contextSnapshot: { issueId: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa" },
});
mockObserveCrossIssueInfluence.mockResolvedValue({
allowed: false,
mode: "enforce",
count: 21,
cap: 20,
enforceAt: "2026-08-11T00:00:00.000Z",
});
const res = await sendRequest(
await installActor(createApp(), agentActor(agentA)),
);
expect(res.status).toBe(429);
expect(res.body.error).toContain(
"limited to 20 cross-issue comments or updates",
);
expect(mockObserveCrossIssueInfluence).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
runId: "run-1",
agentId: agentA,
targetIssueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
kind,
}),
);
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
},
);
it.each([
["hide", "2026-08-04T18:00:00.000Z"],
["unhide", null],
] as const)(
"counts a cross-issue %s PATCH before mutation",
async (_label, hiddenAt) => {
const agentA = "44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444";
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
...makeIssue("todo"),
assigneeAgentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
hiddenAt:
hiddenAt === null ? new Date("2026-08-04T17:00:00.000Z") : null,
});
mockObserveCrossIssueInfluence.mockResolvedValue({
allowed: false,
mode: "enforce",
count: 21,
cap: 20,
enforceAt: "2026-08-11T00:00:00.000Z",
});
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), agentActor(agentA)),
)
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ hiddenAt });
expect(res.status).toBe(429);
expect(res.body.error).toContain(
"limited to 20 cross-issue comments or updates",
);
expect(mockObserveCrossIssueInfluence).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockObserveCrossIssueInfluence).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({ kind: "update" }),
);
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
},
);
it("counts bundled cross-issue PATCH updates and comments separately before mutation", async () => {
const agentA = "44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444";
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
...makeIssue("todo"),
assigneeAgentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
});
const app = await installActor(createApp(), agentActor(agentA));
mockObserveCrossIssueInfluence
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
allowed: true,
mode: "enforce",
count: 20,
cap: 20,
enforceAt: "2026-08-11T00:00:00.000Z",
})
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
allowed: false,
mode: "enforce",
count: 21,
cap: 20,
enforceAt: "2026-08-11T00:00:00.000Z",
});
const res = await request(app)
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ title: "Bundled update", comment: "Bundled comment" });
expect(res.status).toBe(429);
expect(
mockObserveCrossIssueInfluence.mock.calls.map(([, input]) => input.kind),
).toEqual(["update", "comment"]);
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("counts a comment-only cross-issue PATCH once", async () => {
const agentA = "44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444";
const existing = {
...makeIssue("todo"),
assigneeAgentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
};
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(existing);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...existing,
...patch,
}),
);
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), agentActor(agentA)),
)
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ comment: "Comment without an issue update" });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockObserveCrossIssueInfluence).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockObserveCrossIssueInfluence).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({ kind: "comment" }),
);
});
it.each([
[
"comment",
(app: express.Express) =>
request(app)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "cross-issue write" }),
],
[
"update",
(app: express.Express) =>
request(app)
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ title: "cross-issue write" }),
],
] as const)(
"rejects cross-issue %s writes without a run header",
async (_kind, sendRequest) => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("todo"));
const actor = {
...agentActor("44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444"),
runId: undefined,
};
const res = await sendRequest(await installActor(createApp(), actor));
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(res.body.details).toEqual({
code: "cross_issue_influence_run_context_required",
});
expect(mockHeartbeatService.getRun).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockObserveCrossIssueInfluence).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
},
);
it(
"rejects comment and PATCH writes when influence validation rejects the run",
async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("todo"));
mockObserveCrossIssueInfluence.mockRejectedValue(
new HttpError(
403,
"Agent issue comments and updates require a valid heartbeat run so cross-issue influence can be contained",
{ code: "cross_issue_influence_run_context_required" },
),
);
const actor = agentActor("44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444");
const commentRes = await request(await installActor(createApp(), actor))
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "cross-issue write" });
