mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-06 10:48:12 +02:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The native runner connects task state to provider sessions. > - Follow-up turns must retain provider memory and carry new user direction. > - Lost session IDs caused repeated context and extra input tokens. > - Native question answers and approval races could leave valid work blocked. > - This pull request repairs those paths and adds regression coverage. > - Agents can continue accepted work without repeating the conversation or losing the user's answer. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13574. That merged PR shortened continuation prompts and moved question instructions into tool documentation. This change preserves sessions and fixes failures exposed by broader testing. Related runtime work: #13408 and #13410. **What happened?** Native follow-up turns could lose the provider session ID. Completion guidance could replace the original task with its latest comment. Claude native questions could remain pending after the user answered. Approval during a running tool call could suspend the run before the tool response arrived. Onboarding and chat handoff instructions also caused repeated planning or missing plan documents. **Expected behavior** Reuse a valid provider session. Send only new events when that session already has the history. Preserve the task requirements and apply later user direction. Store the question answer and deliver it to the waiting run. Finish governed tool responses before suspending. Execute the accepted plan without asking for the same approval again. **Steps to reproduce** Run the continuation, local-session-integrity, first-task, and agent-chat suites with native Codex and Claude. Include provider-question-bridge, accept-while-running, and plan-handoff. **Paperclip version or commit** This branch is based on masterd54b75011. The active full catalog run tests4e75881db. Later review fixes have separate regression coverage. **Deployment mode** Isolated local instances and Daytona sandboxes in the existing Runner full-stack E2E harness. ## What Changed - Retain provider session identity across turns and late usage snapshots. Send new continuation events on session reuse, with full context available for a fresh session. - Preserve task requirements and later direction in completion guidance. Return the current contract revision after a stale completion submission. - Bridge native Claude questions to saved Paperclip cards. Submit answers through the saved card and resume the same run. - Delay governed suspension until tool results settle. Add a deterministic test barrier for approval during an active run. - Clarify free-text question examples, explicit onboarding plans, and execution of accepted chat plans. - Fix continuation readiness, verified output evidence, and declared screenshot collection. - Qualify the legacy Claude test CLI at 2.1.277. The old 2.1.19 CLI did not discover mounted skills. Update the existing workflow pin and isolated launcher together. - Refresh the Daytona image lockfile integrity pin after reviewing master patch updates. - Carry continuation mode as runtime metadata instead of inferring it from user-visible text. Install the test Claude CLI without lifecycle scripts. ## Verification - Targeted paid verification: 20/20 cases passed across local-environment campaigns before the rebase. [Report](https://pages.paperclip.ing/runner-e2e-seven-fixes-35397904249/). - Harness checks: 379 unit tests passed; harness typecheck passed. - Latest-head PR checks: 55 passed, two intentionally skipped. Greptile is 5/5; the security scan passes. - Review regressions: 350 executor tests and 204 session/driver tests passed. A script-free Claude install was verified with the actual CLI. - Full catalog, including the explicit-only everyday suite: [run 35417932353](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35417932353). Completed: **164/205 passed; 41 failed**. [Full dashboard and failure investigation](https://pages.paperclip.ing/runner-e2e-full-catalog-35417932353/). Includes 204 case artifacts and one pre-case GitHub authorization timeout; missing evidence is not scored as a pass. The full run tested `4e75881db`; Final-head metadata/CLI smoke cases both passed. In the separate [six infrastructure retries](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35419769343), the GitHub timeout case passed and all