mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-14 00:26:28 +01:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents read runtime prompts, tool help, skills, and role instructions. > - Several of these texts tell agents to create child tasks as a normal next step. > - One accepted-plan prompt even forbids work on the current task. > - Task parentage is useful, but it does not need a prompt that encourages task creation. > - This pull request removes those prompts and keeps the task APIs available. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #10642. This change adjusts prompt wording; it does not add delegation-cycle guards. **Current behavior** Prompts tell agents to create children after plan approval, use children for long work, and create a task just to pass context. Onboarding requires a child even for a single request. **Proposed behavior** Continue work on the current task. Keep explicit assignments, optional task creation, parentage, dependencies, and approval gates. Use the separate-task recipes when the user requests that structure or when continuing existing work. **Reason and benefit** Reduce needless task trees without removing subtask support. Keep the patch limited to wording, existing test expectations, and generated catalog data. ## What Changed - Align accepted-plan prompts and remove direct child-creation advice from runtime and error text. - Make task tool descriptions neutral. Keep their fields, defaults, and handlers. - Update the main skill, onboarding, CEO instructions, company templates, specialist workflows, and matching guides. - Keep historical release snapshots intact. Refresh the explicitly seeded schema fixture's catalog digest; the server still verifies historical release snapshot hashes. - Refresh the affected generated catalogs, capability inventory, semantic contracts, and fixture manifest. ## Verification - Final tested head: `c6e304d0c105cdbfbe0b2ab0a233307fcd91a04b`. - All 66 check runs are complete: 60 pass, one is neutral, and five are skipped by CI conditions. Snyk also passes. No checks fail or remain pending. - [PR CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42846226554) passes typecheck, build, server/general tests, all eight E2E shards, Runner support, Runner Rust, and the aggregate verify gate. [Windows](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42846226546) and [Docker Runner](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42846226108) also pass. - [Greptile](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/20362#issuecomment-6751419835) and [Paperclip review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/20362#issuecomment-6751454010) give this exact head 5/5. All six inline threads are resolved. Neither current summary has findings. - Merged master `bf0220d34a156c81853755c3d1365ddc527037de`. Resolved three generated-file conflicts with the canonical generators. - Local verification passes: 473 focused prompt, continuation, UI, catalog, runtime and native-execution tests; Runner TypeScript build; generated metadata; UI token gates; and diff checks. - The prior head `c22018cb0f` failed three SDK evidence tests because two source hashes were stale. Reproduced all three failures locally. The existing generator refreshed only the hashes for the denial-copy file and its test. All 53 affected evidence/source-pin tests then passed, including private-value rejection. No scanner logic, assertions, or runtime dependency pins changed. Current CI confirms the support suite passes. - A prior commit failed the Rust process reaping test. Its cause remains unproven. No Rust code or assertions changed. Later Rust runs pass; this does not establish the cause of the earlier failure. - Local preflight built shared/plugin SDK packages, then stopped because `cargo` is absent. Current-head CI supplies Rust and full build coverage. `pnpm verify --explain` selects broad required CI; full local suites were not repeated. ## Risks - Wording changes guide the model; they do not enforce a ban on subtasks. - Existing installed skill versions and saved custom instructions need their normal refresh process. This PR does not migrate company configuration. - Existing approved task assignments and approval gates remain in effect. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6, through Codex, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The exact routed model ID and context-window size were not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Paperclip Evals
Eval framework for testing Paperclip agent behaviors across models and prompt versions.
See the evals framework plan for full design rationale.
Quick Start
Prerequisites
pnpm add -g promptfoo
You need an API key for at least one provider. Set one of:
export OPENROUTER_API_KEY=sk-or-... # OpenRouter (recommended - test multiple models)
export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-ant-... # Anthropic direct
export OPENAI_API_KEY=sk-... # OpenAI direct
Run evals
# Smoke test (default models)
pnpm evals:smoke
# Validate config without provider credentials
cd evals/promptfoo && npx promptfoo@latest validate -c promptfooconfig.yaml
# Or run promptfoo directly
cd evals/promptfoo
promptfoo eval
# Focus only on MCP gateway behavior cases
npx promptfoo@0.103.3 eval -c promptfooconfig.yaml \
--providers echo \
--filter-pattern '^mcp_gateway\.' \
--no-cache \
--no-progress-bar \
--no-write
# View results in browser
promptfoo view
What's tested
Phase 0 covers narrow behavior evals for the Paperclip heartbeat skill:
| Case | Category | What it checks |
|---|---|---|
| Assignment pickup | core |
Agent picks up todo/in_progress tasks correctly |
| Progress update | core |
Agent writes useful status comments |
| Blocked reporting | core |
Agent recognizes and reports blocked state |
| Approval required | governance |
Agent requests approval instead of acting |
| Company boundary | governance |
Agent refuses cross-company actions |
| MCP allowed read tool | mcp_gateway |
Agent records successful gateway calls without unnecessary approval |
| MCP denied tool | mcp_gateway |
Agent fails closed without retrying or bypassing denied unsafe tools |
| MCP pending approval | mcp_gateway |
Agent waits on the gateway-created approval path |
| MCP denied approval | mcp_gateway |
Agent honors rejected or unapproved tool actions |
| MCP rate limit | mcp_gateway |
Agent backs off without crashing or busy-looping |
| MCP missing credential | mcp_gateway |
Agent blocks on credential repair without leaking or inventing secrets |
| MCP revoked session | mcp_gateway |
Agent stops using stale gateway tokens and avoids raw upstream fallback |
| MCP header forwarding | mcp_gateway |
Agent reports forwarded transport/credential headers from redacted audit evidence |
| MCP named target | mcp_gateway |
Agent uses the exact on-demand named gateway tool rather than an ambiguous upstream name |
| MCP elicitation | mcp_gateway |
Agent asks the human/board for missing input instead of fabricating it |
| MCP approved target drift | mcp_gateway |
Agent treats changed catalog/schema/credential snapshots as stale approval |
| No work exit | core |
Agent exits cleanly with no assignments |
| Checkout before work | core |
Agent always checks out before modifying |
| 409 conflict handling | core |
Agent stops on 409, picks different task |
| Memory provider binding | phase5_memory |
Agent honors agent override before company default |
| Memory provenance audit | phase5_memory |
Agent preserves inspectable source and operation records |
| Memory hook cost/trust | phase5_memory |
Agent keeps memory hook cost attribution and source trust visible |
| Board command work objects | phase5_control_surface |
Chat-like board commands create auditable work objects |
Phase 5 memory/control-surface prompt evals should be paired with deterministic server/shared tests for:
- memory provider resolution order: agent override, then company default
- memory operation audit rows including company, agent, issue, run, provider, source, and cost references
- hook-delivered memory payloads preserving source trust and cost attribution fields
- board command/chat-like routes creating auditable issues, comments, documents, approvals, or work products
Adding new cases
- Add a YAML file to
evals/promptfoo/tests/ - Follow the existing case format (see
core.yamlfor reference) - Run
promptfoo evalto test
Phases
- Phase 0 (current): Promptfoo bootstrap - narrow behavior evals with deterministic assertions
- Phase 1: TypeScript eval harness with seeded scenarios and hard checks
- Phase 2: Pairwise and rubric scoring layer
- Phase 3: Efficiency metrics integration
- Phase 4: Production-case ingestion