mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-07 07:55:47 +01:00
DottaandPaperclip
2920d88034
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents that do work. > - Native runs can accept a result before workspace file finalization ends. > - A user can Stop the run while file finalization is still pending. > - The direct finalizer replaced that cancelled run with the earlier provider status. > - The restart projection already preserves a cancelled run. > - This pull request preserves cancellation in the direct projection too. > - Saved results and normal task decisions remain available. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** An accepted successful result can wait for workspace finalization. If run-only Stop completes first, the run and its source wake become cancelled. Late finalization then changed the run to succeeded, cleared the cancellation error, and replaced its finish time. The wake remained cancelled. **Expected behavior** Preserve the winning run cancellation, finish time, errors and audited acknowledgement. Keep the accepted provider result and complete file finalization. The server task arbiter still decides task status from the accepted result. A valid result can finish the task even though the execution was stopped. **Steps to reproduce** Accept a native result through the control-plane port. Hold an actual workspace-finalization operation. Stop the run through the heartbeat service with a board request identity. Release the operation and call the direct finalizer. The new database regression exercises this sequence. Related work: #18804 settles exact claimed native wakes. This change preserves a wake that Stop already cancelled. #15212 and #12301 address the opposite race in legacy cancellation. They do not change this native finalizer projection. ## What Changed - Evaluate run status and errors against the current locked database row. Preserve a cancelled run when a late accepted result finishes finalization or when workspace/status-decision retries exhaust. Merge finalization failure metadata into the current row so concurrent receipts survive. - Keep finalization receipts and accepted results. Preserve existing server task-arbiter behavior and accounting fields. - Add real database tests for successful and failed accepted results, delayed workspace work, and Stop after the task decision but before run projection. - Check cancelled wakes, audited acknowledgement, no successor, restart projection and idle recovery. Update execution documentation. ## Verification - Before the production change, the actual producer sequence failed: the cancelled run became succeeded, its error code became null, and its finish time advanced. This failure remains saved privately. - The focused projection, cancellation-request and Stop-accounting suites pass all 67 tests. These include the same delayed-finalization sequence, both task status orderings, and complete and late accounting receipts without another provider turn. - Independent review found a second terminal writer in retry exhaustion. On the unchanged previous head, two real database cases changed a cancelled run to failed or succeeded after workspace or status-decision retries. A third case let actual board Stop win after the permanent workspace failure admission snapshot and still changed cancelled to failed. All three now pass. Existing uncancelled exhaustion controls still pass. No mock supplied the canonical cancellation state. - Initial review found that routine regression notes do not belong in the feature maps. Both map additions were removed. Production and test code are unchanged by that correction. - Runner TypeScript build and all server typecheck layers pass. Map, module-boundary and diff checks pass. - An additional direct typecheck of the normally excluded projection fixture reports two existing notification mocks whose transaction parameter is typed as `object`. The same check with the previous test file reports the same two errors. The new regression cases add no type errors. The standard server typecheck remains green. - The previous head passed required CI after one targeted retry of jobs that received the same runner shutdown signal. Those original failures remain recorded. The exhaustion correction passes fresh required CI on exact head `84404d34b9d982d8bca24b63ae2046051f5169b8` (workflow 41726120483, attempt 1). Both required aggregate gates pass. Greptile reviewed this head at 5/5 with no new comments; all review threads are resolved. An independent source review found no blocking issue in the correction. Runner TypeScript and all server typecheck layers pass locally; the exact production server and Runner build passes with the server stamp bound to `84404d34b9d982d8bca24b63ae2046051f5169b8`. The full required CI workflow passes. - This is local fixture evidence. It does not establish hosted recovery, a remote provider stop, or a deployed version. ## Risks - Accepted result finalization can still finish the task after run-only Stop. This is existing server policy; cancelled run API write authority stays revoked. - The fix protects cancelled execution history. It does not invent provider termination, saved-file or accounting proof. - No schema, endpoint, retry budget, provider call or new background worker changes. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol`, Extra High reasoning. The model used code execution, repository tools and test output. The host does not expose the context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>