mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-06 14:02:36 +01:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The server has about 1,100 test and helper files in `server/src/__tests__` > - `server/tsconfig.json` excludes that directory, Vitest does not check types, and no script runs the tsconfig in that directory > - So a test can call a function with the wrong arguments and still pass, and no tool reports it > - This gap hid 2,168 real type errors, and some of them hid tests that did not test what they claim > - This pull request fixes all of these errors and adds the directory to the server layers from paperclipai/paperclip#18737 > - The benefit is that a type error in a server test now fails the typecheck, with no baseline and no backlog ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs paperclipai/paperclip#18737, which is merged and added the server layers. Refs paperclipai/paperclip#18738, which is merged and checks the test projects outside `pnpm -r`, so it is not a duplicate. Refs paperclipai/paperclip#18137, which records that this directory has no check. **What happened?** No tool checked the types of 1,074 of the 1,101 files in `server/src/__tests__`. I searched `package.json`, the workflows, and all tsconfig files. 27 files are in the program of another tsconfig, and these 27 have 0 errors. 11 of the 27 are in `helpers/maintenance/tsconfig.json`. No script ran that project when I measured this. paperclipai/paperclip#18738 now runs it. **Expected behavior** The server typecheck checks these files, and a type error fails the check. **Steps to reproduce** 1. On the base commit, run `tsc -p server/src/__tests__/tsconfig.json --noEmit`. It reports 6,536 errors and needs 12.3 GiB. 2. Add a type error to any file in `server/src/__tests__`. 3. Run `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`. It passes. **Paperclip version or commit** I measured the error breakdown below on commit `8dfd632452`, with TypeScript 7.0.2. The branch now includes master up to paperclipai/paperclip#18865. **Deployment mode** Not applicable. This issue applies to development and CI. No production source file in the server changes. ### Error breakdown Each row adds one change to the row above. | Step | Total errors | Change | Cause | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Config as committed | 6,536 | | | | Add `src/types/*.d.ts` | 4,447 | -2,089 | Config. The Express request types were missing. | | Set `rootDir` to the repository root | 2,436 | -2,011 | Config. | | Set `allowImportingTsExtensions` | 2,181 | -255 | Config. Vitest accepts `.ts` imports. | | Add `ES2024.Promise` to `lib` | 2,138 | -43 | Config. Node 24 has `Promise.withResolvers`. | | Set `allowJs` for `.mjs` imports | 2,148 | +10 | Config. It removes 8 `TS7016` errors and shows new real errors. | | Set `declaration` to false | 2,142 | -6 | Config. Tests emit nothing. | | Count only files in `server/src` | 2,058 | -84 | Other packages: 53 Daytona, 29 Runner test, 2 UI. | So 4,478 of the 6,536 errors (69%) came from config or scope, and 2,058 are real type errors in 314 files. The 29 Runner test errors are also real, which gives 2,087 errors. Tests that master added after this measurement had 81 more errors, so this pull request fixes 2,168 errors. This table classifies the first 2,058 errors. | Kind of real error | Errors | | --- | --- | | Wrong argument or assignment type | 1,023 | | Stale or partial fixture objects | 525 | | Property that the type does not have | 317 | | Missing narrowing of null or unknown | 101 | | Implicit any | 60 | | Missing name or module | 16 | | Other | 16 | ### What the type errors hid Most errors were stale fixtures and loose mocks. These errors hid real test problems, and this pull request fixes them: - **A test that never ran.** `instrumentation.test.ts` required `sdk-trace-base`, which is not installed. So 3 span tests were skipped. They now run and pass. - **Assertions that could not fail.** - `issue-thread-interactions-service` used a company ID as an issue ID. - `status-card-evaluation-work` compared `[]` with `[]` in a rollback check. - `slack-conversation-lifecycle` read `item.issueId`, which does not exist. - `email-channels` used a permission key that does not exist. - `heartbeat-project-env` imported `LOW_TRUST_REVIEW_PRESET`, which is not exported. The value was undefined. - **Postgres processes that did not stop.** 11 test files called `stop` on the test database helper. That method does not exist, and the helper method is `cleanup`. - **Arguments that the service ignored.** - `methodKey` is now `connectionMethodKey` in the Daytona, Unikraft, 1Password, and Railway tests. - 108 calls passed `"owner-user"` to a parameter that expects an options object. - 9 chat wizard fixtures passed `managementContext` as `source`, so they ran `existing_app` and not `manifest`. - 2 tests passed a `{ userId }` actor that the function ignores. - Inserts into `environments` passed a `companyId` column that the table does not have. - **Problems in tests that master added during this work.** - `sandbox-creation-operations` read `database.connectionString` when an external test database was set. In that mode `database` is undefined, so the fixture would stop with a TypeError. It now uses the external URL. - `idle-completed-history` set a Dot operation to `dispatched`. That is a Muse status, and the Dot type does not have it. The fixture now uses `admitted`, which is a real in-flight Dot status. ### Possible product problems, not changed These may be real problems in production code or types. I did not change them, because this pull request does not change production behavior: - `decisions-service` `service.create` does not validate the lenient `cancel_issue_tree` input. - `createConnection` ignores `input.connectionPurpose`. - The `createConnection` route schema default stores `{}` for `transportConfig`. - `prepareManagedAiRuntime` accepted the invalid value `mode: "connection"`. - `createBinding` accepts invalid `projectionClass` strings outside class 3. - `ensureManagedProjectWorkspace` forwards an untyped `repoRef` by spread. - `routineVariableSchema.label` is optional, but `RoutineVariable.label` is required. - `ToolRunContext.projectId` may be too strict. - `withdrawInteraction` reads `issue.status`, which its type omits. - `issueService.list` and `reconcileNativeFinalizations` omit fields that they return at runtime. - `createGitHubExternalObjectProvider` handles `tokenProvider: null`, but its type forbids this value. ## What Changed - Fixed the 2,168 type errors. The diff changes 322 test and helper files. - Corrected `server/src/__tests__/tsconfig.json`. Editors and the typecheck now read the same options and report the same errors. - Added three `test-tree` layers to `server/scripts/typecheck-layers.mjs`. They read the server layers as declarations, and any error fails them. A hash of the path selects the shard, so a new file does not move other files. - Added `server/scripts/typecheck-stubs/daytona-sdk.d.ts`. Server tests reach Daytona plugin source, and the root install does not have `@daytonaio/sdk`. - Changed two imports in `ui/src/lib/issue-execution-policy.ts` to use `.js` extensions, because server tests import this file. - Made `declarationsConfig` and `--declarations-only` skip the `test-tree` layers, because these layers emit nothing. Other projects read only the source layers. Added a test for this. - Updated `doc/DEVELOPING.md`. ## Verification Run these commands: ```sh pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck pnpm exec vitest run server/scripts/typecheck-layers.test.mjs ``` Results on macOS (arm64), Node 24, 16 cores. Each check ran after the merge of paperclipai/paperclip#18738 unless the row says otherwise: | Check | Commit | Result | | --- | --- | --- | | Server typecheck, `PAPERCLIP_TYPECHECK_LOW_MEMORY=1`, all 7 layers | `6e45a08573` | Exit 0, 0 errors, 62 seconds, peak 3.52 GiB | | `node scripts/typecheck-test-projects.mjs --low-memory` | `a3306bd13e` | Exit 0, 0 errors, 42 seconds, peak 3.25 GiB | | The same script with `--reuse-declarations` | `1b878aabc0` | Exit 0, 0 errors | | `typecheck-layers.test.mjs` and `live-recovery-work.test.ts` | `01db5634e4` | 90 passed. These include real compiler runs for a pass, a type error, and an invalid tsconfig. | | `tsconfig.declarations.json` after a full server typecheck | `0fb1e4fb0a` | It references only `below`, `cycle`, and `above`. No generated config names a `tsconfig.layers.json` file. | | Owned runtime test in `idle-completed-history` | `e8f2f448ac` | Passed, with the fix that master later replaced | | `idle-incoming-wake`, `plugin-idle-manager`, and the changed `chat-channels` test | `6e45a08573` | 30 passed | | Runner `native-execution.test.ts` | `eab4dcc1f4` | 114 passed | | The 19 server test files that changed since `eab4dcc1f4`, and `typecheck-layers.test.mjs` | `259737b700` | 4,275 of 4,277 passed. The 2 failures are in `chat-channels` and are in the list of 7 below. | The peak is the largest single process, from `/usr/bin/time -l`. Peaks for the server typecheck were between 3.42 GiB and 3.56 GiB across 8 runs. Peaks for the test projects were 3.25 GiB and 3.37 GiB across 2 runs. I did not measure a cgroup. **Runtime check of the fixes.** Types do not prove that a test still works. So I ran all 309 changed server test files, 11,929 tests, before the rebase onto paperclipai/paperclip#18737: | Result | Tests | Detail | | --- | --- | --- | | Passed | 11,913 | Includes the 2 tests and the 54 `dot-runner` tests that passed in a later run, as described below. | | Failed | 7 | The same 7 tests also fail on the commit before the fixes. | | Skipped | 9 | These tests have their own skip conditions: `sentry` 5, and 1 each in `bundled-plugin-registration`, `customer-success-cloud`, `onepassword-connection`, and `workspace-runtime-https-live-exercise`. | The 7 tests that fail with and without this change, on my machine: - 3 tests in `chat-channels` and `email-channels` stop with `ENOENT` on a `SKILL.md` file. The path is in the parent checkout, above the git worktree that I used, so I expect that the worktree is the cause. I did not prove this. - `workspace-instance-cleanup` compares `/private/var/...` with `/var/...`. This is a macOS symlink difference. - 2 tests in `git-reproducible-managed-checkouts` get `unknown_base_git_files` and expect `unpushed_managed_checkout`. I did not find the cause. - 1 more test in `chat-channels`, `materializes direct external-chat finals once`, gets `undefined`. I did not find the cause. CI is the check for these 7 tests. `ci / verify` passed on `eab4dcc1f4`. Failures during this work: - My fix to `agent-runtime-connector-access` changed an invalid permission key in the setup, but not in the assertion. The runtime check found this. I corrected the assertion, and the file passes. - `heartbeat-plugin-environment` failed one wait in the full run. It passed three times alone, so I think that load caused the failure. It can fail again under load. - `dot-runner` skipped all 54 tests in the full run because `cargo` was not on my `PATH`. It then passed 54 of 54 with the toolchain on the `PATH`. - My first `lib` value removed the default DOM types, and the error count went up by 375. I added the DOM libraries. - My Daytona stub with bare `any` left 48 errors, because generic helpers then inferred `unknown`. I added shapes that return promises. - One fix to `agent-secrets-routes` used `class_3_static_lease`, and the test failed. That class allows only specific paths. I reverted to `unclassified`. - `ci / General tests (server (8/12))` failed on `259737b700` because of the flaky port in `idle-completed-history`. paperclipai/paperclip#18853 fixed this test on master, so this pull request keeps that fix. **Audit of the diff.** I counted these patterns in added and removed lines, to find fixes that only hide an error: | Pattern | Added | Removed | | --- | --- | --- | | `@ts-ignore` | 0 | 0 | | `@ts-expect-error` | 0 | 1 | | `.skip` | 0 | 0 | | `as any` | 9 | 9 | | `: any` | 11 | 2 | | `as never` | 8 | 2 | | `as unknown as` | 35 | 4 | | `Promise<unknown>` | 16 | 5 | | `expect(` | 128 | 113 | No hunk removes more `expect(` calls than it adds. Three removals of test content were intentional, and I checked each one: - `muse-control` removed `signalToken`. Line 1012 already asserts that it is absent. - `merged-pr-confirmation-sweep` removed legacy aliases. Other tests cover them. - `heartbeat-workspace-branch-containment` removed a `finalize` branch that no test row can reach. Some partial fixtures stay unchecked through `as unknown as` and `Promise<unknown>`, mostly in `issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes` and `issue-comment-reopen-routes`. **Accuracy of the check.