mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-23 00:53:38 +02:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source control plane people use to coordinate AI agents, issues, approvals, comments, and work products. > - The involved subsystem is issue context: markdown links, issue properties, related work, lists, filters, inbox/sidebar status, and plugin-provided external context. > - The gap is that URLs to external systems currently remain mostly plain links, so humans and agents must manually open them to understand status, identity, and liveness. > - This matters because external work objects such as GitHub issues and pull requests are part of the operational state of a Paperclip company. > - The implementation keeps core provider-neutral: shared contracts, storage, sync, routes, and UI surfaces live in core while providers can contribute detection and status resolution. > - This pull request adds the external object reference foundation, GitHub provider support, issue-surface rendering, filters, sidebar/list/inbox signals, and test/story coverage. > - The benefit is that linked external work becomes inspectable Paperclip context without hardcoding every provider directly into the UI. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this work. Feature request: - Problem: URLs in Paperclip issues, comments, documents, and related surfaces do not expose provider status or object identity inline. - Proposed behavior: detect supported external object URLs, persist normalized references, refresh provider status, and render concise status-aware links across issue surfaces. - Users affected: board users, agents, and maintainers who triage issues containing external work links. - Acceptance: external object references are company-scoped, provider-extensible, visible in key issue surfaces, filterable where relevant, and covered by focused shared/server/UI tests. Related PR search: - No open duplicate PRs found for `external object references`. - Closed related prior attempt: #4556. ## What Changed - Added shared external-object contracts, validators, status/liveness helpers, and plugin protocol declarations. - Added database schema and additive migrations for external objects, source mentions, and display metadata. - Added server services/routes for detecting, syncing, summarizing, refreshing, and resolving external objects across issues, documents, comments, projects, and plugins. - Added a GitHub external-object provider plus plugin SDK authoring docs. - Wired UI presentation across markdown links, comments, issue chat, documents, properties, related work, issue rows, filters, inbox/sidebar badges, and Storybook stories. - Rebasing cleanup: moved the branch onto current `master`, repaired stale worktree provision config, hardened environment-sensitive tests/mocks, and removed committed screenshot artifacts from the PR branch to keep the reviewable file set below tool limits. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/external-objects.test.ts server/src/__tests__/external-object-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/external-objects-service.test.ts ui/src/components/ExternalObjectPill.test.tsx ui/src/lib/external-objects.test.ts` passed after rebasing: 5 files, 56 tests. - Historical branch verification before this PR creation included `pnpm test:run`, `pnpm -r typecheck`, and `pnpm build`; this PR body does not claim those were rerun after the final rebase. ## Risks - Medium: this adds a new cross-surface sync path on issue/document/comment writes. The implementation uses safe sync wrappers so external-object failures warn instead of blocking core mutations. - Medium: the migrations introduce new tables and indexes. They are additive and company-scoped. - Medium: provider-specific URL parsing can miss or misclassify edge cases. Shared canonicalization tests and provider tests cover current GitHub shapes. - Low: UI badge/filter behavior could add visual noise for object-heavy issues; component tests and Storybook stories cover the intended surfaces. > Roadmap checked: `ROADMAP.md` references the plugin system as the current extension path and does not list a duplicate core feature. Related long-range docs discuss external references, work products, preview URLs, and plugin extension points; this PR implements the scoped external-object reference foundation. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding-agent runtime, with shell and GitHub CLI tool use. Reasoning mode: medium. Exact deployed runtime model ID and context window were not exposed in the environment. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
253 lines
8.3 KiB
TypeScript
253 lines
8.3 KiB
TypeScript
import express from "express";
|
|
import request from "supertest";
|
|
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
|
|
const issueId = "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111";
|
|
const companyId = "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222";
|
|
const ownerAgentId = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
|
|
const peerAgentId = "44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444";
|
|
const ownerRunId = "55555555-5555-4555-8555-555555555555";
|
|
|
|
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
assertCheckoutOwner: vi.fn(),
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockAccessService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
decide: vi.fn(),
|
|
hasPermission: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockAgentService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
list: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockExternalObjectsService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getIssueSummary: vi.fn(),
|
|
getIssueSummaries: vi.fn(),
|
|
listForIssue: vi.fn(),
|
|
refreshIssueObjects: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
const mockInstanceSettingsService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getExperimental: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
function registerRouteMocks() {
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/external-objects.js", () => ({
|
|
externalObjectService: () => mockExternalObjectsService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/instance-settings.js", () => ({
|
|
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/task-watchdog-scope.js", () => ({
|
|
TASK_WATCHDOG_ORIGIN_KIND: "task_watchdog",
|
|
resolveTaskWatchdogMutationScope: vi.fn(async () => ({ kind: "none" })),
|
|
taskWatchdogScopeAllowsIssueMutation: vi.fn(async () => ({ kind: "none" })),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
|
|
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
|
|
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
|
|
companyService: () => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
}),
|
|
companySearchService: () => ({}),
|
|
documentAnnotationService: () => ({}),
|
|
documentService: () => ({}),
|
|
executionWorkspaceService: () => ({}),
|
|
feedbackService: () => ({}),
|
|
goalService: () => ({}),
|
|
heartbeatService: () => ({
|
|
wakeup: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
getRun: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
getActiveRunForAgent: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
cancelRun: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
}),
