Files
PaperClipAI/server/src/__tests__/instance-settings-routes.test.ts
T
DottaandPaperclip 889947c238 feat: add experimental native chat connectors (#13038)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - People also ask agents for work in their existing chat tools.
> - Each external conversation needs one task and a current authorized
source.
> - Retries, Stop, and provider failures must not duplicate work or
expose private data.
> - The first chat PR establishes the opt-in provider and data
contracts.
> - This PR adds experimental channel integration and its durable
control plane.
> - Users can request work from connected channels and inspect delivery
in Paperclip.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #13100 and #13092. This is the second of exactly two chat PRs.
Foundation #13100 is merged and changed 143 files. Runner prerequisite
#13092 is also merged. This PR changes 400 files against master, below
the 500-file review limit. It contains no wireframe images or HTML
galleries.

## What Changed

- Add native Slack, GitHub, Microsoft Teams, Telegram, and Discord chat
connections. Keep chat disabled unless the operator enables experimental
chat connectors. Preserve the production GitHub tool connection and its
normal setup path.
- Bind each provider bot identity to one immutable Paperclip agent. Bind
each admitted external conversation to one task. Paperclip owns tasks,
runs, permissions, and audit records.
- Add durable admission, per-conversation queues, questions, task
controls, progress, final replies, images, files, and delivery receipts.
Board comments remain internal unless explicitly sent to the channel.
- Check current identity, provider reach, resource access, credentials,
runtime generation, and exact source before provider effects. Keep
private responses private. Never send raw reasoning, private logs,
credentials, or tool arguments.
- Hold uncertain sends for explicit audited resolution. Make Board
Send-to-channel atomic and idempotent. Keep reconnect and setup
credentials in Paperclip secret storage.
- Preserve current native-runner authority across retries, lost
acknowledgements, and recovery. Keep immutable input and completion
contracts separate from newer user input. Receipt reconciliation cannot
launch a provider.
- Reconcile chat close/new ordering and provider-effect lock order.
Audit resource access changes in the same transaction. Submit only the
selected resource from each UI toggle so stale pages cannot undo
unrelated access changes.
- Drain Codex stdout before certifying process exit. Bound the drain
with the existing shutdown grace. Preserve observed terminal authority
without treating an undrained process as successful or reusable.
- Incorporate master `018ca5da` with its ACP Stop, mobile task layout,
runner packaging, and official lock changes. Preserve dedicated
chat-answer continuations in both directions when ordinary queued
comments are adopted after Stop.
- Fence late adapter readiness behind an earlier Stop for the same run.
Preserve verified cleanup for registered adapters. Handle single Stop,
agent pause, duplicate Stops, and failure release without creating a
false cancellation receipt.
- Incorporate master's `6dd48cad4` wake-queue extraction. Preserve exact
failed-chat retry authorization and lineage, retired question-source
suppression, and the block on generic recovery that would discard the
admitted source. Fresh deferred input retains its separate promotion
path.
- Incorporate master `2a05b5ed3` and its queue-admission extraction,
simplified transaction ports, and separate runner CI job. Preserve exact
durable receipts, actor separation, and dedicated-answer isolation
through the new module. A failed receipt insert rolls back the
accompanying deferred-wake merge.

## Verification

Current head: `afe19299d06253cb628eb398e91d1200ea9f412a`, incorporating
master `2a05b5ed3457ea33efd6895520447d1d97fe98d8`. The conflicts are
resolved. This successor fixes two test-harness boundaries exposed by
CI: per-case route-module preparation and actual durable-save completion
before intentional runner termination. Production code and all existing
test/turn deadlines are unchanged. [Exact-head Greptile
review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/13038#issuecomment-5587250594)
is **5/5**, completed September 10 at 13:20:55 UTC, with no actionable
findings or open review threads. [Fresh exact-head
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/34481724341)
passes **all 24 jobs**, including Build and both required aggregates.
Normal exact-head guarded merge was attempted and rejected by the
remaining branch approval policy: CODEOWNER review is required and no
human approval is present. Normal **squash auto-merge is enabled** as of
September 10 at 13:36:26 UTC. Requested CODEOWNERS have been notified;
no approval bypass or self-approval was used. Earlier-head results below
remain historical evidence, not qualification of this successor.

