## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Public MCP lets people use their organization from an external assistant. > - Operators need a visible control for this experimental access. > - Hosted users should select an organization once and then approve its permissions. > - This pull request adds the setting, invitation-first setup, and browser or device consent. > - Connections provides a copyable invitation with public instructions that grant no access. > - Users reach browser consent from their assistant and return to inspect or revoke access. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Builds on merged foundation #14846. This PR now targets master. Related settings convention: #13905. **Current behavior** The preview uses an environment variable to enable MCP. Hosted consent repeats organization selection. Assistant access has no entry in Connections, so users must already know the endpoint and how to reach consent. **Proposed behavior** An administrator enables Settings → Experimental → Assistant connections (MCP). A hosted connection shows the selected organization and its icon, then asks for permissions. Requested write access starts checked when the user’s role permits it; the user can opt out before connecting. Direct instance connections show an organization picker with the first available organization selected. The selection stays fixed across refetches and still requires an explicit Connect action. Connections includes Assistant Connection (MCP). Its setup page explains the canonical endpoint, client configuration, browser authentication, and connected access. It connects as the current person and does not select or impersonate an agent. **Reason and benefit** Operators manage access with the other experiments. Users select one organization, and both the UI and server enforce that choice. **Breaking changes** The old enable variable has no effect. Preview operators must enable the setting once. Apply the additive consent-request migration before deploying the tenant, then deploy the compatible Cloud broker. Existing direct requests and grants keep their behavior. ## What Changed - Simplify OAuth and device consent: show the Paperclip logo beside “Connect {client} to Paperclip”, fall back to “your assistant”, and show the identifying origin plus its favicon below, with the callback URL also visible when different. Remove the hosted-organization creation action. Default to the first available organization without silently changing it on refetch; preserve company restrictions and write opt-outs. Keep the button row contained on narrow screens. - Make Copy invitation the primary action, using the shared animated AgentSetupPrompt and a collapsed manual setup section with icon-labeled line tabs. Remove redundant link actions, copy-status text, the extra first-prompt well and revocation explanation from the setup page. Serve shared version-aware HTML and Markdown instructions without private organization data. - Support guarded Client ID Metadata Documents alongside dynamic registration, and include authorization response issuer identification. - Add RFC 8628 device authorization with separately hashed codes, expiry, shared request quotas, persistent polling backoff and atomic redemption. Reuse human consent, role checks, scoped grants, audit and revocation. - Add CLI device login and a local stdio bridge. Store credentials separately with private permissions and serialize rotating refreshes. - Add device consent stories and five cold-start paid Product E2E cases with independent grant, configuration and durable-work assertions. - Add `enablePublicMcp` to the settings validator, normalizer, feature catalog, and toggle UI. Check it live for OAuth, tools, subscriptions, and event delivery. Keep connection management and revocation available while disabled. - Default the MCP origin to the existing auth public URL, with strict validation and an explicit override. - Persist the optional OAuth `company_id` restriction. Describe only that company and reject approval for any other company, even if the person belongs to both. Keep active-membership and role checks. - Show the Paperclip icon and a large organization icon during consent. Return the saved company logo through the company-scoped request response and reuse the standard fallback icon. Use the requested concise permission labels: “Read all of your Paperclip data” and “Allow write access and creating tasks as me”. Use concise permission copy, retain a compact client and callback-origin disclosure, and remove the footer link. - Default requested write access on for eligible roles. Preserve opt-out across organization changes and refetch, reset defaults for a new request, and submit read-only access when the request or role does not allow writes. Align the