## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Task pages must make the current instruction and recent conversation readable quickly. > - Compact startup avoids reading all earlier messages and run activity. > - Every URL fragment previously selected the full-history path, even for documents. > - Saved document cards also arrived after the conversation was visible. PR statistics could add another row later. > - This pull request keeps anchors compact and reveals the saved conversation structure together. > - The benefit is stable reading position without loading unrelated history. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #17593 introduced compact startup. #14667 covers earlier reveal and scroll work. This fix retains the bounded history contract. **What happened?** Opening a task document link loaded all task history. Ordinary cold opens could reveal messages before saved document cards and plans arrived. Later PR metadata added a statistics row and changed card height. **Expected behavior** Every URL fragment keeps compact startup. Document links open their pane. Older-comment links fetch only the target comment. Saved cards keep their geometry after first reveal. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create a task with many comments, a saved plan, documents and saved PR work products. 2. Delay the enriched task response and open the task. Observe cards inserted after messages appear. 3. Open a document fragment. Observe full comment, activity and run reads. 4. Delay PR metadata refresh. Observe each card grow when diff counts arrive. ## What Changed - Remove fragment and tab checks from automatic history expansion. Resolve validated comment UUIDs through the authorized single-comment endpoint, encode their path components, retain fetched targets across document navigation, and preserve cancellation/deletion cache updates. - Include the saved plan, document metadata and local work-product projection in the core task read. Skip recovery, workspace and related-task enrichment. Do not refresh providers. Summary queries no longer select other document bodies. - Seed saved work-product and plan queries from core, including already pending or errored reads, without replacing known lists or an authoritative empty result. Coordinate the bounded recent reads, saved cards, latest transcript and settled initial pane width before first reveal. Keep the thread and composer mounted during refresh and explicit expansion. - Open continuation summaries in the document pane. Reserve PR statistics geometry while provider metadata loads. - Add a reusable synthetic local task, nine browser checks, frame measurements and video. Extend the PostgreSQL core-route fixture with a saved PR row and assert its identity, URL, state and stored metadata survive the response. Update design guidance and capability maps. ## Verification - Red: visible document/plan cards changed from 0 to 1 to 4; thread height grew from 690 to 1,432 pixels. Green: all seven saved cards appear before reveal, with constant thread height and zero per-card movement in the final reviewed browser run. The final 1,492-pixel layout includes the reserved PR statistics lines. - Red: delayed PR diff counts changed all three cards from 62 to 82 pixels. Green: their heights stay at 82 pixels before and after metadata refresh. - Nine browser journeys pass: delayed enrichment, document/comment/unknown/continuation anchors, document clicks and explicit history expansion with a retained draft, missing-comment retry, delayed PR statistics, and retained older-comment position after document navigation. - 583 focused UI tests passed on `c91fa107ba`. After the plan-cache follow-up, all 212 affected page/cache/plan-hook tests and UI typecheck pass, including 14 plan-hook cases. The original 16 focused PostgreSQL tests passed for the server changes. - Merge-review red: holding the duplicate stored work-products read blocked the first reveal past 10 seconds despite core already containing the saved cards. Both empty and populated core projections now reveal while that request remains pending. Malformed-comment tests prove no target request is made; API tests prove path encoding and abort-signal forwarding. - The populated core-route test now inserts a real saved PR work product alongside the plan and documents, then checks the complete saved projection through HTTP. All ten task cold-open PostgreSQL tests pass. - Plan-cache review red: an existing pending or errored plan query prevented the saved core plan from reaching the consumer. Four real-hook cases failed before the data-presence fix and pass afterward, for both present and absent plans. A separately fetched newer plan or known absent plan remains authoritative. - Further layout red: the initial properties pane reduced visible thread width from 775 to 742 pixels after reveal. The reveal now waits for two stable width frames; the browser check includes width, height, card counts and per-card geometry. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed for the original change; UI typecheck and build pass after review fixes. Token, module-boundary and map checks pass. `pnpm test:run` was stopped after about 15 minutes in the serialized server lane. No full local test-suite pass is claimed. On the earlier head, hosted build/typecheck and all Vitest lanes passed; one E2E shard failed because the agent-configuration clipboard helper copied page text into its YAML parser. On `c91fa107ba`, Greptile was 5/5 and every E2E shard passed, including the earlier clipboard case. One unchanged Discord chat-binding test in server shard 8 returned false after 185 ms; its 16-test integration file passes locally without changes. The CI cause remains unestablished. On `be436ce492`, both server shard 8 and E2E shard 7 passed without changing those tests or their product code. On final head `e357b3bced`, all CI jobs pass, including full general and serialized tests, all eight E2E shards, typecheck, build and the aggregate verification gate. Exact-head Greptile is 5/5 with no findings. The overall status rollup contains 55 successes, two intentionally skipped Storybook checks and a neutral Paperclip Review. That advisory review ended without a complete assessment; all previously posted findings are resolved and it added no current findings. - Test startup exceeded an initial 5-second deadline once while development assets and other checks were active. The final browser checks allow 10 seconds. These runs establish geometry and bounded requests; they do not establish a reliable latency improvement. An initial 503 error fixture exercised global reconnect/backoff. The target-comment failure test uses a terminal 404. - Browser data is synthetic. Provider metadata is simulated for the delayed-response check. No staging deployment or live provider execution is claimed. ## Risks - Core task reads now include local saved-card queries and the saved plan body. Other document bodies and all historical run activity remain outside that path. - First reveal waits for the bounded current structure. The existing 15-second incomplete-history fallback and inline retry remain available. - Continuation-summary links open in the document pane in the current task interface. Classic tasks keep their existing surface. - No migration or mutation permission change. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, code editing, shell tools and browser testing. The exact serving model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Issue-detail performance baseline
Run the repeatable baseline from the repository root:
pnpm exec playwright test --config tests/perf/issue-detail/playwright.config.ts
The rig starts an isolated seeded Paperclip instance, runs five samples for each scenario/profile, and writes median-ready raw data plus a Markdown table to test-results/issue-detail-perf/.
