Files
PaperClipAI/ui/src/components/RoutineSubSidebar.test.tsx
T
DottaandClaude Opus 4.8 fae7e920a9 [codex] Polish routine layout follow-ups (#7858)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Routines are the recurring-work surface that lets a company keep
operating without a human manually kicking off every task
> - The base routine detail Variation C shell already landed in #7848,
but the follow-up branch still had polish work for scheduling, section
ergonomics, and the list layout
> - Operators need routine edit screens to explain trigger behavior
clearly, keep long detail pages usable on mobile/touch devices, and make
grouped routine lists easier to scan
> - This pull request rebases the remaining branch work onto current
`master`, drops the duplicate commits already merged through #7848, and
keeps only the new routine UI follow-ups
> - The benefit is a cleaner routines workflow without reopening the
already-merged shell work or carrying unrelated lockfile, workflow, or
screenshot changes

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #7848

Feature follow-up: polish the routines UI after the Variation C
routine-detail shell landed.

Problem / motivation:

- Routine trigger configuration needs clearer previews for manual,
schedule, API, and webhook execution modes.
- Routine detail sections need better responsive spacing and touch
ergonomics.
- The routines list grouping should scan like grouped records instead of
a table with heavy row dividers.
- The routine tests need a React 19-compatible render helper so the
focused routine suite can run in this workspace.

Proposed solution:

- Add cron-fire preview helpers and routine-run display helpers with
focused tests.
- Expand the routine editable and operate sections with richer trigger,
variable, run, activity, and history presentation.
- Adjust the routine detail shell and sub-sidebar spacing for
mobile/touch layout.
- Update grouped routine list presentation to use bordered group headers
with borderless rows.
- Switch affected routine tests to the repo's `flushSync` render-helper
pattern.

Alternatives considered:

- Leaving the duplicate pre-#7848 commits in the branch would recreate
conflicts and make the PR review much larger than the remaining change.
- Keeping grouped routine rows inside one bordered table was simpler,
but made the grouping hierarchy less legible.

Roadmap alignment:

- ROADMAP.md lists Scheduled Routines as a core shipped capability and
Output/Enforced Outcomes as ongoing priorities. This is polish on that
existing routines capability, not a new roadmap-level feature.

## What Changed

- Added routine scheduling preview helpers and tests for
cron/manual/API/webhook fire-policy display.
- Added routine run display helpers and tests for deduped trigger labels
and run-row subtitles.
- Polished routine detail sections, including trigger summaries, operate
views, and env/variable editing ergonomics.
- Adjusted routine detail page and sub-sidebar spacing so the
title/header area is less pinned and touch layouts center better.
- Reworked the routines list grouped layout so group headers are
bordered cards and routine rows are borderless inside each group.
- Added Storybook coverage for the routines list grouped layout and
updated the existing routine detail story.
- Repaired routine tests to use `flushSync` helpers compatible with the
installed React 19 runtime.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/lib/cron-fires.test.ts
ui/src/lib/routine-run-display.test.ts ui/src/pages/Routines.test.tsx
ui/src/components/RoutineSubSidebar.test.tsx
ui/src/components/RoutineSaveBar.test.tsx`
  - Result: 5 test files passed, 37 tests passed.
- Confirmed the rebased PR diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml`,
`.github/workflows/*`, or committed screenshots.
- Confirmed `origin/master` is an ancestor of the pushed branch head
after rebase.

## Risks

- Medium UI risk: this touches the routine detail and routine list
surfaces, so visual regressions are possible in edge cases not covered
by the focused tests.
- Low data risk: no schema, migration, server API, or lockfile changes
are included.
- Review note: the branch intentionally force-pushed after rebasing
because the original first three commits were already merged through
#7848.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent runtime, with repository
shell/tool access. Exact hosted runtime model identifier and
context-window size were not exposed in the execution environment.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-09 18:55:01 -05:00

118 lines
3.6 KiB
TypeScript

// @vitest-environment jsdom
import type { AnchorHTMLAttributes, ReactNode } from "react";
import { flushSync } from "react-dom";
import { createRoot } from "react-dom/client";
import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
vi.mock("@/lib/router", () => ({
Link: ({
to,
children,
...props
}: AnchorHTMLAttributes<HTMLAnchorElement> & { to: string; children: ReactNode; replace?: boolean }) => {
const { replace: _replace, ...rest } = props as Record<string, unknown>;
return (
<a href={to} {...(rest as AnchorHTMLAttributes<HTMLAnchorElement>)}>
{children}
</a>
);
},
}));
import { RoutineSubSidebar } from "./RoutineSubSidebar";
import type { RoutineSectionKey } from "./routine-sections/context";
function act(callback: () => void) {
flushSync(callback);
}
let container: HTMLDivElement;
let root: ReturnType<typeof createRoot>;
beforeEach(() => {
container = document.createElement("div");
document.body.appendChild(container);
root = createRoot(container);
});
afterEach(() => {
act(() => root.unmount());
container.remove();
vi.clearAllMocks();
});
function renderSidebar(overrides?: {
activeSection?: RoutineSectionKey;
dirty?: RoutineSectionKey[];
hasLiveRun?: boolean;
onNavigate?: (section: RoutineSectionKey) => void;
}) {
const dirty = new Set(overrides?.dirty ?? []);
const onNavigate = overrides?.onNavigate ?? vi.fn();
act(() => {
root.render(
<RoutineSubSidebar
activeSection={overrides?.activeSection ?? "overview"}
hrefFor={(section) => `/routines/r1/${section}`}
isSectionDirty={(section) => dirty.has(section)}
hasLiveRun={overrides?.hasLiveRun ?? false}
onNavigate={onNavigate}
/>,
);
});
return { onNavigate };
}
describe("RoutineSubSidebar", () => {
it("renders all eight sections grouped under ROUTINE and OPERATE", () => {
renderSidebar();
const links = Array.from(container.querySelectorAll("a"));
const labels = links.map((link) => link.textContent?.trim());
expect(labels).toEqual([
"Overview",
"Triggers",
"Variables",
"Secrets",
"Delivery",
"Runs",
"Activity",
"History",
]);
const groupLabels = Array.from(container.querySelectorAll("p")).map((p) => p.textContent);
expect(groupLabels).toContain("Routine");
expect(groupLabels).toContain("Operate");
});
it("marks the active section with aria-current=page", () => {
renderSidebar({ activeSection: "secrets" });
const active = container.querySelector('a[aria-current="page"]');
expect(active?.textContent?.trim()).toBe("Secrets");
});
it("links each section to its section URL", () => {
renderSidebar();
const variables = Array.from(container.querySelectorAll("a")).find(
(link) => link.textContent?.trim() === "Variables",
);
expect(variables?.getAttribute("href")).toBe("/routines/r1/variables");
});
it("shows a dirty marker only on dirty editable sections", () => {
renderSidebar({ dirty: ["overview", "delivery"] });
const dirtyMarkers = container.querySelectorAll('[aria-label="Unsaved changes"]');
expect(dirtyMarkers.length).toBe(2);
});
it("fires onNavigate when a section is clicked", () => {
const { onNavigate } = renderSidebar();
const triggers = Array.from(container.querySelectorAll("a")).find(
(link) => link.textContent?.trim() === "Triggers",
) as HTMLAnchorElement;
act(() => {
triggers.dispatchEvent(new MouseEvent("click", { bubbles: true }));
});
expect(onNavigate).toHaveBeenCalledWith("triggers");
});
});