** One program over the tree and the three shards reported the same errors at the same positions. Memory, as the peak of the largest process on one thread, was 3.93 GiB for one program and 2.43 GiB for the largest shard. I measured these two values before the fixes. Not run or not proven: - I did not run the full `pnpm test:run`, or a root `pnpm build`. I expect CI to run the full suites. - I did not run the 4 GiB container check, or the full `scripts/typecheck-low-memory.mjs`. The peaks above come from macOS, so they are not a Linux cgroup measurement. - I did not run the UI typecheck after the merges. - `workspace-runtime-https-live-exercise` is skipped, so its `cleanup` fix did not run. ## Risks - **A large diff in test files.** 328 files change. A pull request that edits the same tests can get merge conflicts. New tests on master can also add type errors before this merges. Any such error fails this check and needs a fix here. - **A higher cost for changes to source types.** A change to a type can add errors in test files that the author did not touch. The author must then fix them. This is the purpose of the check, but it is new work. - **Changed test behavior.** Some tests now run paths that they did not run before, such as the 9 chat wizard fixtures and the 3 span tests. They pass here, but they can be more sensitive to timing or to the environment. - **The Daytona stub can go stale.** The stub is written by hand. If the plugin uses a new SDK member, the typecheck reports an error until someone updates the stub. - **The release path.** `release-verify.yml` and `scripts/release.sh` run `pnpm -r typecheck`, so they now run this check. - **The tsconfig change.** The test transform reads `server/src/__tests__/tsconfig.json`. The options that I changed are for type checks, and the runs above passed. - **A gap that remains.** Tsconfigs in `packages/paperclip-runner` and in most sandbox provider plugins exclude `*.test.ts`. This check does not read most of those test files, so they can still drift. That work is separate from this pull request. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) through Claude Code, with reasoning, tool use, code execution, and subagents. The runtime does not show the context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass (7 tests fail locally, with and without this change. See Verification.) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1896 lines
81 KiB
TypeScript
1896 lines
81 KiB
TypeScript
import { createHash, randomUUID } from "node:crypto";
|
|
import { eq, sql } from "drizzle-orm";
|
|
import { afterAll, afterEach, beforeAll, describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
|
|
import {
|
|
activityLog,
|
|
agents,
|
|
companies,
|
|
companySecrets,
|
|
createDb,
|
|
heartbeatRuns,
|
|
issues,
|
|
principalPermissionGrants,
|
|
projects,
|
|
toolAccessAuditEvents,
|
|
toolActionRequests,
|
|
toolApplications,
|
|
toolCatalogEntries,
|
|
toolCallEvents,
|
|
toolConnections,
|
|
toolInvocations,
|
|
toolMcpGateways,
|
|
toolPolicies,
|
|
toolProfileBindings,
|
|
toolProfileEntries,
|
|
toolProfiles,
|
|
toolRateLimitCounters,
|
|
} from "@paperclipai/db";
|
|
import {
|
|
getEmbeddedPostgresTestSupport,
|
|
startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase,
|
|
} from "./helpers/embedded-postgres.js";
|
|
import { toolAccessPolicyService } from "../services/tool-access-policy.js";
|
|
import { toolAccessService } from "../services/tool-access.js";
|
|
import { createToolGatewayService, ToolGatewayHttpError } from "../services/tool-gateway.js";
|
|
import { canonicalToolArguments, signToolArguments } from "../services/tool-content-guards.js";
|
|
|
|
import { resolveExternalTestDatabaseUrl } from "./helpers/external-test-database.js";
|
|
const externalDatabaseUrl = resolveExternalTestDatabaseUrl("PAPERCLIP_TOOL_POLICY_TEST_DATABASE_URL");
|
|
const embeddedPostgresSupport = externalDatabaseUrl ? { supported: true } : await getEmbeddedPostgresTestSupport();
|
|
const describeEmbeddedPostgres = embeddedPostgresSupport.supported ? describe : describe.skip;
|
|
|
|
function legacySideEffectKey(invocation: typeof toolInvocations.$inferSelect, argumentsHash: string) {
|
|
const scope = { companyId: invocation.companyId, runId: invocation.runId, issueId: invocation.issueId,
|
|
applicationId: invocation.applicationId, connectionId: invocation.connectionId,
|
|
catalogEntryId: invocation.catalogEntryId, toolName: invocation.toolName, argumentsHash };
|
|
return `side_effect:${createHash("sha256").update(JSON.stringify(Object.fromEntries(
|
|
Object.entries(scope).sort(([left], [right]) => left < right ? -1 : left > right ? 1 : 0),
|
|
))).digest("hex")}`;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function createCompany(db: ReturnType<typeof createDb>) {
|
|
return db.insert(companies).values({
|
|
name: `Tool Access ${randomUUID()}`,
|
|
issuePrefix: `TA${randomUUID().slice(0, 6).toUpperCase()}`,
|
|
}).returning().then((rows) => rows[0]!);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function createAgent(
|
|
db: ReturnType<typeof createDb>,
|
|
companyId: string,
|
|
permissions: Record<string, unknown> = {},
|
|
) {
|
|
return db.insert(agents).values({
|
|
companyId,
|
|
name: `Agent ${randomUUID()}`,
|
|
role: "engineer",
|
|
adapterType: "process",
|
|
adapterConfig: {},
|
|
runtimeConfig: {},
|
|
permissions,
|
|
}).returning().then((rows) => rows[0]!);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function createRun(
|
|
db: ReturnType<typeof createDb>,
|
|
companyId: string,
|
|
agentId: string,
|
|
contextSnapshot: Record<string, unknown> = {},
|
|
) {
|
|
return db.insert(heartbeatRuns).values({
|
|
companyId,
|
|
agentId,
|
|
invocationSource: "assignment",
|
|
status: "running",
|
|
contextSnapshot,
|
|
}).returning().then((rows) => rows[0]!);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function createIssue(db: ReturnType<typeof createDb>, companyId: string, title = "Tool issue") {
|
|
return db.insert(issues).values({
|
|
companyId,
|
|
title: `${title} ${randomUUID()}`,
|
|
status: "in_progress",
|
|
}).returning().then((rows) => rows[0]!);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function createTool(db: ReturnType<typeof createDb>, companyId: string) {
|
|
const application = await db.insert(toolApplications).values({
|
|
companyId,
|
|
applicationKey: `fixture-${randomUUID()}`,
|
|
name: `Fixture ${randomUUID()}`,
|
|
type: "mcp_http",
|
|
status: "active",
|
|
}).returning().then((rows) => rows[0]!);
|
|
const connection = await db.insert(toolConnections).values({
|
|
companyId,
|
|
applicationId: application.id,
|
|
name: `Connection ${randomUUID()}`,
|
|
uid: `test/${randomUUID()}`,
|
|
transport: "mcp_remote",
|
|
status: "active",
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
config: { url: "https://example.invalid/mcp" },
|
|
}).returning().then((rows) => rows[0]!);
|
|
const catalogEntry = await db.insert(toolCatalogEntries).values({
|
|
companyId,
|
|
applicationId: application.id,
|
|
connectionId: connection.id,
|
|
name: "send_email",
|
|
toolName: "send_email",
|
|
riskLevel: "write",
|
|
versionHash: randomUUID(),
|
|
schemaHash: randomUUID(),
|
|
}).returning().then((rows) => rows[0]!);
|
|
return { application, connection, catalogEntry };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function createApprovedToolAction(input: {
|
|
db: ReturnType<typeof createDb>;
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
agentId: string;
|
|
connectionId: string;
|
|
catalogEntryId: string;
|
|
issueId?: string | null;
|
|
argumentsValue: Record<string, unknown>;
|
|
status?: "approved" | "executed";
|
|
}) {
|
|
const svc = toolAccessPolicyService(input.db);
|
|
const decisionInput = {
|
|
companyId: input.companyId,
|
|
actor: { actorType: "agent" as const, actorId: input.agentId, agentId: input.agentId },
|
|
runContext: { issueId: input.issueId ?? null },
|
|
request: {
|
|
connectionId: input.connectionId,
|
|
catalogEntryId: input.catalogEntryId,
|
|
toolName: "send_email",
|
|
arguments: input.argumentsValue,
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
const decision = await svc.decide(decisionInput);
|
|
const recorded = await svc.recordInvocation(decisionInput, decision);
|
|
if (!recorded.actionRequest) throw new Error("Expected approval-required action request");
|
|
const [updated] = await input.db
|
|
.update(toolActionRequests)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: input.status ?? "approved",
|
|
resolvedAt: new Date(),
|
|
updatedAt: new Date(),
|
|
})
|
|
.where(eq(toolActionRequests.id, recorded.actionRequest.id))
|
|
.returning();
|
|
return { decisionInput, invocation: recorded.invocation, actionRequest: updated };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type IdRef = { id: string };
|
|
|
|
function sendEmailGrantRow(company: IdRef, agent: IdRef): typeof principalPermissionGrants.$inferInsert {
|
|
return {
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
principalType: "agent",
|
|
principalId: agent.id,
|
|
permissionKey: "tools:use",
|
|
scope: { toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function agentProfileBindingRow(company: IdRef, profile: IdRef, agent: IdRef): typeof toolProfileBindings.$inferInsert {
|
|
return {
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileId: profile.id,
|
|
targetType: "agent",
|
|
targetId: agent.id,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function sendEmailDecisionInput(company: IdRef, agent: IdRef, connection: IdRef, catalogEntry: IdRef): Parameters<ReturnType<typeof toolAccessPolicyService>["decide"]>[0] {
|
|
return {
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actor: { actorType: "agent", actorId: agent.id, agentId: agent.id },
|
|
request: { connectionId: connection.id, catalogEntryId: catalogEntry.id, toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function reviewSendPolicyRow(company: IdRef, name: string): typeof toolPolicies.$inferInsert {
|
|
return {
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
name: name,
|
|
policyType: "require_approval",
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function executedActionInput(db: ReturnType<typeof createDb>, company: IdRef, agent: IdRef, connection: IdRef, catalogEntry: IdRef, args: Record<string, unknown>): Parameters<typeof createApprovedToolAction>[0] {
|
|
return {
|
|
db,
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
agentId: agent.id,
|
|
connectionId: connection.id,
|
|
catalogEntryId: catalogEntry.id,
|
|
argumentsValue: args,
|
|
status: "executed",
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describeEmbeddedPostgres("tool access policy service", () => {
|
|
let db!: ReturnType<typeof createDb>;
|
|
let tempDb: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase>> | null = null;
|
|
|
|
beforeAll(async () => {
|
|
if (externalDatabaseUrl) db = createDb(externalDatabaseUrl);
|
|
else {
|
|
tempDb = await startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase("paperclip-tool-access-policy-");
|
|
db = createDb(tempDb.connectionString);
|
|
}
|
|
}, 20_000);
|
|
|
|
afterEach(async () => {
|
|
await db.delete(toolRateLimitCounters);
|
|
await db.delete(toolActionRequests);
|
|
await db.delete(toolInvocations);
|
|
await db.delete(toolCallEvents);
|
|
await db.delete(toolAccessAuditEvents);
|
|
await db.delete(toolPolicies);
|
|
await db.delete(toolProfileEntries);
|
|
await db.delete(toolProfileBindings);
|
|
await db.delete(toolMcpGateways);
|
|
await db.delete(toolProfiles);
|
|
await db.delete(toolCatalogEntries);
|
|
await db.delete(toolConnections);
|
|
await db.delete(toolApplications);
|
|
await db.delete(companySecrets);
|
|
await db.delete(principalPermissionGrants);
|
|
await db.delete(issues);
|
|
await db.delete(projects);
|
|
await db.delete(activityLog);
|
|
await db.delete(heartbeatRuns);
|
|
await db.delete(agents);
|
|
await db.delete(companies);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
afterAll(async () => {
|
|
await db?.$client.end({ timeout: 1 });
|
|
await tempDb?.cleanup();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("denies direct execution without an effective profile or grant", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection, catalogEntry } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
|
|