shared checkbox with its label. - Use organization wording in consent, management, settings, and walkthroughs. Keep the organization fixed for hosted requests and retain direct-instance choice. - Add an Assistant Connection (MCP) card to the Connectors catalog, a setup page in the app shell, and a return link from Experimental settings. Include Codex, Claude Code, OpenCode, and generic remote MCP instructions. - Read the live gate and canonical server URL through authenticated setup metadata. Show only the current person’s grants for the selected organization, refresh after consent, and support revocation. Surface catalog status failures with an explicit retry action; do not present them as an empty connection list. Opening setup grants no authority. - Start the eight guided chapters in Connections. Keep presenter notes and chapter controls around real product pages in the app shell. Explain the terminal, consent, delegation, retrieval, and revocation handoffs. Mark conversation examples as illustrative. Cover first use, client setup, connected, loading, and error states. Keep the existing consent and management stories. - Keep the paid-eval setup and browser helper aligned with the setting and consent button. ## Verification - Warm-standby integration fix `ec64ea05e`: public MCP ingress now follows the Cloud claim guard; MCP and discovery paths return 503 instead of SPA HTML while unclaimed. Event polling checks the in-memory claim before reading the persisted experimental setting. All 97 focused OAuth/Cloud tests and server typecheck pass, including new request and timer regressions for idle-before-claim and resume-after-claim behavior. Fresh review is 5/5 with no unresolved threads, and all security scans pass on this final head. All browser shards, typecheck, build, canary installation and other test groups passed on the first attempt. The unchanged Cursor sandbox default-command test timed out at 10 seconds; the exact test passed locally without edits in 587 ms. The single failed-job retry passed, with the original failure retained in workflow 37500711895. All 54 final-head checks pass on `ec64ea05e9a03e2179d4e2f84c2de03761f7ce26` (two optional Storybook jobs are intentionally skipped). - Final master integration `8457828fc`: merged foundation #14846 and current master, preserving the invitation changes and all 33 files from the two newer upstream changes. No migration renumbering was required. All 95 focused OAuth/Cloud integration tests, full recursive typecheck and token gates pass. All CI gates passed on that integration head; review identified the warm-standby issue fixed above. - Security-review fix `8c1d0b696`: commit shared global/per-source admission before outbound CIMD work, preserve failed-attempt receipts, and validate resource/scope before fetching. Added migration `0305_chubby_vin_gonzales.sql` and six concurrent/adversarial regression cases. All 69 OAuth/metadata tests, 26 migration checks, full recursive typecheck and production build pass. The security scanner passed that commit. Follow-up `87f9658e7` limits only actual cache-miss fetches; 18 authorization requests sharing one proxy across two service instances use just two fetches. All 70 OAuth/metadata tests and server typecheck pass after that refinement. Final follow-up `8ebeae84c` reports admission-storage failures as retryable HTTP 503 instead of invalid client metadata. Its regression proves no outbound request before admission and successful retry after storage recovers. All 71 OAuth/metadata tests and server typecheck pass. Final-head security scanning passes; Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved findings. CI passed all browser shards, typecheck, build, token gates and canary installation. One unchanged adapter-utils bridge test raced a response-file write (expected a JSON error, received the safe file-changed error). The exact test passed locally without edits. The single failed-job retry passed; the original failure is retained in workflow 37490609192. All 54 checks now pass on final head `8ebeae84ca77c0cf7ac12c2006f0f8743fe50e0b`, with security scan and fresh Greptile 5/5 and no unresolved threads. Foundation #14846 subsequently merged as `e34abee670069cca84afb2efb86041bce7dccbec`; the final integration above now targets master. - Integration with current master: preserved the new Connections source filters and pagination, kept all eval suites, and regenerated the consent/device snapshots as migrations 0303/0304. All four MCP migration SQL hashes are unchanged from the staging versions. Full recursive typecheck and production build, 132 focused UI tests (including catalog filtering), 89 server authorization/settings tests, 26 migration tests, 120 eval calibration tests and token gates pass. Review follow-up `4820ce74c` also