mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-24 01:41:42 +02:00
Dotta
1955b0e2d8
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agent adapters control how Paperclip starts and resumes an agent runtime. > - Paperclip Runner is an experimental Rust runtime and must stay opt-in. > - The server already rejected new runner selections when the flag was off. > - Some setup and onboarding views did not enforce the same boundary. > - This pull request exposes the existing flag and applies it to every new setup path. > - The benefit is a safe rollout with unchanged legacy onboarding and recoverable existing native runs. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** This improves experimental adapter selection in Settings, onboarding, new-agent setup, invite setup, and company import. **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting: the React UI and the server onboarding seed service. **Current behavior** The server defaulted Paperclip Runner to off, but Settings did not expose the flag. First-run onboarding could show the runner after opt-in. A direct new-agent URL and some setup pickers could also reveal native runner configuration before the availability check completed. **Proposed behavior** Settings has a default-off Paperclip Runner toggle. Explicit agent configuration shows the runner only after the server reports that the flag is enabled. First-run and invite onboarding always use legacy adapters. Existing native agents and runs remain readable and recoverable. **Reason and benefit** This keeps the experimental runtime out of normal onboarding. It also gives administrators one clear opt-in before users can create a native runner agent. **Breaking changes** None. Legacy adapter selection and execution stay unchanged. Existing native records remain available. ## What Changed - Added the Paperclip Runner opt-in to Experimental Settings. - Refreshed adapter availability after the setting changes. - Kept UI and server-seeded onboarding on legacy adapters. - Made native runner choices fail closed in new-agent, invite, and import setup. - Preserved edit and recovery behavior for existing native agents and runs. - Added focused regression tests for flag-off and flag-on behavior. ## Verification - GitHub Actions will run the repository test, typecheck, build, and policy gates. - Focused tests cover Settings, onboarding, agent creation, invite setup, import setup, and server-seeded onboarding. - No local test suite was run, per the maintainer request to use GitHub Actions for verification. - `git diff --check` passes. ## Risks Low risk. The change narrows new adapter selection only. The server remains the final enforcement point. Existing native records do not depend on the current flag value for read or recovery behavior. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge