## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents run through the native runner. Codex and Claude Code each have their own plan mode, and each produces a proposed-plan document. > - Paperclip already has a planning work mode, an issue `plan` document, and a `request_confirmation` approval gate for plans. > - These parts were not connected. The Codex proposed-plan item was transcript text only. The server path never put Codex into plan mode. Claude was never put into plan mode, and its ExitPlanMode plan was dropped. A planning run could close its task as done with no approval. > - This pull request turns a harness's own proposed plan into the issue's Plan document and the existing approval gate, for Codex and Claude. > - The benefit is that users approve or send back the agent's real plan from the task chat. Approve resumes the agent. Request changes sends the reason back to the agent. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19252 **Subsystem affected** Native runner provider events (Codex and ACPX Claude), the runner Codex provider (Rust), server native plan synchronization, and the task chat UI. **Problem or motivation** Codex and Claude both produce a proposed-plan document in their native plan mode. Paperclip did not use it. In live tests on the server path, a Codex planning run was not in Codex plan mode, saved its own `implementation-plan` document, and marked the task done without approval. Claude planning runs were not in Claude plan mode, and the ExitPlanMode plan text never reached Paperclip. **Proposed solution** Add a canonical `plan.proposed` event for a harness's proposed plan. Put Codex and Claude into their native plan mode for planning runs. Save a completed proposal as the issue `plan` document with the existing `request_confirmation` gate. Agents can also propose a plan on a standard task; the work mode stays standard. **Alternatives considered** Reuse `plan.updated`. Its schema is the within-turn checklist and is not the durable Plan document, so a separate event keeps the two clear. Stronger prompt text without native plan mode. Live tests showed that the model kept its own document workflow. **Roadmap alignment** This reuses the issue plan document, planning work mode and approval gate that already exist. It adds one canonical provider event. ## What Changed - `packages/paperclip-runner/protocol/schemas/*`: add the `plan.proposed` event (`paperclip.plan.proposed.v1`: `proposalId`, `status`, `markdown` up to 60k characters, `source`). Regenerate the schema bundle, validators and manifest. - `packages/paperclip-runner/src/provider-events.ts`: map the Codex `plan` item and a `<proposed_plan>` block in a completed Codex message to `plan.proposed`. Add `claudePlanProposalEvent`. - `packages/paperclip-runner/runner/crates/runner-core/src/codex_provider.rs`: send Codex's native `collaborationMode: plan` on `turn/start` for a read-only (planning) Codex run. Before this change the server path never sent it. - `runner-core/src/acpx_event_payload.rs`: admit `plan.proposed` as ACPX rich display activity. - `drivers/acpx/codex-runtime-adapter.ts`: set Claude Code to native plan mode for a read-only run. Capture Claude's ExitPlanMode plan from its permission request, record it, and decline the native "Ready to code?" prompt. - `drivers/acpx/codex-acpx-driver.ts`, `cli/acpx-runtime-sidecar.ts`: emit the captured proposal as a rich event. Complete that turn instead of reporting it as cancelled. - `backends/codex-native-backend.ts`: per-harness plan-mode instructions, and a short opt-in hint for Claude on standard tasks. - `server/src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.ts`: synchronize a completed `plan.proposed` into the `plan` document and a `request_confirmation` in planning and standard mode. Do not change the issue status during the run (that revoked the run's lease). The run finalizer turns the pending confirmation into the review wait. - `server/src/services/heartbeat-run-summary.ts`: keep a `<proposed_plan>` block out of the posted reply. - UI: new `plan_proposal` provider family. The task chat shows a live "Writing plan" card while a proposal streams and a one-line record when it completes. Resolved plan reviews keep a receipt ("Approved Plan v1", "Requested changes to Plan v1: reason"). Plan previews skip section headings. - Storybook: `Tasks and conversations/.../Task chat/Proposed plan approval` shows the journey. - `doc/SPEC-implementation.md`: describe harness-proposed plan approval. ## Verification - `cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core --lib` (new: `read_only_codex_turns_use_native_plan_collaboration_mode`) - `cd packages/paperclip-runner && npx vitest run src/provider-events.test.ts src/drivers/acpx/codex-runtime-adapter.test.ts` - `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/native-plan-proposal-sync.test.ts src/__tests__/heartbeat-run-summary.test.ts` - `cd ui && npx vitest run src/components/transcript/native-run-events.test.ts