Files
PaperClipAI/server/src/__tests__/document-annotations-service.test.ts
T
DottaandPaperclip 5e3d6e3627 [codex] Preserve plan review context in agent wakes (#8649)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Planning work relies on issue documents, request-confirmation
interactions, and inline plan annotations
> - Agents can be woken after a plan comment, annotation, or
confirmation decision
> - The wake payload needs enough plan-review context for the agent to
act on the specific feedback instead of losing the thread and falling
back to broad refetches
> - This pull request adds bounded plan-review context to wake payloads
and heartbeat context
> - It also teaches the adapter wake prompt renderer to surface those
open plan annotations and interaction results directly
> - The benefit is that agents can continue plan review and plan
acceptance flows with the relevant comments in hand while keeping wake
payloads bounded and company-scoped

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

No matching public GitHub issue was found.

### Subsystem affected

Cross-cutting: `server/`, `packages/shared`, and
`packages/adapter-utils`.

### Problem or motivation

Plan-review continuations can wake an agent after a plan comment, inline
annotation, or request-confirmation decision without enough inline
context about the open plan annotations or accepted/rejected
confirmation target. That makes scoped wakes less reliable because the
agent may need to refetch broad issue history before it can tell what
feedback should be incorporated.

### Proposed solution

Include bounded, company-scoped plan review context in wake payloads and
heartbeat context. The context includes open `plan` annotation threads,
recent annotation comments, truncation metadata, and plan-confirmation
interaction target/result details. Render that information in the
adapter wake prompt so agents see the relevant plan-review feedback
immediately.

### Alternatives considered

Relying on agents to fetch the full issue thread after every plan-review
wake was rejected because it is slower, harder to audit, and easier to
mishandle when the wake is meant to be scoped to a specific comment,
annotation, or interaction result.

### Roadmap alignment

This supports the roadmap areas for Agent Reviews and Approvals, Deep
Planning, and Enforced Outcomes by making plan approval continuations
explicit and actionable.

### Additional context

The implementation keeps payload size bounded with per-thread,
per-comment, and total-body limits. Resolved annotation threads are
intentionally omitted so the wake focuses on feedback still needing
action.

## What Changed

- Added shared `PlanReviewContext` types for plan annotation threads,
comments, interaction targets, and continuation results.
- Added server-side plan review context assembly for open `plan`
annotation threads with bounded thread/comment/body limits.
- Included plan review context in heartbeat context and scoped wake
payloads for planning, annotation, comment, and plan-confirmation
interaction wakes.
- Rendered plan annotation deltas, open plan comments, interaction
results, and accepted target revisions in adapter wake prompts.
- Added focused regression coverage for scoped plan review context, wake
prompt rendering, annotation filtering, and safe standard-mode
annotation wakes.
- Addressed Greptile feedback by bounding the plan-comment DB fetch and
removing unused plan review context input fields.

## Verification

- `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links`
- `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/adapter-utils
packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/server
--no-file-parallelism --maxWorkers=1
server/src/__tests__/document-annotations-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issues-goal-context-routes.test.ts`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`
- `git diff --check public-gh/master...HEAD`
- GitHub PR checks are green on
`36d0ac6a5dce27b9d62e201bf6d9829170c5974e`n- Rebased onto current
`paperclipai/paperclip:master` and confirmed GitHub reports the PR as
mergeable
- Greptile Review completed successfully after 2 comments were addressed
and resolved; 0 unresolved review threads remain

## Risks

- Medium: wake payloads now include additional plan-review data, so
limits and truncation behavior need to stay conservative as annotation
volume grows.
- Low migration risk: no database schema or migration changes.
- Low repository hygiene risk: this PR does not touch `pnpm-lock.yaml`,
`.github/workflows`, or media assets.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex using `gpt-5` as a coding agent with shell/tool execution.
Reasoning mode and exact context window were not exposed by the runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-06-29 13:26:26 -05:00