const result = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide(sendEmailDecisionInput(company, agent, connection, catalogEntry));
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
decision: "deny",
|
|
reasonCode: "deny_default",
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("allows calls through an effective agent profile", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection, catalogEntry } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
const profile = await db.insert(toolProfiles).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileKey: `profile-${randomUUID()}`,
|
|
name: "Write tools",
|
|
defaultAction: "deny",
|
|
}).returning().then((rows) => rows[0]!);
|
|
await db.insert(toolProfileBindings).values(agentProfileBindingRow(company, profile, agent));
|
|
await db.insert(toolProfileEntries).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileId: profile.id,
|
|
selectorType: "tool_name",
|
|
effect: "include",
|
|
toolName: "send_email",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const result = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide(sendEmailDecisionInput(company, agent, connection, catalogEntry));
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: true,
|
|
decision: "allow",
|
|
reasonCode: "allow_profile",
|
|
effectiveProfileIds: [profile.id],
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("uses issue-scoped profiles ahead of company defaults", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection, catalogEntry } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
const issue = await createIssue(db, company.id, "Scoped deny");
|
|
|
|
const [companyProfile, issueProfile] = await db.insert(toolProfiles).values([
|
|
{
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileKey: `company-allow-${randomUUID()}`,
|
|
name: "Company allow",
|
|
defaultAction: "deny",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileKey: `issue-deny-${randomUUID()}`,
|
|
name: "Issue deny",
|
|
defaultAction: "deny",
|
|
},
|
|
]).returning();
|
|
await db.insert(toolProfileBindings).values([
|
|
{
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileId: companyProfile!.id,
|
|
targetType: "company",
|
|
targetId: company.id,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileId: issueProfile!.id,
|
|
targetType: "issue",
|
|
targetId: issue.id,
|
|
},
|
|
]);
|
|
await db.insert(toolProfileEntries).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileId: companyProfile!.id,
|
|
selectorType: "tool_name",
|
|
effect: "include",
|
|
toolName: "send_email",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const result = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actor: { actorType: "agent", actorId: agent.id, agentId: agent.id },
|
|
runContext: { issueId: issue.id },
|
|
request: { connectionId: connection.id, catalogEntryId: catalogEntry.id, toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
decision: "deny",
|
|
reasonCode: "deny_default",
|
|
effectiveProfileIds: [issueProfile!.id],
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("uses agent-scoped profiles ahead of project defaults", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection, catalogEntry } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
const project = await db.insert(projects).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
name: `Project ${randomUUID()}`,
|
|
}).returning().then((rows) => rows[0]!);
|
|
|
|
const [projectProfile, agentProfile] = await db.insert(toolProfiles).values([
|
|
{
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileKey: `project-allow-${randomUUID()}`,
|
|
name: "Project allow",
|
|
defaultAction: "deny",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileKey: `agent-deny-${randomUUID()}`,
|
|
name: "Agent deny",
|
|
defaultAction: "deny",
|
|
},
|
|
]).returning();
|
|
await db.insert(toolProfileBindings).values([
|
|
{
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileId: projectProfile!.id,
|
|
targetType: "project",
|
|
targetId: project.id,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileId: agentProfile!.id,
|
|
targetType: "agent",
|
|
targetId: agent.id,
|
|
},
|
|
]);
|
|
await db.insert(toolProfileEntries).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileId: projectProfile!.id,
|
|
selectorType: "tool_name",
|
|
effect: "include",
|
|
toolName: "send_email",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const result = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actor: { actorType: "agent", actorId: agent.id, agentId: agent.id },
|
|
runContext: { projectId: project.id },
|
|
request: { connectionId: connection.id, catalogEntryId: catalogEntry.id, toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
decision: "deny",
|
|
reasonCode: "deny_default",
|
|
effectiveProfileIds: [agentProfile!.id],
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("uses issue-scoped allows ahead of broader company denies", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection, catalogEntry } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
const issue = await createIssue(db, company.id, "Scoped allow");
|
|
|
|
const [companyProfile, issueProfile] = await db.insert(toolProfiles).values([
|
|
{
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileKey: `company-deny-${randomUUID()}`,
|
|
name: "Company deny",
|
|
defaultAction: "deny",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileKey: `issue-allow-${randomUUID()}`,
|
|
name: "Issue allow",
|
|
defaultAction: "deny",
|
|
},
|
|
]).returning();
|
|
await db.insert(toolProfileBindings).values([
|
|
{
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileId: companyProfile!.id,
|
|
targetType: "company",
|
|
targetId: company.id,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileId: issueProfile!.id,
|
|
targetType: "issue",
|
|
targetId: issue.id,
|
|
},
|
|
]);
|
|
await db.insert(toolProfileEntries).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileId: issueProfile!.id,
|
|
selectorType: "tool_name",
|
|
effect: "include",
|
|
toolName: "send_email",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const result = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actor: { actorType: "agent", actorId: agent.id, agentId: agent.id },
|
|
runContext: { issueId: issue.id },
|
|
request: { connectionId: connection.id, catalogEntryId: catalogEntry.id, toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: true,
|
|
decision: "allow",
|
|
reasonCode: "allow_profile",
|
|
effectiveProfileIds: [issueProfile!.id],
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("denies calls through draft and archived profiles", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const draftAgent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const archivedAgent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection, catalogEntry } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
const [draftProfile, archivedProfile] = await db.insert(toolProfiles).values([
|
|
{
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileKey: `draft-profile-${randomUUID()}`,
|
|
name: "Draft write tools",
|
|
status: "draft",
|
|
defaultAction: "allow",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileKey: `archived-profile-${randomUUID()}`,
|
|
name: "Archived write tools",
|
|
status: "archived",
|
|
defaultAction: "allow",
|
|
},
|
|
]).returning();
|
|
await db.insert(toolProfileBindings).values([
|
|
{
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileId: draftProfile!.id,
|
|
targetType: "agent",
|
|
targetId: draftAgent.id,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileId: archivedProfile!.id,
|
|
targetType: "agent",
|
|
targetId: archivedAgent.id,
|
|
},
|
|
]);
|
|
await db.insert(toolProfileEntries).values([
|
|
{
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileId: draftProfile!.id,
|
|
selectorType: "tool_name",
|
|
effect: "include",
|
|
toolName: "send_email",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileId: archivedProfile!.id,
|
|
selectorType: "tool_name",
|
|
effect: "include",
|
|
toolName: "send_email",
|
|
},
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
for (const agent of [draftAgent, archivedAgent]) {
|
|
const result = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide(sendEmailDecisionInput(company, agent, connection, catalogEntry));
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
decision: "deny",
|
|
reasonCode: "deny_default",
|
|
effectiveProfileIds: [],
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("denies calls through disabled applications before explicit grants and allows them after reactivation", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { application, connection, catalogEntry } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
await db.insert(principalPermissionGrants).values(sendEmailGrantRow(company, agent));
|
|
const input = {
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actor: { actorType: "agent" as const, actorId: agent.id, agentId: agent.id },
|
|
request: { connectionId: connection.id, catalogEntryId: catalogEntry.id, toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
await expect(toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide(input)).resolves.toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: true,
|
|
decision: "allow",
|
|
reasonCode: "allow_explicit_grant",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await db
|
|
.update(toolApplications)
|
|
.set({ status: "disabled", updatedAt: new Date() })
|
|
.where(eq(toolApplications.id, application.id));
|
|
await expect(toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide(input)).resolves.toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
decision: "deny",
|
|
reasonCode: "deny_disabled_application",
|
|
explanation: "Application is disabled.",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await db
|
|
.update(toolApplications)
|
|
.set({ status: "active", updatedAt: new Date() })
|
|
.where(eq(toolApplications.id, application.id));
|
|
await expect(toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide(input)).resolves.toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: true,
|
|
decision: "allow",
|
|
reasonCode: "allow_explicit_grant",
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("manages generic tool policies without exposing trust rules", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const otherCompany = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const svc = toolAccessPolicyService(db);
|
|
const [trustRule] = await db.insert(toolPolicies).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
name: "Promoted trust rule",
|
|
policyType: "trust_rule",
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
config: { trustRule: { hitCount: 0 } },
|
|
}).returning();
|
|
|
|
const created = await svc.createPolicy(company.id, {
|
|
name: "Block destructive senders",
|
|
description: "Block a dangerous tool family.",
|
|
policyType: "block",
|
|
priority: 10,
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
selectors: { toolNames: ["send_email", "delete_email"] },
|
|
conditions: null,
|
|
config: null,
|
|
}, { userId: "board-user" });
|
|
|
|
expect(created).toMatchObject({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
name: "Block destructive senders",
|
|
policyType: "block",
|
|
priority: 10,
|
|
createdByUserId: "board-user",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await expect(svc.createPolicy(company.id, {
|
|
name: "Generic trust rule",
|
|
description: null,
|
|
policyType: "trust_rule",
|
|
priority: 100,
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
selectors: {},
|
|
conditions: null,
|
|
config: null,
|
|
})).rejects.toMatchObject({ status: 422 });
|
|
|
|
await expect(svc.updatePolicy({
|
|
companyId: otherCompany.id,
|
|
policyId: created.id,
|
|
body: { enabled: false },
|
|
})).rejects.toMatchObject({ status: 404 });
|
|
|
|
const listed = await svc.listPolicies(company.id);
|
|
expect(listed.map((policy) => policy.id)).toEqual([created.id]);
|
|
|
|
const updated = await svc.updatePolicy({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
policyId: created.id,
|
|
body: {
|
|
name: "Require review for destructive senders",
|
|
policyType: "require_approval",
|
|
enabled: false,
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "delete_email" },
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
expect(updated).toMatchObject({
|
|
id: created.id,
|
|
name: "Require review for destructive senders",
|
|
policyType: "require_approval",
|
|
enabled: false,
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "delete_email" },