- Final exact-head Linux evidence: 995/995 chat integration cases; 36/36
agent-skills routes; 35/35 runner live-session cases, including real
process kill/resume; 1948 runner Vitest cases with three existing
benchmark/platform guards; 870/870 API-authority cases; and 104 browser
cases with four existing optional skips. Rust, conformance/replay, full
repository build, typecheck, canary, all server/workspace shards, and
both required aggregates pass with normal CI concurrency. Earlier failed
attempts remain recorded below.

- Latest test-only qualification: 141/141
route/permissions/authentication cases pass in separate cold forks, with
plain server types and independent review clear. The real-runner suite
passes 35/35, with plain runner types and independent review clear. A
controlled premature-save acknowledgement fails as expected; matching
ownership/effect/process evidence, rejected saves, real turn outcome,
test abort, and pre-kill liveness are covered. No local reproduction of
the original CI scheduling failure is claimed. The preceding [CI
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/34479680858)
passes 21/24 jobs, including all 995 Linux chat cases and browser
aggregate (104 passed, four existing optional skips); only Build, the
skills serialized shard, and the required verification aggregate fail.
Its exact-head Greptile review was 5/5. Both failed job logs are
retained.

- Final fixture qualification: all eight focused Discord cases and all
995 chat integration cases pass. The exact modal statement/PID is
observed before taking the real connection lock; the test then proves
its actual blocking relationship before mutation. Original SQL
execution, provider behavior, negative assertions, and 1s/15s timeouts
remain unchanged. Independent review is clear and test/production hashes
remain frozen. The preceding [CI
attempt](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/34477184777)
passed 22 jobs, including Build/runner, typecheck, canary, all other
test shards, and browser aggregate (104 passed, four existing optional
skips); the two fixture failures and failed verification aggregate
remain recorded, not relabeled as a pass.

- Current queue-module composition: 308/308 recovery/batching/queue/Stop
tests; 995/995 full chat integration; 89/89 module tests, including real
PostgreSQL receipt-insert rollback; 24/24 workflow/module-boundary
tests; plain server and UI types. All four actual local process/ACP
browser paths pass in 1.4 minutes. Fresh databases, no skips or retries,
stable reviewed source hashes. The initial boundary failure is retained;
its no-op service wrapper was removed without changing recovery context
or weakening the check. An exploratory standalone test-directory
typecheck fails because its new upstream transformation config is not a
standalone typechecking project; standard CI/build does not invoke it,
and no configuration was weakened to suppress those diagnostics.

- The preceding head `e02a63d462ce5d47433b0aeb632bb6fd20aab1ba` passed
[all 24 CI
jobs](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/34436462958)
and exact-head Greptile review at 5/5. Required CODEOWNER review
prevented its normal merge before master advanced again.

- Final extracted-module composition: 307/307 recovery, batching, queue
and Stop-control tests; 995/995 full chat integration; 49/49 module
tests including eight PostgreSQL adapter cases; and 19/19 issue-update
tests. Plain server types pass. All four actual local process/ACP
browser paths pass in 1.3 minutes. Fresh databases, no skips or retries
in these cohorts, frozen source hashes, and independent review clear.

- The preceding head `3e4e1c1c` passes [all PR CI
jobs](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/34415826820),
including Build and required `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`. Both the
original Rust failure and the previously load-sensitive lineage fixture
pass with unchanged Linux concurrency. Master advanced afterward and
required this reconciliation.
- Final master composition: 448/448 focused UI tests, 186/186 adapter
tests, 24/24 queue/control tests, and 11/11 packaging tests. Plain UI,
server, shared, and adapter types pass. Token gates and diff checks
pass. Independent server and UI reviews are clear.
- Stop-registration regression: both real-service cases fail against
exact `a95` source and pass with the fix. The full corrected
recovery/control suite passes 265/265. Duplicate-owner and failed-Stop
controls also pass. Plain server types pass. The readiness barrier
prevents provider startup without adding an acknowledgment to an already
terminal run.
- Final qualification strengthens terminal-field equality and repeats
both affected cases successfully on a fresh database. All four actual
local process/ACP browser paths pass again in 1.3 minutes, without skips
or retries. The final screenshot shows Cancelled, a paused subtree,
retained input, and no error toast.
- Two new actual-service regressions fail before the merge fix. They
prove that queued-comment adoption could consume a dedicated chat answer
or add unrelated input to that answer. The fixed four-case cohort
passes, including ordinary upstream continuation and adapter Stop
controls. Full recovery passes 257/257. All four actual local
process/ACP Stop browser flows pass in 1.4 minutes, without skips or
retries, on a fresh database.
- The unchanged runner artifact was qualified with 171/171 transport
tests, 870/870 API-authority tests, conformance 1/1, and replay 11/11.
Six controlled reader tests prove the exit/drain repair. Its local
serial Rust workspace passed 546 top-level cases plus two invoked
helpers; the later passing Linux CI supplies default-concurrency
evidence.
- Prior exact-source full chat integration passes 995/995. Settings
regressions cover concurrent stale pages, 501 destinations, pending
state, rejected updates, and explicit retry. These deterministic tests
do not prove live provider behavior.
- Retained failed attempts and their causes are in the [qualification
log](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/afe19299d06253cb628eb398e91d1200ea9f412a/doc/plans/chat-adapters/2026-09-08-chat-queue-and-webhook-repair.md).
The first merge adapter run timed out while macOS slept for 290 seconds.
Its unchanged repeat passed with a temporary sleep guard. No assertion,
deadline, or CI gate was weakened.

