mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-07 16:11:46 +02:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
44e4979d23
## Thinking Path > - Existing lifecycle capture records agent transitions and project creation. > - Project and repository edits need matching project update records. > - The record must commit with the mutation so failed writes cannot lose a hook. > - Creation with repositories is one creation, and repository replacement is one update. > - Archive-only changes preserve project state without creating a hook. > - Plugin consumption and provider behavior are separate work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Problem or motivation** Project edits and repository/workspace changes lack durable lifecycle records. A future resource plugin needs those changes captured alongside the existing project creation hook. Archive-only changes must produce no hook. **Proposed solution** Allow project `update` records in the existing lifecycle journal. Record project and workspace mutations in their database transaction while holding the project row lock. Suppress intermediate workspace hooks during project creation and aggregate repository replacement. **Alternatives considered** Route-only hooks miss shared service callers. Recording after commit can lose an event. Emitting a hook for each child mutation exposes intermediate repository state. **Roadmap alignment** This completes project lifecycle capture begun in #15280. Plugin delivery, VM/volume provisioning, and backfill remain separate. Searches found no duplicate project lifecycle work; related #13306 concerns decision events on the in-process plugin bus. ## What Changed - Record project edits and workspace additions, updates, and removals as project `update` events. - Commit each event atomically with its mutation under the project row lock. - Keep project creation with repositories to one creation event and repository replacement to one aggregate update. - Ignore archive-only changes and retain workspace records. - Extend the journal action constraint and document project update capture. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed on the narrowed scope. - 57 tests passed across six lifecycle, project, repository, and chat-project suites. - Seven managed-sandbox workspace route tests and the CLI lagging-worktree migration regression passed (65 targeted tests total). - Full GitHub CI passed on `8ba6f97f22`; all required gates are green. - Greptile scored the final project-only commit 5/5 with zero unresolved review threads. - The branch is current with `master` and has no merge conflicts. - `git diff --check` and a local secret/PII scan passed. ## Risks - Apply migration `0300_chunky_chamber.sql` before running the new server. It permits project update actions and tolerates older JavaScript worktree backups that omitted the prior CHECK constraint. - Event-write failure intentionally rolls back the project or repository mutation. - Records contain identity and action; future consumers must load current authorized project/workspace data. - Plugin consumption, provider calls, volume cleanup, and backfill are outside this PR. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository inspection, code execution, and tool use. The exact deployment model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>