## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Contributors and agents read the docs under `doc/` before they change code > - `doc/SPEC.md` and `doc/SPEC-implementation.md` were out of date. `doc/SPEC-implementation.md` became an append-only log: in 60 days it got about 1,645 new lines and lost 181, across 140 commits > - #20557 changed `AGENTS.md` so the code and its tests are the source of truth, and the specs are only background > - This pull request removes the two spec docs. It moves only the sections that live code comments cite into focused docs, and it repoints all other references > - The benefit is one less stale document that agents read and append to ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20557 (merged). This PR is the follow-up that removes the docs. It is based on `master`, which already contains #20557. **Issue type** Outdated content. The docs are out of date and conflict with the code. **Where is the issue?** `doc/SPEC.md`, `doc/SPEC-implementation.md`, and the code comments and docs that cite them. **What's wrong?** `doc/SPEC.md` and `doc/SPEC-implementation.md` are out of date, but agents still read them and append a paragraph with each fix. **Suggested fix** Delete both files. Move the sections that code cites into focused docs. Repoint the references. ## What Changed - Deleted `doc/SPEC.md` and `doc/SPEC-implementation.md`. - Moved these spec sections, because live code comments cite them: - §9.3.1 "Shared default-open issue writes" → new section in `doc/agent-permission-defaults.md`. - §9.8.1 "Issue-thread interaction resolver contract" → `doc/execution-semantics.md`, "Issue-thread interaction resolution". That section already had most of the contract. I added only the missing parts: the `supersedeOnUserComment` default, the canonical policy list, the addressee and cap rules, the rule that surfaces show the server's effective audience, and the cross-issue budget charge. The short policy summary at the top of the section now points to the list, so the definitions occur one time only. - §9.9 "Task Watchdog Authority Contract" → new "Authority contract" section in `doc/TASK-WATCHDOG.md`. It holds the allowed and disallowed mutation lists and the deferred capabilities. The atomic recovery batch, restoration verification, and interaction rules were already in `doc/execution-semantics.md` §11, so the new section links there and does not repeat them. I did not move the "Downstream acceptance criteria" checklist or the sentence about the CTO and Security sign-off. These were implementation-time notes; the tests now hold that coverage. - §9.10 "Company Skill Policy Contract" → new `doc/company-skill-policy.md`. No focused doc had this contract. I did not move the "Required regression tests" phase checklist. - Did not move any other part of the specs. - Repointed code comments that cited spec sections: - `packages/shared/src/issue-write-denial.ts` (§9.3) → `doc/agent-permission-defaults.md` - `server/src/routes/issues.ts` (§9.9) → `doc/TASK-WATCHDOG.md`, "Authority contract" - `server/src/routes/issues.ts` (§9.3, §9.8.1 cross-issue budget) → `doc/agent-permission-defaults.md` - `ui/src/lib/interaction-audience.ts` and `ui/src/components/InteractionGovernancePanel.tsx` (§9.8.1) → `doc/execution-semantics.md` - `ui/src/lib/skill-policy-denial.ts`, `ui/src/pages/CompanySkills.tsx`, `ui/src/pages/CompanySkills.production.tsx`, `ui/src/pages/SkillStudio.tsx` (§9.10) → `doc/company-skill-policy.md` - `server/src/services/recovery/ownership-invariant-report.ts` (monitor deadline wait path) → `doc/execution-semantics.md` §8. That section already lists the one-shot monitor as a valid wait path. - Resynced the git blob pin for `packages/shared/src/issue-write-denial.ts` in `tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.json`. The comment edit changed the file's hash, and the Runner support suite checks that pin. I used `node tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.mjs <HEAD> --write`; only that one pin changed. - Updated `AGENTS.md` §1 so it does not name the deleted files. - Removed the links to the deleted files from `doc/plugins/PLUGIN_SPEC.md`. - Updated the `doc-maintenance` agent skill (`.agents/skills/doc-maintenance/`) so it no longer audits or stages `doc/SPEC.md`. - Removed or replaced references in `maps/README.md`, `maps/feature-map/README.md`, `maps/storybook-map/README.md`, `doc/PRODUCT.md`, `doc/CLIPHUB.md`, `doc/DEPLOYMENT-MODES.md`, `doc/DEVELOPING.md`, `doc/evals.md`, `doc/spec/agent-runs.md`, `doc/AGENTCOMPANIES_SPEC_INVENTORY.md`, `doc/connections/CONNECTOR-PLAYBOOK.md`, `doc/plugins/ideas-from-opencode.md`, `doc/execution-semantics.md`, `doc/TASK-WATCHDOG.md`, and `.devin/wiki.json`. - In `doc/execution-semantics.md`, the "admission is independent of cleanup and accounting" reference now states the rule inline: only a hard stop, an explicit pause, or an inactive company refuses admission. - Kept these references as they are: dated plans in `doc/plans/` and `docs/plans/`, the dated log `doc/logs/2026-05-24-cli-api-parity-e2e-log.md`, `releases/`, the transcript fixture `ui/src/fixtures/runTranscriptFixtures.ts` (it uses the filename only as sample text), and `docs/specs/external-task-protocol.md` (it refers to the Symphony project's own `SPEC.md`). ## Verification - `git grep -n "SPEC-implementation\|SPEC\.md"` (without `releases/`, and ignoring `PLUGIN_SPEC.md` citations) finds only the kept references listed above. - `grep -rn "§9\.