Scenarios:
- S1 warm in-app navigation: loads the Issues list, clears the waterfall, and clicks the seeded issue.
- S2 cold open: creates a fresh browser context and deep-links to the seeded issue.
Profiles:
- Unthrottled.
- Fast 4G network with 4x CPU slowdown.
Override the sample count (minimum five) or port when needed:
PAPERCLIP_ISSUE_PERF_RUNS=7 PAPERCLIP_ISSUE_PERF_PORT=3210 pnpm exec playwright test --config tests/perf/issue-detail/playwright.config.ts
Outputs include baseline.md, baseline.json, and a Chrome trace for the first run of each scenario/profile. Open *.trace.json in Chrome DevTools Performance to inspect the issue-detail:* user-timing marks.
Set PAPERCLIP_ISSUE_PERF_PROFILE=1 to capture actual Chrome CPU samples and
conversation-readiness transitions in one diagnostic sample per scenario/profile.
Import the resulting *.cpuprofile in DevTools and inspect *.readiness.json for
the task, comments, metadata, activity, runs, runtime, plan and transcript gates.
Each gate records changes with detail.ready; use its last transition before
content paint when a gate becomes pending after mount. These diagnostic runs
include profiler overhead. Run without the flag for before/after latency claims.
Readiness marks stay in the local browser and contain only fixed gate names and
booleans; the harness enables them before navigation.
For bundle comparisons, build the UI and serve the production assets from an
isolated local instance with PAPERCLIP_UI_DEV_MIDDLEWARE=false. The default
managed server above uses development middleware, which does not reproduce
production chunk loading. Keep the server, database, browser profile and sample
count the same for both builds, and avoid concurrent builds or test suites while
measuring latency.
Copy the first run's output outside test-results/issue-detail-perf, then reuse
its persisted task with PAPERCLIP_ISSUE_PERF_SEED_FILE=/path/to/before/baseline.json
and PAPERCLIP_ISSUE_PERF_BASE_URL pointing to that disposable instance. The
harness validates the task identity before measuring. Network spans in the trace
use recorded request start/end timestamps relative to task navigation; they
include completed requests observed during the sample, even after content paint.
Task layout stability
compact-startup.spec.ts keeps a synthetic local reproduction with 24 messages,
a plan, three documents and three saved PR cards. It holds the enriched task
response, records each visible frame's card count and geometry, and rejects
cards inserted after the conversation becomes readable. It also checks document,
older-comment and unknown anchors without full comments/activity/run reads.
Run it with the same loopback-only URL override below. The fixture URL is saved
in test-results/compact-startup-fixture.json for manual inspection and reuse.
layout-stability.spec.ts exercises the real task route, including Inbox
navigation, with 160 Markdown comments and a resolved interaction. It delays
initial comments, tests failures and retry, tracks a reading anchor across
media growth, composer resizing, properties toggles, older-page loading and
Back navigation, and covers mobile reduced motion and explicit comment links.
The eight scenarios also exercise same-task hash navigation without remounting
on desktop and mobile, and stalled native/log reads that expose Retry after
the 15-second request deadline.
plan-startup.spec.ts also opens tasks with and without a saved plan while
blocking the separate plan endpoint. Both must reveal the saved conversation
from the task response without issuing that redundant read.
It also checks task-list navigation, where a list-only snapshot needs one normal
plan fetch and must still show a saved plan when present.
Videos and per-frame layout.json measurements are written under each test's
output directory. The two-pixel assertion measures a logical row's viewport
offset; total scroll offset legitimately changes when history is prepended.
Ordinary task opens defer the concealed history and composer until their initial data is ready. The skeleton and scroll/composer containers retain their geometry. Comment-link navigation prepares content eagerly so the target can be positioned before reveal. Revealed content stays mounted during refresh. The draft scenario holds a background task read, checks the same editor remains mounted, reloads the saved draft, sends one reply, and independently checks its persisted comment.
To run against an existing disposable local test-drive instance:
PAPERCLIP_ISSUE_PERF_BASE_URL=http://127.0.0.1:3102 \
pnpm exec playwright test --config tests/perf/issue-detail/playwright.config.ts layout-stability.spec.ts
The suite creates its own company and fixtures. The URL override accepts only loopback origins and rejects remote hosts. Use a disposable local instance, not a shared or production instance. Without the override, the harness starts its own isolated instance as before. Live provider walkthroughs additionally require a configured native Paperclip runner and Codex authentication; deterministic browser fixtures do not substitute for watching an actual provider run.
For the live walkthrough, first assign a disposable task to a native Paperclip
runner configured with the Codex provider. Its scratch project should contain
a small sum.mjs fixture. The script sends a paced job, scrolls up, disconnects
and reconnects, steers a follow-up, and records through completion:
PAPERCLIP_LAYOUT_LIVE_URL=http://127.0.0.1:3102/LAY/issues/LAY-8 \
node tests/perf/issue-detail/live-feed.walkthrough.mjs
Inspect test-results/task-layout/live-acceptance/ for the video, screenshots,
per-frame positions, layout shifts, browser timing counters, and reading-anchor
measurement. The live script rejects non-local URLs and uses real provider
capacity. Review the video as well as the assertions: layout-shift scores alone
do not capture programmatic scrolling or replacement flashes.