mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-03 17:51:58 +01:00
DottaandPaperclip
b9e94b85a6
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work performed by AI agents. > - The server prepares a remote execution environment before the agent can respond. > - OpenTelemetry traces show the time spent in each preparation phase. > - A retained Daytona sandbox can take minutes to resume from an archive. > - The provider worker previously exposed no child timings for this operation. > - This pull request adds bounded lease phase spans under the existing worker trace. > - Operators can separate provider startup from lookup, teardown waits, and workspace verification. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Daytona environment acquisition and resume tracing. A long worker invocation currently hides the operation that consumed its time. Related tracing foundation: #10999. No duplicate open PR was found. **Subsystem affected** The Daytona sandbox provider and the server's existing plugin span validation boundary. **Proposed behavior** Show lookup, start or recovery, teardown waits, workspace verification, and fresh acquisition setup as timed child spans. Group verification steps beneath one parent. Record the bounded provider state before start, including archived. **Reason and benefit** An operator can identify which step delayed the first agent response. SDK startup includes its internal readiness wait; this change does not claim to measure provider queue time separately. **Breaking changes** The opt-in trace schema gains fixed span names and one closed state attribute. Execution, authorization, resource ownership, deadlines, and retry policies keep their existing contracts. ## What Changed - Add lease phase spans through the existing invocation tracer. - Add the fixed span names and state values to host validation. Define the state key in the shared startup attribute contract. - Preserve the exact work result or error if tracing fails. Never repeat work through the tracing wrapper. - Test worker receipts for archived and warm resume, recovery, concurrency, failure, disabled tracing, and cleanup. - Document the waterfall and its attribution limits. ## Verification - Daytona plugin suite: 525 passed, 7 skipped. The expanded tracing suite separately passes all 12 cases. - Host span validation and instrumentation tests: 46 passed, 3 skipped. - Standalone Daytona TypeScript check passes. - Module boundary and whitespace checks pass. - Full recursive typecheck and full build pass. - The full local Vitest attempt atb007a8e64fstopped in chat shard 1: 337 passed, 2 failed, 1478 skipped. One retry-notice case exceeded 15 seconds. The next case then reported that fake timers were no longer installed. A focused rerun of all four retry-notice cases passed. This is not a full local suite pass. - Final head8e1f81523bpasses CI and Greptile 5/5, with no unresolved review threads. The CI chat shards pass despite the preserved local timeout attempt. - The expanded lease tracing suite passes 15 tests; host/shared tracing suites pass 66 tests. Disabling the wait flag makes the new teardown test fail, and restoring it passes. Standalone plugin typecheck passes. - The tests drive the real plugin worker RPC and invocation tracer with a controlled provider fixture. They validate receipts and host parent IDs. They do not establish deployment or Honeycomb ingestion. Inspect a new deployed run to verify the exported waterfall. ## Risks - A new provider phase must be added to the closed host allowlist or it appears as other. - SDK-internal start and readiness work remains one measured operation. - Older workers without withSpan run normally without these new detail spans. - Receipt budgets and clock validation can omit detail from very large or invalid receipts. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with repository tools and code execution. The exact runtime model ID and context window were not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>