const updateRes = await request(await installActor(createApp(), actor))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ title: "cross-issue write" });
for (const res of [commentRes, updateRes]) {
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(res.body.details).toEqual({
code: "cross_issue_influence_run_context_required",
});
}
expect(mockObserveCrossIssueInfluence).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
},
);
it("rejects explicit resume intent under an active pause hold", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("done"));
mockIssueTreeControlService.getActivePauseHoldGate.mockResolvedValue({
holdId: "hold-1",
rootIssueId: "root-1",
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
isRoot: false,
mode: "pause",
reason: "reviewing",
releasePolicy: null,
});
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp(), agentActor()))
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "please resume", resume: true });
expect(res.status).toBe(409);
expect(res.body.error).toBe(
"Issue follow-up blocked by active subtree pause hold",
);
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("honors explicit resume intent on cancelled issues", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue("cancelled"));
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...makeIssue("cancelled"),
...patch,
}),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp(), agentActor()))
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: "please resume", resume: true });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
{ status: "todo" },
);
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
expect.objectContaining({
requestedByActorType: "agent",
reason: "issue_reopened_via_comment",
payload: expect.objectContaining({
reopenedFrom: "cancelled",
resumeIntent: true,
}),
}),
);
});
it("interrupts an active run before a combined comment update", async () => {
const issue = {
...makeIssue("todo"),
executionRunId: "run-1",
};
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...issue,
...patch,
}),
);
mockHeartbeatService.getRun.mockResolvedValue({
id: "run-1",
companyId: "company-1",
agentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
status: "running",
});
mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun.mockResolvedValue({
id: "run-1",
companyId: "company-1",
agentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
status: "cancelled",
});
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({
comment: "hello",
interrupt: true,
assigneeAgentId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
});
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.getRun).toHaveBeenCalledWith("run-1");
expect(mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"run-1",
"Interrupted by board comment",
expect.objectContaining({
errorCode: "operator_interrupted",
resultJson: expect.objectContaining({
operatorInterrupted: true,
interruptionSource: "issue_comment_interrupt",
interruptedIssueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
}),
eventMessage: "run interrupted by board comment",
eventPayload: expect.objectContaining({
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
source: "issue_comment_interrupt",
}),
}),
);
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
action: "heartbeat.cancelled",
details: expect.objectContaining({
source: "issue_comment_interrupt",
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
cancellationKind: "operator_interrupted",
operatorInterrupted: true,
}),
}),
);
});
it("cancels an active run when an issue is marked cancelled", async () => {
const issue = {
...makeIssue("in_progress"),
executionRunId: "run-1",
};
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...issue,
...patch,
}),
);
mockHeartbeatService.getRun.mockResolvedValue({
id: "run-1",
companyId: "company-1",
agentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
status: "running",
});
mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun.mockResolvedValue({
id: "run-1",
companyId: "company-1",
agentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
status: "cancelled",
});
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ status: "cancelled" });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.getRun).toHaveBeenCalledWith("run-1");
expect(mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun).toHaveBeenCalledWith("run-1");
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
action: "heartbeat.cancelled",
details: expect.objectContaining({
source: "issue_status_cancelled",
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
}),
}),
);
});
it("does not cancel active runs when an issue is marked done", async () => {
const issue = {
...makeIssue("in_progress"),
executionRunId: "run-1",
};
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...issue,
...patch,
}),
);
mockHeartbeatService.getRun.mockResolvedValue({
id: "run-1",
companyId: "company-1",
agentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
status: "running",
});
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ status: "done" });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("writes decision ids into executionState and inserts the decision inside the transaction", async () => {
