mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-04 11:01:16 +01:00
DottaandPaperclip
88bf4c6c1d
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The feature map describes product areas and verification entry points. > - Storybook has 223 story suites that show production components, proposals, and retained history. > - The parent PR maps those suites to features, but their folders and sidebar still use unrelated groups. > - This pull request puts the existing suites under feature folders and uses the feature map's names and order in the sidebar. > - Explicit meta IDs preserve existing story links while the titles change. > - Contributors can find stories through the same product structure without losing examples. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #16046. This is the requested follow-up. Parent #16046 is merged. This PR now targets master, with its single follow-up commit rebased onto the parent squash merge. The Storybook implementation is unchanged by that rebase. Related open Storybook PRs were checked; this change organizes existing suites and adds no product capability. ## What Changed - Move all 223 story files into folders named for their primary feature area. Keep useful scenario groups below the feature's sidebar label. - Order the sidebar by the eight feature-map sections. Put Overview first and shared Foundations last. Leave areas with no stories out of the sidebar. - Move 19 support files into `ui/storybook/support/` and update relative imports and active documentation. - Preserve all 2,210 story IDs and the single docs ID through explicit CSF meta IDs. Keep all entry names and story exports. - Record stable IDs and sidebar titles in the downstream catalog. Validate feature folders, title prefixes, and IDs. Update the maintenance skill and review evidence. ## Verification - Storybook build passed. Built index comparison against parent `75bd3c977cd828d5222823850339e8204f40eb47` found the same 2,211 entries, IDs, and names. - UI typecheck passed (`ui/node_modules/.bin/tsc -b` from `ui`, invoked as `./node_modules/.bin/tsc -b`). - UI Vitest project: 728 files and 8,176 tests passed. - Catalog checker and its nine tests passed. Feature-map checks, token gates, and the maintenance-skill validator passed. - Chromium: nine existing play cases and one render case reached `storyFinished: success` with no page exceptions. The guide rendered, sidebar sections followed map order, and a search for `steering/queue` opened its preserved story link. - Source comparison found only meta title/ID changes, rebased relative references, and updated fixture path text in story files. - To inspect: build Storybook, start `node scripts/serve-storybook-static.mjs --port 6136`, and open the Overview guide. Expand feature folders and use existing story links. - The complete repository suite was not repeated for this organization change. The parent records a backend timeout that passed in isolation, without a complete broad-suite pass. Visual comparisons remain blocked by the unpublished empty baseline. The separate fixture-server story was not run. ## Risks - Open branches that add stories under old paths will need to choose a feature folder and update the catalog. Cross-feature suites have one primary home and retain related capability references. - Sidebar paths change; story and docs IDs remain stable. Automated references to source paths may need the new location. - This is one requested follow-up with 258 changed files, mostly moves. It exceeds the usual review-size guideline because splitting it would leave the sidebar and folder convention partly migrated. - Browser verification samples ten stories, not all 2,210. Existing production/prototype classifications and review gaps remain unchanged. - Required CI gates and a 5/5 review passed on the original head. Fresh checks and review are running for the rebased head. Catalog validation and all nine checker tests passed after rebase; UI, map, skill, and checker contents are identical to the original reviewed head. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. The exact runtime model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. Used reasoning, repository inspection, code execution, and local browser automation. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
22 lines
1.9 KiB
TypeScript
22 lines
1.9 KiB
TypeScript
import type { DecisionConnectionChoice, DecisionHistoryEntry, DecisionModelSettings, DecisionResult } from "@paperclipai/shared";
|
|
|
|
export const companyId = "company-storybook";
|
|
export const choices: DecisionConnectionChoice[] = ["openai", "openrouter"].map((provider, i) => ({
|
|
id: `10000000-0000-4000-8000-00000000000${i + 1}`,
|
|
grantId: `20000000-0000-4000-8000-00000000000${i + 1}`,
|
|
companyId, provider: provider as "openai" | "openrouter", method: "api_key", ownership: "shared",
|
|
name: i === 0 ? "Company OpenAI" : "Company OpenRouter", isDefault: false, status: "connected",
|
|
decisionModel: i === 0 ? "gpt-6-luna" : "typesafe/jev-1.13",
|
|
}));
|
|
export const unconfigured: DecisionModelSettings = { companyId, enabled: false, allowBackground: true, connectionId: null, grantId: null, provider: null, model: null };
|
|
export const configured: DecisionModelSettings = { ...unconfigured, enabled: true, connectionId: choices[0]!.id, grantId: choices[0]!.grantId, provider: "openai", model: "gpt-6-luna" };
|
|
export const result: DecisionResult = { status: "succeeded", invocationId: "decision-fixture", answers: {
|
|
billing: { type: "boolean", probability: 0.99 }, team: { type: "choice", choice: "billing", probabilities: { billing: 0.98, technical: 0.02 } }, severity: { type: "score", score: 0.08 },
|
|
}, usage: { inputTokens: 140, outputTokens: 0, costCents: "0.0014000", costStatus: "estimated" } };
|
|
export const entry: DecisionHistoryEntry = {
|
|
id: "decision-fixture", feature: "settings.test", actorType: "user", responsibleUserId: "user-board", userName: "Board Operator",
|
|
issueId: null, issueIdentifier: null, agentId: null, runId: null, connectionId: choices[0]!.id, provider: "openai", model: "gpt-6-luna",
|
|
status: "succeeded", errorCode: null, startedAt: new Date().toISOString(), finishedAt: new Date().toISOString(), durationMs: 423,
|
|
inputTokens: 140, outputTokens: 0, costCents: "0.0014000", costStatus: "estimated",
|
|
};
|