five Docker preflight failures repeated. [Follow-up dashboard](https://pages.paperclip.ing/runner-e2e-full-catalog-35417932353/follow-up/). - Full local typecheck and build passed on the rebased branch. The full local unit run completed with 657 passing files, two test timeouts and one suite setup timeout. All three affected files passed when rerun in isolation (84 tests). The first full local run was not clean. - Focused regression coverage includes the live question bridge, same-run response delivery, UI routing, stale revisions, approval overlap, and session reuse. ## Full-catalog follow-ups - Test infrastructure: 14 Claude everyday cells probe an absent host CLI; six cells failed pre-task GitHub/Docker qualification (GitHub passes on retry; all five Docker cases repeat; the workflow preflight allowlist omits their case IDs); five ACPX Codex cells cannot create sandbox namespaces. - Runtime: four OpenCode completion-criteria mismatches masked by shutdown errors, one service-approval suspension failure; three Daytona recovery failures encounter existing skill files; one duplicate completion wake. - Confirmed test defects: question pagination and a noncanonical plan document key. - Product/behavior: mismatched visible/required question sets, an attachment instead of the requested task document, one lone-option onboarding question, early completion instead of review, and a Codex Mini completion-schema failure. - The report job itself fails on trusted master’s stale patch/lock configuration. The linked report is rebuilt with the shared renderer from original cell results and public fixture screenshots; it excludes private snapshots, logs and traces. These are investigated follow-ups, not silently regraded passes. First-task passed 51/52. The PR checks are green independently of the broader catalog’s behavioral/infrastructure failures. ## Risks - Session reuse depends on a valid provider identity and context coverage. Fresh-session fallback and reset tests cover this boundary. - Native question delivery spans saved interaction state and a live provider run. Tests cover duplicate events, closed runs, and same-run answers. - Provider behavior varies. The full paid catalog may expose failures beyond these targeted fixes; those results will be reported without relaxing valid approval or output checks. - The legacy Claude version update is limited to test infrastructure. No database migration is included. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with repository inspection, code execution, and browser/E2E tools. The exact runtime model identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (targeted checks and all three timeout-file reruns pass; full-run timeout caveat above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
366 lines
14 KiB
TypeScript
366 lines
14 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, it, expect, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
import type { AskUserQuestionsPayload } from "../../packages/shared/src/types/issue.js";
|
|
import {
|
|
assertChatHandoff,
|
|
assertChatTaskHandoff,
|
|
chatQuestionPresentation,
|
|
chatRunFailure,
|
|
chatTaskCompletionFailure,
|
|
createChatIdleFailureDetector,
|
|
collectChatRunEvidence,
|
|
readRunningChatLog,
|
|
readChatOutputDocument,
|
|
isChatClarificationReply,
|
|
assertChatExecutionOutput,
|
|
isResetRun,
|
|
type ChatIssue,
|
|
type ChatRun,
|
|
} from "./chat-flow.js";
|
|
import type { RunnerApi } from "./api.js";
|
|
import { chatMarker } from "./chat-cases.js";
|
|
import { runnerMatrix } from "./catalog.js";
|
|
import { isPublicRunnerScreenshotRoute } from "./screenshot-policy.js";
|
|
import { classifyFailure, shouldRetryFailure } from "./failure-classifier.js";
|
|
|
|
const source: ChatIssue = {
|
|
id: "chat",
|
|
companyId: "co",
|
|
title: "Chat",
|
|
status: "in_review",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent",
|
|
};
|
|
const task: ChatIssue = {
|
|
...source,
|
|
id: "work",
|
|
parentId: null,
|
|
projectId: "project",
|
|
};
|
|
const plan = {
|
|
body: "# Relevant plan",
|
|
latestRevisionId: "revision",
|
|
updatedAt: "2026-09-11T10:00:00Z",
|
|
};
|
|
const run: ChatRun = {
|
|
id: "run",
|
|
companyId: "co",
|
|
agentId: "agent",
|
|
status: "succeeded",
|
|
startedAt: "2026-09-11T10:00:01Z",
|
|
};
|
|
describe("chat acceptance contracts", () => {
|
|
it("accepts concrete information requests without requiring question punctuation", () => {
|
|