keeps active assistant grants in Installed, with pending/error recovery and revocation/company-isolation coverage. All 76 setup/catalog tests, UI typecheck and token gates pass after that fix. The unchanged signoff browser test timed out waiting for a heartbeat in CI at `4820ce74c`; the exact test passed locally without code changes, and the preceding CI head passed that shard. That same unchanged test failed at the reviewer stage in the next CI run. All five signoff tests passed three times locally (15/15), without test changes. All eight browser shards pass at final head `8ebeae84c`; no browser-test edits or failed-browser-job retries were needed. - Setup-page refinement at `9ab009178`: all 17 focused setup/consent tests pass, along with UI typecheck, production build, Storybook build and token gates. Browser exercised the shared prompt preview and client tab switching, and the updated InvitationCopied Storybook interaction checks its clipboard fixture. All final-head CI checks pass at `9ab009178`, with no unresolved review findings. Deployed successfully to Butter in https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip-cloud/actions/runs/37475189524. Verified the actual page, tab switching and line styling, removed actions/copy, and successful native copy/paste of the complete Butter invitation into a local-only test field. The existing Claude grant was left intact. - Consent follow-up at `dc8e9fd11`: all 10 consent tests and token gates pass. UI typecheck and production build passed again at `4e4d5e4d9`; Storybook build and eval-helper typecheck passed for `28101cf91`. Follow-ups let the primary button wrap on narrow screens, preserve a distinct callback URL, and use only bundled icons to avoid pre-consent requests to client-selected sites. Browser-verified the real consent component in desktop and 320px mobile stories, including default selection, write access and preserved opt-out. Updated E2E heading/default-selection helpers. All CI checks passed at `dc8e9fd11`, with review 5/5 and no unresolved threads. The Butter preview publication needed a retry because npm initially accepted the DB package before making it visible; the retry succeeded and `dc8e9fd11` deployed. Verified a fresh, unapproved native Codex CIMD request on Butter: default organization/write selection, known-client heading and icon, distinct callback origin, and removed creation action. No grant was approved for this UI check. Prior paid runs below retain their exact source provenance; this UI-only follow-up did not rerun paid qualification. - Source-pinned paid matrix at `2992ef2710f47230e7f484c709c6ba02524f884c`: **15/15 passed**, five cases each on GPT-5.4 Mini, Claude Haiku and Sonnet. Campaign `local-2026-10-06T02-41-14-462Z`. Covers cold start, existing config, unavailable host, denied consent and reconnect/later retrieval, with independent configuration/grant/task/run/document assertions. Original failures, transcripts, source fingerprints and billing remain retained. - Final instruction follow-up `cda8178af`: **3/3 cold starts passed** on Mini, Haiku and Sonnet. Campaign `local-2026-10-06T02-58-30-041Z`. Latest `0637b9f1c` shares that same guidance across HTML, Markdown and manual UI after review; generated Markdown is verified byte-identical to the paid-evaluated version. Shared build, server/UI typechecks, token gates and 63 auth/metadata tests passed again. Every CI gate passed at prior HEAD `0637b9f1c`, with review 5/5 and no unresolved threads. - Other focused checks: 11 CLI credential/refresh-lock tests, 120 eval calibration tests, server/UI/eval typechecks, token gates and Storybook build passed. Full recursive typecheck and production build passed during implementation; CI also passed them at `2992ef271`. - Local full-suite limitations: a large-file Git streaming test times out on this Mac, and broader CLI/route runs hit DB hook timeouts. Fresh MCP reruns passed, and the corresponding CI groups passed. No claim that the local full suite is green. - Actual clients: Codex 0.153.4 and Claude Code 2.1.245 reach CIMD consent; device CLI reaches verification/consent. New grants await human approval. Existing local OpenCode retrieved a saved result in a fresh conversation through its previously approved grant. - Fresh OpenCode 1.18.17 on Butter: started with no MCP config, received the exact copied invitation, read public setup, configured its server and started PKCE consent. Its shell command timed out; background retry reached the client's own callback deadline while approval remained pending. Latest instructions cover that handoff. **No completed Butter read/delegation/result retrieval is claimed.