mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-23 09:07:46 +02:00
DottaandPaperclip
233753e577
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Tool profiles select the actions each agent can use. > - Profile reads, review, mutation and assignment resolution shared a large OAuth and connection service. > - Those paths have their own company checks, lock order and database projections. > - This pull request gives profiles explicit owners while preserving the existing transactions and public API. > - The benefit is a smaller coordinator and a reviewable access boundary. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Depends on #17147. Stack: #17144 → #17146 → #17147 → this PR. These PRs remain open. **What existing behavior does this improve?** Maintenance of tool profile management and effective agent assignments. **Current behavior** The service entry point contains 19,293 lines. Profile behavior is spread across its closure and returned object. **Proposed behavior** Profile management accepts only a database and clock. Assignment resolution accepts three named capabilities. Projection and shared lock functions have explicit homes. Public methods and responses remain unchanged. **Reason and benefit** Reviewers can follow profile transactions, lightweight reads and precedence without navigating OAuth setup. The entry point falls to 17,752 lines, a reduction of 1,541 lines in this PR. ## What Changed - Extract profile management, projections and effective assignment resolution into three modules. Their sizes are 886, 268 and 216 lines. - Move shared actor/transaction types, identifiers and assignment locks into named modules. Preserve the public lock export. - Keep all database reads, transaction boundaries, lock order and method signatures. Add no cache or background work. - Record the next ownership cuts toward an entry point below 5,000 lines. ## Verification - Before and after: 466 cases in `tool-access-service.test.ts` and 33 cases across profile entry validation, effective assignments and catalog publication. All 499 cases pass with one database worker. - Server TypeScript check and `node scripts/check-module-boundaries.mjs` pass. `git diff --check` passes. - Normalized syntax comparison finds all 329 pre-existing function/method bodies unchanged. Wiring passes the unchanged public service tests. - The previous stack passed full typecheck and build. Its full local test run was interrupted and remains unverified; its complete CI matrix passed. This PR will record its own current-head CI result below. - Current-head CI is green. Current review: Greptile is 5/5 at `0f5c85905e`, with no inline review threads. - CI failure preserved: [general server shard 1](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39704932041/job/119582710174) failed the unchanged workspace-runtime test that replaces an unhealthy local process. The replacement refused connections for its original 10-second readiness budget. The fixture and runtime service are unchanged and do not import tool-access. One isolated run passed without changes or timeout increases. The failure log is preserved; the cause is not reproduced. Only that failed job was retried; it passed at the same head without code changes. The original failure remains recorded above. ## Risks - Moving profile mutations could change transaction clients or lock order. Both are unchanged and the existing database tests cover publication and assignment behavior. - Effective assignment resolution still uses the same installed-connection loader and full catalog projection. The lightweight path still omits large schema and metadata fields. - No schema, public API or access policy change is intended. Existing tests provide characterization coverage; no new test mirrors the extraction. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with repository tools and code execution. The exact serving model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>