const policy = await normalizePolicy({
stages: [
{
id: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
type: "approval",
participants: [{ type: "user", userId: "local-board" }],
},
],
})!;
const issue = {
...makeIssue("todo"),
status: "in_review",
assigneeAgentId: null,
assigneeUserId: "local-board",
executionPolicy: policy,
executionState: {
status: "pending",
currentStageId: policy.stages[0].id,
currentStageIndex: 0,
currentStageType: "approval",
currentParticipant: { type: "user", userId: "local-board" },
returnAssignee: {
type: "agent",
agentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
},
completedStageIds: [],
lastDecisionId: null,
lastDecisionOutcome: null,
},
};
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>, tx?: unknown) => ({
...issue,
...patch,
executionState: patch.executionState,
status: "done",
completedAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
_tx: tx,
}),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ status: "done", comment: "Approved for ship" });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockDb.transaction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
expect.objectContaining({
executionState: expect.objectContaining({
status: "completed",
lastDecisionId: expect.any(String),
lastDecisionOutcome: "approved",
}),
}),
mockTx,
expect.any(Array),
expect.any(Array),
);
const updatePatch = mockIssueService.update.mock.calls[0]?.[1] as Record<
string,
any
>;
const decisionId = updatePatch.executionState.lastDecisionId;
expect(mockTxInsertValues).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.objectContaining({
id: decisionId,
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
outcome: "approved",
body: "Approved for ship",
}),
);
});
it("auto-approves a reviewer comment with the APPROVED review marker", async () => {
const reviewerAgentId = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
const policy = await createAgentReviewPolicy(reviewerAgentId)!;
const issue = createReviewIssue(policy, reviewerAgentId);
const reviewBody = "## Review: PAP-580 - APPROVED\n\nLooks good.";
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-review-1",
issueId: issue.id,
companyId: issue.companyId,
body: reviewBody,
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
authorAgentId: reviewerAgentId,
authorUserId: null,
});
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>, tx?: unknown) => ({
...issue,
...patch,
executionState: patch.executionState,
status: "done",
completedAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
_tx: tx,
}),
);
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "agent",
agentId: reviewerAgentId,
companyId: "company-1",
source: "agent_key",
runId: "run-review-1",
}),
)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: reviewBody });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(res.body).toMatchObject({
id: "comment-review-1",
issueId: issue.id,
body: reviewBody,
});
expect(mockDb.transaction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
expect.objectContaining({
status: "done",
actorAgentId: reviewerAgentId,
actorUserId: null,
executionState: expect.objectContaining({
status: "completed",
lastDecisionId: expect.any(String),
lastDecisionOutcome: "approved",
}),
}),
mockTx,
undefined,
expect.any(Array),
);
});
it("auto-approves a reviewer comment with structured review metadata", async () => {
const reviewerAgentId = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
const policy = await createAgentReviewPolicy(reviewerAgentId)!;
const issue = createReviewIssue(policy, reviewerAgentId);
const reviewBody = "kind: review\ndecision: approved\nsummary: ship it";
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-review-2",
issueId: issue.id,
companyId: issue.companyId,
body: reviewBody,
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
authorAgentId: reviewerAgentId,
authorUserId: null,
});
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>, tx?: unknown) => ({
...issue,
...patch,
executionState: patch.executionState,
status: "done",
completedAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
_tx: tx,
}),
);
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "agent",
agentId: reviewerAgentId,
companyId: "company-1",
source: "agent_key",
runId: "run-review-2",
}),
)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: reviewBody });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(res.body).toMatchObject({
id: "comment-review-2",
issueId: issue.id,
body: reviewBody,
});
expect(mockDb.transaction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
expect.objectContaining({
status: "done",
actorAgentId: reviewerAgentId,
actorUserId: null,
executionState: expect.objectContaining({
status: "completed",
lastDecisionId: expect.any(String),
lastDecisionOutcome: "approved",
}),
}),
mockTx,
undefined,
expect.any(Array),
);
});
it("auto-approves a reviewer comment and wakes dependents when the final blocker resolves", async () => {
const reviewerAgentId = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
const dependentAgentId = "44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444";
const policy = await createAgentReviewPolicy(reviewerAgentId)!;
const issue = {
...makeIssue("todo"),
status: "in_review",
