PaperClipAI/doc/connections/GITHUB-REVIEW-BOT.md

GitHub chat and review bots

A GitHub bot belongs to one Paperclip agent. GitHub issues, pull requests, and review threads enter ordinary Paperclip tasks; the agent's runs, permissions, budget, and activity remain visible there. The Reviews page is a projection of assessments attached to those tasks, not a separate execution system.

For a step-by-step explanation of mentions, automatic reviews, scores, and required GitHub checks, read Understanding GitHub PR review bots.

Set up a bot

Enable GitHub review bots in instance Experimental settings, then open the GitHub Code Review Bot connector. This default-off setting is independent of Chat connectors. Hiding either feature does not pause existing provider delivery.

1. Choose the bot agent. Prefer a low-trust review agent with an isolated sandbox and a scoped task boundary. Standard-trust agents show a warning with Change to a low trust agent. This explicitly saves the low-trust preset; it does not configure a sandbox or task boundary.
2. Choose My account or An organization. Enter the organization when needed and review the App name suggested from your agent. Click Continue to GitHub. Paperclip fills permissions, events, and callbacks.
3. Confirm creation on GitHub, then select repositories and approve installation. Paperclip stores the credentials securely and imports the initial selection, including an explicit All repositories choice. Organization policies may require administrator approval; resume the same draft when it is granted.
4. Paperclip reuses your verified GitHub identity when available. Otherwise, authorize the dedicated App and confirm the observed account once. Bot work uses installation credentials, never your personal GitHub token.
5. Connection verification and completion happen automatically. Paperclip opens the bot's Settings with a connected confirmation modal showing the actual App identity, enabled repository count, and a copyable optional review mention. Dismiss it with Done, the close button, or Escape to stay in Settings. Runtime and isolation readiness remain separate prerequisites.

Installation may return before GitHub's separately delivered signed webhook ping. Paperclip keeps the same draft and credentials, shows a waiting state, and continues automatically after authenticating the ping. Refreshing or resuming that draft must not create another App or bypass signature verification. While this Cloud setup screen is waiting, its authenticated advance request also drains the existing sealed event queue. It can bypass an older idle-connection backoff, at most once every five seconds. Setup and background requests share one in-flight lease. The normal stack webhook handler still authenticates the original GitHub bytes before setup can continue. This adds no background timer; closing the screen stops these readiness requests. Existing background recovery and its sleep restrictions remain unchanged.

New connections default to authorized mentions, advisory reviews, linked-member access, guests off, and enabled bot GitHub tools. Existing instructions, explicit behavior, and narrower saved repository restrictions remain intact. Later repository additions require enablement in Access. Advanced review rules and prompts live in Settings.

The App belongs to the selected account or organization and uses its own bot identity. The editable App name determines GitHub's slug and @mention; there is no separate editable bot username. Paperclip shows and copies the verified mention in the connected bot's header. Type @app-slug, without the [bot] suffix shown on GitHub's API author records.

GitHub App name and logo is optional on the connected page and in Settings. Download the agent's avatar as a PNG, then follow the link to this App's GitHub settings to upload it under Display information. GitHub's manifest parameters do not include an avatar; the logo upload remains a GitHub settings action. After renaming the App on GitHub, use the existing reconnect this App flow to refresh its verified identity using its stored credentials. Legacy manual connections without recorded ownership link to the App settings list instead of assuming an owner.

Local instances receive public callbacks and signed events through an enrolled Paperclip Cloud connector, using outbound requests instead of a public tunnel. Your localhost instance does not need HTTPS or a tunnel for this flow. Setup asks you to connect Cloud only if the instance is not already enrolled. The Cloud gateway capability must be deployed before localhost onboarding. Direct public-HTTPS webhook connections and manual existing-App credential recovery remain supported. An expired, unconsumed Cloud handoff can be renewed in the same draft after the configuring manager confirms that no App was created on GitHub. Claimed, consumed, and uncertain exchanges still require existing-App recovery. Setup tasks and copied prompts are not part of this wizard. Normal agent API keys cannot call its board-only management APIs.

GitHub review bots use the existing agent runtime; this connector does not add provider software to the Cloud server image. Codex with managed MCP tools and the native Runner Codex backend do not require a server-side remote provider pack. Remote native ACPX (including Claude) and OpenCode currently require an operator-supplied, build-owned provider pack configured through PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_REMOTE_PROVIDER_PACK_PATH; the standard Cloud server image does not supply one. A pack installed in the sandbox alone does not satisfy that existing runtime requirement. Treat that provider setup as a separate Runner prerequisite, not an automatic connector installation step.

Connection setup reports tool/runtime support and isolation separately; an actual test task is still required to prove that the chosen provider can execute in the selected environment.

