mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-06 21:05:21 +02:00
DottaandPaperclip
2eb9a09c0c
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Managed workspace services must continue after a control-plane restart > - A service command can use shell control operators before it starts the final process > - The final process command line then differs from the stored shell expression > - Paperclip rejected that valid process even when its listener, process group, and workspace matched > - This pull request uses the stronger ownership checks for shell expressions > - The benefit is that Paperclip can adopt a valid service after a restart ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #11740 **What happened?** A managed service could use a command such as `env | sort > file; exec pnpm dev`. After a control-plane restart, the surviving process command line contained only the final program. Paperclip compared it with the complete shell expression and rejected the service. **Expected behavior** Paperclip must adopt the surviving service when the listener, process group, and workspace directory prove ownership. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Configure a managed workspace service with a shell pipeline or command sequence. 2. Start the service. 3. Restart the control plane while the service stays alive. 4. Observe that Paperclip starts a replacement instead of adopting the live service. **Paperclip version or commit** `bd059a073d` **Deployment mode** Local dev with managed workspace services. ## What Changed - Detect shell control syntax outside quoted strings. - Skip the weak command-line comparison for these shell expressions. - Require the live port owner to remain in the recorded process group. - Keep the existing workspace directory check. - Add unit and restart-adoption regression tests. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/local-service-supervisor.test.ts src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts -t 'does not compare shell expressions|re-adopts a live service whose shell command differs' --reporter=verbose` — 2 passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — passed. - `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD` — passed. ## Risks - Low risk. The relaxed command comparison applies only to shell expressions. - Listener ownership, process-group ownership, and workspace directory checks still fail closed. - This change does not change the database schema, lockfile, workflow files, or user interface. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5. The serving suffix and context-window size are not exposed. The model used agentic reasoning, repository tools, code execution, test execution, and GitHub tools. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>