** - Cloud companion https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip-cloud/pull/672 passes checks/review and deployed. Anonymous setup and device-protocol routing verified. Core `2992ef271` deployed successfully and the actual Claude web flow now reaches consent. Its extra JWT-bearer metadata is filtered to implemented grants; unsupported token grants remain rejected. Final `0637b9f1c` deployed successfully to Butter in https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip-cloud/actions/runs/37409195300; live HTML and Markdown both contain the final guidance. The superseded instruction-only build was canceled before deployment. This is a core-only staging preview; private Cloud plugins are omitted. ChatGPT web is signed out, so browser connector use is unverified. - Screenshot gallery begins at Butter's dashboard and distinguishes real setup/pending consent from local reuse and fixtures. It records the timeout finding. New persistent access needs human confirmation before the remaining actual-client acceptance work. - Manual path: Connectors → Assistant Connection (MCP) → Copy invitation → paste into assistant → configure and start authorization → sign in and approve → verify `paperclip_connection` → delegate → retrieve the saved report later. - Plan and instructions: `doc/plans/2026-10-05-assistant-invitations.md` and `doc/public-mcp.md`. ## Risks - Apply additive, replay-safe migration `0304_curvy_shadow_king.sql` before using device authorization. The public setup link carries no credential. Device codes and tokens stay private; neither sharing instructions nor installing a plugin authorizes access. - Apply additive migration `0305_chubby_vin_gonzales.sql` before deploying the shared metadata admission gate. It retains at most 60 short-lived, hashed-source receipts per instance and rejects excess attempts with 429. - CIMD metadata fetching is a new external-input boundary. It requires HTTPS, exact client ID and redirect validation, bounded responses and guarded DNS/network access. Client names remain self-reported. - Device support is per-instance. The central Cloud broker retains its existing grant support. Host installation and tool reload capabilities vary by client; instructions describe manual settings and restart requirements. - Consent names the registered client in its heading and displays its identifying origin below. Known-origin icons are bundled; all other origins show a neutral site icon without contacting client-selected sites. Client names are self-reported; the callback origin is the recipient check. The Cloud chooser also displays the original client and receiving origin before tenant handoff. - A user who accepts the preselected write permission can create tasks and comments. Task creation and comments can start or wake agents and use execution budget; the consent label uses the concise wording explicitly requested by the maintainer. Scope requests, role checks, and the final Connect action still apply. - Migration `0303_supreme_garia.sql` adds one nullable UUID column with `IF NOT EXISTS`. Requests without a company restriction keep the direct-instance picker. The binding stays recorded if its company is deleted; consent then fails closed. - Deploy tenant support before the Cloud broker sends `company_id`. Unknown or inaccessible organizations must never fall back to a different company. - The setting defaults off. Disabling access does not cancel work already delegated. Existing tokens and unexpired subscriptions can resume when enabled again; revocation remains separate. - The catalog entry is visible for discovery while the feature is off. Setup instructions, OAuth, and tool execution remain gated. No access is granted by viewing the entry. - Assistant sign-in starts in the external client so it owns PKCE and callback state. Client command syntax can change and links to official setup documentation are included. - An authenticated instance and valid public URL are required. Hosting, paid execution, and store publication remain separate rollout steps. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 in Codex, with tool use and code execution. The exact serving model version and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused checks pass; unrelated local full-suite timeouts are explicitly recorded above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Quickstart · Docs · GitHub · Discord · Twitter · Website
Paperclip is the app people use to manage AI agents for work.
Open-source orchestration for teams of AI agents.
If OpenClaw is an employee, Paperclip is the company.
Paperclip is a Node.js server and React UI that orchestrates a team of AI agents to run a business. Bring your own agents, assign goals, and track work and costs from one dashboard.
It looks like a task manager. Under the hood: org charts, budgets, governance, goal alignment, and agent coordination.
Manage business goals, not pull requests.
