mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-29 12:59:13 +01:00
DottaandPaperclip
83709f75eb
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Task lists and the inbox help people scan their work. > - Shared task rows show system interruption messages beside task titles. > - These messages add detail that the person cannot act on from the row. > - This pull request removes the three system interruption labels from those rows. > - People can still open the task to inspect progress and use Retry. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #16965, which introduced these labels. Related recovery report: #17386. This change only removes row text and does not resolve that report's retry behavior. **What existing behavior does this improve?** The shared task rows in task lists and the inbox. **Current behavior** Rows show “Retry available,” “Thinking,” or “Trying again soon” beside the title for unresolved system interruptions. **Proposed behavior** Omit all three labels from shared task rows. Keep the existing system-interruption guard so the row does not show a legacy recovery chip in their place. Keep task status, other badges, and retry controls inside the task. **Reason and benefit** People can scan task titles with less incidental execution text. **Breaking changes** The three row labels disappear. APIs, recovery behavior, and task conversation controls stay the same. ## What Changed - Remove the system interruption text from every shared task-row presentation. - Cover working, scheduled-retry, and failed interruptions in both row presentations, including a legacy recovery action that must stay hidden. - Record the expected row behavior and verification states in the task feature map. ## Verification - Passed: token gates, feature-map contract and reference checks, and Git diff whitespace checks. - Passed: 83 component tests in `IssueRow.test.tsx` and `Inbox.test.tsx`, including the new regression cases; full `pnpm -r typecheck`; full `pnpm build`. - The full local `pnpm test:run` was attempted and stopped after 16 database-dependent failures. An independent disposable `initdb` reproduced `FATAL: could not create semaphores: No space left on device`. The host has exhausted its macOS System V semaphore capacity. All required CI test lanes passed on the final commit and provide full database-suite coverage. An earlier attempt also found an unbuilt plugin SDK; building that existing dependency repaired collection before this database failure. - Review the working, scheduled-retry, and failed interruption branches. Each returns no system label. The existing guard still suppresses legacy recovery chips. - Independent source review found no actionable code issues. Regression cases check title navigation, removal of the three labels, and suppression of replacement recovery chips. - All required CI gates passed on commit `dd1d7b08dbba8a10a95c5d24c4aea64479befe95`: typecheck, general and serialized tests, browser suites, build, canary, and Runner checks. - Greptile reviewed that commit at 5/5 with no open findings. The optional Paperclip review also returned 5/5 with no findings; its check status is neutral. ## Risks - Low risk. This removes row text only. Task status, recovery records, other badges, and task-level retry actions keep their current behavior. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. This session does not expose an exact model ID or context-window size. The assistant used reasoning, shell tools, and subagents for source review and validation. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>