mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-14 08:53:19 +01:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The chat-feature eval catalog runs real chat journeys and grades saved state, rendered links and run ledgers. > - The second full-cohort run on master `9296c74e8d` failed 15 cases where the product did the right thing and the harness did not. > - The causes were three harness classes: links read before the reply rendered, raw run counts that rejected product-caused follow-up runs, and keyword graders on free-form replies. Four browser locators also targeted retired controls. > - This pull request fixes those harness layers. It does not change the product. > - The benefit is that these cases measure the feature again: correct behaviour passes, and the relevant broken behaviour still fails. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened** In the second full-cohort chat-eval run on master `9296c74e8d`, these cases failed although the reply and the saved state were correct: `agents.choose-primary`, `cases.case-history`, `budgets-costs.set-budget` (links read about 2s before the reply rendered); `task-coordination.independent-review`, `cases.update-case-facts`, `routines.manage-other-owner`, `questions-and-approvals.review-plan` (a legitimate continuation or the product's completion follow-up exceeded a raw run count or was cancelled); `cases.cases-disabled`, `inbox-search.find-design`, `navigation-preferences.broken-link`, `cases.browse-cases` (keyword or clause graders rejected correct replies); `agent-chat.conference-room`, `workspaces.inspect-git`, `task-coordination.block-on-design`, `skills.author-skill` (browser steps used stale settings or controls). **Expected behavior** A correct reply and correct saved state pass. A wrong outcome, extra or duplicate agent work, a substitution or a missing route still fails. **Steps to reproduce** Run `runner-full-stack-e2e.yml` with `cadence=manual`, `all=false` and an `id` list of the cases above against master `9296c74e8d`. Read `result.json` and `snapshots/` in each cell's evidence. Refs #20600 ## What Changed - `chat-rendered-links.ts`: `collectConversationLinks` waits (at most 10s, once per reply per page) for the latest saved lead reply to render when its conversation is open. A page that does not show the conversation does not wait. `observeInternal` and the flow conversation read use it. - `budgets-costs.set-budget`: waits for the rendered reply before it reads anchors. It fills the budget only after the form shows the saved cap, and checks that the typed value stays. - New `chat-catalog-domains/run-roles.ts`: identifies a run by role (a worker woken by a comment that a named run saved on the task; the CEO's chat completion follow-up). - `task-coordination.independent-review`: admits one Morgan continuation woken by the CEO's authorization comment and one Riley review run. The review request may come from that continuation's native status decision. Other runs still fail. - `cases.update-case-facts`: a phase settles when its CEO turn and at most one Morgan continuation woken by that turn's task comment finish. A new `role-bound-runs` check rejects any other run. `terminal-counts` gets an optional `maximumTerminalStatusCounts`. - `routines.manage-other-owner`: admits one Morgan run on a task that the CEO created for Morgan. A schedule change must be Morgan's own write from that run. The ownership check is structural (a linked owner task, or a link to the routine or Morgan's page). The keyword checks on the reply are removed. - `questions-and-approvals.review-plan`: after the stale-review check, lets the product's completion follow-up settle before final run custody. The existing grader already validates it. - `cases.cases-disabled`: the negation-blind false-claim regex is removed. The case passes with a reply link to the Experimental settings page (the scripted person follows it and sees the Cases control) or a pending choice card. Saved state still proves that nothing was created. - `inbox-search.find-design`: the per-clause regex is removed. The first task link in the reply must be the task with the approved revision. - `navigation-preferences.broken-link`: a link to the similar task fails only when its label names the original (identifier or exact title). A separate mention passes. - `cases.browse-cases`: an excluded case must not be a result row. When the reply has no result list, every case link is a result, so an excluded case must not be linked. - Browser steps: `conference-room` reloads after the fixture enables the flag. `inspect-git` and `block-on-design` open the panel with "Show properties" and pick the tab from the side panel launcher. `author-skill` does not repeat the full inspection in `verifyResult` when `act` already inspected the same saved version. - Each changed case has a new `oracleVersion`. `chat-catalog-descriptors.json` is in sync. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run --config tests/runner-e2e/vitest.config.ts <119 affected test files> --testTimeout=180000`: 1673 passed, 3 skipped. One file (`chat-factual-query-input.test.ts`) did not load in the local worktree because `@paperclipai/plugin-sdk` is not built there. It does not import changed code. CI runs it. - `chat-catalog-consistency.test.ts` passes (242 descriptors). - `npx tsc --noEmit -p tests/runner-e2e`: no errors in changed files. - `node tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.mjs <HEAD> --check`: no pin change. - `node --test` on the three `chat-full-catalog-testops-*.test.mjs` files: 40 passed. - Calibration against retained evidence: the retained replies and run shapes of cases-disabled, browse-cases, find-design, broken-link, independent-review, update-case-facts and manage-other-owner now pass. Broken variants fail (closed case as a result row, earlier design linked first, original label on the similar task's link, unprompted or duplicate worker runs, a second review run, a routine change outside the owner's run, no route link). - Paid runs on this branch: see the PR comments. ## Risks - Low risk. Only eval harness code changes. - The structural graders do not read reply wording. A reply that words the outcome wrongly but links the right records can pass. A person reads the reply. - `navigation-preferences.sidebar-order` is not changed. The shipped sidebar has no per-project order or collapsible Agents section, so the case premise needs an owner decision. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), tool use and code execution in Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
133 lines
13 KiB
TypeScript
133 lines
13 KiB
TypeScript
import { expect, it } from "vitest";
|
|
import { gradeChatCatalogRuns, chatCatalogAllowedRunStatuses, assertExpectedWorkerCancellation, chatCatalogRunStatusAllowed, createChatCatalogFinalRunVerifier, chatCatalogNeverStartedTerminalTaskRun } from "./chat-catalog-run-policy.js";
|
|
import type { ChatRun } from "./chat-flow.js";
|
|
const succeeded: ChatRun = { id: "source-run", companyId: "company", agentId: "ceo", status: "succeeded", runtimeMode: "native", contextSnapshot: { issueId: "source" } };
|
|
const worker: ChatRun = { id: "worker-run", companyId: "company", agentId: "worker", status: "running", runtimeMode: "native", contextSnapshot: { issueId: "task" } };
|
|
const scope = { companyId: "company", leadId: "ceo", source: { id: "source", companyId: "company", title: "Chat", status: "in_review", conversationState: "waiting" } };
|
|
it("requires successful native work by default and exact declared cancellation counts", () => {
|
|
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: { expectedRunCount: 1 }, runs: [succeeded] }).passed).toBe(true);
|
|
const cancelled = { ...succeeded, status: "cancelled" };
|
|
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: { expectedRunCount: 1 }, runs: [cancelled] }).passed).toBe(false);
|
|
const implementation = { expectedRunCount: 1, runPolicy: { kind: "terminal-counts" as const, terminalStatusCounts: { cancelled: 1 } } };
|
|
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [cancelled] }).passed).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [succeeded] }).passed).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
it("admits declared separate active work while rejecting active CEO, wrong scope, unbound and excess work", () => {
|
|
const implementation = { expectedRunCount: 2, runPolicy: { kind: "source-settled-with-active-work" as const, maximumActiveWorkerRuns: 1 } };
|
|
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [succeeded, worker] }).passed).toBe(true);
|
|
for (const bad of [{ ...succeeded, status: "running" }, { ...worker, companyId: "other" }, { ...worker, contextSnapshot: {} }, { ...worker, agentId: "ceo" }])
|
|
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [succeeded, bad] }).passed).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [succeeded, worker, { ...worker, id: "extra" }] }).passed).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
function reassignment() {
|
|
const receipt = { runId: "worker-run", taskId: "task", workerId: "worker", sourceRunId: "final-source" };
|
|
const stopped: ChatRun = { ...worker, status: "cancelled", errorCode: "issue_reassigned", resultJson: {
|
|
reassignmentStopConfirmed: true, nativeCancellation: { schema: "paperclip.native-cancellation.v1", runId: "worker-run", issueId: "task", companyId: "company", dispatchState: "acknowledged", acknowledgedAt: "2026-10-27T10:00:00Z", intentAuditId: "intent", acknowledgementAuditId: "ack" },
|
|
} };
|
|
const implementation = { scenarioId: "tasks.edit-properties", expectedRunCount: 4, minimumRunCount: 3,
|
|
runPolicy: { kind: "source-settled-with-active-work" as const, maximumActiveWorkerRuns: 1, expectedWorkerCancellation: "owned-task-reassignment" as const },
|
|
expectedCancelledWorkerRun: (observation: unknown) => (observation as { proofComplete?: boolean } | undefined)?.proofComplete ? receipt : undefined };
|
|
const observation = { proofComplete: true, state: { heldRun: { ...worker }, heldTask: { id: "task", companyId: "company", assigneeAgentId: "worker", executionRunId: "worker-run" }, riley: { id: "worker" } } };
|
|
return { implementation, stopped, receipt, observation, runs: [succeeded, { ...succeeded, id: "final-source" }, stopped] };
|
|
}
|
|
it("defers only the declared worker cancellation during polling and requires final independent proof", () => {
|
|
const v = reassignment();
|
|
expect(chatCatalogAllowedRunStatuses(v.implementation)).toContain("cancelled");
|
|
expect(chatCatalogRunStatusAllowed({ ...scope, implementation: v.implementation, run: v.stopped, observation: { ...v.observation, proofComplete: false } })).toBe(true);
|
|
for (const run of [{ ...v.stopped, id: "other" }, { ...v.stopped, agentId: "ceo" }, { ...v.stopped, companyId: "foreign" }, { ...v.stopped, errorCode: "user_cancelled" }])
|
|
expect(chatCatalogRunStatusAllowed({ ...scope, implementation: v.implementation, run, observation: v.observation })).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: v.implementation, runs: v.runs }).passed).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: v.implementation, runs: v.runs, observation: v.observation }).passed).toBe(true);
|
|
// No cancellation remains a valid genuine ownership-denied branch; no proof is invented.
