Files
PaperClipAI/ui/src/components/AppsSidebar.test.tsx
T
DottaandPaperclip f712cedbc2 feat(mcp) [split 7/8]: activate Apps and gateway UI (#9562)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Governed MCP access spans contracts, runtime enforcement, adapters,
UI surfaces, and operator verification
> - The parity reference PR #9534 is too large for effective automated
or human review
> - The feature therefore needs a linear stack whose individual diffs
stay below the 100-file review limit
> - This pull request is split 7/8 and focuses on Apps/Gateways UI and
feature-flagged activation
> - The benefit is a standalone, testable review boundary while
preserving byte-for-byte parity at the top of the stack

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

- Related parity reference: #9534
- Problem: The standalone UI foundation needs feature-flagged routes,
navigation, app detail flows, gateways, Storybook scenarios, and QA
configuration.
- Proposed solution: Adds Apps/Gateways pages and components,
navigation/route activation, remaining page integrations, Storybook
stories, and QA Vite configuration.
- Alternatives considered: keeping #9534 as one 403-file review, or
rewriting the feature to manufacture seams; both were rejected in favor
of path extraction plus compile-driven boundary moves.
- Roadmap alignment: this advances the existing governed MCP/tool-access
work already represented by #9534; it does not introduce a separate
roadmap initiative.
- Stack position: base branch is
`pap10341-split/06-ui-tools-foundation`.
- Merge policy: merge bottom-up, in order, only after the complete
eight-PR stack has been reviewed and the top-of-stack parity gate
remains empty.
- Requested review: UXDesigner sanity pass on Apps/Gateways flows and
flag-off behavior; Greptile on every PR.

## What Changed

- Adds Apps/Gateways pages and components, navigation/route activation,
remaining page integrations, Storybook stories, and QA Vite
configuration.
- Keeps this PR below 100 changed files and independently typecheckable.
- Preserves the final tree from #9534 when combined with the other seven
stack levels.

## Verification

- `pnpm typecheck`
- `pnpm check:token-gates` — all gates clean
- Focused UI Vitest run with `NODE_ENV=test` — 17 files, 147 tests
passed

## Risks

- Navigation or flag regressions could expose incomplete experiences;
activation remains controlled by existing experimental settings.
- Stack risk: merging out of order can expose incomplete layers;
mitigate by following the documented bottom-up merge policy.
- Parity risk: later edits to an intermediate branch can drift from
#9534; mitigate by re-running the empty top-of-stack diff before merge.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, exact model ID `gpt-5.4`; runtime-managed context
window; medium reasoning with repository, shell, Git, GitHub CLI, and
code-execution tools enabled.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] Internal references are omitted except the execution-plan link
explicitly required for this coordinated split stack
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge


## Stack Coordination

- Internal execution plan:
[PAP-13874](/PAP/issues/PAP-13874#document-plan)
- Parity reference: #9534
- Stack: #9556 → #9557 → #9558 → #9559 → #9560 → #9561 → #9562 → #9563
- Merge bottom-up only after full-stack review and an empty parity diff
at #9563.


## UI Evidence

QA captured these from the live Garden MCP split stack at 1440px and
verified clean rendering:

![Apps
connections](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paperclipai/paperclip/42512d030c96f678c379fbd97d8b7c1737d654fc/doc/screenshots/garden-mcp-split-stack/apps-list.png)

![Gateway
detail](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paperclipai/paperclip/42512d030c96f678c379fbd97d8b7c1737d654fc/doc/screenshots/garden-mcp-split-stack/gateway-detail.png)

![BYO connect
wizard](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paperclipai/paperclip/42512d030c96f678c379fbd97d8b7c1737d654fc/doc/screenshots/garden-mcp-split-stack/byo-connect.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-07-14 15:40:08 -05:00