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const deleted = await svc.deletePolicy({ companyId: company.id, policyId: created.id });
|
|
expect(deleted.id).toBe(created.id);
|
|
await expect(svc.deletePolicy({ companyId: company.id, policyId: trustRule.id }))
|
|
.rejects.toMatchObject({ status: 404 });
|
|
expect(await svc.listPolicies(company.id)).toEqual([]);
|
|
const remainingTrustRules = await svc.listTrustRules(company.id);
|
|
expect(remainingTrustRules.map((policy) => policy.id)).toEqual([trustRule.id]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("treats glob-looking action-name selectors as exact names", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection, catalogEntry } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
const profile = await db.insert(toolProfiles).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileKey: `profile-${randomUUID()}`,
|
|
name: "Write tools",
|
|
defaultAction: "allow",
|
|
}).returning().then((rows) => rows[0]!);
|
|
await db.insert(toolProfileBindings).values(agentProfileBindingRow(company, profile, agent));
|
|
const wildcardPolicy = await db.insert(toolPolicies).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
name: "Review wildcard-looking sends",
|
|
policyType: "require_approval",
|
|
priority: 10,
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "*send*" },
|
|
}).returning().then((rows) => rows[0]!);
|
|
|
|
const input = {
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actor: { actorType: "agent" as const, actorId: agent.id, agentId: agent.id },
|
|
request: { connectionId: connection.id, catalogEntryId: catalogEntry.id, toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
await expect(toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide(input)).resolves.toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: true,
|
|
decision: "allow",
|
|
reasonCode: "allow_profile",
|
|
effectiveProfileIds: [profile.id],
|
|
matchedPolicyIds: [],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const exactPolicy = await db.insert(toolPolicies).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
name: "Review exact sends",
|
|
policyType: "require_approval",
|
|
priority: 5,
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
}).returning().then((rows) => rows[0]!);
|
|
|
|
await expect(toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide(input)).resolves.toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
decision: "require_approval",
|
|
reasonCode: "requires_approval_policy",
|
|
effectiveProfileIds: [profile.id],
|
|
matchedPolicyIds: [exactPolicy.id],
|
|
});
|
|
expect(wildcardPolicy.selectors).toEqual({ toolName: "*send*" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("matches tool name selectors against connected MCP upstream tool names", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection, catalogEntry } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
const policy = await db.insert(toolPolicies).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
name: "Review upstream todo writes",
|
|
policyType: "require_approval",
|
|
priority: 10,
|
|
selectors: { toolNames: ["todo.add"] },
|
|
}).returning().then((rows) => rows[0]!);
|
|
|
|
await expect(toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actor: { actorType: "agent", actorId: agent.id, agentId: agent.id },
|
|
request: {
|
|
connectionId: connection.id,
|
|
catalogEntryId: catalogEntry.id,
|
|
toolName: "mcp.smoke-fixture:todo-add",
|
|
upstreamToolName: "todo.add",
|
|
},
|
|
})).resolves.toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
decision: "require_approval",
|
|
reasonCode: "requires_approval_policy",
|
|
matchedPolicyIds: [policy.id],
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects agent-supplied run context that belongs to another agent", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const actorAgent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const otherAgent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
const run = await db.insert(heartbeatRuns).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
agentId: otherAgent.id,
|
|
invocationSource: "assignment",
|
|
status: "running",
|
|
}).returning().then((rows) => rows[0]!);
|
|
|
|
const result = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actor: { actorType: "agent", actorId: actorAgent.id, agentId: actorAgent.id },
|
|
runContext: { heartbeatRunId: run.id },
|
|
request: { connectionId: connection.id, toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
reasonCode: "deny_run_context_mismatch",
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects agent-supplied issue context that differs from the stored heartbeat context", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const canonicalIssue = await createIssue(db, company.id, "Canonical");
|
|
const escalatedIssue = await createIssue(db, company.id, "Escalated");
|
|
const { connection } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
const run = await createRun(db, company.id, agent.id, { issueId: canonicalIssue.id });
|
|
|
|
const result = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actor: { actorType: "agent", actorId: agent.id, agentId: agent.id },
|
|
runContext: { heartbeatRunId: run.id, issueId: escalatedIssue.id },
|
|
request: { connectionId: connection.id, toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
reasonCode: "deny_run_context_mismatch",
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("audits denied calls without storing secret argument values", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
const input = {
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actor: { actorType: "agent" as const, actorId: agent.id, agentId: agent.id },
|
|
request: {
|
|
connectionId: connection.id,
|
|
toolName: "send_email",
|
|
arguments: { to: "ops@example.com", apiKey: "sk-test-secret-value-123456" },
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const decision = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide(input);
|
|
await toolAccessPolicyService(db).writeAudit(input, decision);
|
|
const [legacyAudit] = await db.select().from(toolAccessAuditEvents);
|
|
const [callEvent] = await db.select().from(toolCallEvents);
|
|
const serialized = JSON.stringify({ legacy: legacyAudit.details, dedicated: callEvent });
|
|
|
|
expect(decision.reasonCode).toBe("deny_default");
|
|
expect(callEvent).toMatchObject({
|
|
eventType: "policy_decision",
|
|
outcome: "denied",
|
|
reasonCode: "deny_default",
|
|
decision: "deny",
|
|
matchedPolicyIds: [],
|
|
requestHash: expect.any(String),
|
|
});
|
|
expect(serialized).not.toContain("sk-test-secret-value");
|
|
expect(serialized).toContain("[REDACTED]");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("records approval-required invocations and action requests with matched policy IDs", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
const policy = await db.insert(toolPolicies).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
name: "Review writes",
|
|
policyType: "require_approval",
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
description: "Writes require board review.",
|
|
}).returning().then((rows) => rows[0]!);
|
|
const input = {
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actor: { actorType: "agent" as const, actorId: agent.id, agentId: agent.id },
|
|
request: {
|
|
connectionId: connection.id,
|
|
toolName: "send_email",
|
|
arguments: { to: "ops@example.com", body: "ship it" },
|
|
sideEffecting: true,
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const decision = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide(input);
|
|
const recorded = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).recordInvocation(input, decision);
|
|
await toolAccessPolicyService(db).writeAudit(input, decision);
|
|
const [callEvent] = await db.select().from(toolCallEvents);
|
|
|
|
expect(decision).toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
decision: "require_approval",
|
|
reasonCode: "requires_approval_policy",
|
|
matchedPolicyIds: [policy.id],
|
|
});
|
|
expect(recorded.actionRequest).toMatchObject({
|
|
invocationId: recorded.invocation.id,
|
|
requestedByAgentId: agent.id,
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
});
|
|
expect(recorded.invocation).toMatchObject({
|
|
approvalState: "pending",
|
|
status: "awaiting_approval",
|
|
matchedPolicyIds: [policy.id],
|
|
});
|
|
expect(callEvent).toMatchObject({
|
|
eventType: "policy_decision",
|
|
outcome: "pending",
|
|
decision: "require_approval",
|
|
matchedPolicyIds: [policy.id],
|
|
requestSummary: expect.objectContaining({ summary: expect.any(String) }),
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("replays side-effecting calls with the same idempotency key instead of creating a new invocation", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
await db.insert(principalPermissionGrants).values(sendEmailGrantRow(company, agent));
|
|
const input = {
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actor: { actorType: "agent" as const, actorId: agent.id, agentId: agent.id },
|
|
request: {
|
|
connectionId: connection.id,
|
|
toolName: "send_email",
|
|
arguments: { to: "ops@example.com" },
|
|
sideEffecting: true,
|
|
idempotencyKey: "send-email-1",
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const decision = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide(input);
|
|
const first = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).recordInvocation(input, decision);
|
|
const replay = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).recordInvocation(input, decision);
|
|
|
|
expect(first.replayed).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(replay.replayed).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(replay.invocation.id).toBe(first.invocation.id);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("derives a canonical idempotency key for side-effecting calls without caller-supplied keys", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
await db.insert(principalPermissionGrants).values(sendEmailGrantRow(company, agent));
|
|
const input = {
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actor: { actorType: "agent" as const, actorId: agent.id, agentId: agent.id },
|
|
request: {
|
|
connectionId: connection.id,
|
|
toolName: "send_email",
|
|
arguments: { to: "ops@example.com", body: "only once" },
|
|
sideEffecting: true,
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const decision = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide(input);
|
|
const first = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).recordInvocation(input, decision);
|
|
const replay = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).recordInvocation(input, decision);
|
|
|
|
expect(first.replayed).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(first.invocation.idempotencyKey).toMatch(/^side_effect:v2:/);
|
|
expect(replay.replayed).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(replay.invocation.id).toBe(first.invocation.id);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it.each([
|
|
[{ password: "old-value" }, { password: "new-value" }],
|
|
[{ body: `${"x".repeat(500)}old` }, { body: `${"x".repeat(500)}new` }],
|
|
[{ items: [...Array.from({ length: 50 }, (_, index) => index), "old"] }, { items: [...Array.from({ length: 50 }, (_, index) => index), "new"] }],
|
|
])("blocks unverifiable legacy default-key writes until an explicit new operation is requested (%#)", async (original, replacement) => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
await db.insert(principalPermissionGrants).values(sendEmailGrantRow(company, agent));
|
|
const svc = toolAccessPolicyService(db, { toolActionSigningSecret: "legacy-identity-fixture-key" });
|
|
const input = { companyId: company.id, actor: { actorType: "agent" as const, actorId: agent.id, agentId: agent.id },
|
|
request: { connectionId: connection.id, toolName: "send_email", arguments: original, sideEffecting: true } };
|
|
const decision = await svc.decide(input);
|
|
const first = await svc.recordInvocation(input, decision);
|
|
const oldHash = first.invocation.argumentsSummary!.sha256!;
|
|
await db.update(toolInvocations).set({ argumentsHash: oldHash,
|
|
idempotencyKey: legacySideEffectKey(first.invocation, oldHash), status: "succeeded" })
|
|
.where(eq(toolInvocations.id, first.invocation.id));
|
|
// A complete new request can equal the old shortened preview verbatim.
|
|
// That must not bypass the legacy verifier through the current-key lookup.