804 lines
25 KiB
TypeScript

import { randomUUID } from "node:crypto";
import { eq } from "drizzle-orm";
import { afterAll, afterEach, beforeAll, describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
import {
companies,
createDb,
documentAnnotationAnchorSnapshots,
documentAnnotationComments,
documentAnnotationThreads,
documentRevisions,
documents,
issueComments,
issueDocuments,
issueThreadInteractions,
issues,
} from "@paperclipai/db";
import {
getEmbeddedPostgresTestSupport,
startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase,
} from "./helpers/embedded-postgres.js";
import { documentAnnotationService } from "../services/document-annotations.js";
import { documentService } from "../services/documents.js";
import { buildPaperclipWakePayload } from "../services/heartbeat.js";
import { buildPlanReviewContext, PLAN_REVIEW_CONTEXT_LIMITS } from "../services/plan-review-context.js";
const embeddedPostgresSupport = await getEmbeddedPostgresTestSupport();
const describeEmbeddedPostgres = embeddedPostgresSupport.supported ? describe : describe.skip;
if (!embeddedPostgresSupport.supported) {
console.warn(
`Skipping embedded Postgres document annotation service tests on this host: ${embeddedPostgresSupport.reason ?? "unsupported environment"}`,
);
}
function deferred<T>() {
let resolve!: (value: T | PromiseLike<T>) => void;
let reject!: (reason?: unknown) => void;
const promise = new Promise<T>((promiseResolve, promiseReject) => {
resolve = promiseResolve;
reject = promiseReject;
});
return { promise, resolve, reject };
}
describeEmbeddedPostgres("documentAnnotationService", () => {
let db!: ReturnType<typeof createDb>;
let annotations!: ReturnType<typeof documentAnnotationService>;
let docs!: ReturnType<typeof documentService>;
let tempDb: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase>> | null = null;
beforeAll(async () => {
tempDb = await startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase("paperclip-document-annotations-");
db = createDb(tempDb.connectionString);
annotations = documentAnnotationService(db);
docs = documentService(db);
}, 20_000);
afterEach(async () => {
await db.delete(documentAnnotationAnchorSnapshots);
await db.delete(documentAnnotationComments);
await db.delete(documentAnnotationThreads);
await db.delete(issueThreadInteractions);
await db.delete(documentRevisions);
await db.delete(issueDocuments);
await db.delete(documents);
await db.delete(issueComments);
await db.delete(issues);
await db.delete(companies);
});
afterAll(async () => {
await tempDb?.cleanup();
});
async function createIssueWithDocument(workMode: "planning" | "standard" = "planning") {
const companyId = randomUUID();
const issueId = randomUUID();
await db.insert(companies).values({
id: companyId,
name: "Paperclip",
issuePrefix: `T${companyId.replace(/-/g, "").slice(0, 6).toUpperCase()}`,
requireBoardApprovalForNewAgents: false,
});
await db.insert(issues).values({
id: issueId,
companyId,
identifier: `PAP-${companyId.replace(/-/g, "").slice(0, 6).toUpperCase()}`,
title: "Annotation race",
description: "Validate annotation revision guards",
status: "in_progress",
workMode,
priority: "high",
});
const created = await docs.upsertIssueDocument({
issueId,
key: "plan",
title: "Plan",
format: "markdown",
body: "Alpha selected text omega",
});
return { companyId, issueId, document: created.document };
}
it("fails closed when a concurrent document update wins before annotation thread creation commits", async () => {
const { companyId, issueId, document } = await createIssueWithDocument();
const concurrentUpdateCanCommit = deferred<void>();
const concurrentUpdateHasWritten = deferred<void>();
const concurrentUpdate = db.transaction(async (tx) => {
const now = new Date();
const [revision] = await tx
.insert(documentRevisions)
.values({
companyId,
documentId: document.id,
revisionNumber: document.latestRevisionNumber + 1,
title: "Plan",
format: "markdown",
body: "Alpha changed text omega",
changeSummary: "Concurrent edit",
createdAt: now,
})
.returning();
await tx
.update(documents)
.set({
latestBody: "Alpha changed text omega",
latestRevisionId: revision.id,
latestRevisionNumber: document.latestRevisionNumber + 1,
updatedAt: now,
})