src/components/task-chat` - Live test on a local worktree instance with real harnesses: - Codex (`gpt-5.6-sol`), planning task: Codex asked one question, then produced a native plan item. The task showed Plan v1 with Approve plan / Request changes and moved to in review. Approve changed the work mode to standard. Codex then implemented the plan and its tests passed. - Codex, Request changes with a reason: Codex woke in planning mode and produced Plan v2 that includes the change. - Claude (`claude-opus-5-5`), planning task: Claude was in plan mode. ExitPlanMode became Plan v1 and the turn completed. Approve resumed Claude in standard mode, and Claude implemented the plan. - Claude, standard task that asks for a plan first: Claude stopped before code changes and asked for plan approval. The work mode stayed standard. - Storybook: open `Proposed plan approval` and check each stage. ## Risks - Codex planning runs now really use Codex plan mode on the server path. Codex can ask a clarifying question before it proposes. This matches Codex plan mode. - Claude planning runs now use Claude plan mode. A declined ExitPlanMode ends the Claude turn; the runner reports it as completed. Claude's tool row for that request records a rejection from Claude's side. - Codex does not stream the proposed plan on the server path yet, so the live card shows a placeholder until the plan completes. - A `<proposed_plan>` block in any completed Codex message on a standard task now asks for approval. This is the documented opt-in path. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), via Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, browser). Long context. No extended thinking mode was used. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
PRP v1/v2 Contract
The JSON Schema files in schemas/ are the language-neutral source of truth for
Paperclip Runner Protocol versions 1 and 2. The fixtures in fixtures/ define
accepted and rejected compatibility cases.
Compatibility
protocolVersion,fixtureVersion, andevent.schemaVersionare required.- A consumer fails closed when a required version or schema discriminator is not supported.
- A v1 envelope can contain an unknown optional property when its schema marks that object as extensible.
- A consumer ignores an unknown optional property until a later contract gives it meaning.
- A required field, enum value, or typed structured-input field is not optional.
- Question and answer identifiers are stable across the provider boundary.
- Peers negotiate the highest mutually supported protocol version. Existing v1 runners remain compatible but cannot receive v2-only session-goal commands.
The unknown-optional-fields.json fixture must be accepted. The
unsupported-required-version.json fixture must be rejected.
Session goals (v2)
PRP v2 adds a provider-neutral durable session-goal lifecycle. Every v2
capability snapshot includes sessionGoals, even when its availability is
unsupported or policy_disabled. Paperclip sends controls only when the
negotiated capability advertises the corresponding action.
Commands:
session.goal.getsession.goal.setfor objective, status, and optional token budget changessession.goal.clear
Events:
session.capabilities.updatedsession.goal.snapshotsession.goal.updatedsession.goal.cleared
Goal state is separate from Paperclip's company/business goal hierarchy. The
snapshot distinguishes the durable status from workingNow, because an active
goal can be idle between autonomous turns. A runner emits the full capability
and authoritative snapshot after every session open or resume. Missing v1
capability is unsupported; clients do not infer support from an adapter name.
Harness credential updates
auth.credentials.updated is a P0 runner event available in the v1, v2, and v3 event
schemas. Its payload uses paperclip.auth.credentials.updated.v1 and contains
only provider, bindingId, revision, and detection. No tokens, account
identifiers, credential paths, or credential fingerprints are permitted.
An updated consumer opts in with observeCredentials: true in run.prepare,
before session.open. The bundled runner transport opts in for fresh sessions;
set its observeCredentials option to false to disable observation for a
fresh session. Older hosts that omit the field receive no new event. Consumers
must update their schemas before opting in: an event-enum addition is not an
unknown optional property. Existing runner binaries ignore the optional flag
and do not provide observation; absence of an event does not establish support.
The current Unix runner observes native Codex's managed CODEX_HOME/auth.json
and the Codex/Grok ACPX session homes. It uses a non-recursive directory watch
plus a one-second polling fallback, so atomic file replacement is handled.
Grok's initial inline subscription credential is the baseline, allowing a
refresh during launcher startup to be detected. A first valid credential file
without a prior baseline establishes the baseline without claiming a refresh.