expect(isChatClarificationReply("What is the club name?")).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(
|
|
isChatClarificationReply(
|
|
"Before assigning the welcome-note work, please share:\n\n1. Club name and intended readers.\n2. Format, length, and tone.\n3. Required details, sender, and deadline.",
|
|
),
|
|
).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(
|
|
isChatClarificationReply("Tell me the intended audience and format."),
|
|
).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(
|
|
isChatClarificationReply(
|
|
"Thanks — before assigning the welcome-note drafting work, I need a compact brief covering:\n\n- Club and audience: club name and intended readers.\n- Purpose: welcome or next steps.\n- Required content: dates, links, and contacts.\n- Voice: tone and sender.\n- Delivery constraints: format, length, and deadline.\n- Examples or policies: existing notes and approval requirements.",
|
|
),
|
|
).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(isChatClarificationReply("I'll need your details about the audience and format.")).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(isChatClarificationReply("We need some information about the club and intended readers.")).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(isChatClarificationReply("I needed a compact brief before I assigned the work.")).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(isChatClarificationReply("I need a compact brief:")).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(isChatClarificationReply("I need information.")).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(isChatClarificationReply("I need to create the task and write the note.")).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(isChatClarificationReply("Please share:")).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(isChatClarificationReply("Please share.")).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(
|
|
isChatClarificationReply("Asked the user clarifying questions about their club."),
|
|
).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(
|
|
isChatClarificationReply("I created the task and started writing the welcome note."),
|
|
).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects superseded plan requirements in executed output, independently of plan history", () => {
|
|
expect(() => assertChatExecutionOutput("Welcome CHAT123.", "CHAT123", "DRAFT123")).not.toThrow();
|
|
expect(() => assertChatExecutionOutput("Welcome DRAFT123 and CHAT123.", "CHAT123", "DRAFT123")).toThrow();
|
|
expect(() => assertChatExecutionOutput("Welcome DRAFT123.", "CHAT123", "DRAFT123")).toThrow();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("keeps chat markers literal across rich-text and Markdown boundaries", () => {
|
|
for (const prefix of ["CHAT", "DRAFT", "OLDCONTEXT"] as const) {
|
|
expect(chatMarker(prefix, "abc123-1")).toBe(`${prefix}abc1231`);
|
|
expect(chatMarker(prefix, "abc_123-1")).toMatch(/^[a-zA-Z0-9]+$/);
|
|
}
|
|
expect(chatMarker("OLDCONTEXT", "one-1")).not.toBe(
|
|
chatMarker("CHAT", "one-1"),
|
|
);
|
|
expect(chatMarker("CHAT", "one-1")).not.toBe(chatMarker("CHAT", "two-1"));
|
|
});
|
|
it("has exactly six workflows on the four chosen local profiles", () => {
|
|
const matrix = runnerMatrix.filter(
|
|
(cell) => cell.suite.id === "agent-chat",
|
|
);
|
|
expect(matrix).toHaveLength(24);
|
|
expect(new Set(matrix.map((cell) => cell.profile.id))).toEqual(
|
|
new Set([
|
|
"legacy-codex",
|
|
"legacy-claude",
|
|
"runner-codex",
|
|
"runner-acpx-claude",
|
|
]),
|
|
);
|
|
expect(new Set(matrix.map((cell) => cell.task.id)).size).toBe(6);
|
|
expect(
|
|
matrix.every(
|
|
(cell) =>
|
|
cell.environment.id === "local" &&
|
|
cell.task.expectedTerminalState.issue === "in_review",
|
|
),
|
|
).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
it("rejects missing plan, chat children, wrong assignments, and execution before the plan", () => {
|
|
expect(() => assertChatHandoff(task, plan, [run], source)).not.toThrow();
|
|
for (const invalid of [
|
|
{ ...task, parentId: "chat" },
|
|
{ ...task, projectId: null },
|
|
{ ...task, assigneeAgentId: "other" },
|
|
])
|
|
expect(() => assertChatHandoff(invalid, plan, [run], source)).toThrow();
|
|
expect(() =>
|
|
assertChatHandoff(task, { ...plan, body: "" }, [run], source),
|
|
).toThrow();
|
|
expect(() =>
|
|
assertChatHandoff(
|
|
task,
|
|
{ ...plan, updatedAt: "2026-09-11T10:00:02Z" },
|
|
