## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their work. > - The feature map describes user capabilities and verification recipes. > - Storybook holds isolated examples of those capabilities. > - Missing catalog links can hide existing examples. > - Some stories also expose shipped capabilities absent from the map. > - This pull request adds verified source associations and three paired map entries. > - Readers can find existing examples without changing their homes or URLs. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #16052, #16049 and #16046. **What existing behavior does this improve?** Storybook capability lookup and the feature/agent access maps. **Current behavior** Seventy capabilities have no example link. Some matching stories already exist. Primary-agent preferences and company decision/fast-response services appear only under broad neighboring capabilities. **Proposed behavior** Add source-supported links across 34 suites. Keep shared foundations in place while cross-listing them. Add primary-agent, decision-model and fast-response capabilities to both upstream maps. Retain explicit simulation and partial-example limits. **Reason and benefit** The catalog distinguishes missing associations from missing examples. The upstream map describes three existing product capabilities more precisely. **Breaking changes** None to product behavior, story exports, folders, sidebar titles or URLs. A shared foundation can declare a reasoned `home: "foundations"` override while referencing related capabilities. ## What Changed - Add 55 references across 34 suites. Replace primary-agent suites' reporting-line association with their own capability. - Add three source-reviewed capabilities and their API/actor boundaries to paired maps. - Preserve the shared Foundations home when cross-listing developer design examples. Add a validation regression test. - Record which exports demonstrate each association and what remains simulated or unverified. - Regenerate the catalog and capability data. Preserve all original 223 authored suites and 2,210 story IDs. Retain the two skill-removal stories added by current master, for 2,212 authored stories in total. - Reduce empty example lookups from 70 of 171 capabilities to 59 of 174. Links do not establish complete capability coverage. ## Verification - Passed: 27 catalog/generator/map tests, catalog validation, map structural checks, token gates and skill validation. - Passed: source inventory comparison preserves all authored files, titles, meta IDs and story IDs. - Passed: repository typecheck/build and Storybook build. Final built index has 2,248 entries and preserves all previous entries, including the two skills stories added by current master. - The broad local repository test run was interrupted before completion to resolve a new master conflict. A complete local suite pass is not claimed; fresh CI passed on the reconciled branch. - Browser: Design links to preserved Foundations stories; company-service sections link settings/history/journey suites; decision SetupToHistory passed 12 interaction steps; primary-agent ReplacePrimary passed four steps. No console errors in selected checks. - Greptile: 5/5 on final commit `805a8af62abe589907e7cc6ca1b415ce1e0cc3c0`, with no findings or unresolved threads. - Final-revision CI passed all 57 checks/statuses, including all eight browser shards, server and Runner tests, typecheck and build. The unchanged Cloud-auth mocked-response race seen on a superseded revision did not recur on the final commit. No test expectations were changed. - New agent-access evidence is source-only. Live provider and agent-credential verification is not established. ## Risks - Suite-level associations can represent only selected states. Notes retain those limits and existing review classifications. - In-memory connection drafts do not prove reload persistence. Resume-failure UI does not prove successful continuation. No-op budget controls do not prove relief or resumption. - Three map capabilities document existing behavior. No permission, API, provider or production component changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, code execution and source inspection. The exact runtime model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Storybook map
The feature index connects the existing Storybook to stable capability
IDs from the upstream feature map. Story files remain
in ui/storybook/. The feature map and its maintenance skill do not depend on
this catalog. New capabilities or upstream recipe drift are reported to their
maintainer; this catalog does not redefine product behavior or permissions.
Ownership
- maintain-storybook owns story alignment, fixture corrections, classification, and this catalog.
- review-storybook consumes it to select and exercise examples, then reports evidence and drift.
- DESIGN.md governs design. Production verification remains with the existing product recipes and verification tools.
Catalog contract
catalog.json is the maintained inventory, with one entry per authored story file.
INDEX.md is generated from it, the upstream feature map, and the installed Storybook CSF parser. Titles,
export filtering, story counts and IDs come from source, not filename guesses.
All examples are retained, including historical suites. A file's first capability
is its primary home; remaining capabilities are lookup references, not copies.
Shared foundations may declare home: "foundations" to retain their folder and
sidebar while linking related capabilities. This override requires an exception
reason; it is not available for arbitrary feature homes.
