mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-11 23:36:51 +02:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Issue interactions give agents and people a structured decision record. > - Resolver routes used different authorization rules. > - Some routes blocked valid agents, including task watchdogs with normal issue access. > - The API did not show who could resolve a pending interaction. > - This pull request gives every interaction kind one resolver policy evaluator. > - The benefit is a clear decision path with consistent governance and company isolation. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Fixes: #8087 Refs: #7403 Related PR: #11082 proposes board-only confirmation rules. This change keeps human-only review as an explicit policy. **What happened?** Agents could create issue interactions. Some resolver routes still required board access. This left valid agent confirmations pending. Task watchdogs could see the same problem without board identity. **Expected behavior** Every interaction kind must use one resolver policy contract. The contract must support `anyone`, `not_creator`, and `human_only`. It must also apply all normal governance controls. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create a `request_confirmation` interaction as an agent. 2. Resolve it with another authorized agent. 3. Observe the board-only denial. **Paperclip version or commit** The problem exists on `master` before this change. **Deployment mode** Local development with `pnpm dev`. ## What Changed - Add canonical policies for `anyone`, `not_creator`, and `human_only`. - Use one server evaluator for every interaction kind. - Apply named addressees, company limits, review rules, and task watchdog scope. - Charge cross-issue resolutions to the existing per-run action limit. - Return the effective resolver audience in attention and interaction data. - Show the audience, governance choices, and denial reasons in the board UI. - Add telemetry, API documents, product documents, and regression fixtures. - Add migration provenance for safe legacy behavior. - Make migration `0218` safe for complete replays and partial prior runs. ## Product Rules - An interaction records a response. It does not grant authority for the next action. - `anyone` lets any authorized issue participant respond. - `not_creator` requires a responder other than the interaction creator. - `human_only` requires an authorized person. - A named addressee, company policy, or governed action can narrow the audience. - These controls cannot widen the audience. - A task watchdog uses the same rules as an ordinary agent. - A task watchdog does not receive board authority. - An agent resolution on another issue uses the shared cross-issue action limit. - Legacy pending interactions keep their earlier restrictions. - The UI shows the effective audience and a permanent denial reason. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db check:migrations` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck` - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/db/src/issue-thread-interaction-resolver-policy-migration.test.ts` - The focused PostgreSQL test applies migration `0218` twice. - The test also completes a partial prior run and preserves existing provenance. - The latest GitHub head has 29 successful checks. - The opt-in Storybook visual check skipped as expected. - Greptile reports 5/5 with no open comments. ## Risks - New interaction writes use `anyone` by default. - Callers must select `not_creator` or `human_only` when they need stricter review. - Legacy pending interactions keep the old creator and human restrictions. - Migration `0218` fills only missing provenance fields during recovery. - Cross-issue resolutions can reach the existing action limit. - The shared evaluator affects every interaction kind. - Route, service, database, shared contract, and UI tests cover these rules. > This work matches the Agent Reviews and Approvals direction in `ROADMAP.md`. It does not duplicate a planned item. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5. The runtime does not expose the exact deployment ID or context window. The agent used reasoning, repository tools, shell commands, and test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either linked public issues or described the issue with the required labels - [x] I have not referenced internal Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal ticket id - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation - [x] I have considered and documented the risks - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open comments - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
336 lines
12 KiB
TypeScript
336 lines
12 KiB
TypeScript
import type {
|
|
IssueThreadInteractionCanonicalResolverPolicy,
|
|
IssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicy,
|
|
} from "@paperclipai/shared";
|
|
import { normalizeIssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicy } from "@paperclipai/shared";
|
|
import { HttpError } from "../errors.js";
|
|
|
|
export const ISSUE_THREAD_INTERACTION_RESOLUTION_DENIAL_CODES = [
|
|
"interaction_not_found",
|
|
"interaction_run_attribution_required",
|
|
"interaction_scope_denied",
|
|
"interaction_human_only",
|
|
"interaction_creator_excluded",
|
|
"interaction_addressee_mismatch",
|
|
"interaction_stale_target",
|
|
"interaction_superseded",
|
|
"interaction_already_resolved",
|
|
"interaction_issue_closed",
|
|
"interaction_governed_action_denied",
|
|
"review_policy_denied",
|
|
] as const;
|
|
|
|
export type IssueThreadInteractionResolutionDenialCode =
|
|
(typeof ISSUE_THREAD_INTERACTION_RESOLUTION_DENIAL_CODES)[number];
|
|
|
|
export type IssueThreadInteractionResolverActor =
|
|
| { type: "user"; userId: string }
|
|
| { type: "agent"; agentId: string | null | undefined; runId: string | null | undefined }
|
|
| { type: "system"; systemId: string };
|
|
|
|
export type IssueThreadInteractionResolverRestriction = {
|
|
policy: IssueThreadInteractionCanonicalResolverPolicy;
|
|
/**
|
|
* A server-resolved identity excluded by the binding flow in addition to the
|
|
* interaction creator. `null` means the binding requires an identity but it
|
|
* could not be resolved, so the evaluator must fail closed.