.where(eq(documents.id, document.id));
concurrentUpdateHasWritten.resolve();
await concurrentUpdateCanCommit.promise;
});
await concurrentUpdateHasWritten.promise;
let annotationSettled = false;
const annotationResult = annotations
.createThread(
issueId,
"plan",
{
baseRevisionId: document.latestRevisionId!,
baseRevisionNumber: document.latestRevisionNumber,
selector: {
quote: { exact: "selected text", prefix: "Alpha ", suffix: " omega" },
position: { normalizedStart: 6, normalizedEnd: 19, markdownStart: 6, markdownEnd: 19 },
},
body: "Please review this text",
},
{ actorType: "user", actorId: "board-user", userId: "board-user" },
)
.then(
() => ({ status: "fulfilled" as const }),
(error: unknown) => ({ status: "rejected" as const, error }),
)
.finally(() => {
annotationSettled = true;
});
await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 50));
expect(annotationSettled).toBe(false);
concurrentUpdateCanCommit.resolve();
await concurrentUpdate;
const result = await annotationResult;
expect(result.status).toBe("rejected");
if (result.status === "rejected") {
expect(result.error).toMatchObject({
status: 409,
message: "Annotation anchor requires the current document revision",
details: {
currentRevisionNumber: 2,
},
});
}
const threads = await db.select().from(documentAnnotationThreads);
expect(threads).toHaveLength(0);
});
it("removes linked annotation comments and resolves empty threads when an issue comment is deleted", async () => {
const { companyId, issueId, document } = await createIssueWithDocument();
const [issueComment] = await db
.insert(issueComments)
.values({
companyId,
issueId,
authorType: "user",
authorUserId: "board-user",
body: "Delete this linked comment",
})
.returning();
const thread = await annotations.createThread(
issueId,
"plan",
{
baseRevisionId: document.latestRevisionId!,
baseRevisionNumber: document.latestRevisionNumber,
selector: {
quote: { exact: "selected text", prefix: "Alpha ", suffix: " omega" },
position: { normalizedStart: 6, normalizedEnd: 19, markdownStart: 6, markdownEnd: 19 },
},
body: "Linked annotation body",
issueCommentId: issueComment.id,
},
{ actorType: "user", actorId: "board-user", userId: "board-user" },
);
const cleanup = await annotations.cleanupForIssueCommentDeletion(
issueId,
issueComment.id,
{ actorType: "user", actorId: "board-user", userId: "board-user" },
);
expect(cleanup.deletedCommentIds).toEqual([thread.comments[0]!.id]);
expect(cleanup.resolvedThreadIds).toEqual([thread.id]);
await expect(
db.select().from(documentAnnotationComments).where(eq(documentAnnotationComments.id, thread.comments[0]!.id)),
).resolves.toHaveLength(0);
const [updatedThread] = await db
.select()
.from(documentAnnotationThreads)
.where(eq(documentAnnotationThreads.id, thread.id));
expect(updatedThread?.status).toBe("resolved");
expect(updatedThread?.resolvedByUserId).toBe("board-user");
});
it("rejects annotation comments linked to already-deleted issue comments", async () => {
const { companyId, issueId, document } = await createIssueWithDocument();
const [issueComment] = await db
.insert(issueComments)
.values({
companyId,
issueId,
authorType: "user",
authorUserId: "board-user",
body: "",
deletedAt: new Date("2026-06-05T03:00:00.000Z"),
deletedByType: "user",
deletedByUserId: "board-user",
})
.returning();
await expect(
annotations.createThread(
issueId,
"plan",
{
baseRevisionId: document.latestRevisionId!,
baseRevisionNumber: document.latestRevisionNumber,
selector: {
quote: { exact: "selected text", prefix: "Alpha ", suffix: " omega" },
position: { normalizedStart: 6, normalizedEnd: 19, markdownStart: 6, markdownEnd: 19 },
},
body: "Do not link this annotation to a deleted comment",
issueCommentId: issueComment.id,
},
{ actorType: "user", actorId: "board-user", userId: "board-user" },
),
).rejects.toMatchObject({
status: 422,
message: "Linked issue comment must belong to this issue",
});
await expect(db.select().from(documentAnnotationComments)).resolves.toHaveLength(0);
});
it("does not report already-resolved empty threads as newly resolved during linked comment cleanup", async () => {
const { companyId, issueId, document } = await createIssueWithDocument();
const [issueComment] = await db
.insert(issueComments)