[run],
|
|
source,
|
|
),
|
|
).toThrow();
|
|
expect(() => assertChatHandoff(task, plan, [], source)).toThrow();
|
|
});
|
|
it("requires a plan for plan handoff, while direct requests need only normal task assignment", () => {
|
|
expect(() => assertChatTaskHandoff(task, [run], source)).not.toThrow();
|
|
expect(() =>
|
|
assertChatHandoff(task, { ...plan, body: "" }, [run], source),
|
|
).toThrow();
|
|
expect(() =>
|
|
assertChatTaskHandoff({ ...task, projectId: null }, [run], source),
|
|
).toThrow();
|
|
});
|
|
it.each(["project-description", "welcome-note", "output"])("finds committed %s output without accepting a copied plan or a claim", async (key) => {
|
|
const output = {
|
|
...plan,
|
|
id: "description-doc",
|
|
issueId: "work",
|
|
key,
|
|
body: "A completed description with CHAT123.",
|
|
createdByAgentId: "agent",
|
|
};
|
|
const get = vi.fn(async (path: string) => {
|
|
if (path === "/api/issues/work/documents")
|
|
return [{ key: "plan" }, { key }];
|
|
if (path === `/api/issues/work/documents/${key}`)
|
|
return output;
|
|
throw new Error(`Unexpected document read: ${path}`);
|
|
});
|
|
const api = { get } as Pick<RunnerApi, "get">;
|
|
await expect(readChatOutputDocument(api, "work", "CHAT123")).resolves.toBe(
|
|
output,
|
|
);
|
|
await expect(readChatOutputDocument(api, "work", "WRONG123")).rejects.toThrow(
|
|
"no non-plan output document",
|
|
);
|
|
get.mockImplementation(async () => [{ key: "plan" }]);
|
|
await expect(readChatOutputDocument(api, "work", "CHAT123")).rejects.toThrow(
|
|
"document keys: plan",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
it("uses durable free-text labels, multi-selection, and the supplied submit label", () => {
|
|
const payload: AskUserQuestionsPayload = {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
submitLabel: "Send brief",
|
|
questions: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "audience",
|
|
prompt: "Who is it for?",
|
|
selectionMode: "multi",
|
|
required: true,
|
|
options: [
|
|
{ id: "members", label: "New members" },
|
|
{
|
|
id: "custom",
|
|
label: "Another audience or occasion",
|
|
freeText: true,
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
};
|
|
const presentation = chatQuestionPresentation(payload);
|
|
expect(presentation.submitLabel).toBe("Send brief");
|
|
expect(presentation.questions[0]).toMatchObject({
|
|
answerMode: "multi_select",
|
|
customAnswer: { enabled: true, label: "Another audience or occasion" },
|
|
});
|
|
const nativePayload: AskUserQuestionsPayload = {
|
|
...payload,
|
|
questionSet: {
|
|
schema: "paperclip.question_set.v1",
|
|
submitLabel: "Continue",
|
|
questions: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "audience",
|
|
prompt: "Who is it for?",
|
|
required: true,
|
|
answerMode: "text",
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
expect(chatQuestionPresentation(nativePayload)).toBe(
|
|
nativePayload.questionSet,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
it("retains reset events without requesting a provider log, and does not hide missing real logs", async () => {
|
|
const get = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([{ type: "session_reset" }]);
|
|
const reset = { ...run, resultJson: { conversationReset: true } };
|
|
await expect(collectChatRunEvidence({ get }, reset)).resolves.toEqual({
|
|
runId: run.id,
|
|
log: null,
|
|
events: [{ type: "session_reset" }],
|
|
});
|
|
expect(get.mock.calls).toEqual([
|
|
[`/api/heartbeat-runs/${run.id}/events?limit=1000`],
|
|
]);
|
|
get.mockRejectedValue(new Error("Run log not found"));
|
|
await expect(collectChatRunEvidence({ get }, run)).rejects.toThrow(
|
|
"Run log not found",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
it("retains events for an unstarted dependency-blocked wake without asking for a nonexistent log", async () => {
|
|
const get = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
const suppressed = { ...run, status: "cancelled", errorCode: "issue_dependencies_blocked", startedAt: null };
|
|
expect((await collectChatRunEvidence({ get }, suppressed)).log).toBeNull();
|
|
expect(get).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
get.mockRejectedValue(new Error("Run log not found"));
|
|
await expect(collectChatRunEvidence({ get }, { ...suppressed, startedAt: "2026-09-18T00:00:00Z" })).rejects.toThrow("Run log not found");
|
|
await expect(collectChatRunEvidence({ get }, { ...suppressed, errorCode: "provider_transport_failed" })).rejects.toThrow("Run log not found");