|
|
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
|
|
issueRecoveryActionService: () => ({}),
|
|
issueReferenceService: () => ({
|
|
listIssueReferenceSummary: async () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
|
}),
|
|
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
|
issueThreadInteractionService: () => ({}),
|
|
logActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
projectService: () => ({}),
|
|
routineService: () => ({}),
|
|
workProductService: () => ({}),
|
|
}));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function makeIssue(overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}) {
|
|
return {
|
|
id: issueId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
status: "in_progress",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
projectId: null,
|
|
goalId: null,
|
|
parentId: null,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: ownerAgentId,
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
identifier: "PAP-2265",
|
|
title: "External object routes",
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
...overrides,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function createApp(actor: Express.Request["actor"]) {
|
|
const [{ errorHandler }, { issueRoutes }] = await Promise.all([
|
|
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
|
|
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/issues.js")>("../routes/issues.js"),
|
|
]);
|
|
const app = express();
|
|
app.use(express.json());
|
|
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
|
|
req.actor = actor;
|
|
next();
|
|
});
|
|
app.use("/api", issueRoutes({} as any, { provider: "local_disk" } as any));
|
|
app.use(errorHandler);
|
|
return app;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function boardActor(): Express.Request["actor"] {
|
|
return {
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: "board-user",
|
|
userName: null,
|
|
userEmail: null,
|
|
companyIds: [companyId],
|
|
memberships: [],
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: false,
|
|
source: "local_implicit",
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function ownerActor(): Express.Request["actor"] {
|
|
return {
|
|
type: "agent",
|
|
agentId: ownerAgentId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
keyId: "key-1",
|
|
runId: ownerRunId,
|
|
source: "agent_key",
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function peerActor(): Express.Request["actor"] {
|
|
return {
|
|
type: "agent",
|
|
agentId: peerAgentId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
keyId: "key-2",
|
|
runId: "66666666-6666-4666-8666-666666666666",
|
|
source: "agent_key",
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("external object routes", () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.resetModules();
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/external-objects.js");
|
|
registerRouteMocks();
|
|
vi.resetAllMocks();
|
|
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue());
|
|
mockIssueService.assertCheckoutOwner.mockResolvedValue({ adoptedFromRunId: null });
|
|
mockAccessService.hasPermission.mockResolvedValue(false);
|
|
mockAccessService.decide.mockImplementation(async ({ action }: { action: string }) => ({
|
|
allowed: action === "issue:mutate",
|
|
explanation: "Denied by test mock",
|
|
}));
|
|
mockAgentService.list.mockResolvedValue([
|
|
{ id: ownerAgentId, companyId, reportsTo: null, permissions: { canCreateAgents: false } },
|
|
{ id: peerAgentId, companyId, reportsTo: null, permissions: { canCreateAgents: false } },
|
|
]);
|
|
mockExternalObjectsService.getIssueSummary.mockResolvedValue({ total: 1, objects: [] });
|
|
mockExternalObjectsService.getIssueSummaries.mockResolvedValue(new Map([
|
|
[issueId, { total: 1, objects: [] }],
|
|
]));
|
|
mockExternalObjectsService.listForIssue.mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
mockExternalObjectsService.refreshIssueObjects.mockResolvedValue([
|
|
{ object: { id: "77777777-7777-4777-8777-777777777777" }, refreshed: false, reason: "no_resolver" },
|
|
]);
|
|
mockInstanceSettingsService.getExperimental.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
enableExternalObjects: true,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("enforces company access on read routes", async () => {
|
|
const app = await createApp({ ...ownerActor(), companyId: "other-company" });
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app).get(`/api/issues/${issueId}/external-object-summary`);
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
expect(mockExternalObjectsService.getIssueSummary).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("allows board users to read issue external object summaries", async () => {
|
|
const app = await createApp(boardActor());
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app).get(`/api/issues/${issueId}/external-object-summary`);
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
expect(res.body.total).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(mockExternalObjectsService.getIssueSummary).toHaveBeenCalledWith(issueId);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("allows board users to fetch company-scoped external object summaries in bulk", async () => {
|
|
const app = await createApp(boardActor());
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
.post(`/api/companies/${companyId}/issues/external-object-summaries`)
|
|
.send({ issueIds: [issueId] });
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
expect(res.body.summaries[issueId].total).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(mockExternalObjectsService.getIssueSummaries).toHaveBeenCalledWith(companyId, [issueId]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("enforces company access on bulk external object summaries", async () => {
|
|
const app = await createApp({ ...ownerActor(), companyId: "other-company" });
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
.post(`/api/companies/${companyId}/issues/external-object-summaries`)
|
|
.send({ issueIds: [issueId] });
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
expect(mockExternalObjectsService.getIssueSummaries).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("requires active checkout ownership for agent manual refresh", async () => {
|
|
const app = await createApp(peerActor());
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
.post(`/api/issues/${issueId}/external-objects/refresh`)
|
|
.send({});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(409);
|
|
expect(res.body.error).toBe("Issue is checked out by another agent");
|
|
expect(mockExternalObjectsService.refreshIssueObjects).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("allows the checked-out agent to request manual refresh", async () => {
|
|
const app = await createApp(ownerActor());
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
.post(`/api/issues/${issueId}/external-objects/refresh`)
|
|
.send({});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
expect(mockIssueService.assertCheckoutOwner).toHaveBeenCalledWith(issueId, ownerAgentId, ownerRunId);
|
|
expect(mockExternalObjectsService.refreshIssueObjects).toHaveBeenCalledWith(issueId, expect.objectContaining({
|
|
companyId,
|
|
actor: expect.objectContaining({ actorType: "agent", actorId: ownerAgentId }),
|
|
}));
|
|
});
|
|
});
|