| Step | Example | |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | Define the goal | "Build the #1 AI note-taking app to $1M MRR." |
| 02 | Hire the team | CEO, CTO, engineers, designers, marketers — any bot, any provider. |
| 03 | Approve and run | Review strategy. Set budgets. Hit go. Monitor from the dashboard. |
Paperclip is right for you if
- ✅ You want to build autonomous AI companies
- ✅ You coordinate many different agents (OpenClaw, Codex, Claude, Cursor) toward a common goal
- ✅ You have 20 simultaneous Claude Code terminals open and lose track of what everyone is doing
- ✅ You want agents running autonomously 24/7, but still want to audit work and chime in when needed
- ✅ You want to monitor costs and enforce budgets
- ✅ You want a process for managing agents that feels like using a task manager
- ✅ You want to manage your autonomous businesses from your phone
Features
🔌 Bring Your Own AgentAny agent, any runtime, one org chart. If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired. |
🎯 Goal AlignmentEvery task traces back to the company mission. Agents know what to do and why. |
💓 HeartbeatsAgents wake on a schedule, check work, and act. Delegation flows up and down the org chart. |
💰 Cost ControlMonthly budgets per agent. When they hit the limit, they stop. No runaway costs. |
🏢 Multi-CompanyOne deployment, many companies. Complete data isolation. One control plane for your portfolio. |
🎫 Ticket SystemEvery conversation traced. Every decision explained. Full tool-call tracing and immutable audit log. |
🛡️ GovernanceApprove hires, override strategy, pause or terminate any agent — at any time. |
📊 Org ChartHierarchies, roles, reporting lines. Your agents have a boss, a title, and a job description. |
📱 Mobile ReadyMonitor and manage your autonomous businesses from anywhere. |
Problems Paperclip solves
| Without Paperclip | With Paperclip |
|---|---|
| ❌ You have 20 Claude Code tabs open and can't track which one does what. On reboot you lose everything. | ✅ Tasks are ticket-based, conversations are threaded, sessions persist across reboots. |
| ❌ You manually gather context from several places to remind your bot what you're actually doing. | ✅ Context flows from the task up through the project and company goals — your agent always knows what to do and why. |
| ❌ Folders of agent configs are disorganized and you're re-inventing task management, communication, and coordination between agents. | ✅ Paperclip gives you org charts, ticketing, delegation, and governance out of the box — so you run a company, not a pile of scripts. |
| ❌ Runaway loops waste hundreds of dollars of tokens and max your quota before you even know what happened. | ✅ Cost tracking surfaces token budgets and throttles agents when they're out. Management prioritizes with budgets. |
| ❌ You have recurring jobs (customer support, social, reports) and have to remember to manually kick them off. | ✅ Heartbeats handle regular work on a schedule. Management supervises. |
| ❌ You have an idea, you have to find your repo, fire up Claude Code, keep a tab open, and babysit it. | ✅ Add a task in Paperclip. Your coding agent works on it until it's done. Management reviews their work. |
Why Paperclip is special
Paperclip handles the hard orchestration details correctly.
| Atomic execution. | Task checkout and budget enforcement are atomic, so no double-work and no runaway spend. |
| Persistent agent state. | Agents resume the same task context across heartbeats instead of restarting from scratch. |
| Runtime skill injection. | Agents can learn Paperclip workflows and project context at runtime, without retraining. |
| Governance with rollback. | Approval gates are enforced, config changes are revisioned, and bad changes can be rolled back safely. |
| Goal-aware execution. | Tasks carry full goal ancestry so agents consistently see the "why," not just a title. |
| Portable company templates. | Export/import orgs, agents, and skills with secret scrubbing and collision handling. |
| True multi-company isolation. | Every entity is company-scoped, so one deployment can run many companies with separate data and audit trails. |
What's Under the Hood
Paperclip is a full control plane, not a wrapper. Before you build any of this yourself, know that it already exists:
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PAPERCLIP SERVER │
│ │
│ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │
│ │Identity & │ │ Work & │ │ Heartbeat │ │Governance │ │
│ │ Access │ │ Tasks │ │ Execution │ │& Approvals│ │
│ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ │
│ │
│ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │
│ │ Org Chart │ │Workspaces │ │ Plugins │ │ Budget │ │
│ │ & Agents │ │ & Runtime │ │ │ │ & Costs │ │
│ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ │
│ │
│ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │
│ │ Routines │ │ Secrets & │ │ Activity │ │ Company │ │
