## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agent adapters are the boundary between the control plane and the runtimes that actually do work. > - Hermes support needs to be available as first-class local and gateway adapters while still preserving the adapter-manager override path for external packages. > - The adapter work touches runtime execution, UI adapter metadata, onboarding prompts, scoped credentials, release packaging, and smoke coverage, so the handoff needs concrete verification rather than only unit tests. > - This pull request adds built-in Hermes local and Hermes gateway support, keeps external adapter overrides compatible, and documents/tests the gateway flow end to end. > - The benefit is that operators can hire Hermes-backed agents without a manual plugin install, while self-hosted installs can still override/shadow the built-ins through Adapter manager packages. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this exact Hermes built-in adapter, gateway onboarding, and release-source work. Problem description: - Hermes local and gateway adapters need a public, reviewable source path in the monorepo so package artifacts and built-in adapter behavior match the application source. - Operators need built-in `hermes_local` and `hermes_gateway` adapter choices without losing the ability to install external Hermes packages as overrides. - Gateway onboarding needs secure defaults for API server URLs, API keys, and generated agent setup text. - Hermes-originated task bridge credentials need narrower API-key scope configuration. - Related public PRs found during duplicate search include #3027, #2363, #7544, #7950, #8095, and #8543. ## What Changed - Added the unified Hermes adapter package with local and gateway server/UI/CLI exports, config schemas, transcript parsing, model detection, and package metadata. - Registered `hermes_local` and `hermes_gateway` as built-in adapters across shared constants, server registries, CLI packaging, and UI adapter registries. - Kept the external adapter override path compatible so installed Hermes packages can shadow built-ins and restore the built-in parser when disabled. - Added Hermes gateway onboarding docs, board-operator docs, Docker smoke assets, and shell smoke harnesses for join/e2e validation. - Added scoped task-bridge API-key support, authorization checks, issue-origin handling, and tests for Hermes-created Paperclip tasks. - Hardened gateway transport and redaction behavior for API keys, headers, session data, and smoke diagnostics. - Updated release packaging/bootstrap checks for the Hermes packages while leaving `pnpm-lock.yaml` out of the PR per repository policy. ## Verification Targeted local verification recorded before PR handoff: - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/hermes-paperclip-adapter exec vitest run src/gateway/server/execute.test.ts` — 14/14 passed. - `pnpm test:hermes-gateway-smoke` — 6/6 passed. - Hermes package typecheck/build checks passed. - Focused server/UI adapter tests passed — 31/31. - Release helper Node tests passed — 18/18. - `git diff --check origin/master..HEAD` passed. Fresh Docker E2E smoke evidence: - Ran `pnpm smoke:hermes-gateway-e2e` on 2026-06-26 with a fresh state directory and fresh Docker container against a live Paperclip dev server. - Hermes direct execution reached `completed`. - Hermes stop/cancel path reached `cancelled`. - Hermes gateway created a Paperclip task, Paperclip ran the Hermes agent, and the task reached `done` with the expected marker response. - Temporary board auth keys, token files, smoke state, and Docker containers were cleaned up after the run. PR checks on head `b5eae40ce`: - GitHub Actions passed: `policy`, `review`, `Typecheck + Release Registry`, all general test shards, all serialized server shards, `Build`, `Canary Dry Run`, `e2e`, and aggregate `verify`. - External checks passed: Snyk and Socket Project Report. - External Socket Pull Request Alerts remained pending after the first-party CI matrix completed. ## Risks - Medium risk: this spans adapter registration, package publishing, gateway execution, onboarding docs, API-key scoping, and UI adapter metadata. - Migration risk is low: the scope-config migration adds a nullable column and does not rewrite existing keys. - Gateway execution depends on operator-provided Hermes API configuration; the smoke covers the Docker gateway path but real deployments may differ by network/auth setup. - Direct Greptile review on the latest expanded diff is file-count limited, although the commitperclip review gate passed. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool use enabled in a local repository workspace. Context window size is not exposed in this environment. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Commitperclip review gate is green; direct Greptile review is file-count limited on the latest expanded diff - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
9.5 KiB
Publishing to npm
Low-level reference for how Paperclip packages are prepared and published to npm.
For the maintainer workflow, use doc/RELEASING.md. This document focuses on packaging internals.
Current Release Entry Points
Use these scripts:
scripts/release.shfor canary and stable publish flowsscripts/create-github-release.shafter pushing a stable tagscripts/rollback-latest.shto repointlatestscripts/build-npm.shfor the CLI packaging build
Paperclip no longer uses release branches or Changesets for publishing.
Why the CLI needs special packaging
The CLI package, paperclipai, imports code from workspace packages such as:
@paperclipai/server@paperclipai/db@paperclipai/shared- adapter packages under
packages/adapters/
Those workspace references are valid in development but not in a publishable npm package. The release flow rewrites versions temporarily, then builds a publishable CLI bundle.
build-npm.sh
Run:
./scripts/build-npm.sh
This script:
- runs the forbidden token check unless
--skip-checksis supplied - runs
pnpm -r typecheck - bundles the CLI entrypoint with esbuild into
cli/dist/index.js - verifies the bundled entrypoint with
node --check - rewrites
cli/package.jsoninto a publishable npm manifest and stores the dev copy ascli/package.dev.json - copies the repo
README.mdintocli/README.mdfor npm metadata
After the release script exits, the dev manifest and temporary files are restored automatically.
Package discovery and versioning
Public packages are discovered from:
packages/server/ui/cli/
The version rewrite step now uses scripts/release-package-map.mjs, which:
- finds all public packages
- sorts them topologically by internal dependencies
- rewrites each package version to the target release version
- rewrites internal
workspace:*dependency references to the exact target version - updates the CLI's displayed version string
Those rewrites are temporary. The working tree is restored after publish or dry-run.
