mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-09 16:02:36 +01:00
DottaandPaperclip
1c91bacf97
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work done by AI agents. > - A completed native run must deliver its saved final response. > - The response worker also recovers retained replies that can wait on publication locks. > - A pass waited for its old publication groups even when other check slots were free. > - This could delay an independent final reply beyond a full page of retained candidates. > - This PR enables the existing shared coordinator option that admits independent due work during an active pass. > - Existing authority checks, resource keys and the four-check limit still control publication. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A native run completed after replacement recovery. Its final response and accounting were saved, but its final issue reply was missing. The response queue contained more than 100 retained chat replies and repeated endpoint-lock failures. The existing worker did not admit independent due entries until its current groups finished. **Expected behavior** A contended publication owner must not hold free worker slots. An independent accepted final reply must publish once, including when its candidate is on a later SQL page. **Steps to reproduce** Create 100 accepted, committed replies that share one publication owner. Create an independent reply after them in candidate order. Hold the old coordinator rows with a database transaction and start the real response worker. Before this change, the independent reply stays unpublished until the old group is released. Related: #18977 changes response selection in standing conversations. This PR changes only worker admission and preserves response selection. ## What Changed - Enable `admitDueWhileActive` in the native response worker's existing shared coordinator configuration. - Add a real PostgreSQL regression with the full 100-row SQL page, the default dispatch batch, real row-lock contention and a later-page independent reply. - Verify one comment per reply after settlement and no further SQL or scheduled deadline across 60 seconds of idle time. - Update one existing principal/rescope integration assertion to observe the reconciled invalidation revision. Keep its actual per-run replies, authorization, publication and idle checks. ## Verification - Regression on the unchanged worker: the independent reply remained unpublished while the first 100 replies were locked. The real PostgreSQL test failed as expected. - Final head `748fb9609104c016c33ff7caf282ba9e15e88495`: all six publication regressions and both principal/rescope controls passed (8/8, 47.96 seconds). Checks cover later-page admission, exact per-run comment counts, retry and rollback behavior, authorization, and 60 seconds with no idle SQL or scheduled deadline. - The tests used the canonical PostgreSQL wrapper and one owned disposable PostgreSQL 18.1 fixture. All clients and test databases were closed before fixture cleanup. - The current-head [full CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42338953241) supplies typecheck, build and broad test coverage. All current-head checks passed; the merge gate is green. - Local full typecheck was blocked by unbuilt dependencies; it is not counted as a pass. The prior timer-state CI failure and the final successful rescope-generation regression remain recorded. - Greptile reviewed the final head at 5/5 with no unresolved threads. `git diff --check` passed. - Deployed acceptance remains separate. No serving instance was changed by the PR tests. ## Risks The worker can now use free slots during a slow pass. The shared coordinator still limits checks to four and preserves task, endpoint and principal exclusions. Authorization, result identity, retry limits, response selection and transaction ownership are unchanged. The regression checks idle quiet after all concrete obligations settle. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6.1 (`gpt-6.1-sol`), with reasoning, code execution and tool use. The runtime does not expose the context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>