## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The runner package already provides the production protocol and execution spine. > - Contributors still need stable SDK surfaces, deterministic test tools, and local inspection tools. > - Those surfaces share generated contracts and must change as one package boundary. > - This pull request adds the package-local SDK, labs, examples, and drift checks. > - The benefit is a reviewable developer platform that does not change application execution selection. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** `packages/paperclip-runner` — runner SDK, conformance tools, and developer tooling. **Problem or motivation** The production runner spine is present, but package consumers cannot build deterministic integrations, inspect sessions, or verify provider-neutral behavior through supported surfaces. **Proposed solution** Add browser, React, standalone, live-session, scenario, conformance, and evaluation surfaces. Add generated contract inventories and package-local verification scripts. Keep production application routing unchanged. **Alternatives considered** We considered splitting each generated catalog, SDK surface, and demo into separate pull requests. Those changes share exports, fixtures, and drift gates. Splitting them would create intermediate package states that do not build. **Roadmap alignment** No overlapping item appears in `ROADMAP.md`. This work extends the runner package that is already on `master`. ## What Changed - Add browser, React, standalone, live-session, and issue-thread SDK surfaces. - Add deterministic mock control-plane, scenario, conformance, replay, and evaluation tools. - Add bounded Codex, OpenCode, and ACPX development transports and fixtures. - Keep deferred managed-provider execution fail-closed. Persisted compatibility data remains readable. - Add generated capability inventories with their source files and drift checks. - Add examples, package documentation, browser checks, and clean-consumer checks. - Preserve the reviewed protocol bounds, replay compatibility aliases, process environment isolation, and semantic redaction limits. - Update the ACPX package patch that the existing workspace patch registry already tracks. - Do not change `pnpm-lock.yaml`, repository workflows, server runtime selection, or the application UI. ## Verification GitHub Actions is the verification authority for this pull request. The repository CI, package TypeScript and Rust checks, package tests, generated-output drift checks, browser checks, security scans, and Greptile review must pass on the exact head. Local test suites were not run because this series uses parallel GitHub Actions for verification. ## Risks This is a large greenfield package change. The main risks are public export drift, generated-output drift, and optional React consumer compatibility. Package boundary checks, clean-consumer checks, and browser tests cover those risks. Production adapter selection and server execution are outside this pull request. ## Stack 1. **This PR:** runner SDK and developer tooling. 2. [Codex production server integration](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/12616). 3. [Provider-neutral task-thread UI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/12617). ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, high-reasoning mode, with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the feature request template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge
4.5 KiB
Capability execution modes and identity
Capability runs the same semantic tool catalog, authorization engine, and mock
ControlPlanePort under two agent modes. Whichever mode is active, the
surface always names three separate actors so a reader never mistakes one for
another.
Three actors, always separate
| Actor | What it is in Capability | What it is not |
|---|---|---|
| Real Codex | A real Codex app-server session driving the turn loop. The agent has no Paperclip skill; it sees only the semantic tools the scenario exposes. | Not a scripted stand-in, and not a Paperclip-aware agent. |
| Real runnerd | The real package-local paperclip-runnerd binary. It owns the Codex child process group and proxies newline-delimited JSON-RPC over stdio. |
Not an in-process fake and not the production Paperclip runtime. |
| Mock Paperclip | The deterministic in-process ControlPlanePort adapter. It holds every issue, comment, document, interaction, approval, and audit record as mock state. |
Not the Paperclip control plane, database, or API. No request leaves the process for a Paperclip service. |
The live surface renders a Real Codex, Real runnerd, and Mock Paperclip
marker at all times. Mock records carry an MCK- identifier prefix so a mock
issue is never confused with a real PAP- issue.
Two agent modes
Scripted (deterministic) — fake mode
The scripted driver replays a recorded conversation over the same mock core.
It needs no provider credential, no runnerd process, and no network after
pnpm install. It is the mode used for:
- the 106-case conformance suite and its bounded parity report;
- the byte-stable screenshot matrix;
- replay of a recorded session.
Because it is fully deterministic, two runs of the same route produce
byte-identical output. A scripted (mode=fake) artifact cannot satisfy a
live acceptance criterion — it proves the contract, not a real provider turn.
Codex (bounded) — live mode
Live mode starts a real paperclip-runnerd process and a real Codex
app-server session. The package server — never the browser — owns the Codex
process, the session, the tool loop, and provider authentication. The browser
receives no provider, runner, mock-control-plane, or real-control-plane
credential.
Live mode requires a locally authenticated Codex installation. When that relay is not present, the UI keeps Codex disabled with a named reason and scripted mode stays available. Live mode is the only mode eligible for the final Revision 3/4 acceptance criteria that require a real provider turn.
Mode-independent controls
These behave the same in either mode because they operate on the mock core and the runner session, not on the agent:
- Reset restores the original clean mock seed under new run/session authority and rotates or clears the old session authority. It does not affect another browser session's state.
- Stop cancels only the active turn and reaps the runnerd process group; the session and its transcript survive. Cleanup evidence shows no abandoned child process and no active session afterward.
- Replay reproduces a recorded canonical timeline. It is always scripted and always labelled as fake-derived, even inside a session that also ran a live turn.
- Refresh / reconnect restores the same durable session, pending interaction, transcript, and mock state. Reconnect starts a fresh runnerd and Codex app-server and resumes the persisted provider thread; the session does not restart because the browser reconnected.
Two entry points, one live mode
Live mode is reachable from both primary surfaces:
- the preset scenario explorer, with
mode=liveon a chosen scenario; - the clean-room chat at
#/chat, which has no other mode. It starts blank on a freshly minted mock tenant, pinsmode=livein the route, and reports a failure to start real Codex rather than falling back to a fixture or a recording.
Eligibility summary
| Evidence | Eligible for |
|---|---|
Scripted / mode=fake run |
106-case conformance, replay determinism, screenshot matrix, contract proofs |
| Live Codex run on the final build | Revision 3/4 final acceptance criteria that require a real provider turn |
Revision 2 preview (build da0d32d74a, historical URL) |
Historical comparison only — not eligible for final acceptance |
See the live runnerd and Codex loop reference for the session API and verification commands behind each row above.