.values({
companyId,
issueId,
authorType: "user",
authorUserId: "board-user",
body: "Delete this linked comment from a resolved thread",
})
.returning();
const thread = await annotations.createThread(
issueId,
"plan",
{
baseRevisionId: document.latestRevisionId!,
baseRevisionNumber: document.latestRevisionNumber,
selector: {
quote: { exact: "selected text", prefix: "Alpha ", suffix: " omega" },
position: { normalizedStart: 6, normalizedEnd: 19, markdownStart: 6, markdownEnd: 19 },
},
body: "Linked annotation body",
issueCommentId: issueComment.id,
},
{ actorType: "user", actorId: "board-user", userId: "board-user" },
);
await db
.update(documentAnnotationThreads)
.set({ status: "resolved", resolvedByUserId: "board-user", resolvedAt: new Date("2026-06-05T03:05:00.000Z") })
.where(eq(documentAnnotationThreads.id, thread.id));
const cleanup = await annotations.cleanupForIssueCommentDeletion(
issueId,
issueComment.id,
{ actorType: "user", actorId: "board-user", userId: "board-user" },
);
expect(cleanup.deletedCommentIds).toEqual([thread.comments[0]!.id]);
expect(cleanup.resolvedThreadIds).toEqual([]);
});
it("builds compact open plan review context and excludes resolved threads", async () => {
const { companyId, issueId, document } = await createIssueWithDocument();
const longBody = "x".repeat(PLAN_REVIEW_CONTEXT_LIMITS.maxBodyChars + 25);
const openThread = await annotations.createThread(
issueId,
"plan",
{
baseRevisionId: document.latestRevisionId!,
baseRevisionNumber: document.latestRevisionNumber,
selector: {
quote: { exact: "selected text", prefix: "Alpha ", suffix: " omega" },
position: { normalizedStart: 6, normalizedEnd: 19, markdownStart: 6, markdownEnd: 19 },
},
body: longBody,
},
{ actorType: "user", actorId: "board-user", userId: "board-user" },
);
const resolvedThread = await annotations.createThread(
issueId,
"plan",
{
baseRevisionId: document.latestRevisionId!,
baseRevisionNumber: document.latestRevisionNumber,
selector: {
quote: { exact: "selected text", prefix: "Alpha ", suffix: " omega" },
position: { normalizedStart: 6, normalizedEnd: 19, markdownStart: 6, markdownEnd: 19 },
},
body: "Already resolved",
},
{ actorType: "user", actorId: "board-user", userId: "board-user" },
);
await db
.update(documentAnnotationThreads)
.set({
status: "resolved",
anchorState: "stale",
anchorConfidence: "fuzzy",
resolvedByUserId: "board-user",
resolvedAt: new Date("2026-06-05T03:05:00.000Z"),
})
.where(eq(documentAnnotationThreads.id, resolvedThread.id));
const context = await buildPlanReviewContext({
db,
companyId,
issueId,
issueWorkMode: "planning",
});
expect(context).toMatchObject({
documentKey: "plan",
issueId,
latestRevisionId: document.latestRevisionId,
latestRevisionNumber: document.latestRevisionNumber,
totals: {
openThreadCount: 1,
includedThreadCount: 1,
omittedThreadCount: 0,
commentCount: 1,
includedCommentCount: 1,
omittedCommentCount: 0,
},
truncated: true,
});
expect(context?.threads.map((thread) => thread.id)).toEqual([openThread.id]);
expect(context?.threads[0]).toMatchObject({
status: "open",
anchorState: "active",
anchorConfidence: "exact",
selectedText: "selected text",
prefixText: "Alpha ",
suffixText: " omega",
comments: [
expect.objectContaining({
body: "x".repeat(PLAN_REVIEW_CONTEXT_LIMITS.maxBodyChars),
bodyTruncated: true,
author: { type: "user", id: "board-user" },
}),
],
});
});
it("includes same-issue plan confirmation target/result and rejects cross-issue interaction context", async () => {
const { companyId, issueId, document } = await createIssueWithDocument();
const otherIssueId = randomUUID();
await db.insert(issues).values({
id: otherIssueId,
companyId,
identifier: "PAP-9443",
title: "Other planning task",
description: null,
status: "in_progress",
workMode: "planning",
priority: "medium",
});
const [interaction] = await db
.insert(issueThreadInteractions)
.values({
companyId,
issueId,
kind: "request_confirmation",
status: "accepted",
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee_on_accept",
payload: {
version: 1,
prompt: "Approve this plan?",
target: {
type: "issue_document",
issueId,
documentId: document.id,
key: "plan",
revisionId: document.latestRevisionId,
revisionNumber: document.latestRevisionNumber,