|
|
*/
|
|
excludedActor?: { type: "agent" | "user"; id: string } | null;
|
|
source?: "issue_review";
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
export type IssueThreadInteractionResolverAudienceInput = {
|
|
actor: IssueThreadInteractionResolverActor;
|
|
interaction: {
|
|
createdByAgentId?: string | null;
|
|
createdByUserId?: string | null;
|
|
sourceRunId?: string | null;
|
|
addresseeAgentId?: string | null;
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy: IssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicy | string;
|
|
resolverPolicyProvenance?: string | null;
|
|
};
|
|
/**
|
|
* A server-derived restriction owned by a binding flow such as issue review.
|
|
* It may only narrow the interaction's persisted effective audience.
|
|
*/
|
|
additionalRestriction?:
|
|
| IssueThreadInteractionCanonicalResolverPolicy
|
|
| IssueThreadInteractionResolverRestriction
|
|
| null;
|
|
governedAction?: boolean;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
export type IssueThreadInteractionResolverAudienceDecision =
|
|
| {
|
|
allowed: true;
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy: IssueThreadInteractionCanonicalResolverPolicy;
|
|
reason: "allow_anyone" | "allow_addressee" | "allow_human" | "allow_system" | "allow_human_override";
|
|
}
|
|
| {
|
|
allowed: false;
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy: IssueThreadInteractionCanonicalResolverPolicy;
|
|
status: 403 | 422;
|
|
code: Extract<
|
|
IssueThreadInteractionResolutionDenialCode,
|
|
| "interaction_run_attribution_required"
|
|
| "interaction_human_only"
|
|
| "interaction_creator_excluded"
|
|
| "interaction_addressee_mismatch"
|
|
| "interaction_governed_action_denied"
|
|
| "review_policy_denied"
|
|
>;
|
|
message: string;
|
|
details?: Record<string, unknown>;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Canonicalize one stored resolver-policy value.
|
|
*
|
|
* Before provenance existed, `board_or_agents` excluded both the creator agent
|
|
* and the creating run, so a pre-migration row must stay `not_creator` rather
|
|
* than widening to canonical `anyone`. Every reader of the stored columns —
|
|
* hydration, the audience evaluator, and the attention feed — goes through here
|
|
* so none of them can disagree about a legacy row.