│ │& Schedules│ │ Storage │ │ & Events │ │Portability│ │
│ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
┌─────┴─────┐ ┌─────┴─────┐ ┌─────┴─────┐ ┌─────┴─────┐
│ Claude │ │ Codex │ │ CLI │ │ HTTP/web │
│ Code │ │ │ │ agents │ │ bots │
└───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘
The Systems
|
Identity & Access — Two deployment modes (trusted local or authenticated), board users, agent API keys, short-lived run JWTs, company memberships, invite flows, and OpenClaw onboarding. Every mutating request is traced to an actor. |
Org Chart & Agents — Agents have roles, titles, reporting lines, permissions, and budgets. Adapter examples match the diagram: Claude Code, Codex, CLI agents such as Cursor/Gemini/bash, HTTP/webhook bots such as OpenClaw, and external adapter plugins. If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired. |
|
Work & Task System — Issues carry company/project/goal/parent links, atomic checkout with execution locks, first-class blocker dependencies, comments, documents, attachments, work products, labels, and inbox state. No double-work, no lost context. |
Heartbeat Execution — DB-backed wakeup queue with coalescing, budget checks, workspace resolution, secret injection, skill loading, and adapter invocation. Runs produce structured logs, cost events, session state, and audit trails. Recovery handles orphaned runs automatically. |
|
Workspaces & Runtime — Project workspaces, isolated execution workspaces (git worktrees, operator branches), and runtime services (dev servers, preview URLs). Agents work in the right directory with the right context every time. |
Governance & Approvals — Board approval workflows, execution policies with review/approval stages, decision tracking, budget hard-stops, agent pause/resume/terminate, and full audit logging. Nothing ships without your sign-off. |
|
Budget & Cost Control — Token and cost tracking by company, agent, project, goal, issue, provider, and model. Scoped budget policies with warning thresholds and hard stops. Overspend pauses agents and cancels queued work automatically. |
Routines & Schedules — Recurring tasks with cron, webhook, and API triggers. Concurrency and catch-up policies. Each routine execution creates a tracked issue and wakes the assigned agent — no manual kick-offs needed. |
|
Plugins — Instance-wide plugin system with out-of-process workers, capability-gated host services, job scheduling, tool exposure, and UI contributions. Extend Paperclip without forking it. |
Secrets & Storage — Instance and company secrets, encrypted local storage, provider-backed object storage, attachments, and work products. Sensitive values stay out of prompts unless a scoped run explicitly needs them. |
|
Activity & Events — Mutating actions, heartbeat state changes, cost events, approvals, comments, and work products are recorded as durable activity so operators can audit what happened and why. |
Company Portability — Export and import entire organizations — agents, skills, projects, routines, and issues — with secret scrubbing and collision handling. One deployment, many companies, complete data isolation. |
What Paperclip is not
| Not a chatbot. | Agents have jobs, not chat windows. |
| Not an agent framework. | We don't tell you how to build agents. We tell you how to run a company made of them. |
| Not a workflow builder. | No drag-and-drop pipelines. Paperclip models companies — with org charts, goals, budgets, and governance. |
| Not a prompt manager. | Agents bring their own prompts, models, and runtimes. Paperclip manages the organization they work in. |
| Not a single-agent tool. | This is for teams. If you have one agent, you probably don't need Paperclip. If you have twenty — you definitely do. |
| Not a code review tool. | Paperclip orchestrates work, not pull requests. Bring your own review process. |
Quickstart
Open source. Self-hosted. No Paperclip account required.
npx paperclipai onboard --yes
That quickstart path now defaults to trusted local loopback mode for the fastest first run. To start in authenticated/private mode instead, choose a bind preset explicitly:
npx paperclipai onboard --yes --bind lan
# or:
npx paperclipai onboard --yes --bind tailnet
If you already have Paperclip configured, rerunning onboard keeps the existing config in place. Use paperclipai configure to edit settings.
Or manually:
git clone https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
cd paperclip
pnpm install
pnpm dev
This starts the API server at http://localhost:3100. An embedded PostgreSQL database is created automatically — no setup required.
Requirements: Node.js 24.11+, pnpm 9.15+
FAQ
What does a typical setup look like? Locally, a single Node.js process manages an embedded Postgres and local file storage. For production, point it at your own Postgres and deploy however you like. Configure projects, agents, and goals — the agents take care of the rest.