},
},
result: {
version: 1,
outcome: "accepted",
reason: null,
},
resolvedAt: new Date("2026-06-05T03:10:00.000Z"),
})
.returning();
const context = await buildPlanReviewContext({
db,
companyId,
issueId,
issueWorkMode: "standard",
interactionId: interaction.id,
});
expect(context?.interaction).toMatchObject({
id: interaction.id,
status: "accepted",
target: {
issueId,
documentId: document.id,
key: "plan",
revisionId: document.latestRevisionId,
revisionNumber: document.latestRevisionNumber,
},
acceptedTargetRevision: {
revisionId: document.latestRevisionId,
revisionNumber: document.latestRevisionNumber,
},
result: {
outcome: "accepted",
reason: null,
},
});
await expect(buildPlanReviewContext({
db,
companyId,
issueId: otherIssueId,
issueWorkMode: "standard",
interactionId: interaction.id,
})).resolves.toBeNull();
});
it("includes open plan annotations for standard-mode issue comment wakes", async () => {
const { companyId, issueId, document } = await createIssueWithDocument("standard");
const thread = await annotations.createThread(
issueId,
"plan",
{
baseRevisionId: document.latestRevisionId!,
baseRevisionNumber: document.latestRevisionNumber,
selector: {
quote: { exact: "selected text", prefix: "Alpha ", suffix: " omega" },
position: { normalizedStart: 6, normalizedEnd: 19, markdownStart: 6, markdownEnd: 19 },
},
body: "Please incorporate this plan annotation in standard mode.",
},
{ actorType: "user", actorId: "board-user", userId: "board-user" },
);
const [comment] = await db
.insert(issueComments)
.values({
companyId,
issueId,
authorUserId: "board-user",
body: "Please continue with the plan feedback above.",
})
.returning();
const payload = await buildPaperclipWakePayload({
db,
companyId,
contextSnapshot: {
issueId,
wakeCommentIds: [comment.id],
wakeReason: "issue_commented",
},
});
expect(payload?.comments).toMatchObject([
expect.objectContaining({
id: comment.id,
body: "Please continue with the plan feedback above.",
}),
]);
expect(payload?.planReviewContext).toMatchObject({
issueId,
totals: {
openThreadCount: 1,
includedCommentCount: 1,
},
threads: [
expect.objectContaining({
id: thread.id,
comments: [
expect.objectContaining({
id: thread.comments[0]!.id,
body: "Please incorporate this plan annotation in standard mode.",
}),
],
}),
],
});
});
it("includes accepted plan annotations in the structured wake payload", async () => {
const { companyId, issueId, document } = await createIssueWithDocument();
const thread = await annotations.createThread(
issueId,
"plan",
{
baseRevisionId: document.latestRevisionId!,
baseRevisionNumber: document.latestRevisionNumber,
selector: {
quote: { exact: "selected text", prefix: "Alpha ", suffix: " omega" },
position: { normalizedStart: 6, normalizedEnd: 19, markdownStart: 6, markdownEnd: 19 },
},
body: "Please split this plan step before creating child issues.",
},
{ actorType: "user", actorId: "board-user", userId: "board-user" },
);
const [interaction] = await db
.insert(issueThreadInteractions)
.values({
companyId,
issueId,
kind: "request_confirmation",
status: "accepted",
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee_on_accept",
payload: {
version: 1,
prompt: "Approve this plan?",
target: {
type: "issue_document",
issueId,
documentId: document.id,
key: "plan",
revisionId: document.latestRevisionId,
revisionNumber: document.latestRevisionNumber,
},
},
result: {
version: 1,
outcome: "accepted",
},
resolvedAt: new Date("2026-06-05T03:10:00.000Z"),
})
.returning();
const payload = await buildPaperclipWakePayload({
db,
companyId,
contextSnapshot: {
issueId,
interactionId: interaction.id,
interactionKind: "request_confirmation",
interactionStatus: "accepted",
wakeReason: "issue_commented",
},
});
expect(payload?.planReviewContext).toMatchObject({
interaction: {
id: interaction.id,
status: "accepted",
acceptedTargetRevision: {
issueId,
documentId: document.id,
key: "plan",
revisionId: document.latestRevisionId,
revisionNumber: document.latestRevisionNumber,
},
result: {
outcome: "accepted",
},
},
totals: {
openThreadCount: 1,
includedCommentCount: 1,
},
threads: [
expect.objectContaining({
id: thread.id,
selectedText: "selected text",
comments: [
expect.objectContaining({