Foundations/guides and proposals without a mapped capability need an exception
reason. An absent story is not automatically a feature gap.
Folders and sidebar
Story files live in ui/storybook/stories/<primary-feature-area>/, using the first
capability's area slug. Related capabilities still point to the same story. Shared
fixture modules and assets live in ui/storybook/support/; production wrappers in
ui/storybook/prototypes/ retain their existing ownership.
The sidebar follows the section and feature names in the feature-map README, then
retains each suite's useful scenario grouping. Foundations contains shared component
examples with no primary product capability. Overview contains the catalog guide.
Every indexed feature has an Overview page, even when it has no cataloged examples.
The main guide and these pages use the same section, feature, and capability order
as the upstream map. Related suite links cross primary homes without copying stories.
Sidebar labels replace / with , because Storybook treats slashes as folders;
the index and page heading retain the original feature name.
Missing examples are explicit; historical examples and guides do not imply current
behavioral coverage.
ui/storybook/generated/ contains the derived index and one CSF Overview per
feature. The inline storySort.order in the preview config is also generated:
Storybook's indexer requires a literal there. Regenerate these outputs with the catalog command; do not edit
them or add them to the authored inventory. Their stable IDs use
feature-map-<area>--overview. Generated pages are explanatory guides and do not
increase example-suite counts. Storybook start/build checks this output for drift.
The generator fails on unexpected files rather than silently deleting them.
Each suite declares an explicit CSF id, recorded as stableId in the catalog.
The sidebarTitle can change without changing that identity. Existing story and
autodocs URLs and screenshot names remain valid. Do not derive a replacement ID
from a newly organized title. The checker rejects missing or changed explicit IDs,
incorrect feature folders, and sidebar titles outside their primary feature home.
Each entry records purpose, capability references, review sources/date/fingerprint, notes, and three independent dimensions:
| Dimension | Values |
|---|---|
| Product status | current: source comparison supports the named subject; proposed: intentional alternate design; historical: superseded reference retained for its original purpose; mixed: suite combines these; unreviewed: parity has not been established |
| Implementation | production: shipped subject with fixture/layout wrappers; prototype: locally implemented subject, even if it uses shared primitives; mixed: both subjects; guide: explanatory documentation |
| Data boundary | fixtures: props, callbacks, caches or API responses are simulated; fixture-server: requires a separately owned local API/database fixture with simulated upstream providers; static: explanatory/static examples |
current is a source-review classification, not a promise that every state renders
or that APIs, gates, persistence and providers passed live tests. unreviewed
entries still have an inventory/classification review; notes explain the deeper
parity work outstanding. Mixed files retain a note naming the important split.
Production components can legitimately use mock data. A prototype directory name
does not establish implementation: some wrappers there re-export shipped UI.
Review sources include the story, relevant local support and production subjects. Include directly rendered subjects regardless of import spelling, and primitives when the suite demonstrates them. Do not truncate the list to a fixed source count. Fingerprints make changes to those declared dependencies visible. They do not follow every transitive production import or infer semantic correctness. Shared preview/config/fixture changes have a separate fingerprint and require reviewing affected callers. Update fingerprints only after reviewing the change, and add missing dependencies when discovered. Date/revision context for the initial pass and executed evidence belong in REVIEW.md.
Maintenance commands
After installing workspace dependencies:
node scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs
node scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs --write
node --test scripts/storybook-catalog.test.mjs scripts/storybook-feature-index.test.mjs
The checker rejects unaccounted or deleted stories, invalid capability references,
duplicate entries/IDs, missing review sources, changed fingerprints and a stale
generated indexes and feature pages. --write only regenerates these outputs; it never refreshes review
fingerprints or blesses drift. Preserve IDs when changing titles or moving files;
compare the existing built Storybook index before and after such changes.
Feature outputs are regenerated before fingerprints are checked. If those writes
change a review source, the command fails with the affected review entries. Inspect
the generated change before updating those fingerprints and rerunning the command.
Use the existing Storybook workflow for builds,
browser review, and visual tests. Report source inspection, rendering, play
assertions, visual comparisons and production acceptance separately. Do not publish
new visual baselines just to make catalog maintenance pass.