assigneeAgentId: reviewerAgentId,
executionPolicy: policy,
executionState: {
status: "pending",
currentStageId: policy.stages[0].id,
currentStageIndex: 0,
currentStageType: "review",
currentParticipant: { type: "agent", agentId: reviewerAgentId },
returnAssignee: {
type: "agent",
agentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
},
completedStageIds: [],
lastDecisionId: null,
lastDecisionOutcome: null,
},
parentId: null,
};
const reviewBody = "## Review: PAP-580 - APPROVED\n\nLooks good.";
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-review-3",
issueId: issue.id,
companyId: issue.companyId,
body: reviewBody,
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
authorAgentId: reviewerAgentId,
authorUserId: null,
});
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>, tx?: unknown) => ({
...issue,
...patch,
executionState: patch.executionState,
status: "done",
completedAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
_tx: tx,
}),
);
mockIssueService.listWakeableBlockedDependents.mockResolvedValue([
{
id: "dependent-1",
assigneeAgentId: dependentAgentId,
blockerIssueIds: [issue.id],
},
]);
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "agent",
agentId: reviewerAgentId,
companyId: "company-1",
source: "agent_key",
runId: "run-review-3",
}),
)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: reviewBody });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.listWakeableBlockedDependents).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
issue.id,
);
await waitForWakeup(() => {
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
dependentAgentId,
expect.objectContaining({
reason: "issue_blockers_resolved",
payload: expect.objectContaining({
issueId: "dependent-1",
resolvedBlockerIssueId: issue.id,
blockerIssueIds: [issue.id],
}),
}),
);
});
});
it("does not wake the returnAssignee with issue_commented when auto-approval reassigns the issue", async () => {
const reviewerAgentId = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
const returnAssigneeAgentId = "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222";
const policy = await createAgentReviewPolicy(reviewerAgentId)!;
const issue = {
...makeIssue("todo"),
status: "in_review",
assigneeAgentId: reviewerAgentId,
executionPolicy: policy,
executionState: {
status: "pending",
currentStageId: policy.stages[0].id,
currentStageIndex: 0,
currentStageType: "review",
currentParticipant: { type: "agent", agentId: reviewerAgentId },
returnAssignee: { type: "agent", agentId: returnAssigneeAgentId },
completedStageIds: [],
lastDecisionId: null,
lastDecisionOutcome: null,
},
};
const reviewBody = "## Review: APPROVED";
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-review-5",
issueId: issue.id,
companyId: issue.companyId,
body: reviewBody,
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
authorAgentId: reviewerAgentId,
authorUserId: null,
});
// Simulate the policy transition reassigning the now-done issue back to the
// returnAssignee so the post-mutation assignee differs from the reviewer.
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>, tx?: unknown) => ({
...issue,
...patch,
executionState: patch.executionState,
assigneeAgentId: returnAssigneeAgentId,
status: "done",
completedAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
_tx: tx,
}),
);
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "agent",
agentId: reviewerAgentId,
companyId: "company-1",
source: "agent_key",
runId: "run-review-stale-isclosed",
}),
)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: reviewBody });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
// Allow any deferred wakeup task to flush before asserting it never fired.
await new Promise((resolve) => setImmediate(resolve));
const issueCommentedWakeCalls =
mockHeartbeatService.wakeup.mock.calls.filter(
([, wakeup]: [string, { reason?: string }]) =>
wakeup?.reason === "issue_commented",
);
expect(issueCommentedWakeCalls).toEqual([]);
});
it("does not auto-approve APPROVED comments from a non-review participant", async () => {
const reviewerAgentId = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
const policy = await createAgentReviewPolicy(reviewerAgentId)!;
const issue = createReviewIssue(policy, reviewerAgentId);
const reviewBody = "## Review: PAP-580 - APPROVED\n\nLooks good.";
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-review-4",
issueId: issue.id,
companyId: issue.companyId,
body: reviewBody,
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
authorAgentId: null,
authorUserId: "local-board",
});
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: reviewBody });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
// The human comment and optional receipt commit together; no approval update occurs.
expect(mockDb.transaction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.any(String),
expect.objectContaining({ reason: "issue_blockers_resolved" }),
);
});
it("does not auto-approve when actor kind disagrees with the participant kind", async () => {
// The reviewer participant is a USER, but the request actor is an AGENT whose id collides
// with that user's id. The auto-approval gate must dispatch on actor kind, not just id, so
// this comment must follow the normal non-approval insert path.
