mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-27 11:20:42 +01:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The control plane owns agent lifecycle, issue assignment, routine dispatch, heartbeat wakeups, and recovery paths > - Terminated, paused, pending-approval, or otherwise invalid agents should not receive new work or new execution attempts > - The old behavior left eligibility checks spread across routes and services, so assignment and run paths could drift apart > - This pull request centralizes agent lifecycle eligibility and applies it consistently to assignment, invocation, routines, recovery, and UI affordances > - The benefit is safer autonomy: terminated agents stay paused, invalid org-chain agents are surfaced, and active agents keep receiving valid work ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #5103 Related: #1864 Bug fix context: - What happened: agent assignment and heartbeat/run paths did not share one eligibility contract, so invalid lifecycle states could still be considered in some paths. - Expected behavior: terminated agents must never receive new assignments or heartbeat runs, and paused or otherwise invalid agents should be treated as non-invokable consistently. - Steps to reproduce: create or select an agent in an invalid lifecycle state, then attempt assignment, routine dispatch, or heartbeat/recovery wake paths. - Paperclip version/commit: fixed on top of `paperclipai/paperclip` `master` at the PR base. - Deployment mode: applies to the server control plane in local and authenticated deployments. ## What Changed - Added shared agent lifecycle eligibility helpers and exported the related shared types. - Centralized server-side assignability and invokability checks for issue assignment, agent routes, heartbeat dispatch, routines, recovery, and liveness logic. - Hardened issue assignment so invalid assignees are rejected instead of queued for work. - Hardened heartbeat/routine/recovery paths so terminated and otherwise invalid agents are not woken for new runs. - Updated board UI affordances to disable invalid agent actions and surface org-chain warnings where relevant. - Added targeted shared, server, and UI tests for the new eligibility behavior. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/agent-eligibility.test.ts server/src/__tests__/agent-invokability.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-archived-company-guard.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-liveness.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/routines-service.test.ts ui/src/lib/company-members.test.ts ui/src/pages/Agents.test.tsx` — 8 files, 144 tests passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed. - Checked the PR diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows` changes. - Checked `ROADMAP.md`; this is a targeted control-plane safety fix and does not duplicate a planned core feature. - Searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs/issues; closest related items are linked above. - CI and Greptile verification are pending on the opened PR and will be followed up before requesting merge. ## Risks Low to moderate risk. The intended behavioral shift is that invalid agents are refused earlier and more consistently, which could expose existing data with paused, pending, terminated, or broken org-chain assignees. The added tests cover the critical assignment, heartbeat, routine, recovery, shared helper, and UI paths. No database migrations are included. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 Codex via the Paperclip `codex_local` adapter, with shell/git/GitHub CLI tool use. Reasoning mode and context window are managed by the adapter runtime and not exposed in this environment. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots (not applicable: no design screenshots requested; UI behavior is covered by tests) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (not applicable: no user-facing command or schema docs changed) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (pending CI) - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups (pending Greptile) - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
