mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-19 20:44:16 +02:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
5fbece9dcc
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages shared skills and agent assignments. > - Runtime plugins need installed skills before a task starts. > - Skill content can change without changing the agent row. > - Source access and version pins also affect delivered files. > - This pull request feeds those changes into the durable runtime stream. > - The runtime reader resolves the same immutable skill sources used for execution. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Builds on merged PR #16499. This pull request now targets `master` and contains only the five skill synchronization commits. **Problem** Plugins receive no durable notification when an assigned skill changes. A saved assignment can also become inaccessible after private-source access changes. **Proposed solution** Invalidate referencing agents at installed skill mutations. Invalidate inherited access when source bindings, project privacy, or policy change. Return authorized skill sources and version IDs through the owning runtime reader. **Alternatives considered** Activity-only subscriptions miss service writers. Per-task synchronization adds preparation work. Copying current files would ignore version pins. **Roadmap alignment** This extends existing skills, source synchronization, and plugin runtime support. ## What Changed - Defer multi-skill source runtime hooks until commit, after publication holds all skill rows. Keep file-save journaling immediate to preserve filesystem rollback. - Add transactional invalidations for skill content, companion files, versions, rename, deletion, policy, source access, and pin-setting changes. - Recognize canonical keys and supported legacy aliases. - Reuse the execution skill resolver, current agent access, and instance version-pin rules. - Resolve and materialize sources outside the agent row lock. Recheck ownership and runtime revision afterward. - Keep task-only mentions and running-task snapshots in the execution path. - Document conservative invalidations for pinned assignments and inherited access. ## Verification - Rebased onto origin/master `9f4a956b90`, which contains merged PR #16499. All five commits are unchanged according to `git range-diff`; no conflict resolutions or source changes were needed. - On rebased head `58b065941`, all 237 focused tests passed: runtime skill hooks/source publication (41), plus content service, assignment routes, policy routes, and project source access (196). - Server typecheck passed after rebuilding Runner with the installed Rust toolchain. Migration numbering/safety and map checks passed; snapshot pruning made no changes. Migration CLI checks required local IPC permission. - Real PostgreSQL coverage includes concurrent source publication/version saves, policy-only tightening/restoration, referencing-agent fanout, company isolation, no-op counters, supporting files, rename/deletion, rollback, private-source access, pinned/latest bytes, and unassignment. - Earlier stack validation passed workspace typecheck/build. Fresh hosted CI and review must verify the rebased head before handoff. - The broad local suite was previously limited by an unchanged diagnostic test that rejects "private" in an error stack under this /private/tmp worktree; that unchanged suite passed all 108 tests in the original checkout. Hosted full-suite checks provide exact-head verification. - Diff whitespace and full PR secret/PII scan passed. - All hosted CI/security checks are green on `58b065941`; fresh standard Greptile and Apex both returned 5/5 with no findings or unresolved threads. The PR targets master and is mergeable without conflicts. ## Risks - Apply migration 0348 after the runtime-stream migration in #16499. - Content invalidations include pinned assignments. The resolved version stays pinned; consumers can avoid writes when its version/hash is unchanged. - Project access and source changes invalidate only agents assigned skills from the affected sources. Company policy still invalidates the company. Source polling bookkeeping and popularity counters do not create work. - The reader rebuilds installed caches without upstream requests. Concurrent changes cause a bounded retry and then a conflict. - Private transport integration and live remote computer qualification remain separate. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, repository inspection, code execution, and testing. The exact deployment model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub references) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused suites; broad local limitation documented above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>