mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-23 09:07:46 +02:00
DottaandPaperclip
4fdef9457f
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Connections need durable credentials that survive authorization and token rotation. > - Storage, registration, refresh coordination and credential selection lived in the general tool service. > - Each has a different ownership boundary: secrets, process-wide registration, database leases and per-service refresh work. > - This pull request gives those responsibilities named modules and passes their narrow capabilities to consumers. > - The benefit is visible credential ownership while retaining current concurrency and failure behavior. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Depends on #17159. Earlier stack: #17144 → #17146 → #17147 → #17155 → #17157 → #17159 → this PR. **What existing behavior does this improve?** Maintenance of OAuth credential persistence, refresh and provider credential access. **Current behavior** The 14,877-line service owns registration flights, refresh leases, secret writes and provider selection alongside app setup. **Proposed behavior** Dedicated owners handle credential storage, client registration, refresh leases, connection/grant refresh, GitHub continuity and Vercel credential access. Credential selection composes those owners. Authorization callbacks remain in the coordinator for the next extraction. **Reason and benefit** The entry point falls to 12,019 lines, a reduction of 2,858. Lease acquisition and cleanup can be reviewed together, independently of callback completion. ## What Changed - Extract credential owners and shared single-flight/connection-link primitives. The largest new module is 650 lines. - Preserve process-wide client-registration flights, per-service refresh maps and GitHub sweep state. - Preserve live cloud-connector lookup, options and environment reads; use the existing secret client and transaction-scoped clients. - Extend the real local HTTP/PostgreSQL OAuth fixture with concurrent refresh across two service instances and authenticated use of rotated credentials. ## Verification - The two extended HTTP integration cases pass before extraction for public and client-secret-basic clients. - After extraction, all 470 public service and HTTP integration cases pass, including refresh failure, abandoned leases, secret redaction and membership revocation cases. The fixture was then strengthened after review: a second expiry must use the persisted rotated refresh token, and the provider rejects the old token. Both cases pass before and after extraction; server typecheck also passes. - Server typecheck, module-boundary gate and diff whitespace checks pass. - All 233 pre-existing function/method bodies match by normalized syntax comparison. - Full typecheck/build will run at the stack handoff. The earlier interrupted local full suite remains unverified; all current-head CI gates pass, with Greptile 5/5 and no open review findings. - Prior-head CI failure retained: run 39708550066, general server shard 2/12, `native-session-executor.test.ts` case “preserves a real listening process and its marker when a health RPC times out” raised `runner_remote_process_identity_unavailable` / `process_identity_changed`. Both the fixture and runner implementation are unchanged. The isolated case passes without changing assertions or timeouts. The fresh full CI run passes for the test-only review fix; the prior failure remains recorded here. ## Risks - Changing state lifetime could permit duplicate refreshes or registrations. Existing concurrency cases and the real HTTP fixture exercise these paths. - A transaction-scoped secret write must stay inside its authority lock. Function bodies, await ordering and client arguments are preserved. - The fixture proves assembled local HTTP/database behavior, not live third-party qualification. - No schema, public API, policy or scheduling change is intended. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with repository tools and code execution. The exact serving model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>