|
|
const previewArguments = JSON.parse(first.invocation.argumentsSummary!.summary);
|
|
for (const args of [original, replacement, previewArguments]) {
|
|
await expect(svc.recordInvocation({ ...input, request: { ...input.request, arguments: args } }, decision))
|
|
.rejects.toMatchObject({ status: 409, details: {
|
|
reasonCode: "legacy_tool_idempotency_unverifiable", invocationId: first.invocation.id,
|
|
} });
|
|
}
|
|
expect(await db.select().from(toolInvocations)).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
const explicit = await svc.recordInvocation({ ...input, request: { ...input.request, arguments: replacement,
|
|
idempotencyKey: "intentional-new-operation" } }, decision);
|
|
expect(explicit.replayed).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(explicit.invocation.id).not.toBe(first.invocation.id);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it.each(["preview", "complete"])("replays a legacy default-key result when its %s identity proves an exact match", async (identityKind) => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
await db.insert(principalPermissionGrants).values(sendEmailGrantRow(company, agent));
|
|
const svc = toolAccessPolicyService(db, { toolActionSigningSecret: "legacy-identity-fixture-key" });
|
|
// Historical sorting was ordinal; the new canonical serializer uses locale order.
|
|
const input = { companyId: company.id, actor: { actorType: "agent" as const, actorId: agent.id, agentId: agent.id },
|
|
request: { connectionId: connection.id, toolName: "send_email", arguments: identityKind === "preview"
|
|
? { Z: "last", a: "first" } : { password: "saved-secret" }, sideEffecting: true } };
|
|
const decision = await svc.decide(input);
|
|
const first = await svc.recordInvocation(input, decision);
|
|
expect(first.invocation.argumentsHash).not.toBe(first.invocation.argumentsSummary!.sha256);
|
|
const oldHash = identityKind === "preview" ? first.invocation.argumentsSummary!.sha256! : first.invocation.argumentsHash!;
|
|
const resultSummary = { summary: "saved result" };
|
|
await db.update(toolInvocations).set({ argumentsHash: oldHash, resultSummary,
|
|
idempotencyKey: legacySideEffectKey(first.invocation, oldHash), status: "succeeded" })
|
|
.where(eq(toolInvocations.id, first.invocation.id));
|
|
expect(await svc.recordInvocation(input, decision)).toMatchObject({ replayed: true,
|
|
invocation: { id: first.invocation.id, resultSummary } });
|
|
expect(await db.select().from(toolInvocations)).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("uses authenticated legacy arguments to distinguish an exact retry from a new secret operation", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
await db.insert(principalPermissionGrants).values(sendEmailGrantRow(company, agent));
|
|
const signingSecret = "legacy-identity-fixture-key";
|
|
const svc = toolAccessPolicyService(db, { toolActionSigningSecret: signingSecret });
|
|
const input = { companyId: company.id, actor: { actorType: "agent" as const, actorId: agent.id, agentId: agent.id },
|
|
request: { connectionId: connection.id, toolName: "send_email", arguments: { password: "old-value" }, sideEffecting: true } };
|
|
const decision = await svc.decide(input);
|
|
const first = await svc.recordInvocation(input, decision);
|
|
const oldHash = first.invocation.argumentsSummary!.sha256!;
|
|
await db.update(toolInvocations).set({ argumentsHash: oldHash,
|
|
idempotencyKey: legacySideEffectKey(first.invocation, oldHash), status: "succeeded" })
|
|
.where(eq(toolInvocations.id, first.invocation.id));
|
|
await db.insert(toolActionRequests).values({ companyId: company.id, invocationId: first.invocation.id,
|
|
status: "executed", canonicalArgumentsHash: oldHash, canonicalArgumentsSummary: first.invocation.argumentsSummary!, signedArguments: signToolArguments({
|
|
invocationId: first.invocation.id, toolName: "send_email", canonicalArguments: canonicalToolArguments(input.request.arguments), signingSecret,
|
|
}) });
|
|
expect(await svc.recordInvocation(input, decision)).toMatchObject({ replayed: true, invocation: { id: first.invocation.id } });
|
|
const replacement = await svc.recordInvocation({ ...input, request: { ...input.request, arguments: { password: "new-value" } } }, decision);
|
|
expect(replacement.replayed).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(await db.select().from(toolInvocations)).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("separates no-run default keys by actor and never exposes another actor's legacy result", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const firstAgent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const secondAgent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
await db.insert(principalPermissionGrants).values([sendEmailGrantRow(company, firstAgent), sendEmailGrantRow(company, secondAgent)]);
|
|
const svc = toolAccessPolicyService(db);
|
|
const input = { companyId: company.id, actor: { actorType: "agent" as const, actorId: firstAgent.id, agentId: firstAgent.id },
|
|
request: { connectionId: connection.id, toolName: "send_email", arguments: { body: "same request" }, sideEffecting: true } };
|
|
const secondInput = { ...input, actor: { actorType: "agent" as const, actorId: secondAgent.id, agentId: secondAgent.id } };
|
|
const first = await svc.recordInvocation(input, await svc.decide(input));
|
|
const second = await svc.recordInvocation(secondInput, await svc.decide(secondInput));
|
|
expect(second.replayed).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(second.invocation.idempotencyKey).not.toBe(first.invocation.idempotencyKey);
|
|
const oldHash = first.invocation.argumentsSummary!.sha256!;
|
|
await db.update(toolInvocations).set({ argumentsHash: oldHash, resultSummary: { summary: "first actor's result" },
|
|
idempotencyKey: legacySideEffectKey(first.invocation, oldHash), status: "succeeded" })
|
|
.where(eq(toolInvocations.id, first.invocation.id));
|
|
await db.delete(toolInvocations).where(eq(toolInvocations.id, second.invocation.id));
|
|
const error = await svc.recordInvocation(secondInput, await svc.decide(secondInput)).then(() => null, failure => failure);
|
|
expect(error).toMatchObject({ status: 409 });
|
|
expect(error.details).toEqual({ reasonCode: "legacy_tool_idempotency_unverifiable" });
|
|
expect(JSON.stringify(error)).not.toContain(first.invocation.id);
|
|
expect(await db.select().from(toolInvocations)).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("enforces rate-limit policies before explicit grants", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
await db.insert(principalPermissionGrants).values(sendEmailGrantRow(company, agent));
|
|
await db.insert(toolPolicies).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
name: "One send per minute",
|
|
policyType: "rate_limit",
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
config: { limit: 1, windowSeconds: 60, keyBy: ["agent", "tool"] },
|
|
});
|
|
const input = {
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actor: { actorType: "agent" as const, actorId: agent.id, agentId: agent.id },
|
|
request: { connectionId: connection.id, toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
consumeRateLimit: true,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const first = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide(input);
|
|
const second = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide(input);
|
|
|
|
expect(first.allowed).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(second).toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
decision: "rate_limited",
|
|
reasonCode: "rate_limited",
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("atomically consumes the final rate-limit slot", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
await db.insert(principalPermissionGrants).values(sendEmailGrantRow(company, agent));
|
|
await db.insert(toolPolicies).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
name: "One concurrent send per minute",
|
|
policyType: "rate_limit",
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
config: { limit: 1, windowSeconds: 60, keyBy: ["agent", "tool"] },
|
|
});
|
|
const input = {
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actor: { actorType: "agent" as const, actorId: agent.id, agentId: agent.id },
|
|
request: { connectionId: connection.id, toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
consumeRateLimit: true,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const decisions = await Promise.all([
|
|
toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide(input),
|
|
toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide(input),
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
expect(decisions.filter((decision) => decision.allowed)).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(decisions.filter((decision) => decision.reasonCode === "rate_limited")).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
async function admittedRateLimitedInvocation(limit = 1) {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const issue = await createIssue(db, company.id);
|
|
const run = await createRun(db, company.id, agent.id);
|
|
const { connection, catalogEntry } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
const [profile] = await db.insert(toolProfiles).values({ companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileKey: "admitted-gateway", name: "Admitted gateway", defaultAction: "deny" }).returning();
|
|
const [gateway] = await db.insert(toolMcpGateways).values({ companyId: company.id,
|
|
name: "Admitted gateway", slug: "admitted-gateway", profileId: profile.id }).returning();
|
|
await db.insert(principalPermissionGrants).values(sendEmailGrantRow(company, agent));
|
|
const [ratePolicy] = await db.insert(toolPolicies).values({ companyId: company.id, name: "One admitted send",
|
|
policyType: "rate_limit", selectors: { toolName: "send_email" }, priority: 1,
|
|
config: { limit, windowSeconds: 3600, keyBy: ["agent", "tool"] } }).returning();
|
|
const input = { ...sendEmailDecisionInput(company, agent, connection, catalogEntry),
|
|
runContext: { heartbeatRunId: run.id, issueId: issue.id, gatewayId: gateway.id }, consumeRateLimit: true,
|
|
request: { connectionId: connection.id, catalogEntryId: catalogEntry.id, toolName: "send_email", arguments: { to: "recipient@example.test" } } };
|
|
const svc = toolAccessPolicyService(db);
|
|
const initial = await svc.decide(input);
|
|
expect(initial.allowed).toBe(true);
|
|
const { invocation } = await svc.recordInvocation(input, initial);
|
|
expect(invocation.gatewayId).toBe(gateway.id);
|
|
await db.update(toolInvocations).set({ status: "executing" }).where(eq(toolInvocations.id, invocation.id));
|
|
return { company, agent, input: { ...input, consumeRateLimit: false }, invocation, ratePolicy, svc };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
it.each(["allow", "approved"] as const)("retains the consumed final rate-limit slot for the same executing %s invocation", async authorization => {
|
|
const { input, invocation, ratePolicy, svc } = await admittedRateLimitedInvocation();
|
|
if (authorization === "approved") await db.update(toolInvocations).set({ policyDecision: "require_approval", approvalState: "approved" })
|
|
.where(eq(toolInvocations.id, invocation.id));
|
|
expect(await svc.decide(input)).toMatchObject({ decision: "rate_limited" });
|
|
expect(invocation.policyExplanation?.consumedRateAdmissions).toEqual([
|
|
{ policyId: ratePolicy.id, versionHash: expect.stringMatching(/^[a-f0-9]{64}$/),
|
|
bucketKey: `${ratePolicy.id}:agent:${input.actor.agentId}|tool:send_email` },
|
|
]);
|
|
const counters = await db.select().from(toolRateLimitCounters);
|
|
expect(await svc.decide(input, { admittedInvocationId: invocation.id })).toMatchObject({ allowed: true });
|
|
expect(await svc.decide(input, { admittedInvocationId: invocation.id })).toMatchObject({ allowed: true });
|
|
expect(await db.select().from(toolRateLimitCounters)).toEqual(counters);
|
|
expect((await db.select().from(toolRateLimitCounters))[0].remaining).toBe(0);
|
|
// A fresh invocation cannot borrow another invocation's already-spent slot.
|
|
// Execution revalidation retains its own durable admission.