Review commands include `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest
run src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts
src/__tests__/issue-queued-comments-routes.test.ts` and `pnpm exec
playwright test --config tests/e2e/playwright.config.ts
tests/e2e/acp-stop-continuation.spec.ts`. Database suites require fresh
disposable databases. See the [browser
runbook](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/afe19299d06253cb628eb398e91d1200ea9f412a/doc/plans/chat-adapters/2026-09-04-chat-adapters-browser-e2e-runbook.md)
for provider setup and separate live acceptance steps.

## Risks

- This remains experimental. Deterministic tests and bounded live
evidence do not establish every provider feature, tenant, permission
layout, or media shape. Teams work-tenant qualification is still open.
- Failed and uncertain provider effects remain visible and can require
operator action. A transport receipt does not prove recipient
visibility.
- Native controller and runner artifacts must remain compatible.
Preserve lease ownership, terminal authority, source binding, and
quarantine during future changes.
- Access and audit rows commit together, but activity notifications
remain best-effort. This is not a new durable event outbox.
- The PR operation does not deploy a live server, replace its runner, or
change provider permissions. Remaining live qualification is documented
in the [temporary
handoff](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/afe19299d06253cb628eb398e91d1200ea9f412a/doc/plans/chat-adapters/2026-09-08-open-qualification-followups.md).

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex assisted with implementation, tool execution, testing, and
review. The work records `gpt-6-astra` assistance. The environment does
not report a context-window size. No private reasoning traces are
included.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-10 10:06:45 -05:00