\(3\|8\|9\|10\)" ui/src server/src packages/shared/src` finds no results. - `node scripts/check-maps.mjs`: "Maps aligned: 35 areas, 192 capability IDs". - `pnpm check:token-gates`: "All gates clean". - `pnpm exec vitest run --config tests/runner-e2e/vitest.config.ts tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-type.test.ts tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-evidence.test.ts`: 45 passed. These failed in CI before the pin resync. - `pnpm verify`: exit 2 ("Broader verification required") because `AGENTS.md` is a global CI input. Required CI supplies the broad coverage for this revision. - All code changes are comments only. No runtime behavior changes. The title uses `refactor:` because comments in source files changed. ## Risks - Low risk. The change removes docs and edits comments only. - A reader can lose context from spec sections that I did not move. The text stays in git history. The code and its tests are the source of truth. - External links to the two deleted files will return 404. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), in Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits). Standard context window. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused checks above; CI supplies broad coverage) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable (not applicable: docs and comments only) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
9.6 KiB
Deployment Modes
Status: Canonical deployment and auth mode model
Date: 2026-02-23
Paperclip Cloud sign-in
Cloud-managed instances use Cloud for human sign-in. The instance /auth
route waits for deployment metadata before rendering; it never renders the
email/password form when health identifies a Cloud-managed instance. A missing
instance session returns through Cloud's /v1/stacks/:slug/entry-redirect.
Cloud renews the tenant session from the existing Cloud session, or sends the
user through its sign-in flow. The original tenant path, query, and fragment
travel as returnTo so the user returns to the same task.
Both the Cloud origin and stack slug come from the server's health metadata
(PAPERCLIP_CLOUD_API_ORIGIN and PAPERCLIP_STACK_SLUG). Do not infer the
environment from the browser hostname or hardcode staging/production domains.
Missing configuration shows an unavailable state. An automatic recovery attempt
is limited per browser tab until a session is verified, with a five-minute
expiry and an explicit retry link if recovery fails. Network/server failures
show an error rather than treating the user as signed out.
Self-hosted authenticated instances retain their instance sign-in form, and
local_trusted instances retain their normal access path.
Cloud stack Admins can change experimental settings on their dedicated instance. This permission comes from the current trusted Cloud stack role and does not grant other instance-admin powers. Members, Support users, and agents cannot change experiments. Operator-hidden settings and Cloud-managed feature values remain protected. Staging allows saved overrides for its editable experiments; production retains its managed feature policy.
1. Purpose
Paperclip supports two runtime modes:
local_trustedauthenticated
authenticated supports two exposure policies:
privatepublic
This keeps one authenticated auth stack while still separating low-friction private-network defaults from internet-facing hardening requirements.
Paperclip now treats bind as a separate concern from auth:
- auth model:
local_trustedvsauthenticated, plusprivate/public - reachability model:
server.bind = loopback | lan | tailnet | custom
2. Canonical Model
| Runtime Mode | Exposure | Human auth | Primary use |
|---|---|---|---|
local_trusted |
n/a | No login required | Single-operator local machine workflow |
authenticated |
private |
Login required | Private-network access (for example Tailscale/VPN/LAN) |
authenticated |
public |
Login required | Internet-facing/cloud deployment |
Reachability Model
| Bind | Meaning | Typical use |
|---|---|---|
loopback |
Listen on localhost only | default local usage, reverse-proxy deployments |
lan |
Listen on all interfaces (0.0.0.0) |
LAN/VPN/private-network access |
tailnet |
Listen on a detected Tailscale IP | Tailscale-only access |
custom |
Listen on an explicit host/IP | advanced interface-specific setups |
3. Security Policy
local_trusted
- loopback-only host binding
- no human login flow
- optimized for fastest local startup
authenticated + private
- login required
- low-friction URL handling (
autobase URL mode) - private-host trust policy required
- Better Auth request rate limiting is off by default for private mode to keep local/LAN repair loops from locking out the operator; set
PAPERCLIP_AUTH_RATE_LIMIT_ENABLED=trueto opt in - bind can be
loopback,lan,tailnet, orcustom
authenticated + public
- login required
- explicit public URL required
- stricter deployment checks and failures in doctor
- Better Auth request rate limiting is on by default; set
PAPERCLIP_AUTH_RATE_LIMIT_ENABLED=falseonly when an explicit front-door limiter covers the deployment - recommended bind is
loopbackbehind a reverse proxy; directlan/customis advanced - local stdio MCP runtime slots fail closed by default; set
PAPERCLIP_TRUSTED_MCP_RUNTIME_HOSTonly when a trusted worker/runtime host is configured to supervise those processes. Remote HTTP MCP remains the preferred public-hosted path.