|
|
expect(await svc.decide(input, { admittedInvocationId: randomUUID() })).toMatchObject({ decision: "rate_limited" });
|
|
expect(await svc.admitInvocation(input, invocation.id)).toMatchObject({ allowed: true });
|
|
expect(await db.select().from(toolRateLimitCounters)).toEqual(counters);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("atomically charges a new rule once across concurrent retries of the same invocation", async () => {
|
|
const { company, input, invocation, svc } = await admittedRateLimitedInvocation();
|
|
const added = await svc.createPolicy(company.id, { name: "New admission", policyType: "rate_limit", enabled: true, priority: 0,
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" }, config: { limit: 1, windowSeconds: 3600, keyBy: ["agent", "tool"] } });
|
|
const oldCounters = await db.select().from(toolRateLimitCounters);
|
|
expect(await svc.decide(input, { admittedInvocationId: invocation.id })).toMatchObject({ allowed: true });
|
|
expect(await db.select().from(toolRateLimitCounters)).toEqual(oldCounters);
|
|
const results = await Promise.all(Array.from({ length: 4 }, () => svc.admitInvocation(input, invocation.id)));
|
|
expect(results.every(result => result.allowed)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(await db.select().from(toolRateLimitCounters).where(eq(toolRateLimitCounters.policyId, added.id)))
|
|
.toMatchObject([{ limit: 1, remaining: 0 }]);
|
|
const [saved] = await db.select().from(toolInvocations).where(eq(toolInvocations.id, invocation.id));
|
|
expect(saved.policyExplanation?.consumedRateAdmissions).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
const { consumedRateAdmissions: oldAdmissions, ...oldExplanation } = invocation.policyExplanation!;
|
|
expect(saved.policyExplanation).toMatchObject(oldExplanation);
|
|
expect(saved.policyExplanation?.consumedRateAdmissions).toEqual(expect.arrayContaining(oldAdmissions as unknown[]));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("allows only one of two admitted invocations to spend a newly added final slot", async () => {
|
|
const { company, input, invocation, svc } = await admittedRateLimitedInvocation(2);
|
|
const initial = await svc.decide({ ...input, consumeRateLimit: true });
|
|
expect(initial.allowed).toBe(true);
|
|
const { invocation: second } = await svc.recordInvocation(input, initial);
|
|
await db.update(toolInvocations).set({ status: "executing" }).where(eq(toolInvocations.id, second.id));
|
|
const added = await svc.createPolicy(company.id, { name: "One competing slot", policyType: "rate_limit", enabled: true, priority: 0,
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" }, config: { limit: 1, windowSeconds: 3600, keyBy: ["agent", "tool"] } });
|
|
const results = await Promise.all([invocation.id, second.id].map(id => svc.admitInvocation(input, id)));
|
|
expect(results.filter(result => result.allowed)).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(results.filter(result => result.decision === "rate_limited")).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(await db.select().from(toolRateLimitCounters).where(eq(toolRateLimitCounters.policyId, added.id)))
|
|
.toMatchObject([{ limit: 1, remaining: 0 }]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rolls back new rate charges when a later policy rejects the invocation", async () => {
|
|
const { company, input, invocation, svc } = await admittedRateLimitedInvocation();
|
|
await svc.createPolicy(company.id, { name: "Before rejection", policyType: "rate_limit", enabled: true, priority: 0,
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" }, config: { limit: 1, windowSeconds: 3600, keyBy: ["agent", "tool"] } });
|
|
await svc.createPolicy(company.id, { name: "Later rejection", policyType: "block", enabled: true, priority: 10,
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" } });
|
|
const counters = await db.select().from(toolRateLimitCounters);
|
|
expect(await svc.admitInvocation(input, invocation.id)).toMatchObject({ decision: "deny" });
|
|
expect(await db.select().from(toolRateLimitCounters)).toEqual(counters);
|
|
expect((await db.select().from(toolInvocations).where(eq(toolInvocations.id, invocation.id)))[0].policyExplanation)
|
|
.toEqual(invocation.policyExplanation);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rolls back rate charges when saving the admission receipt fails and admits a retry once", async () => {
|
|
const { company, input, invocation, svc } = await admittedRateLimitedInvocation();
|
|
const added = await svc.createPolicy(company.id, { name: "Receipt failure", policyType: "rate_limit", enabled: true, priority: 0,
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" }, config: { limit: 1, windowSeconds: 3600, keyBy: ["agent", "tool"] } });
|
|
await db.execute(sql`create function sleep_admission_fail() returns trigger language plpgsql as $$ begin
|
|
raise exception 'receipt write unavailable'; end $$`);
|
|
await db.execute(sql`create trigger sleep_admission_fail before update of policy_explanation on tool_invocations
|
|
for each row execute function sleep_admission_fail()`);
|
|
try {
|
|
await expect(svc.admitInvocation(input, invocation.id)).rejects.toThrow();
|
|
expect(await db.select().from(toolRateLimitCounters).where(eq(toolRateLimitCounters.policyId, added.id))).toEqual([]);
|
|
expect((await db.select().from(toolInvocations).where(eq(toolInvocations.id, invocation.id)))[0].policyExplanation)
|
|
.toEqual(invocation.policyExplanation);
|
|
} finally {
|
|
await db.execute(sql`drop trigger sleep_admission_fail on tool_invocations`);
|
|
await db.execute(sql`drop function sleep_admission_fail()`);
|
|
}
|
|
expect(await svc.admitInvocation(input, invocation.id)).toMatchObject({ allowed: true });
|
|
expect(await svc.admitInvocation(input, invocation.id)).toMatchObject({ allowed: true });
|
|
expect(await db.select().from(toolRateLimitCounters).where(eq(toolRateLimitCounters.policyId, added.id)))
|
|
.toMatchObject([{ limit: 1, remaining: 0 }]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it.each([2, 4])("preserves spent slots when a rate limit changes from three to %s", async limit => {
|
|
const { company, input, ratePolicy, svc } = await admittedRateLimitedInvocation(3);
|
|
await svc.updatePolicy({ companyId: company.id, policyId: ratePolicy.id,
|
|
body: { config: { limit, windowSeconds: 3600, keyBy: ["agent", "tool"] } } });
|
|
const results = await Promise.all(Array.from({ length: limit }, () => svc.decide({ ...input, consumeRateLimit: true })));
|
|
expect(results.filter(result => result.allowed)).toHaveLength(limit - 1);
|
|
expect(results.filter(result => result.decision === "rate_limited")).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(await db.select().from(toolRateLimitCounters)).toMatchObject([{ limit, remaining: 0 }]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it.each(["pending", "approved"] as const)("retains a waiting invocation's consumed slot without bypassing %s approval policy", async approvalState => {
|
|
const { company, input, invocation, svc } = await admittedRateLimitedInvocation();
|
|
await db.update(toolInvocations).set({ status: "awaiting_approval", policyDecision: "require_approval", approvalState })
|
|
.where(eq(toolInvocations.id, invocation.id));
|
|
await db.insert(toolPolicies).values({ companyId: company.id, name: "Review admitted sends",
|
|
policyType: "require_approval", priority: 2, selectors: { toolName: "send_email" } });
|
|
const counters = await db.select().from(toolRateLimitCounters);
|
|
expect(await svc.decide(input, { admittedInvocationId: invocation.id }))
|
|
.toMatchObject({ allowed: false, decision: "require_approval" });
|
|
expect(await db.select().from(toolRateLimitCounters)).toEqual(counters);
|
|
expect(await svc.decide(input)).toMatchObject({ decision: "rate_limited" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rechecks a newly added rate policy rather than borrowing an older policy's consumed slot", async () => {
|
|
const { company, input, invocation, svc } = await admittedRateLimitedInvocation();
|
|
await svc.createPolicy(company.id, { name: "New send limit", policyType: "rate_limit", enabled: true, priority: 0,
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" }, config: { limit: 1, windowSeconds: 3600, keyBy: ["agent", "tool"] } });
|
|
// Consume the new rule through normal admission; the exhausted original
|
|
// rule then denies this separate request before any provider dispatch.
|
|
expect(await svc.decide({ ...input, consumeRateLimit: true })).toMatchObject({ decision: "rate_limited" });
|
|
const counters = await db.select().from(toolRateLimitCounters);
|
|
expect(counters).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
expect(await svc.decide(input, { admittedInvocationId: invocation.id })).toMatchObject({ decision: "rate_limited" });
|
|
expect(await db.select().from(toolRateLimitCounters)).toEqual(counters);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rechecks an edited rate-policy generation without consuming another slot", async () => {
|
|
const { company, input, invocation, ratePolicy, svc } = await admittedRateLimitedInvocation(2);
|
|
expect(await svc.decide({ ...input, consumeRateLimit: true })).toMatchObject({ allowed: true });
|
|
await svc.updatePolicy({ companyId: company.id, policyId: ratePolicy.id,
|
|
body: { config: { limit: 1, windowSeconds: 3600, keyBy: ["agent", "tool"] } } });
|
|
const counters = await db.select().from(toolRateLimitCounters);
|
|
expect(await svc.decide(input, { admittedInvocationId: invocation.id })).toMatchObject({ decision: "rate_limited" });
|
|
expect(await db.select().from(toolRateLimitCounters)).toEqual(counters);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rechecks rate limits for historical executing invocations without durable consumption proof", async () => {
|
|
const { input, invocation, svc } = await admittedRateLimitedInvocation();
|
|
await db.update(toolInvocations).set({ policyExplanation: null }).where(eq(toolInvocations.id, invocation.id));
|
|
expect(await svc.decide(input, { admittedInvocationId: invocation.id })).toMatchObject({ decision: "rate_limited" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("reevaluates current blocks, grants, and approval policies for admitted work", async () => {
|
|
const { company, input, invocation, svc } = await admittedRateLimitedInvocation();
|
|
const options = { admittedInvocationId: invocation.id };
|
|
const [block] = await db.insert(toolPolicies).values({ companyId: company.id, name: "Block admitted sends",
|
|
policyType: "block", priority: 0, selectors: { toolName: "send_email" } }).returning();
|
|
expect(await svc.decide(input, options)).toMatchObject({ decision: "deny", reasonCode: "deny_policy_block" });
|
|
await db.delete(toolPolicies).where(eq(toolPolicies.id, block.id));
|
|
await db.delete(principalPermissionGrants).where(eq(principalPermissionGrants.companyId, company.id));
|
|
expect(await svc.decide(input, options)).toMatchObject({ decision: "deny", reasonCode: "deny_default" });
|
|
await db.insert(toolPolicies).values({ companyId: company.id, name: "Require new review",
|
|
policyType: "require_approval", priority: 2, selectors: { toolName: "send_email" } });
|
|
expect(await svc.decide(input, options)).toMatchObject({ decision: "require_approval" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("does not retain rate admission for a mismatched or no-longer-authorized invocation", async () => {
|
|
const { input, invocation, svc } = await admittedRateLimitedInvocation();
|
|
const options = { admittedInvocationId: invocation.id };
|
|
const mutations: Partial<typeof toolInvocations.$inferInsert>[] = [
|
|
{ actorType: "system" }, { actorId: randomUUID() }, { agentId: null }, { runId: null }, { issueId: null }, { gatewayId: null },
|
|
{ applicationId: null }, { connectionId: null }, { catalogEntryId: null }, { toolName: "different_tool" },
|
|
{ providerType: null }, { applicationKey: null }, { upstreamToolName: null }, { argumentsHash: "different" },
|
|
{ status: "authorized" }, { status: "succeeded" }, { status: "awaiting_approval" },
|
|
{ status: "awaiting_approval", policyDecision: "require_approval", approvalState: "rejected" }, { policyDecision: "deny" }, { policyDecision: "require_approval", approvalState: "pending" },
|
|
];
|
|
for (const mutation of mutations) {
|
|
await db.update(toolInvocations).set(mutation).where(eq(toolInvocations.id, invocation.id));
|
|
expect(await svc.decide(input, options), JSON.stringify(mutation)).toMatchObject({ decision: "rate_limited" });
|
|
expect(await svc.admitInvocation(input, invocation.id), JSON.stringify(mutation)).toMatchObject({ decision: "deny" });
