mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-01 15:35:12 +01:00
DottaandPaperclip
12d8c3043e
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native runs keep Stop intent and retry state in durable records. > - A provider error can leave a failed retry with an earlier acknowledged Stop. > - The replay path returned the existing receipt before it closed that retry. > - This pull request applies the existing retry fence to the validated replay. > - The same Stop can settle without another provider cancellation or a new receipt. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #14733 for the related caller-bound Stop contract. This change covers a later retry that already has a Stop acknowledgement. The older CI-only #14743 is not a production delivery PR. **What happened?** A failed native run can have a retryable coordinator and an earlier audited Stop. A repeat Stop returns the old acknowledgement without moving the coordinator to `terminal_failure`. The final failed-to-cancelled transition requires that fence, so the Stop cannot settle through that path. **Expected behavior** A valid replay closes the same retry and keeps the original intent and acknowledgement. It does not send a second provider cancellation. Physical stop and workspace cleanup still require their own evidence. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Store a failed native run with a `retryable_failure` coordinator. 2. Store a matching run-scoped Stop with a dispatched acknowledgement and audit IDs. 3. Call `cancelNativeSession` for that same run and inspect the coordinator. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on public master `f2db909393de124caf6a5380a52d4e0e1d621661`. **Deployment mode** Core native execution. The regression uses the real cancellation executor with controlled persistence and provider boundaries. ## What Changed - Reuse the existing guarded coordinator fence for a validated Stop replay. - Test repeated replay, unchanged receipts, one fence, and no second provider cancellation. - Reject foreign company, run, issue, scope, effect, and missing-audit receipts before any write. - Check that an acknowledged Stop with an unconfirmed remote lease still fails the physical-stop guard. - Document the separate retry fence and physical-cleanup requirements. ## Verification - RED on the selected public base: the new executor case returned success but left the coordinator in `retryable_failure` with a future retry. One case executed and failed for that assertion. - GREEN: 62 focused tests passed across `native-session-executor.test.ts` and `native-cancellation-request.test.ts`. These include ownership, caller conflict, changed-phase, and receipt controls. - Command from `server/`: `node ../node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/native-cancellation-request.test.ts -t 'native session cancellation|caller-bound native cancellation|failed native retry caller admission'`. - Canonical Linux CI passed all 1,018 executor cases and all 32 caller-cancellation cases. The exact file completion lines are in [server shard 2](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41203989386/job/124545366271) and [server shard 10](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41203989386/job/124545366219). - Node 24.22.2 and Vitest 5.0.3. Map contract checks and `git diff --check` pass. - Local dependencies are linked from an existing checkout. Full local TypeScript validation reports older Runner/shared declarations that lack current Kimi and continuity APIs. The changed ranges have no diagnostics. The canonical clean CI Typecheck + Release Registry gate passed. - A broader two-file run was stopped when an unchanged integration case tried to start embedded Postgres and hit the host listen restriction. It is not a passing full-suite result. No host settings or other services were changed. - Repository-wide `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm test:run`, and `pnpm build` were not completed locally. Current-head CI passed against clean source and dependencies. - Fresh [Greptile review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18457#issuecomment-6543772487) on `dbc1c1a5b71450194d568725592969660864cb5a`: 5/5 with no actionable findings. The review-thread inventory has no threads and no pagination. Full [current-head CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41203989386) passed: 59 terminal checks, 55 successful, 3 skipped, and 1 neutral. No failure or pending check remains. Merge status is CLEAN. No live recovery, rollout, or physical termination is claimed. ## Risks - A wrong or stale Stop must not close another retry. Existing run/coordinator locks, caller checks, receipt binding, and the final compare-and-set remain in place. - This fix changes logical retry settlement only. Provider termination, workspace preservation, lease cleanup, and continuation gates remain separate. - The regression controls persistence and provider boundaries. It does not establish the physical state of a remote provider. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, code editing, and tool use. The session does not expose an exact model build ID or context-window capacity. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub references) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>