const sharedId = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
const policy = await normalizePolicy({
stages: [
{
id: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
type: "review",
participants: [{ type: "user", userId: sharedId }],
},
],
})!;
const issue = {
...makeIssue("todo"),
status: "in_review",
assigneeAgentId: null,
executionPolicy: policy,
executionState: {
status: "pending",
currentStageId: policy.stages[0].id,
currentStageIndex: 0,
currentStageType: "review",
currentParticipant: { type: "user", userId: sharedId },
returnAssignee: {
type: "agent",
agentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
},
completedStageIds: [],
lastDecisionId: null,
lastDecisionOutcome: null,
},
};
const reviewBody = "## Review: PAP-580 - APPROVED\n\nShipping.";
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-mismatched-kind",
issueId: issue.id,
companyId: issue.companyId,
body: reviewBody,
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
authorAgentId: sharedId,
authorUserId: null,
});
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "agent",
agentId: sharedId,
companyId: "company-1",
source: "agent_key",
runId: "run-kind-mismatch",
}),
)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: reviewBody });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockDb.transaction).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("does not auto-approve structured metadata separated by a blank line", async () => {
// Even though both `kind: review` and `decision: approved` appear, a blank line between
// them means they are not on truly consecutive lines, so the strict regex must reject it.
const reviewerAgentId = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
const policy = await createAgentReviewPolicy(reviewerAgentId)!;
const issue = createReviewIssue(policy, reviewerAgentId);
const reviewBody = "kind: review\n\ndecision: approved";
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-blank-line-metadata",
issueId: issue.id,
companyId: issue.companyId,
body: reviewBody,
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
authorAgentId: reviewerAgentId,
authorUserId: null,
});
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "agent",
agentId: reviewerAgentId,
companyId: "company-1",
source: "agent_key",
runId: "run-blank-line-metadata",
}),
)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: reviewBody });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockDb.transaction).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("does not auto-approve reviewer comments without an approval marker", async () => {
const reviewerAgentId = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
const policy = await createAgentReviewPolicy(reviewerAgentId)!;
const issue = createReviewIssue(policy, reviewerAgentId);
const reviewBody = "Looks good.";
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-review-5",
issueId: issue.id,
companyId: issue.companyId,
body: reviewBody,
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
authorAgentId: reviewerAgentId,
authorUserId: null,
});
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "agent",
agentId: reviewerAgentId,
companyId: "company-1",
source: "agent_key",
runId: "run-review-5",
}),
)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: reviewBody });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockDb.transaction).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("does not auto-approve approval comments outside the in_review status", async () => {
const reviewerAgentId = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
const policy = await createAgentReviewPolicy(reviewerAgentId)!;
const issue = {
...makeIssue("todo"),
status: "in_progress",
assigneeAgentId: reviewerAgentId,
executionPolicy: policy,
executionState: {
status: "pending",
currentStageId: policy.stages[0].id,
currentStageIndex: 0,
currentStageType: "review",
currentParticipant: { type: "agent", agentId: reviewerAgentId },
returnAssignee: {
type: "agent",
agentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
},
completedStageIds: [],
lastDecisionId: null,
lastDecisionOutcome: null,
},
};
const reviewBody = "## Review: PAP-580 - APPROVED\n\nLooks good.";
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-review-6",
issueId: issue.id,
companyId: issue.companyId,
body: reviewBody,
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
authorAgentId: reviewerAgentId,
authorUserId: null,
});
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "agent",
agentId: reviewerAgentId,
companyId: "company-1",
source: "agent_key",
runId: "run-review-6",
}),
)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: reviewBody });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockDb.transaction).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