|
|
await db.update(toolInvocations).set({ ...invocation, status: "executing" }).where(eq(toolInvocations.id, invocation.id));
|
|
}
|
|
expect(await svc.decide({ ...input, request: { ...input.request, arguments: { to: "another@example.test" } } }, options))
|
|
.toMatchObject({ decision: "rate_limited" });
|
|
expect(await svc.admitInvocation({ ...input, request: { ...input.request, arguments: { to: "another@example.test" } } }, invocation.id))
|
|
.toMatchObject({ decision: "deny" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects unsupported policy semantics at create and update time", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const svc = toolAccessPolicyService(db);
|
|
const policy = await svc.createPolicy(company.id, {
|
|
name: "Require review",
|
|
policyType: "require_approval",
|
|
priority: 100,
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await expect(svc.createPolicy(company.id, {
|
|
name: "Dead redact policy",
|
|
policyType: "redact" as never,
|
|
priority: 100,
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
config: { redact: { fields: ["to", "body"] } },
|
|
})).rejects.toThrow("Tool policy type 'redact' is not supported at runtime");
|
|
await expect(svc.createPolicy(company.id, {
|
|
name: "Dead custom check",
|
|
policyType: "validate" as never,
|
|
priority: 100,
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
config: { schema: { required: ["body"] } },
|
|
})).rejects.toThrow("Tool policy type 'validate' is not supported at runtime");
|
|
await expect(svc.createPolicy(company.id, {
|
|
name: "Malformed conditional policy",
|
|
policyType: "allow",
|
|
priority: 100,
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
conditions: { args: { body: "safe" } } as never,
|
|
})).rejects.toThrow("Tool policy conditions include unsupported runtime semantics");
|
|
await expect(svc.createPolicy(company.id, {
|
|
name: "Ignored approval config",
|
|
policyType: "require_approval",
|
|
priority: 100,
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
config: { validate: { required: ["body"] } },
|
|
})).rejects.toThrow("Tool policy type 'require_approval' does not support config");
|
|
await expect(svc.createPolicy(company.id, {
|
|
name: "Invalid rate limit",
|
|
policyType: "rate_limit",
|
|
priority: 100,
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
config: { rateLimit: { limit: 0, windowSeconds: 60 } },
|
|
})).rejects.toThrow("Rate-limit policy config requires positive numeric limit and windowSeconds");
|
|
await expect(svc.updatePolicy({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
policyId: policy.id,
|
|
body: { conditions: { args: { body: "safe" } } as never },
|
|
})).rejects.toThrow("Tool policy conditions include unsupported runtime semantics");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects fieldMatches patterns with nested quantifiers", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const svc = toolAccessPolicyService(db);
|
|
|
|
await expect(svc.createPolicy(company.id, {
|
|
name: "Unsafe regex",
|
|
policyType: "allow",
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
priority: 10,
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
conditions: {
|
|
arguments: { fieldMatches: { body: "^(a+)+$" } },
|
|
},
|
|
})).rejects.toThrow("unsafe regular expression");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects fieldMatches patterns with ambiguous alternation", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const svc = toolAccessPolicyService(db);
|
|
|
|
await expect(svc.createPolicy(company.id, {
|
|
name: "Unsafe alternation",
|
|
policyType: "allow",
|
|
priority: 100,
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
selectors: {},
|
|
conditions: {
|
|
arguments: { fieldMatches: { body: "^(a|aa)*b$" } },
|
|
},
|
|
})).rejects.toThrow("unsafe regular expression");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("allows a write policy only for a safe argument subset and blocks unsafe arguments", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection, catalogEntry } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
const svc = toolAccessPolicyService(db);
|
|
const allowPolicy = await svc.createPolicy(company.id, {
|
|
name: "Allow safe destination",
|
|
policyType: "allow",
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
priority: 10,
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
conditions: {
|
|
arguments: {
|
|
fieldEquals: { to: "ops@example.com" },
|
|
fieldMatches: { body: "^[\\s\\S]{1,200}$" },
|
|
},
|
|
risk: { isWrite: true },
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
const blockPolicy = await svc.createPolicy(company.id, {
|
|
name: "Block external destination",
|
|
policyType: "block",
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
priority: 5,
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
conditions: {
|
|
arguments: {
|
|
fieldNotEquals: { to: "ops@example.com" },
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await expect(svc.decide({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actor: { actorType: "agent", actorId: agent.id, agentId: agent.id },
|
|
request: {
|
|
connectionId: connection.id,
|
|
catalogEntryId: catalogEntry.id,
|
|
toolName: "send_email",
|
|
arguments: { to: "ops@example.com", body: "safe update" },
|
|
},
|
|
})).resolves.toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: true,
|
|
decision: "allow",
|
|
reasonCode: "allow_policy",
|
|
matchedPolicyIds: [allowPolicy.id],
|
|
policyExplanation: {
|
|
conditionsMatched: ["arguments", "risk"],
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await expect(svc.decide({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actor: { actorType: "agent", actorId: agent.id, agentId: agent.id },
|
|
request: {
|
|
connectionId: connection.id,
|
|
catalogEntryId: catalogEntry.id,
|
|
toolName: "send_email",
|
|
arguments: { to: "outside@example.com", body: "exfiltrate" },
|
|
},
|
|
})).resolves.toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
decision: "deny",
|
|
reasonCode: "deny_policy_block",
|
|
matchedPolicyIds: [blockPolicy.id],
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("fails closed for legacy unsupported redact and validate policies", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection, catalogEntry } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
const profile = await db.insert(toolProfiles).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileKey: `profile-${randomUUID()}`,
|
|
name: "Fallback allow",
|
|
defaultAction: "allow",
|
|
}).returning().then((rows) => rows[0]!);
|
|
await db.insert(toolProfileBindings).values(agentProfileBindingRow(company, profile, agent));
|
|
const [redactPolicy] = await db.insert(toolPolicies).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
name: "Legacy redact",
|
|
policyType: "redact" as never,
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
config: { redact: { fields: ["to", "body"] } },
|
|
priority: 1,
|
|
}).returning();
|
|
const [validatePolicy] = await db.insert(toolPolicies).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
name: "Legacy validate",
|
|
policyType: "validate" as never,
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
config: { schema: { required: ["body"] } },
|
|
priority: 2,
|
|
}).returning();
|
|
|
|
const redactDecision = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide(sendEmailDecisionInput(company, agent, connection, catalogEntry));
|
|
await db.update(toolPolicies).set({ enabled: false }).where(eq(toolPolicies.id, redactPolicy!.id));
|
|
const validateDecision = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide(sendEmailDecisionInput(company, agent, connection, catalogEntry));
|
|
|
|
expect(redactDecision).toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
decision: "deny",
|
|
reasonCode: "deny_policy_block",
|
|
matchedPolicyIds: [redactPolicy!.id],
|
|
});
|
|
expect(validateDecision).toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
decision: "deny",
|
|
reasonCode: "deny_policy_block",
|
|
matchedPolicyIds: [validatePolicy!.id],
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("fails closed for legacy condition-bearing policies", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection, catalogEntry } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
const profile = await db.insert(toolProfiles).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileKey: `profile-${randomUUID()}`,
|
|
name: "Fallback allow",
|
|
defaultAction: "allow",
|
|
}).returning().then((rows) => rows[0]!);
|
|
await db.insert(toolProfileBindings).values(agentProfileBindingRow(company, profile, agent));
|
|
const [policy] = await db.insert(toolPolicies).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
name: "Legacy conditional allow",
|
|
policyType: "allow",
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
conditions: { args: { body: "safe" } },
|
|
priority: 1,
|
|
}).returning();
|
|
|
|
const result = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide(sendEmailDecisionInput(company, agent, connection, catalogEntry));
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
decision: "deny",
|
|
reasonCode: "deny_policy_block",
|
|
matchedPolicyIds: [policy!.id],
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("fails closed for legacy rate-limit policies with invalid config", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection, catalogEntry } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
const profile = await db.insert(toolProfiles).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
profileKey: `profile-${randomUUID()}`,
|
|
name: "Fallback allow",
|
|
defaultAction: "allow",
|
|
}).returning().then((rows) => rows[0]!);
|
|
await db.insert(toolProfileBindings).values(agentProfileBindingRow(company, profile, agent));
|
|
const [policy] = await db.insert(toolPolicies).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
name: "Broken rate limit",
|
|
policyType: "rate_limit",
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
config: { rateLimit: { limit: 0, windowSeconds: 60 } },
|
|
priority: 1,
|
|
}).returning();
|
|
|
|
const result = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide(sendEmailDecisionInput(company, agent, connection, catalogEntry));
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
decision: "deny",
|
|
reasonCode: "deny_policy_block",
|
|
matchedPolicyIds: [policy!.id],
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("promotes repeated approved actions into a scoped trust rule with audited hits", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const issue = await createIssue(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection, catalogEntry } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
await db.insert(toolPolicies).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
name: "Review send_email",
|
|
policyType: "require_approval",
|
|
selectors: { toolName: "send_email" },
|
|
description: "Writes require review until promoted.",
|
|
});
|
|
const args = { to: "ops@example.com", body: "ship it" };
|
|
const first = await createApprovedToolAction({
|
|
db,
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
agentId: agent.id,
|
|
connectionId: connection.id,
|
|
catalogEntryId: catalogEntry.id,
|
|
issueId: issue.id,
|
|
argumentsValue: args,
|
|
status: "executed",
|
|
});
|
|
await createApprovedToolAction({
|
|
db,
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
agentId: agent.id,
|
|
connectionId: connection.id,
|
|
catalogEntryId: catalogEntry.id,
|
|
issueId: issue.id,
|
|
argumentsValue: args,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const trustRule = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).createTrustRuleFromActionRequest({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actionRequestId: first.actionRequest.id,
|
|
body: {
|
|
approvalThreshold: 2,
|
|
scope: { includeIssue: true, includeCatalogEntry: true },
|
|
expiresAt: new Date(Date.now() + 60_000),
|
|
batchApproval: { enabled: true, maxBatchSize: 5, windowSeconds: 3600 },
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
const decision = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide({
|
|
...first.decisionInput,
|
|
consumeRateLimit: true,
|
|
});
|
|
const [updatedRule] = await db.select().from(toolPolicies).where(eq(toolPolicies.id, trustRule.id));
|
|
const trustConfig = updatedRule.config as { trustRule?: { hitCount?: number; lastHitAt?: string | null } };
|
|
const trustEvents = await db.select().from(toolCallEvents);
|
|
|
|
expect(trustRule).toMatchObject({
|
|
policyType: "trust_rule",
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