1293 lines
49 KiB
TypeScript

import express from "express";
import request from "supertest";
import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
import { hoistModuleGraph } from "./helpers/hoist-module-graph.js";
const mockInstanceSettingsService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
get: vi.fn(),
getGeneral: vi.fn(),
getExperimental: vi.fn(),
update: vi.fn(),
updateGeneral: vi.fn(),
updateExperimental: vi.fn(),
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockHeartbeatService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
computeTaskDrain: vi.fn(),
applyTaskDrain: vi.fn(),
stopTaskDrain: vi.fn(),
getTaskDrainStatus: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockEnvironmentService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
findManagedSandboxEnvironment: vi.fn(),
update: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
const mockPublishActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
function registerModuleMocks() {
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
publishActivity: mockPublishActivity,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/environments.js", () => ({
environmentService: () => mockEnvironmentService,
}));
}
// Identity object the mocked db.transaction hands to writers; tests assert
// both the marker clear and the settings update receive THIS same tx.
const TX_SENTINEL = { __tx: true };
// Runs the callback with a sentinel tx and propagates throws, so a failing
// write inside rejects the whole request exactly like a real transaction
// rollback. This is the default mockDb.transaction implementation; a test
// that installs its own mockImplementation loses this default, so
// beforeEach below reinstalls it before every test.
function defaultTransactionImplementation(fn: (tx: unknown) => Promise<unknown>) {
return fn(TX_SENTINEL);
}
// Module-scoped (not rebuilt per createApp call) so a test can assert how
// many times a request opened a transaction — the task-drain audit writes
// for every company must share ONE transaction, not one each.
const mockDb = {
transaction: vi.fn(defaultTransactionImplementation),
};
describe("instance settings routes", () => {
const routeModules = hoistModuleGraph(registerModuleMocks, async () => {
const [{ errorHandler }, { instanceSettingsRoutes }] = await Promise.all([
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/instance-settings.js")>("../routes/instance-settings.js"),
]);
return { errorHandler, instanceSettingsRoutes };
});
function createApp(actor: any) {
const { errorHandler, instanceSettingsRoutes } = routeModules.value;
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
req.actor = actor;
next();
});
app.use("/api", instanceSettingsRoutes(mockDb as any));
app.use(errorHandler);
return app;
}
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks();
// vi.clearAllMocks() clears recorded calls only; it does not remove a
// mockImplementation a prior test installed. Reinstall the default here
// so a stateful implementation from one test can never leak into the
// next one.
mockDb.transaction.mockReset();
mockDb.transaction.mockImplementation(defaultTransactionImplementation);
mockInstanceSettingsService.get.mockReset();
mockInstanceSettingsService.getGeneral.mockReset();
mockInstanceSettingsService.getExperimental.mockReset();
mockInstanceSettingsService.update.mockReset();
mockInstanceSettingsService.updateGeneral.mockReset();
mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental.mockReset();
mockInstanceSettingsService.listCompanyIds.mockReset();
mockHeartbeatService.computeTaskDrain.mockReset();
mockHeartbeatService.applyTaskDrain.mockReset();
mockHeartbeatService.stopTaskDrain.mockReset();
mockHeartbeatService.getTaskDrainStatus.mockReset();
mockEnvironmentService.getById.mockReset();
mockEnvironmentService.findManagedSandboxEnvironment.mockReset();
mockEnvironmentService.findManagedSandboxEnvironment.mockResolvedValue(null);
mockEnvironmentService.update.mockReset();
mockPublishActivity.mockReset();
mockLogActivity.mockReset();
// Mirrors the real logActivity: push a publication for the transaction
// to publish once it commits, so route-level tests can prove publish
// happens only after every company's write in the same request lands.
mockLogActivity.mockImplementation((_db: unknown, input: { companyId: string }, postCommitPublications?: unknown[]) => {
postCommitPublications?.push({ companyId: input.companyId, payload: input, pluginEvent: null });
return Promise.resolve({ id: `activity-${input.companyId}` });
});
mockInstanceSettingsService.get.mockResolvedValue({
id: "instance-settings-1",
defaultEnvironmentId: null,
general: {
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
keyboardShortcuts: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
},
experimental: {
enableEnvironments: false,
enableIsolatedWorkspaces: false,
enableIssuePlanDecompositions: false,
enableExperimentalFileViewer: false,
enableExternalObjects: false,
enableBuiltInAgents: false,
enableBetaSkills: false,
enableGoalsSidebarLink: false,
enableServerInfoDebugView: false,
autoRestartDevServerWhenIdle: false,
enableWorkspaceBranchReconcileForward: true,
enableWorkspaceDirtyQuarantineRepair: true,
enableWorktreeRunExecution: false,
worktreeRunExecutionActivatedAt: null,
worktreeRunExecutionActivationInstanceId: null,
},
createdAt: "2026-06-20T00:00:00.000Z",
updatedAt: "2026-06-20T00:00:00.000Z",
});
mockInstanceSettingsService.getGeneral.mockResolvedValue({
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
keyboardShortcuts: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
});
mockInstanceSettingsService.getExperimental.mockResolvedValue({
enableEnvironments: false,
enableIsolatedWorkspaces: false,
enableIssuePlanDecompositions: false,
enableExperimentalFileViewer: false,
enableExternalObjects: false,
enableBuiltInAgents: false,
enableBetaSkills: false,
enableGoalsSidebarLink: false,
enableServerInfoDebugView: false,
autoRestartDevServerWhenIdle: false,
enableWorkspaceBranchReconcileForward: true,
enableWorkspaceDirtyQuarantineRepair: true,
enableWorktreeRunExecution: false,
worktreeRunExecutionActivatedAt: null,
worktreeRunExecutionActivationInstanceId: null,
});
mockInstanceSettingsService.update.mockResolvedValue({
id: "instance-settings-1",
defaultEnvironmentId: "env-1",
general: {
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