522 lines
15 KiB
TypeScript
522 lines
15 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
|
|
import { classifyIssueGraphLiveness } from "../services/issue-liveness.ts";
|
|
|
|
const companyId = "company-1";
|
|
const managerId = "manager-1";
|
|
const coderId = "coder-1";
|
|
const blockerId = "blocker-1";
|
|
const blockedId = "blocked-1";
|
|
|
|
function issue(overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}) {
|
|
return {
|
|
id: blockedId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
identifier: "PAP-1703",
|
|
title: "Parent work",
|
|
status: "blocked",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: coderId,
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: null,
|
|
executionState: null,
|
|
...overrides,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function agent(overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}) {
|
|
return {
|
|
id: coderId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
name: "Coder",
|
|
role: "engineer",
|
|
title: null,
|
|
status: "idle",
|
|
reportsTo: managerId,
|
|
...overrides,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const manager = agent({
|
|
id: managerId,
|
|
name: "CTO",
|
|
role: "cto",
|
|
reportsTo: null,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const blocks = [{ companyId, blockerIssueId: blockerId, blockedIssueId: blockedId }];
|
|
|
|
describe("issue graph liveness classifier", () => {
|
|
it("detects a PAP-1703-style blocked chain with an unassigned blocker and stable incident key", () => {
|
|
const findings = classifyIssueGraphLiveness({
|
|
issues: [
|
|
issue(),
|
|
issue({
|
|
id: blockerId,
|
|
identifier: "PAP-1704",
|
|
title: "Missing unblock work",
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: null,
|
|
}),
|
|
],
|
|
relations: blocks,
|
|
agents: [agent(), manager],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(findings).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(findings[0]).toMatchObject({
|
|
issueId: blockedId,
|
|
identifier: "PAP-1703",
|
|
state: "blocked_by_unassigned_issue",
|
|
recoveryIssueId: blockerId,
|
|
recommendedOwnerAgentId: managerId,
|
|
dependencyPath: [
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ issueId: blockedId }),
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ issueId: blockerId }),
|
|
],
|
|
incidentKey: `harness_liveness:${companyId}:${blockedId}:blocked_by_unassigned_issue:${blockerId}`,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("does not use free-form executive role or name matching for recovery ownership", () => {
|
|
const rootAgentId = "root-agent";
|
|
const spoofedExecutiveId = "spoofed-executive";
|
|
|
|
const findings = classifyIssueGraphLiveness({
|
|
issues: [
|
|
issue({
|
|
assigneeAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
}),
|
|
issue({
|
|
id: blockerId,
|
|
identifier: "PAP-1704",
|
|
title: "Missing unblock work",
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
}),
|
|
],
|
|
relations: blocks,
|
|
agents: [
|
|
agent({
|
|
id: spoofedExecutiveId,
|
|
name: "Chief Executive Recovery",
|
|
role: "cto",
|
|
title: "CEO",
|
|
reportsTo: rootAgentId,
|
|
}),
|
|
agent({
|
|
id: rootAgentId,
|
|
name: "Root Operator",
|
|
role: "operator",
|
|
title: null,
|
|
reportsTo: null,
|
|
}),
|
|
],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(findings).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(findings[0]?.recommendedOwnerAgentId).toBe(rootAgentId);
|
|
expect(findings[0]?.recommendedOwnerCandidates[0]).toMatchObject({
|
|
agentId: rootAgentId,
|
|
reason: "root_agent",
|
|
sourceIssueId: blockerId,
|
|
});
|
|
expect(findings[0]?.recommendedOwnerCandidateAgentIds).toEqual([
|
|
rootAgentId,
|
|
spoofedExecutiveId,
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("does not flag a live blocked chain with an active assignee and wake path", () => {
|
|
const findings = classifyIssueGraphLiveness({
|
|
issues: [
|
|
issue(),
|
|
issue({
|
|
id: blockerId,
|
|
identifier: "PAP-1704",
|
|
title: "Live unblock work",
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "blocker-agent",
|
|
}),
|
|
],
|
|
relations: blocks,
|
|
agents: [
|
|
agent(),
|
|
manager,
