Files
PaperClipAI/ui/src/lib/agent-config-patch.ts
T
DottaandPaperclip 4b6de5327e Remove cheap model profiles (#12683)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages agents that use different model providers and
adapters.
> - Paperclip must keep agent execution rules clear and predictable.
> - The cheap-model profile added a second execution mode across
adapters, task recovery, APIs, and the UI.
> - That mode increased configuration and recovery complexity.
> - This pull request removes the cheap-model profile as a product
feature.
> - The benefit is one model-selection path for normal work and recovery
work.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

This change simplifies model selection across agent configuration, task
execution, recovery, and adapter capabilities.

**Current behavior**

Paperclip exposes cheap-model profiles in adapter metadata, agent
runtime configuration, task overrides, recovery rules, APIs, and the
board UI. Recovery work can select a different model profile from the
agent's configured model.

**Proposed behavior**

Paperclip uses the agent's configured model for normal work and recovery
work. Status-only recovery stays limited to coordination work. The API
rejects legacy model-profile configuration. A migration removes stored
model-profile values from existing agent, issue, and historical revision
records.

**Reason and benefit**

One model path reduces configuration, API, UI, and recovery complexity.
It also prevents status recovery from becoming a separate product-level
model-routing feature.

**Breaking changes**

This change removes model-profile fields and adapter capability
metadata. Existing stored model-profile values are removed by an
idempotent migration. The validators reject new legacy profile values
with clear errors.

## What Changed

- Removed model-profile types, adapter capabilities, API fields, and
model selection logic.
- Removed cheap-model controls from agent and task UI surfaces.
- Kept status-only recovery limited to coordination context while normal
continuations use the configured agent model.
- Added an idempotent migration that removes stored model-profile values
from agents, issues, and configuration revisions without changing issue
update timestamps.
- Updated tests and product documentation for the single-model behavior.

## Verification

- `pnpm check:token-gates` passes.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` passes.
- `pnpm build` passes.
- `pnpm test:run` completed with 5,607 passing tests and 8
environment-sensitive failures in unrelated fixed-port and
database-deadlock suites. The same failures repeated in an isolated
rerun. CI is the final clean-room result.

## Risks

- This is an intentional breaking change for clients that send
model-profile fields.
- The migration changes legacy agent, issue, and configuration-revision
JSON. It is idempotent and preserves unrelated fields and issue update
timestamps.
- The change is cross-cutting because the removed feature existed in
adapters, shared contracts, the server, plugins, and the UI.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex with `gpt-5`. Reasoning and tool use were enabled. The
runtime did not expose the context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-01 14:57:38 -05:00

82 lines
2.6 KiB
TypeScript

import { ADAPTER_AGNOSTIC_KEYS, type Agent } from "@paperclipai/shared";
export interface AgentConfigOverlay {
identity: Record<string, unknown>;
adapterType?: string;
adapterConfig: Record<string, unknown>;
heartbeat: Record<string, unknown>;
debug: Record<string, unknown>;
runtime: Record<string, unknown>;
}
export function omitUndefinedEntries(value: Record<string, unknown>) {
return Object.fromEntries(
Object.entries(value).filter(([, entryValue]) => entryValue !== undefined),
);
}
export function buildAgentUpdatePatch(agent: Agent, overlay: AgentConfigOverlay) {
const patch: Record<string, unknown> = {};
if (Object.keys(overlay.identity).length > 0) {
Object.assign(patch, overlay.identity);
}
if (overlay.adapterType !== undefined) {
patch.adapterType = overlay.adapterType;
}
if (overlay.adapterType !== undefined || Object.keys(overlay.adapterConfig).length > 0) {
const existing = (agent.adapterConfig ?? {}) as Record<string, unknown>;
const nextAdapterConfig =
overlay.adapterType !== undefined
? {
...Object.fromEntries(
ADAPTER_AGNOSTIC_KEYS
.filter((key) => existing[key] !== undefined)
.map((key) => [key, existing[key]]),
),
...overlay.adapterConfig,
}
: {
...existing,
...overlay.adapterConfig,
};
patch.adapterConfig = omitUndefinedEntries(nextAdapterConfig);
patch.replaceAdapterConfig = true;
}
if (
Object.keys(overlay.heartbeat).length > 0
|| Object.keys(overlay.debug).length > 0
) {
const existingRc = (agent.runtimeConfig ?? {}) as Record<string, unknown>;
const nextRuntimeConfig: Record<string, unknown> = (patch.runtimeConfig as Record<string, unknown> | undefined)
?? { ...existingRc };
if (Object.keys(overlay.heartbeat).length > 0) {
const existingHb = (existingRc.heartbeat ?? {}) as Record<string, unknown>;
nextRuntimeConfig.heartbeat = { ...existingHb, ...overlay.heartbeat };
}
if (Object.keys(overlay.debug).length > 0) {
const existingDebug = (existingRc.debug ?? {}) as Record<string, unknown>;
const nextDebug = omitUndefinedEntries({ ...existingDebug, ...overlay.debug });
if (Object.keys(nextDebug).length === 0) {
delete nextRuntimeConfig.debug;
} else {
nextRuntimeConfig.debug = nextDebug;
}
}
patch.runtimeConfig = nextRuntimeConfig;
}
if (Object.keys(overlay.runtime).length > 0) {
Object.assign(patch, overlay.runtime);
}
return patch;
}