|
|
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: v.implementation, runs: [succeeded, { ...succeeded, id: "final-source" }, worker] }).passed).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
it("rejects wrong cancellation identities, scope, reason, acknowledgement and unrelated cancelled work", () => {
|
|
const mutations = [
|
|
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.receipt.runId = "unrelated"; },
|
|
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.receipt.taskId = "other-task"; },
|
|
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.receipt.workerId = "other-worker"; },
|
|
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.receipt.sourceRunId = "unrelated-source"; },
|
|
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.stopped.companyId = "foreign"; },
|
|
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.stopped.agentId = "ceo"; },
|
|
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.stopped.errorCode = "user_cancelled"; },
|
|
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.stopped.resultJson!.reassignmentStopConfirmed = false; },
|
|
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { (v.stopped.resultJson!.nativeCancellation as Record<string, unknown>).dispatchState = "pending"; },
|
|
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { (v.stopped.resultJson!.nativeCancellation as Record<string, unknown>).issueId = "other-task"; },
|
|
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.runs.push({ ...v.stopped, id: "another-cancelled-run" }); },
|
|
];
|
|
for (const mutate of mutations) { const v = reassignment(); mutate(v); expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: v.implementation, runs: v.runs, observation: v.observation }).passed).toBe(false); }
|
|
});
|
|
it("requires exact scenario/flag/callback and leaves every undeclared active-work case unchanged", () => {
|
|
const v = reassignment();
|
|
expect(() => assertExpectedWorkerCancellation(v.implementation)).not.toThrow();
|
|
for (const implementation of [
|
|
{ ...v.implementation, scenarioId: "tasks.assignment-conflict" },
|
|
{ ...v.implementation, expectedCancelledWorkerRun: undefined },
|
|
{ ...v.implementation, runPolicy: { kind: "source-settled-with-active-work" as const, maximumActiveWorkerRuns: 1 } },
|
|
]) { expect(() => assertExpectedWorkerCancellation(implementation)).toThrow(); expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: v.runs, observation: v.observation }).passed).toBe(false); }
|
|
expect(chatCatalogAllowedRunStatuses({ runPolicy: { kind: "source-settled-with-active-work", maximumActiveWorkerRuns: 1 } })).not.toContain("cancelled");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("binds cancellation proof presence through the actual lazy registry loader", async () => {
|
|
const { loadChatCatalogImplementation } = await import("./chat-catalog-registry.js");
|
|
const v = reassignment(); const { expectedCancelledWorkerRun, ...metadata } = v.implementation;
|
|
const descriptor = { ...metadata, modulePath: "./chat-catalog-domains/internal-tasks.js", exportName: "cases", sourceFiles: ["chat-catalog-domains/internal-edit-ownership.ts"], oracleVersion: "test", turnTimeoutMs: 120_000, attemptTimeoutMs: 600_000 };
|
|
const implementation = { ...descriptor, expectedCancelledWorkerRun, setup: async () => ({}), observe: async () => ({}), grade: () => ({ passed: true, checks: [{ id: "actual-proof", passed: true, detail: "Fixture-only registry control" }] }), verifyResult: async () => {} };
|
|
await expect(loadChatCatalogImplementation(descriptor, async () => ({ cases: [implementation] }))).resolves.toBe(implementation);
|
|
await expect(loadChatCatalogImplementation(descriptor, async () => ({ cases: [{ ...implementation, expectedCancelledWorkerRun: undefined }] }))).rejects.toThrow("cancellation proof");
|
|
const wrongDescriptor = { ...descriptor, scenarioId: "tasks.assignment-conflict" };
|
|
await expect(loadChatCatalogImplementation(wrongDescriptor, async () => ({ cases: [{ ...implementation, scenarioId: wrongDescriptor.scenarioId }] }))).rejects.toThrow("cancellation proof");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
it("retains the executable cancellation proof at the outer final-run boundary", () => {
|
|
const v = reassignment();
|
|
const verify = createChatCatalogFinalRunVerifier({ implementation: v.implementation, companyId: scope.companyId,
|
|
leadId: scope.leadId, observation: v.observation });
|
|
expect(verify(scope.source, v.runs).passed).toBe(true);
|
|
// JSON declarations cannot replace the executable independent proof callback.