167 lines
4.9 KiB
TypeScript

// @vitest-environment jsdom
import { flushSync } from "react-dom";
import { createRoot } from "react-dom/client";
import { QueryClient, QueryClientProvider } from "@tanstack/react-query";
import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
import { AppsSidebar } from "./AppsSidebar";
const sidebarNavItemMock = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
const mockToolsApi = vi.hoisted(() => ({
listRuntimeSlots: vi.fn(),
listActionRequests: vi.fn(),
}));
vi.mock("@/lib/router", () => ({
Link: ({
children,
to,
onClick,
className,
}: {
children: React.ReactNode;
to: string;
onClick?: () => void;
className?: string;
}) => (
<a href={to} onClick={onClick} className={className}>
{children}
</a>
),
}));
vi.mock("@/context/CompanyContext", () => ({
useCompany: () => ({
selectedCompanyId: "company-1",
selectedCompany: { id: "company-1", name: "Paperclip" },
}),
}));
vi.mock("@/context/SidebarContext", () => ({
useSidebar: () => ({
isMobile: false,
setSidebarOpen: vi.fn(),
}),
}));
vi.mock("@/api/tools", () => ({
toolsApi: mockToolsApi,
}));
vi.mock("./SidebarNavItem", () => ({
SidebarNavItem: (props: {
to: string;
label: string;
end?: boolean;
liveCount?: number;
badge?: number;
}) => {
sidebarNavItemMock(props);
return <div data-to={props.to}>{props.label}</div>;
},
}));
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
(globalThis as any).IS_REACT_ACT_ENVIRONMENT = true;
// React 19 does not export a usable `act` in this vitest/jsdom setup; use a
// flushSync-based helper (PAP-12371 gotcha).
async function act(callback: () => void | Promise<void>) {
let result: void | Promise<void> = undefined;
flushSync(() => {
result = callback();
});
await result;
}
async function flushReact() {
for (let i = 0; i < 5; i += 1) {
await act(async () => {
await Promise.resolve();
await new Promise((resolve) => window.setTimeout(resolve, 0));
});
}
}
describe("AppsSidebar", () => {
let container: HTMLDivElement;
beforeEach(() => {
container = document.createElement("div");
document.body.appendChild(container);
mockToolsApi.listRuntimeSlots.mockResolvedValue({
runtimeSlots: [
{ id: "slot-1", status: "running" },
{ id: "slot-2", status: "stopped" },
],
});
mockToolsApi.listActionRequests.mockResolvedValue({ actionRequests: [] });
});
afterEach(() => {
container.remove();
document.body.innerHTML = "";
vi.clearAllMocks();
});
it("renders Apps and Developer sections in one sidebar", async () => {
const root = createRoot(container);
const queryClient = new QueryClient({
defaultOptions: { queries: { retry: false } },
});
await act(async () => {
root.render(
<QueryClientProvider client={queryClient}>
<AppsSidebar />
</QueryClientProvider>,
);
});
await flushReact();
expect(container.textContent).toContain("Apps");
expect(container.textContent).toContain("Developer");
// The Developer boundary caption frames who the door is for (PAP-13241 §5).
expect(container.textContent).toContain("Advanced setup for developers");
// "Run your own" / "Paste a config" moved to the Connect-an-app page (PAP-10922);
// assert their absence at the item level below.
// Three peer consumer doors: Browse (store) · Connections · Review (PAP-13254).
expect(sidebarNavItemMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.objectContaining({ to: "/apps/browse", label: "Browse" }),
);
expect(sidebarNavItemMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.objectContaining({ to: "/apps", label: "Connections", end: true }),
);
expect(sidebarNavItemMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.objectContaining({ to: "/apps/review", label: "Review" }),
);
// "Needs attention" is no longer a top-level door — it folds into Connections.
expect(sidebarNavItemMock).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.objectContaining({ label: "Needs attention" }),
);
expect(sidebarNavItemMock).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.objectContaining({ label: "Run your own" }),
);
expect(sidebarNavItemMock).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.objectContaining({ label: "Paste a config" }),
);
expect(sidebarNavItemMock).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.objectContaining({ label: "Applications" }),
);
expect(sidebarNavItemMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.objectContaining({ to: "/apps/advanced/profiles", label: "Profiles", end: true }),
);
expect(sidebarNavItemMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.objectContaining({ to: "/apps/advanced/runtime", label: "Health", end: true, liveCount: 1 }),
);
expect(sidebarNavItemMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.objectContaining({ to: "/apps/advanced/audit", label: "Activity", end: true }),
);
await act(async () => {
root.unmount();
});
});
});