If you're a solo entrepreneur you can use Tailscale to access Paperclip on the go. Then later you can deploy to e.g. Vercel when you need it.
Can I run multiple companies? Yes. A single deployment can run an unlimited number of companies with complete data isolation.
How is Paperclip different from agents like OpenClaw or Claude Code? Paperclip uses those agents. It orchestrates them into a company — with org charts, budgets, goals, governance, and accountability.
Why should I use Paperclip instead of just pointing my OpenClaw to Asana or Trello? Agent orchestration has subtleties in how you coordinate who has work checked out, how to maintain sessions, monitoring costs, establishing governance - Paperclip does this for you.
(Bring-your-own-ticket-system is on the Roadmap)
Do agents run continuously? By default, agents run on scheduled heartbeats and event-based triggers (task assignment, @-mentions). You can also hook in continuous agents like OpenClaw. You bring your agent and Paperclip coordinates.
Importing & Exporting Companies
Export a company to a portable package and import it into any other instance — local or cloud — from a local path or GitHub:
paperclipai company export <company-id> --out ./my-export
paperclipai company import ./my-export --dry-run
paperclipai company import org/repo --target new
The board UI has matching Export and Import pages in company settings: the Export page shows a fidelity panel listing what the bundle will not carry, and the Import page starts imported agents and routines paused by default, with a post-import activation step. See the Importing & Exporting guide for details.
Development
pnpm dev # Full dev (API + UI, watch mode)
pnpm dev:once # Full dev without file watching
pnpm dev:server # Server only
pnpm build # Build all
pnpm typecheck # Type checking
pnpm test # Cheap default test run (Vitest only)
pnpm test:watch # Vitest watch mode
pnpm test:e2e # Playwright browser suite
pnpm db:generate # Generate DB migration
pnpm db:migrate # Apply migrations
pnpm test does not run Playwright. Browser suites stay separate and are typically run only when working on those flows or in CI.
See doc/DEVELOPING.md for the full development guide.
Roadmap
- ✅ Plugin system (e.g. add a knowledge base, custom tracing, queues, etc)
- ✅ Get OpenClaw / claw-style agent employees
- ✅ companies.sh - import and export entire organizations
- ✅ Easy AGENTS.md configurations
- ✅ Skills Manager
- ✅ Scheduled Routines
- ✅ Better Budgeting
- ✅ Agent Reviews and Approvals
- ✅ Multiple Human Users
- ⚪ Cloud / Sandbox agents (e.g. Cursor / e2b / Novita agents)
- ⚪ Artifacts & Work Products
- ⚪ Memory / Knowledge
- ⚪ Enforced Outcomes
- ⚪ MAXIMIZER MODE
- ⚪ Deep Planning
- ⚪ Work Queues
- ⚪ Self-Organization
- ⚪ Automatic Organizational Learning
- ⚪ CEO Chat
- ⚪ Cloud deployments
- ⚪ Desktop App
This is the short roadmap preview. See the full roadmap in ROADMAP.md.
Community & Plugins
Find Plugins and more at awesome-paperclip
Telemetry
Paperclip collects anonymous usage telemetry to help us understand how the product is used and improve it. No personal information, issue content, prompts, file paths, or secrets are ever collected. Private repository references are hashed with a per-install salt before being sent.
Telemetry is enabled by default and can be disabled with any of the following:
| Method | How |
|---|---|
| Environment variable | PAPERCLIP_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1 |
| Standard convention | DO_NOT_TRACK=1 |
| CI environments | Automatically disabled when CI=true |
| Config file | Set telemetry.enabled: false in your Paperclip config |
Contributing
We welcome contributions. See the contributing guide for details.
Community
- Discord — Join the community
- Twitter / X — Follow updates and announcements
- GitHub Issues — bugs and feature requests
- GitHub Discussions — ideas and RFC
License
MIT © 2026 Paperclip Labs, Inc
Star History
Open source under MIT. Built for people who want to get work done, not babysit agents.