keyboardShortcuts: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
},
experimental: {
enableEnvironments: true,
enableIsolatedWorkspaces: true,
enableIssuePlanDecompositions: true,
enableExperimentalFileViewer: true,
enableExternalObjects: false,
enableBuiltInAgents: false,
enableBetaSkills: false,
enableGoalsSidebarLink: false,
enableServerInfoDebugView: false,
autoRestartDevServerWhenIdle: false,
enableWorkspaceBranchReconcileForward: true,
enableWorkspaceDirtyQuarantineRepair: true,
enableWorktreeRunExecution: false,
worktreeRunExecutionActivatedAt: null,
worktreeRunExecutionActivationInstanceId: null,
},
createdAt: "2026-06-20T00:00:00.000Z",
updatedAt: "2026-06-20T01:00:00.000Z",
});
mockInstanceSettingsService.updateGeneral.mockResolvedValue({
id: "instance-settings-1",
general: {
censorUsernameInLogs: true,
keyboardShortcuts: true,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "allowed",
},
});
mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental.mockResolvedValue({
id: "instance-settings-1",
experimental: {
enableEnvironments: true,
enableIsolatedWorkspaces: true,
enableIssuePlanDecompositions: true,
enableExperimentalFileViewer: true,
enableExternalObjects: false,
enableBuiltInAgents: true,
enableGoalsSidebarLink: false,
enableServerInfoDebugView: true,
autoRestartDevServerWhenIdle: false,
enableWorkspaceBranchReconcileForward: true,
enableWorkspaceDirtyQuarantineRepair: true,
enableWorktreeRunExecution: false,
worktreeRunExecutionActivatedAt: null,
worktreeRunExecutionActivationInstanceId: null,
},
});
mockInstanceSettingsService.listCompanyIds.mockResolvedValue(["company-1", "company-2"]);
mockEnvironmentService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
id: "env-1",
driver: "local",
status: "active",
config: {},
});
});
it("allows local board users to read and update experimental settings", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
});
const getRes = await request(app).get("/api/instance/settings/experimental");
expect(getRes.status).toBe(200);
expect(getRes.body).toEqual({
enableEnvironments: false,
enableIsolatedWorkspaces: false,
enableIssuePlanDecompositions: false,
enableExperimentalFileViewer: false,
enableExternalObjects: false,
enableBuiltInAgents: false,
enableBetaSkills: false,
enableGoalsSidebarLink: false,
enableServerInfoDebugView: false,
autoRestartDevServerWhenIdle: false,
enableWorkspaceBranchReconcileForward: true,
enableWorkspaceDirtyQuarantineRepair: true,
enableWorktreeRunExecution: false,
worktreeRunExecutionActivatedAt: null,
worktreeRunExecutionActivationInstanceId: null,
});
const patchRes = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/experimental")
.send({ enableIsolatedWorkspaces: true });
expect(patchRes.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
enableIsolatedWorkspaces: true,
});
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
}, 10_000);
it("does not expose the retired liveness auto-recovery endpoints", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
});
await request(app)
.post("/api/instance/settings/experimental/issue-graph-liveness-auto-recovery/preview")
.send({ lookbackHours: 24 })
.expect(404);
await request(app)
.post("/api/instance/settings/experimental/issue-graph-liveness-auto-recovery/run")
.send({ lookbackHours: 24 })
.expect(404);
});
it.each([true, false])("allows only instance admins to change chat connector visibility (%s)", async (isInstanceAdmin) => {
const app = createApp({ type: "board", userId: "user-1", source: "session", isInstanceAdmin, companyIds: ["company-1"] });
const response = await request(app).patch("/api/instance/settings/experimental").send({ enableChatConnectors: true });
expect(response.status).toBe(isInstanceAdmin ? 200 : 403);
if (isInstanceAdmin) {
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ enableChatConnectors: true });
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalled();
} else {
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
}
});
it("accepts the instance-wide Streamlined UI preference", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
});
await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/experimental")
.send({ enableStreamlinedUi: false })
.expect(200);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
enableStreamlinedUi: false,
});
});
it("strips server-managed worktree run execution fields before updating experimental settings", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
});
await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/experimental")
.send({
enableWorktreeRunExecution: true,
worktreeRunExecutionActivatedAt: "2026-07-10T12:00:00.000Z",
worktreeRunExecutionActivationInstanceId: "copied-instance",
})
.expect(200);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
enableWorktreeRunExecution: true,
});
});
it("allows local board users to read and update the instance default environment", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
});
const getRes = await request(app).get("/api/instance/settings");
expect(getRes.status).toBe(200);
expect(getRes.body.defaultEnvironmentId).toBeNull();
const patchRes = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings")
.send({ defaultEnvironmentId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111" });
expect(patchRes.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
{ defaultEnvironmentId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111" },
{ db: TX_SENTINEL },
);
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
});
it("clears the managed-default stamp marker on an explicit tenant default write", async () => {
// A tenant write of defaultEnvironmentId reclassifies the default as
// tenant-chosen: the reconciliation stamp marker on the managed
// sandbox row must not survive, or a later managed-sandbox-only
// mode-off pass would mistake the tenant's choice for a stamp.
mockEnvironmentService.findManagedSandboxEnvironment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "managed-env-1",
driver: "sandbox",
status: "active",
config: {},
envVars: {},
metadata: { managedByPaperclip: true, managedDefaultStamped: true },
});
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
});
const patchRes = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings")
.send({ defaultEnvironmentId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111" });
