Files
PaperClipAI/maps
DottaandPaperclip 5cea9c7c0e fix(ui): show eligible wake targets when resuming tasks (#17521)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages agents and their assigned tasks.
> - A task pause controls execution without changing task status.
> - Resume can remove that pause and request work from eligible
assignees.
> - The preview counted blocked tasks and former executors as wake
targets.
> - The release route correctly skipped those targets, so the dialog
promised work that did not start.
> - Resume also trusted stale pause snapshots after tasks were reopened.
> - This PR aligns preview with execution eligibility and rechecks
current task state when releasing a pause.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

Pause an assigned blocked task, then open Resume. The dialog says that
one task will resume and offers to wake one agent. Applying it only
removes the pause. The route skips blocked and backlog tasks. A former
executor can also inflate the wake count after reassignment.

**Expected behavior**

The dialog must distinguish removing a pause from starting work. Its
wake count must use the current assignees and statuses accepted by the
release route. Blocked work must stay blocked.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Open an assigned blocked task.
2. Choose Pause work, then Resume task.
3. Inspect the wake count and apply Resume work.

Related runtime recovery work is tracked separately in #17097 and
#17439. This PR does not change remote execution recovery.

## What Changed

- Share the resume status list between preview and release. Count only
current assignees on todo, in-progress, and in-review tasks for resume
wakes.
- Explain that Resume removes the pause. Show the existing preview
warnings, including tasks that remain idle.
- Disable and uncheck the wake option when no agents qualify. Send the
same choice to the server.
- Reevaluate previously skipped pause members after reopening or
releasing another hold. Retain active-pause and unsafe-execution guards.
- Add real PostgreSQL and HTTP-route regressions plus browser coverage
for both task interfaces. Keep draft, ancestor-pause, and
Stop/reconciliation coverage.
- Update the task coordination maps. Add an opt-in dedicated test
database URL for hosts where embedded PostgreSQL cannot start.

## Verification

- Final head `9548eb16736f632cc111a5c13a9a994ec1d95a13`: all 55
completed checks pass, with two optional Storybook checks skipped. [CI
40188094904](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40188094904)
passes, including typecheck, build, all general/serialized suites, and
all eight E2E shards. Greptile is 5/5 on this commit; the reopened-task
finding is fixed and resolved.
- Red: the real PostgreSQL regression receives three agents instead of
the one eligible current assignee on the original code.
- Green: all 27 tree-control service, route, and unit tests pass. They
cover current assignees, blocked/backlog exclusions, reopened tasks,
company boundaries, remaining pause holds, and execution blockers.
- The reopened-task route regression fails on the previous
implementation: skipped members never reach preflight/wake, and an
unsafe replay releases the hold instead of returning 409. All cases pass
with the fix.
- Browser: all five applicable cases pass together (90 seconds):
blocked-work resume in both interfaces, draft/ancestor-pause cases in
both interfaces, and the process
Stop/pause/reconciliation/restart/cancel lifecycle. The optional
native-runner fixture is skipped locally because its fixture binary is
not configured.
- All 157 task-page component tests pass on the prior commit; subsequent
changes affect the server route and Stop fixture only.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass before rebase, and CI
typecheck/build passed on the previous PR commit. Server typecheck
passes again after the route fix. The final-head CI run also passes
these full checks.
- `node scripts/check-maps.mjs`, `node scripts/check-token-gates.mjs`,
and `git diff --check` pass.
- Full `pnpm test:run` was attempted but did not complete: this host
cannot initialize embedded PostgreSQL, and unrelated workspace-runtime
tests timed out. The focused database tests and E2E suite use disposable
PostgreSQL 18 instead. All general-test and serialized-test CI shards
passed on the previous PR commit; the final-head CI run also passes
every test shard.
- The first CI run caught the existing Stop test trying to check a
disabled wake option for blocked legacy work. It now asserts zero wake
targets and retains the no-execution-before-reconciliation checks.
- Earlier E2E attempts exposed fixture problems: assignment started the
fixture before it was paused, and the classic interface had two matching
editor nodes. The fixture now enables dispatch after the hold exists and
scopes the final assertion to the task composer. No product assertion
was removed.