|
|
});
|
|
it("waits for a newly running provider's log file without swallowing server failures", async () => {
|
|
const get = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ status: () => 404 });
|
|
const api = { request: { get } } as unknown as Pick<RunnerApi, "request">;
|
|
await expect(readRunningChatLog(api, "starting")).resolves.toBeUndefined();
|
|
get.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
status: () => 200,
|
|
ok: () => true,
|
|
json: async () => ({ content: "streamed reply" }),
|
|
});
|
|
await expect(readRunningChatLog(api, "running")).resolves.toBe(
|
|
"streamed reply",
|
|
);
|
|
get.mockResolvedValue({ status: () => 500, ok: () => false });
|
|
await expect(readRunningChatLog(api, "broken")).rejects.toThrow(
|
|
"log returned 500",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
it("fails terminal execution errors without preempting active retries or recovery", () => {
|
|
const failed = {
|
|
...run,
|
|
status: "failed",
|
|
error: "provider rejected request",
|
|
};
|
|
expect(chatTaskCompletionFailure(task, [failed])).toContain(
|
|
"provider rejected request",
|
|
);
|
|
expect(
|
|
chatTaskCompletionFailure(task, [failed, { ...run, status: "queued" }]),
|
|
).toBeUndefined();
|
|
expect(
|
|
chatTaskCompletionFailure({ ...task, scheduledRetry: { id: "retry" } }, [
|
|
failed,
|
|
]),
|
|
).toBeUndefined();
|
|
expect(
|
|
chatTaskCompletionFailure(
|
|
{ ...task, activeRecoveryAction: { id: "recovery" } },
|
|
[failed],
|
|
),
|
|
).toBeUndefined();
|
|
});
|
|
it("fails stable contradictory idle states promptly without paid retries or transient false alarms", () => {
|
|
const detect = createChatIdleFailureDetector(3);
|
|
const settled = {
|
|
resolved: true,
|
|
status: "blocked",
|
|
conversationState: "waiting",
|
|
providerRunCount: 3,
|
|
activeRuns: [] as string[],
|
|
};
|
|
expect(detect(settled)).toBeUndefined();
|
|
expect(detect({ ...settled, activeRuns: ["running"] })).toBeUndefined();
|
|
expect(detect(settled)).toBeUndefined();
|
|
const failure = detect(settled);
|
|
expect(failure).toContain("chat_idle_state_invariant");
|
|
expect(classifyFailure(failure)).toBe("candidate_failure");
|
|
expect(shouldRetryFailure(classifyFailure(failure))).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(detect({ ...settled, status: "in_review" })).toBeUndefined();
|
|
expect(detect(settled)).toBeUndefined();
|
|
expect(detect({ ...settled, providerRunCount: 2 })).toBeUndefined();
|
|
expect(detect({ ...settled, status: "in_progress" })).toBeUndefined();
|
|
expect(detect(settled)).toBeUndefined();
|
|
});
|
|
it("fails promptly on terminal provider failures while permitting only expected cancellations", () => {
|
|
expect(chatRunFailure([run])).toBeUndefined();
|
|
expect(chatRunFailure([{ ...run, status: "running" }])).toBeUndefined();
|
|
expect(
|
|
chatRunFailure([
|
|
{
|
|
...run,
|
|
status: "failed",
|
|
errorCode: "permission_denied",
|
|
error: "sandbox unavailable",
|
|
},
|
|
]),
|
|
).toContain("run run failed (permission_denied): sandbox unavailable");
|
|
expect(chatRunFailure([{ ...run, status: "cancelled" }])).toContain(
|
|
"cancelled",
|
|
);
|
|
expect(
|
|
chatRunFailure([{ ...run, status: "cancelled" }], true),
|
|
).toBeUndefined();
|
|
});
|
|
it("separates reset control runs from provider runs without treating failures as resets", () => {
|
|
expect(isResetRun(run)).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(isResetRun({ ...run, status: "failed" })).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(
|
|
isResetRun({ ...run, contextSnapshot: { conversationReset: true } }),
|
|
).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
it("only publishes screenshots of the exact disposable chat", () => {
|
|
const target = {
|
|
issuePrefix: "E2E",
|
|
issueId: "chat",
|
|
issueIdentifier: null,
|
|
chatAgentId: "fixture-agent",
|
|
};
|
|
expect(
|
|
isPublicRunnerScreenshotRoute(
|
|
"http://127.0.0.1:3199/E2E/chats/fixture-agent",
|
|
target,
|
|
),
|
|
).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(
|
|
isPublicRunnerScreenshotRoute(
|
|
"http://127.0.0.1:3199/E2E/chats/another-agent",
|
|
target,
|
|
),
|
|
).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(
|
|
isPublicRunnerScreenshotRoute(
|
|
"https://example.com/E2E/chats/fixture-agent",
|
|
target,
|
|
),
|
|
).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|