|
|
agent({ id: "blocker-agent", name: "Blocker Agent", reportsTo: managerId }),
|
|
],
|
|
queuedWakeRequests: [{ companyId, issueId: blockerId, agentId: "blocker-agent", status: "queued" }],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(findings).toEqual([]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("detects an assigned backlog blocker leaf with no action path", () => {
|
|
const findings = classifyIssueGraphLiveness({
|
|
issues: [
|
|
issue(),
|
|
issue({
|
|
id: blockerId,
|
|
identifier: "PAP-1704",
|
|
title: "Parked assigned unblock work",
|
|
status: "backlog",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "blocker-agent",
|
|
}),
|
|
],
|
|
relations: blocks,
|
|
agents: [
|
|
agent(),
|
|
manager,
|
|
agent({ id: "blocker-agent", name: "Blocker Agent", reportsTo: managerId }),
|
|
],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(findings).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(findings[0]).toMatchObject({
|
|
issueId: blockedId,
|
|
identifier: "PAP-1703",
|
|
state: "blocked_by_assigned_backlog_issue",
|
|
recoveryIssueId: blockerId,
|
|
recommendedOwnerAgentId: "blocker-agent",
|
|
dependencyPath: [
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ issueId: blockedId }),
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ issueId: blockerId, status: "backlog" }),
|
|
],
|
|
incidentKey: `harness_liveness:${companyId}:${blockedId}:blocked_by_assigned_backlog_issue:${blockerId}`,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("does not flag an assigned backlog blocker that has an explicit waiting path", () => {
|
|
const backlogBlocker = issue({
|
|
id: blockerId,
|
|
identifier: "PAP-1704",
|
|
title: "Explicitly parked unblock work",
|
|
status: "backlog",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "blocker-agent",
|
|
});
|
|
const baseInput = {
|
|
issues: [issue(), backlogBlocker],
|
|
relations: blocks,
|
|
agents: [
|
|
agent(),
|
|
manager,
|
|
agent({ id: "blocker-agent", name: "Blocker Agent", reportsTo: managerId }),
|
|
],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
expect(classifyIssueGraphLiveness({
|
|
...baseInput,
|
|
issues: [issue(), { ...backlogBlocker, assigneeAgentId: null, assigneeUserId: "board-user-1" }],
|
|
})).toEqual([]);
|
|
expect(classifyIssueGraphLiveness({
|
|
...baseInput,
|
|
activeRuns: [{ companyId, issueId: blockerId, agentId: "blocker-agent", status: "running" }],
|
|
})).toEqual([]);
|
|
expect(classifyIssueGraphLiveness({
|
|
...baseInput,
|
|
openRecoveryIssues: [{ companyId, issueId: blockerId, status: "todo" }],
|
|
})).toEqual([]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("does not flag an unassigned blocker that already has an active execution path", () => {
|
|
const findings = classifyIssueGraphLiveness({
|
|
issues: [
|
|
issue(),
|
|
issue({
|
|
id: blockerId,
|
|
identifier: "PAP-1704",
|
|
title: "Unassigned but already running",
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: null,
|
|
}),
|
|
],
|
|
relations: blocks,
|
|
agents: [agent(), manager],
|
|
activeRuns: [{ companyId, issueId: blockerId, agentId: coderId, status: "running" }],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(findings).toEqual([]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("detects cancelled blockers and uninvokable blocker assignees deterministically", () => {
|
|
const cancelled = classifyIssueGraphLiveness({
|
|
issues: [
|
|
issue(),
|
|
issue({
|
|
id: blockerId,
|
|
identifier: "PAP-1704",
|
|
title: "Cancelled unblock work",
|
|
status: "cancelled",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "blocker-agent",
|
|
}),
|
|
],
|
|
relations: blocks,
|
|
agents: [agent(), manager, agent({ id: "blocker-agent", name: "Paused", status: "paused" })],
|
|
});
|
|
expect(cancelled[0]?.state).toBe("blocked_by_cancelled_issue");
|
|
|
|
const paused = classifyIssueGraphLiveness({
|
|
issues: [
|
|
issue(),
|
|
issue({
|
|
id: blockerId,
|
|
identifier: "PAP-1704",
|
|
title: "Paused unblock work",
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "blocker-agent",
|
|
}),
|
|
],
|
|
relations: blocks,
|
|
agents: [agent(), manager, agent({ id: "blocker-agent", name: "Paused", status: "paused" })],