Account identity changes also emit updates, even when token values stay the
same, and establish the baseline for later refreshes on the new account.
Hosts must evaluate the current credential through their private credential
channel and account checks; the event does not authorize an account switch.
Metadata-only changes, partial writes, and deletion do not emit updates.
Unsupported harnesses and refreshes retained only in memory need
their own observer or native-hook integration; adding this event does not make
them observable.
bindingId: "harness-auth" identifies the selected harness authentication
within the envelope's normalized session. Revisions increase for that binding
and survive runner restarts and warm run attachments. The baseline fingerprint
and pending event are persisted together in a private runner state file. Source
retries retain the same event identity until the durable PRP outbox accepts it.
Hosts should commit an idempotent reaction or durable work item through
onCommittedEvent before returning and advancing the cumulative ACK.
The bundled transport exposes onCredentialsUpdated(event) for this commit.
It awaits the callback before ACK, including during warm idle, attachment, and
provider cleanup. Callback failures leave delivery unacknowledged for retry;
callbacks must therefore deduplicate by the original source event identity.
When configured, credential updates bypass the turn notification queue.
Paperclip commits them directly to the run log in a separate credential source
namespace, preserving the original PRP envelope and avoiding collisions with
the driver's normalized event sequence. A turn-only notification consumer
cannot reliably handle idle or cleanup updates; use this callback instead.
detection: "credential_store" reports an observed credential change, not proof
that an OAuth refresh succeeded. Multiple changes between observations can be
coalesced; this is not an audit of every refresh exchange. The schema also
allows native_hook for integrations with an explicit signal. Observation
continues during warm idle and checks at turn terminal and close boundaries,
including Grok's private refresh handoff after live-store cleanup. Retained
runner observations enter the durable outbox before a suspend or shutdown
command completes, without draining the provider backlog. A final check after
provider cleanup also enters the outbox and waits for the host ACK. The runner
retains its terminal recovery fence if that delivery fails.
The event authorizes no credential access or write on its own. A host that needs rotated token values must use a separately authorized handoff with its existing account-identity and freshness safeguards. The default Paperclip credential copy-back behavior remains in place.
Scope
The first provider descriptor and adapter fixture cover Codex only. The schemas for provider-neutral events and semantic receipts do not enable those actions. Discovery and authorization are separate contracts.
The conformance manifest records every source file and its SHA-256 digest. Run
pnpm generate:protocol-manifest from this package after a source change. CI
runs the same generator with --check to reject drift. This check also compiles
the JSON Schemas and validates every replay, question, and cross-language
conformance fixture against its declared schema.
The files in fixtures/replay/golden/ are deterministic reducer oracles. Each
accepted replay fixture has a complete session snapshot and a compact parity
summary. pnpm generate:replay-goldens updates them after an intentional
reducer change; package build and CI fail when they drift.
The files in fixtures/local-runner/scripts/ drive the package-local fake
harness. They cover successful, failed, interrupted, interactive, duplicate
terminal, process-cleanup, and oversized-frame behavior without starting a
production adapter.
runtime.activity.recorded is a P1 Runner event in v1, v2 and v3 with exactly
{ namespace, activityKey }. Both opaque identifiers contain 1–160 Unicode code
points and exclude C0 controls and DEL. namespace groups a producer's activity
types; activityKey names an activity within that group. Consumers use the pair
to select a response to activity in the run. The authenticated outer envelope
provides run and session identity, source sequence and emission time. Core resolves
the run's company, task and agent through its existing authorized run binding;
callers cannot supply those identities in the payload. Recording activity does
not independently verify the reported action or grant access to any resource.
The event uses the ordinary durable outbox, acknowledgement and replay contract.
Local clients capture an opaque context with paperclip-runnerd notification-context
before an operation and invoke record-activity CONTEXT NAMESPACE ACTIVITY_KEY
after success. Runner publishes its matching absolute executable as host-owned
PAPERCLIP_RUNTIME_NOTIFICATION_HELPER and the stable endpoint descriptor path
as PAPERCLIP_RUNTIME_NOTIFICATION_CONTEXT. Configured task environment cannot
override either value. Context is invalidated on warm attachment and process
recovery, so a caller cannot attribute a later completion to a different run.