|
|
*/
|
|
export function canonicalizeStoredResolverPolicy(
|
|
policy: IssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicy | string,
|
|
resolverPolicyProvenance: string | null | undefined,
|
|
): IssueThreadInteractionCanonicalResolverPolicy {
|
|
if (resolverPolicyProvenance === "legacy_inherited_restriction" && policy === "board_or_agents") {
|
|
return "not_creator";
|
|
}
|
|
return normalizeIssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicy(policy as IssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicy);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function canonicalStoredPolicy(input: IssueThreadInteractionResolverAudienceInput["interaction"]) {
|
|
return canonicalizeStoredResolverPolicy(
|
|
input.effectiveResolverPolicy,
|
|
input.resolverPolicyProvenance,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function reviewRestrictionExcludesActor(
|
|
restriction: IssueThreadInteractionResolverRestriction | null | undefined,
|
|
actor: { type: "agent" | "user"; id: string },
|
|
) {
|
|
return restriction?.policy === "not_creator"
|
|
&& restriction.source === "issue_review"
|
|
&& (
|
|
restriction.excludedActor === null
|
|
|| (
|
|
restriction.excludedActor?.type === actor.type
|
|
&& restriction.excludedActor.id === actor.id
|
|
)
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function reviewPolicyDeniedDecision(
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy: IssueThreadInteractionCanonicalResolverPolicy,
|
|
requesterKnown: boolean,
|
|
): Extract<IssueThreadInteractionResolverAudienceDecision, { allowed: false }> {
|
|
return {
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy,
|
|
status: 403,
|
|
code: "review_policy_denied",
|
|
message: requesterKnown
|
|
? "Review policy `not_creator` requires someone other than the writer who moved the issue into `in_review` to approve or reject it."
|
|
: "Review policy `not_creator` requires a different writer, but the review requester could not be determined.",
|
|
details: {
|
|
policy: "not_creator",
|
|
allowedActor: "writer_other_than_review_requester",
|
|
remediation: requesterKnown
|
|
? "Have another writer with issue write access submit the verdict, or change reviewPolicy to `anyone`."
|
|
: "Change reviewPolicy to `anyone`, or move the issue out of and back into `in_review` to record a requester before another writer submits the verdict.",
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* The single pure audience evaluator for issue-thread interaction resolution.
|
|
* Resource access, run validation, containment, and current-target checks must
|
|
* happen before this evaluator. Mutation routes must re-run it at use time.
|
|
*/
|
|
export function evaluateIssueThreadInteractionResolverAudience(
|
|
input: IssueThreadInteractionResolverAudienceInput,
|
|
): IssueThreadInteractionResolverAudienceDecision {
|
|
const persistedPolicy = canonicalStoredPolicy(input.interaction);
|
|
const additionalRestriction = typeof input.additionalRestriction === "string"
|
|
? { policy: input.additionalRestriction }
|
|
: input.additionalRestriction;
|
|
// human_only and not_creator are independent constraints, not a linear
|
|
// severity scale: their intersection means "a human other than the
|
|
// creator." Keep both predicates even though the persisted public policy
|
|
// enum can only name one of them.
|
|
const creatorExcluded =
|
|
persistedPolicy === "not_creator"
|
|
|| additionalRestriction?.policy === "not_creator";
|
|
const humanOnly =
|
|
Boolean(input.governedAction)
|
|
|| persistedPolicy === "human_only"
|
|
|| additionalRestriction?.policy === "human_only";
|
|
const effectiveResolverPolicy: IssueThreadInteractionCanonicalResolverPolicy = humanOnly
|
|
? "human_only"
|
|
: creatorExcluded
|
|
? "not_creator"
|
|
: "anyone";
|
|
|
|
if (input.actor.type === "system") {
|
|
return { allowed: true, effectiveResolverPolicy, reason: "allow_system" };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (input.actor.type === "user") {
|
|
if (
|
|
creatorExcluded
|
|
&& input.interaction.createdByUserId === input.actor.userId
|
|
) {
|
|
return {
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy,
|
|
status: 403,
|
|
code: "interaction_creator_excluded",
|
|
message: "This issue-thread interaction requires a resolver other than its creator",
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
if (reviewRestrictionExcludesActor(additionalRestriction, {
|
|
type: "user",
|
|
id: input.actor.userId,
|
|
})) {
|
|
return reviewPolicyDeniedDecision(
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy,
|
|