## Risks

Resume preview is a snapshot. The release route still checks current
status, assignment, and execution blockers. It does not bypass approval,
budget, or recovery gates. Pause, cancel, and restore keep their
existing affected-agent semantics. The test database override only
accepts a dedicated database name ending in `_test`; it runs migrations
before the suite and closes its clients afterward.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, browser
control, and code execution. The runtime does not expose a more specific
model ID or context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-25 21:49:52 -05:00
..

Paperclip maps

The maps describe the same capabilities from two perspectives:

  • Feature map: what a person can do, where to reach it, and how to verify the user journey. Preserve its Poteto format.
  • Agent access map: the APIs and agent entry points for those capabilities, their permission boundaries, and access verification.

These are sibling directories under maps/. Each feature file has a same-named agent access companion. Reuse the product map's sub-feature IDs, so tasks/create identifies the same capability in both maps. Product behavior remains governed by the implementation spec; a map cannot grant authority or redefine a permission denial as success.

Capability identifiers

The feature ID is the recipe filename without .md, such as onboarding. The full capability ID joins that feature ID and a Sub-features key with /: the company key in feature-map/onboarding.md is onboarding/company. Its agent-access-map/onboarding.md companion uses the same local company key. The feature-map index lists the existing feature and full capability IDs.

Each child page states Feature ID: `onboarding`. after its introduction or product-map link. In feature recipes, show the full ID beside the parsed local key: - `company`: `onboarding/company` — create a company. In access companions and Storybook verification guidance, keep the existing local heading and put Capability ID: `onboarding/company`. beneath it. These labels make the existing identifiers visible without changing keys, anchors, or ID generation.

Use full capability IDs in cross-feature references, Storybook annotations, tests, issues, PRs, and verification evidence. Both segments use lowercase letters, digits, and hyphens. Keep filenames and keys stable when display titles or navigation labels change; renaming either changes the capability ID.

Entry-point IDs describe a surface, such as web-wizard, and are scoped to their recipe. Reference them with a recipe link, such as onboarding.md#web-wizard, and record the capability exercised separately. Navigation section labels are not capability IDs. See IDs and references for examples.

Access contract

Every business operation needs both an API and a usable agent entry point for an actor authorized to perform it. A dedicated tool is optional when REST, the CLI, an assigned MCP client, or native search_api / call_api already provides the operation. Record which agent surfaces actually have that path; an installed CLI or optional MCP package cannot be assumed available to every native/remote run.

Track these independently:

Dimension Values and meaning
API present, missing, not-applicable, or unreviewed. Use exact methods/paths; distinguish protocols from REST.
Agent access available, partial, missing, restricted, operator-only, not-applicable, or unreviewed. Name the supported surface and actual entry point.
Policy Actor, action/grant, company/resource/ownership scope, responsible-user intersection, run requirements, work modes, and gates relevant to the operation.
Evidence source-only, verified, failed, blocked, or not-run. Source presence and successful board calls are not agent verification.
Review depth baseline records representative operations and known gaps; operation-reviewed enumerates the capability's meaningful operations and their individual access contracts.

Broad capabilities such as task properties must be split into operations before they count as operation-reviewed: renaming, metadata edits, assignment, dependencies, and lifecycle changes can use different tools and permission rules. An available read path cannot certify a write path. List/get/create/update/delete, execution/control, credential handling, and resolution are separate where their authority or transport differs. Do not duplicate request schemas from OpenAPI.

Exceptions and restrictions

Presentation-only state, static developer fixtures, and pre-start/local operator work may use not-applicable for a domain API, with a concrete reason and the existing local path. When a capability combines shared data with presentation, split the operations: browser recents do not exempt resource lookup from API coverage. Promoting local state to a shared feature requires revisiting the entry.

A board-only endpoint is restricted for agent identity, not an automatic exception or a missing API. Cite the enforced policy and record whether the agent can request the authorized human's action and observe its result. An unresolved delegation question remains in Gaps. Company access, a job title, a personal assistant's OAuth grant, or an accepted interaction does not grant board identity. Keep budget, approval, secret and execution authority intact.