Manage a connected bot

• Settings: edit instructions, choose when the bot runs, and set review output. Event-specific instructions, filters, and formal approvals are available in disclosures. Repository-override editing is temporarily hidden in the UI; existing overrides and the configuration API remain supported. Changing defaults preserves saved overrides.
• Access: choose enabled repositories and allowed people. Repository switches save immediately. Other changes use Save changes. A linked account alone does not grant selected-member access. Add external contributor still requires a sponsor and restricted permissions. Bot tools are enabled during setup; a previously disabled connection exposes an explicit repair action without silently changing its permissions.
• Reviews: see every assessment as one row, newest first. Open a row for its summary, commit, findings, coverage, and task/run/publication links. Each review has its own URL. A previous passing result does not stand in for a pending review of a newer commit.
• Conversations: follow the task title to Paperclip or the repository/thread label to GitHub.

Settings and Access share unsaved edits while you switch connection tabs. Save before reloading or leaving the connection. No permissions change merely by opening a tab.

The repository list loads 20 rows at a time as you scroll. Search covers the entire connection. Disable all and Enable all also apply to the entire connection, including unloaded rows and repositories outside the search results. Enabling all includes only repositories still available in the App installation; it cannot restore revoked GitHub access. These changes save immediately.

Who can start work

Linked members may be allowed together or selected individually. Teammates connect and confirm their own accounts; an administrator cannot assert someone else's identity by entering a username.

To admit an unlinked GitHub person, explicitly add their verified GitHub account, choose an active sponsor, and use the restricted guest profile. Guests receive no company membership or sponsor credentials. Authority is checked again before tool calls and publication, so revocation also affects queued or ongoing work.

The username lookup uses the bot's own GitHub App installation with a short-lived, metadata-only token. It does not use a personal account or the shared unauthenticated IP quota. An active connection with a verified installation is required. GitHub supports installation tokens for Get a user without additional permissions. Lookup errors distinguish unavailable accounts, rate limits, and installation authentication or access failures.

Choose automatic events and author filters in Settings to control which authored PRs and issues start work. Authorized mentions remain available with automatic events off and bypass automatic author filters. The shared external- contributor switch controls whether sponsored guests may start automatic work; there are no per-person automatic-run switches in Access. Legacy saved automaticReviews values are ignored.

Automatic tasks use the configured responsible Paperclip member for accountability, not that member's personal GitHub credentials. A member named Board in a local test drive is still the responsible user, not a separate GitHub actor. The PR author and webhook sender are recorded independently. Follow-ups preserve task ownership while checking the current requester's authority.

Mentions and pushes

Use mentions only for reviews initiated by an authorized @your-bot request. Choose automatic reviews and enable updated commits to review new pushes. Opened, reopened, ready-for-review, and updated-commit events are independently configurable. Draft and bot-authored PRs are excluded by default. Settings can be overridden per enabled repository.

New GitHub issues is a separate opt-in automatic event, disabled on existing and new connections until selected. It uses the same repository, author, linked-member or sponsored-guest, responsible-member, and label restrictions as automatic PR events; PR branch filters do not apply to issues. Its instructions start an ordinary issue task with task-bound comment tools, without a PR assessment or commit check. Older manually configured Apps must subscribe to the issues webhook event before enabling this setting.

An authorized mention can bypass automatic author/branch/label scheduling filters. It cannot bypass repository restrictions, excluded files, or access permissions. Ordinary discussion does not change a review score. Repeat review mentions and pushes continue the existing task; inline replies return to the task owning that thread.

A successful native execution can still be resolving its visible response. Without a confirmed reply for that run, maintenance waits for its committed presentation decision before choosing a completion fallback. It then uses the same saved request to settle the wait, publish a genuine missing-response notice, or report a failed turn.

A queued or running follow-up acknowledgement preserves an existing App-owned final PR summary. A new validated assessment can replace it through the review publication path. When an authorized native turn commits a passive response wait with no new comment, maintenance settles that request's acknowledgement without replacing the assessment with a generic completion notice. This does not count the old summary as a reply from the new run. Missing or failed responses still receive their normal fallback; uncertain writes remain held.

Event prompts supplement the agent's instructions. Repository content and PR prose are untrusted input and cannot change tool authority or publication policy. The execution records the configuration revision and event context used.

Assessments, checks, and formal reviews

The agent reads through task-bound bot tools, explicitly begins an assessment, and submits the reviewed commit, findings, rationale, and coverage. Paperclip validates the result and computes the Paperclip Review check. The default threshold is 5/5; choose 1–5 or report-only as needed.

submit_review.summary contains the review body: the change, findings, and verdict. rationale adds evidence for the score and remaining risk without repeating the summary. Paperclip renders the bot-name/score heading and the reviewed-commit, coverage, and task/run footer from the structured fields. Agents must not copy these generated sections from an earlier published comment into either text field. This contract is included in new bots' tool schemas and in the review instructions generated for existing bots. Publication also removes leading copied score headings for the current bot, with a plain or Markdown-escaped name, or the legacy Paperclip Review name. Other review sections and the saved assessment remain intact.