Paperclip Cloud warm-pool identity
A Cloud-managed warm-pool process initially boots under a pool-* origin. It
receives only Cloud's public verification set in
PAPERCLIP_CLOUD_RUNTIME_IDENTITY_JWKS. Before Cloud activates a claimed stack,
the existing server-to-server health request carries a short-lived Ed25519 JWS
that binds the immutable PAPERCLIP_CLOUD_STACK_ID, pool claim, previous
origin, canonical HTTPS origin, and slug. Paperclip verifies and persists that
one-time assertion, updates its live public/API URL provider, and acknowledges
the exact origin in /api/health before the first user request is admitted.
The Harness signing private key is never present in Paperclip, browsers, or
other tenant stacks. A different claim or destination cannot replace the
persisted identity. On restart, the durable identity is loaded before auth,
routes, and child-runtime configuration, even when provider variables are
temporarily stale. Self-hosted deployments continue to use their configured
PAPERCLIP_PUBLIC_URL and do not participate in this protocol.
4. Onboarding UX Contract
Default onboarding remains interactive and flagless:
pnpm paperclipai onboard
Server prompt behavior:
- quickstart
--yesdefaults toserver.bind=loopbackand thereforelocal_trusted/private - advanced server setup asks reachability first:
Trusted local→bind=loopback,local_trusted/privatePrivate network→bind=lan,authenticated/privateTailnet→bind=tailnet,authenticated/privateCustom→ manual mode/exposure/host entry
- raw host entry is only required for the
Custompath - explicit public URL is only required for
authenticated + public
Examples:
pnpm paperclipai onboard --yes
npx paperclipai onboard --yes --bind lan
npx paperclipai run --bind tailnet
configure --section server follows the same interactive behavior.
5. Doctor UX Contract
Default doctor remains flagless:
pnpm paperclipai doctor
Doctor reads configured mode/exposure and applies mode-aware checks. Optional override flags are secondary.
6. Board/User Integration Contract
Board identity must be represented by a real DB user principal for user-based features to work consistently.
Required integration points:
- real user row in
authUsersfor Board identity instance_user_rolesentry for Board admin authoritycompany_membershipsintegration for user-level task assignment and access
This is required because user assignment paths validate active membership for assigneeUserId.
7. Local Trusted -> Authenticated Claim Flow
When running authenticated mode, if the only instance admin is local-board, Paperclip emits a startup warning with a one-time high-entropy claim URL.
- URL format:
/board-claim/<token>?code=<code> - intended use: signed-in human claims board ownership
- claim action:
- promotes current signed-in user to
instance_admin - demotes
local-boardadmin role - ensures active owner membership for the claiming user across existing companies
- promotes current signed-in user to
This prevents lockout when a user migrates from long-running local trusted usage to authenticated mode.
8. First Admin Setup For Fresh Authenticated Installs
Fresh authenticated installs start in bootstrap_pending until the first
instance_admin exists.
For authenticated/private, Paperclip supports a browser-first setup path:
- open the Paperclip URL from the private network or appliance UI
- sign in or create a Paperclip account
- choose
Claim this instanceon the setup screen
That browser claim promotes the signed-in session user to the first instance
admin and then falls through to normal onboarding. The endpoint is available
only to real browser session actors in authenticated/private; unauthenticated
requests, agent keys, board API keys, and local implicit board actors are
rejected.
This is intentionally a first-claim bootstrap contract: before an instance
admin exists, the first authenticated browser session that completes the claim
wins. Operators must keep a bootstrap_pending private deployment on a trusted
network and complete setup before admitting untrusted users. This behavior is
not an account-recovery or public-deployment mechanism.
The CLI fallback remains supported in all authenticated setup states:
pnpm paperclipai auth bootstrap-ceo
That command prints a one-time first-admin invite URL. Browser claim and bootstrap invite acceptance share the same first-admin transaction, so whichever path wins first makes later attempts return a conflict.
For authenticated/public, browser first-admin claim is intentionally disabled.
Public deployments must use the high-entropy bootstrap invite path unless a
future public-hosted setup design explicitly changes this policy.
9. Current Code Reality (As Of 2026-02-23)
- runtime values are
local_trusted | authenticated authenticateduses Better Auth sessions and bootstrap invite flowlocal_trustedensures a real local Board user principal inauthUserswithinstance_user_rolesadmin access- company creation ensures creator membership in
company_membershipsso user assignment/access flows remain consistent
10. Naming and Compatibility Policy
- canonical naming is
local_trustedandauthenticatedwithprivate/publicexposure - no long-term compatibility alias layer for discarded naming variants
11. Relationship to Other Docs
- implementation plan:
doc/plans/2026-02-23-deployment-auth-mode-consolidation.md - operator workflows:
doc/DEVELOPING.mdanddoc/CLI.md - invite/join state map:
doc/spec/invite-flow.md