|
|
});
|
|
expect(paused[0]?.state).toBe("blocked_by_uninvokable_assignee");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("detects blocker assignees under terminated org ancestors as uninvokable", () => {
|
|
const findings = classifyIssueGraphLiveness({
|
|
issues: [
|
|
issue(),
|
|
issue({
|
|
id: blockerId,
|
|
identifier: "PAP-1704",
|
|
title: "Invalid tree unblock work",
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "qa-2",
|
|
}),
|
|
],
|
|
relations: blocks,
|
|
agents: [
|
|
agent(),
|
|
manager,
|
|
agent({ id: "qa-2", name: "QA 2", status: "active", reportsTo: "cto-2" }),
|
|
agent({ id: "cto-2", name: "CTO 2", status: "terminated", reportsTo: "ceo-2" }),
|
|
agent({ id: "ceo-2", name: "CEO 2", status: "terminated", reportsTo: null }),
|
|
],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(findings).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(findings[0]).toMatchObject({
|
|
state: "blocked_by_uninvokable_assignee",
|
|
reason: "PAP-1703 is blocked by PAP-1704, but its assignee is in an invalid org chain.",
|
|
recommendedOwnerAgentId: managerId,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("detects invalid in_review execution participant", () => {
|
|
const findings = classifyIssueGraphLiveness({
|
|
issues: [
|
|
issue({
|
|
status: "in_review",
|
|
executionState: {
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
currentStageId: "stage-1",
|
|
currentStageIndex: 0,
|
|
currentStageType: "review",
|
|
currentParticipant: { type: "agent", agentId: "missing-agent" },
|
|
returnAssignee: { type: "agent", agentId: coderId },
|
|
completedStageIds: [],
|
|
lastDecisionId: null,
|
|
lastDecisionOutcome: null,
|
|
},
|
|
}),
|
|
],
|
|
relations: [],
|
|
agents: [agent(), manager],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(findings).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(findings[0]).toMatchObject({
|
|
state: "invalid_review_participant",
|
|
incidentKey: `harness_liveness:${companyId}:${blockedId}:invalid_review_participant:missing-agent`,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("detects the PAP-2239-style blocked chain at the first stalled in_review leaf without duplicate findings", () => {
|
|
const phaseIssueId = "phase-issue-1";
|
|
const reviewLeafId = "review-leaf-1";
|
|
|
|
const findings = classifyIssueGraphLiveness({
|
|
issues: [
|
|
issue({
|
|
id: "pap-2239",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-2239",
|
|
title: "External object reference project",
|
|
status: "blocked",
|
|
}),
|
|
issue({
|
|
id: phaseIssueId,
|
|
identifier: "PAP-2276",
|
|
title: "UX acceptance review phase",
|
|
status: "blocked",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: coderId,
|
|
}),
|
|
issue({
|
|
id: reviewLeafId,
|
|
identifier: "PAP-2279",
|
|
title: "Screenshot acceptance review",
|
|
status: "in_review",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: coderId,
|
|
executionState: null,
|
|
}),
|
|
],
|
|
relations: [
|
|
{ companyId, blockerIssueId: phaseIssueId, blockedIssueId: "pap-2239" },
|
|
{ companyId, blockerIssueId: reviewLeafId, blockedIssueId: phaseIssueId },
|
|
],
|
|
agents: [agent(), manager],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(findings).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(findings[0]).toMatchObject({
|
|
issueId: "pap-2239",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-2239",
|
|
state: "in_review_without_action_path",
|
|
recoveryIssueId: reviewLeafId,
|
|
recommendedOwnerAgentId: coderId,
|
|
dependencyPath: [
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ issueId: "pap-2239" }),
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ issueId: phaseIssueId }),
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ issueId: reviewLeafId }),
|
|
],
|
|
incidentKey: `harness_liveness:${companyId}:pap-2239:in_review_without_action_path:${reviewLeafId}`,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("skips paused stalled review assignees when choosing recovery owner candidates", () => {
|
|
const reviewIssueId = "review-1";
|
|
|
|
const findings = classifyIssueGraphLiveness({
|
|
issues: [
|
|
issue({
|
|