Score	Assessment rubric
0	No usable assessment; explain what prevented evaluation.
1	Critical defects make the change unsafe to ship.
2	Major defects require substantial correction.
3	Meaningful defects require correction before merging.
4	Minor concerns remain; explain impact and remaining risk.
5	No actionable defects found within the stated coverage and limitations.

Incomplete coverage cannot pass. Filtering which findings become inline comments does not remove them from the assessment. A new head requires a new assessment; old runs cannot publish over the latest head. One current summary is updated in place, with history and task/run links retained. Stable finding keys prevent duplicate inline comments on repeated reviews.

See Publication recovery for deadlines, retries, and lost-response receipt recovery.

The check's Details link opens its Paperclip task on the current instance hostname, or the connector's Reviews page when no task has been created yet.

Formal APPROVE and REQUEST_CHANGES are separate governed tools, each off by default. Enabling either does not automatically perform it. A score of 5/5 alone never approves a PR. The agent must finish an assessment and explicitly choose the allowed action. Allow approvals permits a formal ready-to-merge decision; Allow request changes permits a formal change request, which can prevent merging when the repository's review rules require resolution. Keeping these off leaves scores, comments, and checks available while making formal review decisions opt-in. The controls include contextual tooltips.

To enforce the rating at merge time, configure GitHub branch protection or a ruleset to require Paperclip Review, selecting this bot App as the source where supported. Paperclip does not change repository rules. GitHub account and repository plan restrictions may limit required-check enforcement. If automatic execution is disallowed, a gated head requests an authorized manual review.

Publication recovery

GitHub bot tools have a sixty-second default deadline. A caller can request a shorter deadline. The assessment and publication intent are saved before provider writes, so a caller timeout does not prove that publication failed.

Temporary network errors, HTTP 408/429, and GitHub server errors use bounded backoff with jitter. Reads and installation-token issuance can retry within the call. Publication writes retry through the durable outbox, where App-owned comment markers and check identities recover lost responses. An unknown write is never repeated without checking its existing provider receipt.

The caller waits for up to three publication attempts within a forty-five-second retry window. Longer delays remain queued. A dedicated worker restores received actions and future retry deadlines after restart without another inbound event. The durable limit is eight failed attempts. Authorization, configuration, and the current PR head are checked again before dispatch. Permanent permission or validation failures, changed authority, and superseded reviews stop retries.

Rate-limit retries respect GitHub's Retry-After and primary reset headers; secondary limits without a deadline wait at least one minute. See GitHub's retry guidance.

Repeat the exact submit_review, comment, or update_comment call to receive the current durable receipt after a timeout. Preserve the assessment and idempotency key; do not start another review to recover publication. A result with status: failed and receipt.retryable: true, or status: received, is still pending. Claim publication only after status: processed. Receipt recovery does not itself mark a task Done; the agent must finish its task after confirming the receipt.

Receipt recovery compares the complete saved publication request, including long text and nested coverage entries. Shortened audit previews do not establish request identity. Changed content or a missing completed durable publication returns a conflict without dispatching another write. Exact retries read the current receipt; the durable worker owns pending publication retries.

A timeout during metadata or file reads can occur before publication staging. The same request can repeat this preflight with its complete request identity. The saved assessment, unique publication key, and provider lease still prevent repeat external writes. begin_review retries return the run's current review result. They do not return a shortened audit preview.

For a call that required human approval, the durable publication keeps that verified approval for its exact operation. An exact caller retry only reads the current receipt; the worker owns provider retries. A new policy denial or revoked authority still stops recovery, and new content still requires its own approval.

Hosted ingress

Dedicated Apps use Cloud as a sealed transport gateway. Cloud routes opaque callbacks and signed webhook bytes to the enrolled instance; the instance exchanges GitHub codes, stores credentials, verifies webhook signatures, and applies repository and actor policy. Local instances poll outbound and do not need an inbound tunnel.

Legacy direct-webhook Cloud deployments proxy only POST /api/chat-webhooks/:publicId/github and the narrow GET /api/chat-github/manifest/callback registration callback without browser login. The instance verifies the untouched webhook body and GitHub signature; registration uses expiring, single-use user/company/origin-bound state. Installation return, configuration, and identity confirmation remain authenticated. URLs use the trusted current vanity hostname, with explicit webhook-ingress overrides preserved.

Existing chat connections do not gain review execution or broader permissions until explicitly configured. GitHub.com and UI-managed settings are the initial scope; cross-repository indexing and auto-fix are not included.