mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-30 13:20:54 +01:00
yzxcj797andAndrew Aymeloglu
81dcc4f6bf
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The Kubernetes sandbox provider supports the Sandbox CR backend. > - Its migration guide tells users to install the agent-sandbox controller. > - The command names install.yaml, which is not a release asset. > - This pull request changes the asset name to sandbox.yaml. > - Users can then download the base controller and CRD manifest. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Issue type** Incorrect information. **Where is the issue?** packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/kubernetes/README.md, under “Migrating from job to sandbox-cr”. **What's wrong?** The installation command uses releases/latest/download/install.yaml. The upstream agent-sandbox release does not publish that asset. **Suggested fix** Use releases/latest/download/sandbox.yaml, the base installation manifest. ## What Changed - Replace install.yaml with sandbox.yaml in the controller installation command. ## Verification - Checked upstream release v1.0.8. Its assets are sandbox.yaml, extensions.yaml, and sandbox-with-extensions.yaml. - Reviewed the one-line documentation diff. - No Kubernetes installation or local tests were run. ## Risks - Low risk. This changes one documentation URL. - The URL follows the latest upstream release, so future upstream asset changes can affect it. ## Model Used Original author model use was not reported. Adoption and description update assisted by OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex), with repository and GitHub tool access. A more specific runtime model ID is not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [ ] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [ ] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [ ] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Andrew Aymeloglu <aaymeloglu@gmail.com>