|
|
expect(() => createChatCatalogFinalRunVerifier({ implementation: JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(v.implementation)),
|
|
companyId: scope.companyId, leadId: scope.leadId, observation: v.observation })).toThrow("cancellation proof");
|
|
for (const run of [
|
|
{ ...v.stopped, errorCode: "user_cancelled" },
|
|
{ ...v.stopped, companyId: "foreign" },
|
|
{ ...v.stopped, resultJson: { ...v.stopped.resultJson, nativeCancellation: { ...(v.stopped.resultJson!.nativeCancellation as object), dispatchState: "pending" } } },
|
|
]) expect(verify(scope.source, v.runs.map(row => row.id === run.id ? run : row)).passed).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(verify(scope.source, [...v.runs, { ...v.stopped, id: "new-cancellation" }]).passed).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(verify({ ...scope.source, id: "different-source" }, v.runs).passed).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("keeps an ordinary ownership-denial boundary strict without a cancellation declaration", () => {
|
|
const implementation = { expectedRunCount: 2,
|
|
runPolicy: { kind: "source-settled-with-active-work" as const, maximumActiveWorkerRuns: 1 } };
|
|
const verify = createChatCatalogFinalRunVerifier({ implementation, companyId: scope.companyId,
|
|
leadId: scope.leadId, observation: undefined });
|
|
expect(verify(scope.source, [succeeded, worker]).passed).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(verify(scope.source, [succeeded, { ...worker, status: "cancelled" }]).passed).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
it("treats only a never-started run cancelled by its own task's terminal status as lifecycle, and still grades it", () => {
|
|
// Shape recorded for tasks.website-task: the agent cancelled its own stray task before the queued run started.
|
|
const queued: ChatRun = { id: "stray-run", companyId: "company", agentId: "ceo", status: "cancelled", runtimeMode: "legacy", startedAt: null,
|
|
errorCode: "issue_terminal_status", error: "Cancelled because issue reached terminal status (cancelled) before the queued run could start",
|
|
resultJson: { stopReason: "issue_terminal_status", timeoutFired: false }, contextSnapshot: { issueId: "stray-task", wakeReason: "issue_assigned" } };
|
|
expect(chatCatalogNeverStartedTerminalTaskRun(queued, scope.source)).toBe(true);
|
|
for (const run of [{ ...queued, startedAt: "2026-11-09T15:27:00Z" }, { ...queued, errorCode: "user_cancelled" }, { ...queued, status: "failed" },
|
|
{ ...queued, resultJson: {} }, { ...queued, contextSnapshot: { issueId: "source" } }, { ...queued, contextSnapshot: {} }])
|
|
expect(chatCatalogNeverStartedTerminalTaskRun(run, scope.source)).toBe(false);
|
|
const implementation = { expectedRunCount: 3, runPolicy: { kind: "source-settled-with-active-work" as const, maximumActiveWorkerRuns: 1 } };
|
|
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [succeeded, worker, queued] }).passed).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
it("admits a declared role-bound range above an exact terminal count, and nothing beyond it", () => {
|
|
const cancelled = { ...succeeded, id: "stopped", status: "cancelled" };
|
|
const ok = (id: string) => ({ ...succeeded, id });
|
|
const implementation = { expectedRunCount: 6, minimumRunCount: 4, runPolicy: { kind: "terminal-counts" as const, terminalStatusCounts: { cancelled: 1, succeeded: 3 }, maximumTerminalStatusCounts: { succeeded: 5 } } };
|
|
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [cancelled, ok("a"), ok("b"), ok("c")] }).passed).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [cancelled, ok("a"), ok("b"), ok("c"), ok("d"), ok("e")] }).passed).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [cancelled, ok("a"), ok("b")] }).passed).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: { ...implementation, expectedRunCount: 7 }, runs: [cancelled, ok("a"), ok("b"), ok("c"), ok("d"), ok("e"), ok("f")] }).passed).toBe(false);
|
|
// A maximum may only widen a status the exact counts already declare.
|
|
const undeclared = { ...implementation, runPolicy: { ...implementation.runPolicy, maximumTerminalStatusCounts: { failed: 1 } } };
|
|
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: undeclared, runs: [cancelled, ok("a"), ok("b"), ok("c")] }).passed).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|