additionalRestriction?.excludedActor !== null,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
return {
|
|
allowed: true,
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy,
|
|
reason: input.interaction.addresseeAgentId ? "allow_human_override" : "allow_human",
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!input.actor.agentId || !input.actor.runId?.trim()) {
|
|
return {
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy,
|
|
status: 422,
|
|
code: "interaction_run_attribution_required",
|
|
message: "A valid authenticated agent run is required to resolve this issue-thread interaction",
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (input.governedAction) {
|
|
return {
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy,
|
|
status: 403,
|
|
code: "interaction_governed_action_denied",
|
|
message: "This interaction is bound to a governed action that requires independent authorization",
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (effectiveResolverPolicy === "human_only") {
|
|
return {
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy,
|
|
status: 403,
|
|
code: "interaction_human_only",
|
|
message: "This issue-thread interaction is human-only",
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (
|
|
input.interaction.addresseeAgentId
|
|
&& input.interaction.addresseeAgentId !== input.actor.agentId
|
|
) {
|
|
return {
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy,
|
|
status: 403,
|
|
code: "interaction_addressee_mismatch",
|
|
message: "Only the addressed agent or an authorized human may resolve this issue-thread interaction",
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (
|
|
creatorExcluded
|
|
&& (
|
|
input.interaction.createdByAgentId === input.actor.agentId
|
|
|| (
|
|
Boolean(input.interaction.sourceRunId)
|
|
&& input.interaction.sourceRunId === input.actor.runId
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
) {
|
|
return {
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy,
|
|
status: 403,
|
|
code: "interaction_creator_excluded",
|
|
message: "This issue-thread interaction requires a resolver other than its creator or creating run",
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (reviewRestrictionExcludesActor(additionalRestriction, {
|
|
type: "agent",
|
|
id: input.actor.agentId,
|
|
})) {
|
|
return reviewPolicyDeniedDecision(
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy,
|
|
additionalRestriction?.excludedActor !== null,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
allowed: true,
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy,
|
|
reason: input.interaction.addresseeAgentId ? "allow_addressee" : "allow_anyone",
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export function issueThreadInteractionResolutionError(
|
|
status: number,
|
|
code: IssueThreadInteractionResolutionDenialCode,
|
|
message: string,
|
|
details: Record<string, unknown> = {},
|
|
) {
|
|
return new HttpError(status, message, { code, ...details });
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export function assertIssueThreadInteractionResolverAudience(
|
|
input: IssueThreadInteractionResolverAudienceInput,
|
|
) {
|
|
const decision = evaluateIssueThreadInteractionResolverAudience(input);
|
|
if (!decision.allowed) {
|
|
throw issueThreadInteractionResolutionError(
|
|
decision.status,
|
|
decision.code,
|
|
decision.message,
|
|
{ effectiveResolverPolicy: decision.effectiveResolverPolicy, ...(decision.details ?? {}) },
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
return decision;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Resolves agent-owned attention with the same audience rules used by mutation
|
|
* routes. Run attribution is deliberately represented by the interaction's
|
|
* source run for the creator and by an opaque non-source run for other agents;
|
|
* the real run is still authenticated at mutation time.
|
|
*/
|
|
export function issueThreadInteractionAttentionAgentAllowed(input: {
|
|
agentId: string;
|
|
interaction: IssueThreadInteractionResolverAudienceInput["interaction"];
|
|
additionalRestriction?: IssueThreadInteractionResolverAudienceInput["additionalRestriction"];
|
|
governedAction?: boolean;
|
|
}) {
|
|
const attentionRunId = input.interaction.createdByAgentId === input.agentId
|
|
? input.interaction.sourceRunId ?? "attention-owner-creator-run"
|
|
: "attention-owner-non-source-run";
|
|
return evaluateIssueThreadInteractionResolverAudience({
|
|
actor: { type: "agent", agentId: input.agentId, runId: attentionRunId },
|
|
interaction: input.interaction,
|
|
additionalRestriction: input.additionalRestriction,
|
|
governedAction: input.governedAction,
|
|
}).allowed;
|
|
}
|