@paperclipai/ui packaging
The UI package publishes prebuilt static assets, not the source workspace.
The ui package uses scripts/generate-ui-package-json.mjs during prepack to swap in a lean publish manifest that:
- keeps the release-managed
nameandversion - publishes only
dist/ - omits the source-only dependency graph from downstream installs
After packing or publishing, postpack restores the development manifest automatically.
Manual first publish for @paperclipai/ui
If you need to publish only the UI package once by hand, use the real package name:
@paperclipai/ui
Recommended flow from the repo root:
# optional sanity check: this 404s until the first publish exists
npm view @paperclipai/ui version
# make sure the dist payload is fresh
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build
# confirm your local npm auth before the real publish
npm whoami
# safe preview of the exact publish payload
cd ui
pnpm publish --dry-run --no-git-checks --access public
# real publish
pnpm publish --no-git-checks --access public
Notes:
- Publish from
ui/, not the repo root. prepackautomatically rewritesui/package.jsonto the lean publish manifest, andpostpackrestores the dev manifest after the command finishes.- If
npm view @paperclipai/ui versionalready returns the same version that is inui/package.json, do not republish. Bump the version or use the normal repo-wide release flow inscripts/release.sh.
If the first real publish returns npm E404, check npm-side prerequisites before retrying:
npm whoamimust succeed first. An expired or missing npm login will block the publish.- For an organization-scoped package like
@paperclipai/ui, thepaperclipainpm organization must exist and the publisher must be a member with permission to publish to that scope. - The initial publish must include
--access publicfor a public scoped package. - npm also requires either account 2FA for publishing or a granular token that is allowed to bypass 2FA.
Version formats
Paperclip uses calendar versions:
- stable:
YYYY.MDD.P - canary:
YYYY.MDD.P-canary.N
Examples:
- stable:
2026.318.0 - canary:
2026.318.1-canary.2
Publish model
Canary
Canaries publish under the npm dist-tag canary.
Example:
paperclipai@2026.318.1-canary.2
This keeps the default install path unchanged while allowing explicit installs with:
npx paperclipai@canary onboard
The release script now verifies two things after a canary publish:
- the
canarydist-tag resolves to the version that was just published - every published internal
@paperclipai/*dependency referenced by that manifest exists on npm
It also treats latest -> canary as a failure by default, because npm metadata can otherwise leave the default install path pointing at an unreleased canary dependency graph. Only pass ./scripts/release.sh canary --allow-canary-latest when that latest behavior is explicitly intended.
Stable
Stable publishes use the npm dist-tag latest.
Example:
paperclipai@2026.318.0
Stable publishes do not create a release commit. Instead:
- package versions are rewritten temporarily
- packages are published from the chosen source commit
- git tag
vYYYY.MDD.Ppoints at that original commit
Trusted publishing
The intended CI model is npm trusted publishing through GitHub OIDC.
That means:
- no long-lived
NPM_TOKENin repository secrets - GitHub Actions obtains short-lived publish credentials
- trusted publisher rules are configured per workflow file
See doc/RELEASE-AUTOMATION-SETUP.md for the GitHub/npm setup steps.
Release enrollment for new public packages
Paperclip does not auto-publish every non-private workspace package anymore.
CI publishing is controlled by scripts/release-package-manifest.json.
When you add a new public package:
- add it to the manifest and decide whether CI should publish it immediately
- if CI should publish it, bootstrap the package on npm before merge
- if CI should not publish it yet, keep
"publishFromCi": false - only enable
"publishFromCi": trueafter npm trusted publishing is configured for that package
PR CI now checks changed release-enabled package manifests against npm. That catches a missing first-publish bootstrap before the change reaches master.
One-time bootstrap sequence for a new package
The first publish of a brand-new package still needs one human maintainer with npm write access. After that, trusted publishing can take over.
Example for @paperclipai/adapter-acpx-local from the repo root:
# safe preview
pnpm run release:bootstrap-package -- @paperclipai/adapter-acpx-local
# one-time first publish from an authenticated maintainer machine
pnpm run release:bootstrap-package -- @paperclipai/adapter-acpx-local --publish --otp 123456
The helper script:
- checks that the package does not already exist on npm
- builds the target package unless
--skip-buildis passed - runs
pnpm publish <package-dir> --dry-run --no-git-checks --access publicfrom the repo root - only runs the real
pnpm publish <package-dir> --no-git-checks --access publicwhen--publish --otp <code>is provided
The helper intentionally uses pnpm publish instead of npm publish so workspace
dependencies and publishConfig export fields are normalized before the package
is sent to the registry.
For the real --publish step, the maintainer machine must already be authenticated to npm.
If npm whoami returns 401, first run npm logout --registry=https://registry.npmjs.org/ to clear any stale local auth, then run npm login or npm adduser locally as an npm org member, and finally rerun the helper.
That local human auth is fine for the one-time bootstrap publish; we just do not want the same auth model inside CI.
The helper now requires --otp <code> up front for --publish, so it fails before the real publish attempt if the one-time password is missing.
After that first publish succeeds:
- open
https://www.npmjs.com/package/@paperclipai/adapter-acpx-local - go to
Settings→Trusted publishing - add repository
paperclipai/paperclip - set workflow filename to
release.yml - optionally go to
Settings→Publishing accessand enableRequire two-factor authentication and disallow tokens - keep
publishFromCi: trueinscripts/release-package-manifest.json
Once those steps are done, future canary and stable publishes for that package are automated through GitHub OIDC. The manual step is only the first package creation on npm.
Rollback model
Rollback does not unpublish anything.
It repoints the latest dist-tag to a prior stable version:
./scripts/rollback-latest.sh 2026.318.0
This is the fastest way to restore the default install path if a stable release is bad.