describe.each([
{ name: "uppercase negation", body: "## Review: NOT APPROVED" },
{
name: "uppercase negation with trailing period",
body: "## Review: NOT APPROVED.",
},
{ name: "mixed-case negation", body: "## Review: Not approved." },
{ name: "do-not phrasing", body: "## Review: Do not approve" },
{ name: "present-progressive negation", body: "## Review: Not approving" },
{
name: "structured rejection",
body: "kind: review\ndecision: rejected\nsummary: ship it",
},
{
name: "structured changes_requested",
body: "kind: review\ndecision: changes_requested\nsummary: ship it",
},
{
name: "disjoint structured metadata across prose",
body: "kind: review\n\nThe previous sprint decision: approved by stakeholders, but this round still needs work.",
},
{
name: "disjoint structured metadata with summary line between",
body: "kind: review\nsummary: needs more work\ndecision: approved",
},
])("does not auto-approve negated approval phrasings ($name)", ({ body }) => {
it("rejects the auto-approval transition and keeps the comment as a regular comment", async () => {
const reviewerAgentId = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
const policy = await createAgentReviewPolicy(reviewerAgentId)!;
const issue = createReviewIssue(policy, reviewerAgentId);
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-review-negated",
issueId: issue.id,
companyId: issue.companyId,
body,
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
authorAgentId: reviewerAgentId,
authorUserId: null,
});
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "agent",
agentId: reviewerAgentId,
companyId: "company-1",
source: "agent_key",
runId: "run-review-negated",
}),
)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockDb.transaction).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});
describe.each([
{ name: "uppercase approval", body: "## Review: APPROVED" },
{ name: "trailing punctuation", body: "## Review: APPROVED!" },
{ name: "ticketed approval", body: "## Review: PAP-580 - APPROVED" },
{ name: "lowercase approval", body: "## Review: LGTM, approved" },
{
name: "approval with body context",
body: "## Review: APPROVED\n\nReady to ship.",
},
])("auto-approves positive approval phrasings ($name)", ({ body }) => {
it("triggers the auto-approval transition", async () => {
const reviewerAgentId = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
const policy = await createAgentReviewPolicy(reviewerAgentId)!;
const issue = createReviewIssue(policy, reviewerAgentId);
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-review-positive",
issueId: issue.id,
companyId: issue.companyId,
body,
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
authorAgentId: reviewerAgentId,
authorUserId: null,
});
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>, tx?: unknown) => ({
...issue,
...patch,
executionState: patch.executionState,
status: "done",
completedAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
_tx: tx,
}),
);
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "agent",
agentId: reviewerAgentId,
companyId: "company-1",
source: "agent_key",
runId: "run-review-positive",
}),
)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockDb.transaction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockIssueService.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
expect.objectContaining({ status: "done" }),
mockTx,
undefined,
expect.any(Array),
);
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
action: "issue.updated",
details: expect.objectContaining({
status: "done",
source: "auto_approval_comment",
_previous: { status: "in_review" },
}),
}),
);
});
});
it("rolls back the comment when the auto-approval status transition fails", async () => {
const reviewerAgentId = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
const policy = await createAgentReviewPolicy(reviewerAgentId)!;
const issue = createReviewIssue(policy, reviewerAgentId);
const reviewBody = "## Review: PAP-580 - APPROVED\n\nLooks good.";
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-review-atomic",
issueId: issue.id,
companyId: issue.companyId,
body: reviewBody,
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
authorAgentId: reviewerAgentId,
authorUserId: null,
});
const { unprocessable } = await import("../errors.js");
mockIssueService.update.mockRejectedValue(
unprocessable("Issue can only have one assignee"),
);
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "agent",
agentId: reviewerAgentId,
companyId: "company-1",
source: "agent_key",
runId: "run-review-atomic",
}),
)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: reviewBody });
// The route must propagate the 422 (no successful 201) and must insert the
// comment inside the same transaction as the status update so the comment
// rolls back when the status update fails.