body: "Please split this plan step before creating child issues.",
}),
],
}),
],
});
});
it("fails closed when an annotation delta comment id points at a different issue", async () => {
const { companyId, issueId, document } = await createIssueWithDocument("standard");
const { issueId: otherIssueId, document: otherDocument } = await createIssueWithDocument("standard");
const otherThread = await annotations.createThread(
otherIssueId,
"plan",
{
baseRevisionId: otherDocument.latestRevisionId!,
baseRevisionNumber: otherDocument.latestRevisionNumber,
selector: {
quote: { exact: "selected text", prefix: "Alpha ", suffix: " omega" },
position: { normalizedStart: 6, normalizedEnd: 19, markdownStart: 6, markdownEnd: 19 },
},
body: "Different issue annotation comment.",
},
{ actorType: "user", actorId: "board-user", userId: "board-user" },
);
const payload = await buildPaperclipWakePayload({
db,
companyId,
contextSnapshot: {
issueId,
annotationCommentId: otherThread.comments[0]!.id,
wakeReason: "issue_commented",
},
});
expect(payload?.annotationDeltas).toEqual([]);
expect(payload?.planReviewContext).toBeNull();
});
it("includes plan review context for same-issue annotation deltas on standard issues", async () => {
const { companyId, issueId, document } = await createIssueWithDocument("standard");
const thread = await annotations.createThread(
issueId,
"plan",
{
baseRevisionId: document.latestRevisionId!,
baseRevisionNumber: document.latestRevisionNumber,
selector: {
quote: { exact: "selected text", prefix: "Alpha ", suffix: " omega" },
position: { normalizedStart: 6, normalizedEnd: 19, markdownStart: 6, markdownEnd: 19 },
},
body: "Direct same-issue annotation comment.",
},
{ actorType: "user", actorId: "board-user", userId: "board-user" },
);
const payload = await buildPaperclipWakePayload({
db,
companyId,
contextSnapshot: {
issueId,
annotationCommentId: thread.comments[0]!.id,
wakeReason: "issue_commented",
},
});
expect(payload?.annotationDeltas).toMatchObject([
expect.objectContaining({
id: thread.comments[0]!.id,
issueId,
threadId: thread.id,
body: "Direct same-issue annotation comment.",
}),
]);
expect(payload?.planReviewContext).toMatchObject({
issueId,
totals: {
openThreadCount: 1,
includedCommentCount: 1,
},
threads: [
expect.objectContaining({
id: thread.id,
comments: [
expect.objectContaining({
id: thread.comments[0]!.id,
body: "Direct same-issue annotation comment.",
}),
],
}),
],
});
});
it("includes rejection result and open plan annotations even when the reason is empty", async () => {
const { companyId, issueId, document } = await createIssueWithDocument();
await annotations.createThread(
issueId,
"plan",
{
baseRevisionId: document.latestRevisionId!,
baseRevisionNumber: document.latestRevisionNumber,
selector: {
quote: { exact: "selected text", prefix: "Alpha ", suffix: " omega" },
position: { normalizedStart: 6, normalizedEnd: 19, markdownStart: 6, markdownEnd: 19 },
},
body: "The plan needs a concrete QA owner.",
},
{ actorType: "user", actorId: "board-user", userId: "board-user" },
);
const [interaction] = await db
.insert(issueThreadInteractions)
.values({
companyId,
issueId,
kind: "request_confirmation",
status: "rejected",
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
payload: {
version: 1,
prompt: "Approve this plan?",
target: {
type: "issue_document",
issueId,
documentId: document.id,
key: "plan",
revisionId: document.latestRevisionId,
revisionNumber: document.latestRevisionNumber,
},
},
result: {
version: 1,
outcome: "rejected",
reason: "",
},
resolvedAt: new Date("2026-06-05T03:10:00.000Z"),
})
.returning();
const payload = await buildPaperclipWakePayload({
db,
companyId,
contextSnapshot: {
issueId,
interactionId: interaction.id,
interactionKind: "request_confirmation",
interactionStatus: "rejected",
wakeReason: "issue_commented",
},
});
expect(payload?.planReviewContext).toMatchObject({
interaction: {
id: interaction.id,
status: "rejected",
result: {
outcome: "rejected",
reason: null,
},
},
totals: {
openThreadCount: 1,
includedCommentCount: 1,
},
threads: [
expect.objectContaining({
selectedText: "selected text",
comments: [
expect.objectContaining({
body: "The plan needs a concrete QA owner.",
}),
],
}),
],
});
});
});