Check actual route/service authorization and production tool admission. OpenAPI actor labels and scenario/evaluation tool declarations are supporting metadata; record disagreements rather than using them as proof of access. Native API fallback restrictions, tool field/scope limits, and rollout settings are part of the agent path, even when a legacy agent can call the REST endpoint directly.

Companion file format

Each agent-access-map/<area>.md has an H1, a relative link to its product file, and its feature ID, followed by one H2 backticked local key per product sub-feature. Each capability starts with its full capability ID and contains these fields:

  • Review: baseline or operation-reviewed.
  • API: presence state and exact operation IDs, or a reasoned exception.
  • Agent access: availability state and concrete entry points by surface.
  • Policy: relevant permission and runtime boundaries, with source references.
  • Evidence: evidence state, reviewed commit and sources or executed proof.
  • Verification: allowed/denied assertions and observable result; record what has actually run separately from the proposed recipe.
  • Gaps: missing APIs/paths, discovery drift, unreviewed operations or policy decisions; use none only for the enumerated scope that was reviewed.

For an operation-reviewed capability, use H3 backticked operation IDs and repeat API, Agent access, Policy, Evidence, Verification and Gaps for each operation. Use small operation names such as create, update, read, or run-now. The enclosing capability has Review: operation-reviewed only after its meaningful operations have been enumerated. The following excerpt shows one operation; include the others before using that review label:

## `definition`

Review: `operation-reviewed`.

### `create`

API: `present` — POST /api/companies/{companyId}/routines.
Agent access: `available` — agent REST, CLI routine create and native call_api
under the enabled rollout and active-run/mode gates.
Policy: same company; assigneeAgentId must be the calling agent; cite the
routine authorization and native API policy sources.
Evidence: `source-only` — reviewed commit and source links; no live proof.
Verification: `not-run` — create an owned routine; reject assignment to another
agent; inspect saved configuration, attribution and retry behavior.
Gaps: verify ownership and responsible-user resolution with a permitted agent
context; source presence alone does not qualify this operation.

Keeping the maps synchronized

When a change adds/removes a capability or changes its behavior, API, permission, tool binding, CLI support, or work mode, update the affected companion and product recipe as appropriate in the same change. Preserve IDs across renames where the capability is unchanged; update the affected cross-links together. Indexes discover recipes automatically. An API-only change may update the companion without rewriting unchanged user instructions.

maintain-verification-skill owns reconciliation of both maps. It follows changed source and authorization, checks real agent reachability, and records product gaps without implementing them during a maintenance pass. The creation skill uses this structure. verify-paperclip consumes the relevant recipes and reports evidence/drift; map editing belongs to maintenance.

Run the structural check after map changes:

node scripts/check-maps.mjs

It checks paired areas/IDs, navigation metadata, required fields, and local references. It does not certify endpoint authorization, production bindings, operation completeness, or live behavior. Source audits must check those against the existing API and tool contracts; avoid a second schema catalog or runtime.

For live access proof, use Paperclip's existing API/runner/MCP fixtures or an owned isolated instance. Use the actual agent identity, target and work mode. Assert the allowed result and relevant denial (another company/private resource, wrong owner, missing grant, invalid run, restricted mode or resolver). Mutations also need persisted state/attribution and retry behavior. Capture evidence using the existing artifact workflow; keep executed run results separate from generated maps/generated/coverage.json, which lists page references.

Local authorship and generated indexes

Change only the recipes, access contracts and stories whose behavior or intent changed. Feature recipes own navigation metadata; stories own small parameters.paperclip annotations. Keep the feature-map README's readable ID index aligned with those sources; it does not register entries for generation. Do not refresh counts in shared READMEs, inventories, fingerprints or review journals.

node scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs validates and generates aggregate navigation, Storybook data, verification routes and the page inventory. All outputs live in ignored maps/generated/, ui/storybook/generated/, and the ignored Storybook preview.tsx wrapper. Start/build and UI typechecking generate their own inputs. A clean merged checkout therefore assembles both branches' changes automatically.

Git provides history and diffs. PRs, issues and CI artifacts retain review/run evidence for the named revision. Capability associations do not create whole-file review dependencies. Keep durable scenario limits in the affected recipe or story.