selectors: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
agentId: agent.id,
|
|
issueId: issue.id,
|
|
connectionId: connection.id,
|
|
catalogEntryId: catalogEntry.id,
|
|
toolName: "send_email",
|
|
}),
|
|
});
|
|
expect(decision).toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: true,
|
|
decision: "allow",
|
|
reasonCode: "allow_trust_rule",
|
|
matchedPolicyIds: [trustRule.id],
|
|
});
|
|
expect(trustConfig.trustRule?.hitCount).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(trustConfig.trustRule?.lastHitAt).toEqual(expect.any(String));
|
|
expect(trustEvents.some((event) => event.eventType === "trust_rule_created")).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(trustEvents.some((event) => event.eventType === "trust_rule_used")).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("does not count approved actions outside the final trust-rule agent scope", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agentA = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const agentB = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection, catalogEntry } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
await db.insert(toolPolicies).values(reviewSendPolicyRow(company, "Review scoped sends"));
|
|
const args = { to: "ops@example.com", body: "same reviewed payload" };
|
|
await createApprovedToolAction({
|
|
db,
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
agentId: agentA.id,
|
|
connectionId: connection.id,
|
|
catalogEntryId: catalogEntry.id,
|
|
argumentsValue: args,
|
|
status: "executed",
|
|
});
|
|
const agentBAction = await createApprovedToolAction({
|
|
db,
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
agentId: agentB.id,
|
|
connectionId: connection.id,
|
|
catalogEntryId: catalogEntry.id,
|
|
argumentsValue: args,
|
|
status: "executed",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await expect(toolAccessPolicyService(db).createTrustRuleFromActionRequest({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actionRequestId: agentBAction.actionRequest.id,
|
|
body: { approvalThreshold: 2 },
|
|
})).rejects.toThrow(/final rule scope; found 1/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("does not count approvals from stale catalog versions toward trust-rule promotion", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection, catalogEntry } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
await db.insert(toolPolicies).values(reviewSendPolicyRow(company, "Review versioned sends"));
|
|
const args = { to: "ops@example.com", body: "same payload after tool change" };
|
|
await createApprovedToolAction(executedActionInput(db, company, agent, connection, catalogEntry, args));
|
|
await db
|
|
.update(toolCatalogEntries)
|
|
.set({ versionHash: randomUUID(), schemaHash: randomUUID(), updatedAt: new Date() })
|
|
.where(eq(toolCatalogEntries.id, catalogEntry.id));
|
|
const currentVersionAction = await createApprovedToolAction(executedActionInput(db, company, agent, connection, catalogEntry, args));
|
|
|
|
await expect(toolAccessPolicyService(db).createTrustRuleFromActionRequest({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actionRequestId: currentVersionAction.actionRequest.id,
|
|
body: { approvalThreshold: 2, scope: { includeCatalogEntry: true } },
|
|
})).rejects.toThrow(/final rule scope; found 1/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects company-wide trust-rule promotion bodies that drop the reviewed scope", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection, catalogEntry } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
await db.insert(toolPolicies).values(reviewSendPolicyRow(company, "Review scoped sends"));
|
|
const args = { to: "ops@example.com", body: "same reviewed payload" };
|
|
const first = await createApprovedToolAction(executedActionInput(db, company, agent, connection, catalogEntry, args));
|
|
await createApprovedToolAction(executedActionInput(db, company, agent, connection, catalogEntry, args));
|
|
|
|
await expect(toolAccessPolicyService(db).createTrustRuleFromActionRequest({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actionRequestId: first.actionRequest.id,
|
|
body: {
|
|
approvalThreshold: 2,
|
|
scope: {
|
|
includeAgent: false,
|
|
includeProject: false,
|
|
includeApplication: false,
|
|
includeConnection: false,
|
|
includeTool: false,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
})).rejects.toThrow(/reviewed actor\/tool scope/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects argument-broadening trust-rule promotion bodies", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection, catalogEntry } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
await db.insert(toolPolicies).values(reviewSendPolicyRow(company, "Review exact payload sends"));
|
|
const args = { to: "ops@example.com", body: "same reviewed payload" };
|
|
const first = await createApprovedToolAction(executedActionInput(db, company, agent, connection, catalogEntry, args));
|
|
await createApprovedToolAction(executedActionInput(db, company, agent, connection, catalogEntry, args));
|
|
|
|
await expect(toolAccessPolicyService(db).createTrustRuleFromActionRequest({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actionRequestId: first.actionRequest.id,
|
|
body: {
|
|
approvalThreshold: 2,
|
|
argumentFilters: { allowAny: true },
|
|
},
|
|
})).rejects.toThrow(/exact reviewed argument hash/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("falls back to review when a trusted catalog tool changes", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection, catalogEntry } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
await db.insert(toolPolicies).values(reviewSendPolicyRow(company, "Review changed sends"));
|
|
const args = { to: "ops@example.com", body: "repeatable" };
|
|
const first = await createApprovedToolAction(executedActionInput(db, company, agent, connection, catalogEntry, args));
|
|
await createApprovedToolAction({
|
|
db,
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
agentId: agent.id,
|
|
connectionId: connection.id,
|
|
catalogEntryId: catalogEntry.id,
|
|
argumentsValue: args,
|
|
});
|
|
const trustRule = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).createTrustRuleFromActionRequest({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actionRequestId: first.actionRequest.id,
|
|
body: { approvalThreshold: 2, scope: { includeCatalogEntry: true } },
|
|
});
|
|
await db
|
|
.update(toolCatalogEntries)
|
|
.set({ status: "quarantined", versionHash: randomUUID(), updatedAt: new Date() })
|
|
.where(eq(toolCatalogEntries.id, catalogEntry.id));
|
|
|
|
const decision = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide(first.decisionInput);
|
|
|
|
expect(decision).toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
decision: "require_approval",
|
|
reasonCode: "requires_review_changed_tool",
|
|
matchedPolicyIds: [trustRule.id],
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("revokes trust rules so matching actions return to per-call approval", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const { connection, catalogEntry } = await createTool(db, company.id);
|
|
await db.insert(toolPolicies).values(reviewSendPolicyRow(company, "Review revocable sends"));
|
|
const args = { to: "ops@example.com", body: "revocable" };
|
|
const first = await createApprovedToolAction(executedActionInput(db, company, agent, connection, catalogEntry, args));
|
|
await createApprovedToolAction({
|
|
db,
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
agentId: agent.id,
|
|
connectionId: connection.id,
|
|
catalogEntryId: catalogEntry.id,
|
|
argumentsValue: args,
|
|
});
|
|
const trustRule = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).createTrustRuleFromActionRequest({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
actionRequestId: first.actionRequest.id,
|
|
body: { approvalThreshold: 2 },
|
|
});
|
|
const revoked = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).revokeTrustRule({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
policyId: trustRule.id,
|
|
body: { reason: "Tool scope changed" },
|
|
});
|
|
const decision = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide(first.decisionInput);
|
|
const config = revoked.config as { trustRule?: { revokedAt?: string | null; revocationReason?: string | null } };
|
|
|
|
expect(revoked.enabled).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(config.trustRule?.revokedAt).toEqual(expect.any(String));
|
|
expect(config.trustRule?.revocationReason).toBe("Tool scope changed");
|
|
expect(decision).toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
decision: "require_approval",
|
|
reasonCode: "requires_approval_policy",
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("routes gateway execution through policy decisions instead of legacy gateway permissions", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id, { toolGateway: { allowAll: true } });
|
|
const run = await createRun(db, company.id, agent.id);
|
|
const gateway = createToolGatewayService(db);
|
|
const session = await gateway.createSession({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
agentId: agent.id,
|
|
runId: run.id,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await expect(gateway.executeTool({
|
|
sessionToken: session.token,
|
|
tool: "mcp-remote-fixture:echo",
|
|
parameters: { message: "hello" },
|
|
})).rejects.toMatchObject({
|
|
status: 403,
|
|
reasonCode: "deny_default",
|
|
} satisfies Partial<ToolGatewayHttpError>);
|
|
|
|
const [invocation] = await db.select().from(toolInvocations);
|
|
expect(invocation).toMatchObject({
|
|
toolName: "mcp-remote-fixture:echo",
|
|
policyDecision: "deny",
|
|
status: "denied",
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("replays idempotent side-effecting gateway calls without creating a second invocation", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const agent = await createAgent(db, company.id);
|
|
const run = await createRun(db, company.id, agent.id);
|
|
await db.insert(principalPermissionGrants).values({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
principalType: "agent",
|
|
principalId: agent.id,
|
|
permissionKey: "tools:use",
|
|
scope: { toolName: "mcp-remote-fixture:update_note" },
|
|
});
|
|
const gateway = createToolGatewayService(db);
|
|
const session = await gateway.createSession({
|
|
companyId: company.id,
|
|
agentId: agent.id,
|
|
runId: run.id,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const first = await gateway.executeTool({
|
|
sessionToken: session.token,
|
|
tool: "mcp-remote-fixture:update_note",
|
|
parameters: { noteId: "n1", body: "ship" },
|
|
idempotencyKey: "note-update-1",
|
|
});
|
|
const replay = await gateway.executeTool({
|
|
sessionToken: session.token,
|
|
tool: "mcp-remote-fixture:update_note",
|
|
parameters: { noteId: "n1", body: "ship" },
|
|
idempotencyKey: "note-update-1",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(first).toMatchObject({ status: "completed", tool: "mcp-remote-fixture:update_note" });
|
|
expect(replay).toMatchObject({ status: "replayed", invocationId: first.invocationId });
|
|
const invocations = await db.select().from(toolInvocations);
|
|
expect(invocations).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(invocations[0]).toMatchObject({
|
|
idempotencyKey: "note-update-1",
|
|
status: "succeeded",
|
|
resultSummary: expect.objectContaining({ summary: expect.any(String) }),
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects cross-company owner agents and credential secret refs before persisting tool access records", async () => {
|
|
const company = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const otherCompany = await createCompany(db);
|
|
const otherAgent = await createAgent(db, otherCompany.id);
|
|
const [otherSecret] = await db.insert(companySecrets).values({
|
|
companyId: otherCompany.id,
|
|
key: `secret-${randomUUID()}`,
|
|
name: `Secret ${randomUUID()}`,
|
|
}).returning();
|
|
const svc = toolAccessService(db);
|
|
|
|
await expect(svc.createApplication(company.id, {
|
|
name: "Wrong owner",
|
|
type: "mcp_http",
|
|
ownerAgentId: otherAgent.id,
|
|
})).rejects.toThrow(/same company/);
|
|
|
|
await expect(svc.createConnection(company.id, {
|
|
name: "Wrong secret",
|
|
transport: "mcp_remote",
|
|
connectionPurpose: "tool",
|
|
authKind: "none",
|
|
ownership: "customer",
|
|
connectionKind: "managed",
|
|
transportConfig: { url: "https://8.8.8.8/mcp" },
|
|
credentialSecretRefs: [{
|
|
secretId: otherSecret.id,
|
|
configPath: "headers.Authorization",
|
|
}],
|
|
})).rejects.toThrow(/same company/);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|