expect(res.status).toBe(422);
expect(mockDb.transaction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
reviewBody,
expect.objectContaining({ agentId: reviewerAgentId }),
expect.any(Object),
mockTx,
);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("rolls back the auto-approval comment when the issue is concurrently deleted", async () => {
const reviewerAgentId = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
const policy = await createAgentReviewPolicy(reviewerAgentId)!;
const issue = createReviewIssue(policy, reviewerAgentId);
const reviewBody = "## Review: PAP-580 - APPROVED\n\nLooks good.";
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "comment-review-missing",
issueId: issue.id,
companyId: issue.companyId,
body: reviewBody,
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
authorAgentId: reviewerAgentId,
authorUserId: null,
});
// Simulate the concurrent-delete race: svc.update resolves to null instead of throwing.
mockIssueService.update.mockResolvedValue(null);
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "agent",
agentId: reviewerAgentId,
companyId: "company-1",
source: "agent_key",
runId: "run-review-missing",
}),
)
.post("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments")
.send({ body: reviewBody });
// The route must surface a 404 AND keep the transaction rollback path intact:
// the addComment INSERT must run inside the same transaction that the throw aborts,
// so the comment cannot survive when the status update finds no issue.
expect(res.status).toBe(404);
expect(mockDb.transaction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
reviewBody,
expect.objectContaining({ agentId: reviewerAgentId }),
expect.any(Object),
mockTx,
);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("coerces executor handoff patches into workflow-controlled review wakes", async () => {
const policy = await normalizePolicy({
stages: [
{
id: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
type: "review",
participants: [
{ type: "agent", agentId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333" },
],
},
],
})!;
const issue = {
...makeIssue("todo"),
status: "in_progress",
assigneeAgentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
executionPolicy: policy,
executionState: null,
};
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...issue,
...patch,
updatedAt: new Date(),
}),
);
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "agent",
agentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
companyId: "company-1",
runId: "run-1",
}),
)
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({
status: "in_review",
assigneeAgentId: null,
assigneeUserId: "local-board",
reviewRequest: {
instructions:
"Please verify the fix against the reproduction steps and note any residual risk.",
},
});
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(res.body.assigneeAgentId).toBe(
"33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
);
expect(res.body.assigneeUserId).toBeNull();
expect(res.body.executionState).toMatchObject({
status: "pending",
currentStageType: "review",
currentParticipant: {
type: "agent",
agentId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
},
returnAssignee: {
type: "agent",
agentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
},
reviewRequest: {
instructions:
"Please verify the fix against the reproduction steps and note any residual risk.",
},
});
await waitForWakeup(() =>
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
expect.objectContaining({
reason: "execution_review_requested",
payload: expect.objectContaining({
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
executionStage: expect.objectContaining({
wakeRole: "reviewer",
stageType: "review",
reviewRequest: {
instructions:
"Please verify the fix against the reproduction steps and note any residual risk.",
},
allowedActions: ["approve", "request_changes"],
}),
}),
}),
),
);
});
it("wakes the return assignee with execution_changes_requested", async () => {
const policy = await normalizePolicy({
stages: [
{
id: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
type: "review",
participants: [
{ type: "agent", agentId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333" },
],
},
],
})!;
const issue = {
...makeIssue("todo"),
status: "in_review",
assigneeAgentId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
executionPolicy: policy,
executionState: {
status: "pending",
currentStageId: policy.stages[0].id,
currentStageIndex: 0,
currentStageType: "review",
currentParticipant: {
type: "agent",
agentId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
},
returnAssignee: {
type: "agent",
agentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
},
completedStageIds: [],
lastDecisionId: null,
lastDecisionOutcome: null,
},
};
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(
async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...issue,
...patch,
updatedAt: new Date(),
}),
);
const res = await request(
await installActor(createApp(), {
type: "agent",
agentId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
companyId: "company-1",
runId: "run-2",
}),
)
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({
status: "in_progress",
comment: "Needs another pass",
});
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
await waitForWakeup(() =>
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
expect.objectContaining({
reason: "execution_changes_requested",
payload: expect.objectContaining({
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
executionStage: expect.objectContaining({
wakeRole: "executor",
stageType: "review",
lastDecisionOutcome: "changes_requested",
allowedActions: ["address_changes", "resubmit"],
}),
}),
}),
),
);
});
});