id: reviewIssueId,
|
|
identifier: "PAP-2279",
|
|
title: "Screenshot acceptance review",
|
|
status: "in_review",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: coderId,
|
|
executionState: null,
|
|
}),
|
|
],
|
|
relations: [],
|
|
agents: [agent({ status: "paused" }), manager],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(findings).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(findings[0]).toMatchObject({
|
|
state: "in_review_without_action_path",
|
|
recommendedOwnerAgentId: managerId,
|
|
});
|
|
expect(findings[0]?.recommendedOwnerCandidates).toEqual([
|
|
{
|
|
agentId: managerId,
|
|
reason: "assignee_reporting_chain",
|
|
sourceIssueId: reviewIssueId,
|
|
},
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("does not flag healthy in_review issues with an explicit action path", () => {
|
|
const reviewIssueId = "review-1";
|
|
const baseReviewIssue = issue({
|
|
id: reviewIssueId,
|
|
identifier: "PAP-2279",
|
|
title: "Screenshot acceptance review",
|
|
status: "in_review",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: coderId,
|
|
executionState: null,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const cases = [
|
|
{
|
|
name: "typed agent participant",
|
|
issue: {
|
|
...baseReviewIssue,
|
|
executionState: {
|
|
currentParticipant: { type: "agent", agentId: coderId },
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "typed user participant",
|
|
issue: {
|
|
...baseReviewIssue,
|
|
executionState: {
|
|
currentParticipant: { type: "user", userId: "board-user-1" },
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "user owner",
|
|
issue: { ...baseReviewIssue, assigneeAgentId: null, assigneeUserId: "board-user-1" },
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "active run",
|
|
issue: baseReviewIssue,
|
|
activeRuns: [{ companyId, issueId: reviewIssueId, agentId: coderId, status: "running" }],
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "queued wake",
|
|
issue: baseReviewIssue,
|
|
queuedWakeRequests: [{ companyId, issueId: reviewIssueId, agentId: coderId, status: "queued" }],
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "pending interaction",
|
|
issue: baseReviewIssue,
|
|
pendingInteractions: [{ companyId, issueId: reviewIssueId, status: "pending" }],
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "pending approval",
|
|
issue: baseReviewIssue,
|
|
pendingApprovals: [{ companyId, issueId: reviewIssueId, status: "pending" }],
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "open recovery issue",
|
|
issue: baseReviewIssue,
|
|
openRecoveryIssues: [{ companyId, issueId: reviewIssueId, status: "todo" }],
|
|
},
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
for (const testCase of cases) {
|
|
const findings = classifyIssueGraphLiveness({
|
|
issues: [testCase.issue],
|
|
relations: [],
|
|
agents: [agent(), manager],
|
|
activeRuns: testCase.activeRuns,
|
|
queuedWakeRequests: testCase.queuedWakeRequests,
|
|
pendingInteractions: testCase.pendingInteractions,
|
|
pendingApprovals: testCase.pendingApprovals,
|
|
openRecoveryIssues: testCase.openRecoveryIssues,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(findings, testCase.name).toEqual([]);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("ignores cross-company waiting paths for stalled in_review issues", () => {
|
|
const reviewIssueId = "review-1";
|
|
|
|
const findings = classifyIssueGraphLiveness({
|
|
issues: [
|
|
issue({
|
|
id: reviewIssueId,
|
|
identifier: "PAP-2279",
|
|
title: "Screenshot acceptance review",
|
|
status: "in_review",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: coderId,
|
|
executionState: null,
|
|
}),
|
|
],
|
|
relations: [],
|
|
agents: [agent(), manager],
|
|
pendingInteractions: [{ companyId: "other-company", issueId: reviewIssueId, status: "pending" }],
|
|
openRecoveryIssues: [{ companyId: "other-company", issueId: reviewIssueId, status: "todo" }],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(findings).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(findings[0]).toMatchObject({
|
|
state: "in_review_without_action_path",
|
|
recoveryIssueId: reviewIssueId,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|