expect(patchRes.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockEnvironmentService.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"managed-env-1",
{ metadata: { managedByPaperclip: true } },
{ db: TX_SENTINEL },
);
// Both writes commit in ONE transaction — each receives the SAME tx —
// so no partial failure can desync the stamp marker from the default
// (neither a stale stamp on a tenant choice, nor a reconciliation
// default that lost its marker and can never revert).
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
{ defaultEnvironmentId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111" },
{ db: TX_SENTINEL },
);
});
it("aborts the whole request (no committed settings) when the stamp-marker clear fails inside the transaction", async () => {
// The marker clear and the settings write share a transaction, so a
// failure in either rolls the whole thing back — a real DB would
// discard both; here the settings write is never even reached.
mockEnvironmentService.findManagedSandboxEnvironment.mockResolvedValue({
id: "managed-env-1",
driver: "sandbox",
status: "active",
config: {},
envVars: {},
metadata: { managedByPaperclip: true, managedDefaultStamped: true },
});
mockEnvironmentService.update.mockRejectedValue(new Error("metadata write failed"));
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
});
const patchRes = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings")
.send({ defaultEnvironmentId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111" });
expect(patchRes.status).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(500);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("rejects unknown defaultEnvironmentId values with 422", async () => {
mockEnvironmentService.getById.mockResolvedValue(null);
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
});
const res = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings")
.send({ defaultEnvironmentId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111" });
expect(res.status).toBe(422);
expect(res.body.error).toContain("Environment not found");
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("allows local board users to update guarded dev-server auto-restart", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
});
await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/experimental")
.send({ autoRestartDevServerWhenIdle: true })
.expect(200);
expect(
mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental.mock.calls.some(
([patch]) => patch?.autoRestartDevServerWhenIdle === true,
),
).toBe(true);
});
it("allows local board users to update external object detection", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
});
await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/experimental")
.send({ enableExternalObjects: true })
.expect(200);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
enableExternalObjects: true,
});
});
it("allows local board users to update built-in agents", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
});
await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/experimental")
.send({ enableBuiltInAgents: true })
.expect(200);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
enableBuiltInAgents: true,
});
});
it("allows local board users to update the goals sidebar link", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
});
await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/experimental")
.send({ enableGoalsSidebarLink: true })
.expect(200);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
enableGoalsSidebarLink: true,
});
});
it("allows local board users to update the server info debug view", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
});
await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/experimental")
.send({ enableServerInfoDebugView: true })
.expect(200);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
enableServerInfoDebugView: true,
});
});
it("allows local board users to update environment controls", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
});
await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/experimental")
.send({ enableEnvironments: true })
.expect(200);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
enableEnvironments: true,
});
});
it("allows non-admin board users with company access to read but not update experimental settings", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "user-1",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
companyIds: ["company-1"],
});
await request(app).get("/api/instance/settings/experimental").expect(200);
await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/experimental")
.send({ enableEnvironments: true })
.expect(403);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("allows local board users to read and update general settings", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
});
const getRes = await request(app).get("/api/instance/settings/general");
expect(getRes.status).toBe(200);
expect(getRes.body).toEqual({
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
keyboardShortcuts: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
});
const patchRes = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/general")
.send({
censorUsernameInLogs: true,
keyboardShortcuts: true,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "allowed",
});
expect(patchRes.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateGeneral).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
censorUsernameInLogs: true,
keyboardShortcuts: true,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "allowed",
});
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
});
it("allows non-admin board users to read general settings", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "user-1",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
companyIds: ["company-1"],
});
const res = await request(app).get("/api/instance/settings/general");
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(res.body).toEqual({
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
keyboardShortcuts: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
});
});
it("rejects signed-in users without company access from reading general settings", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "user-2",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
companyIds: [],
memberships: [],
});
const res = await request(app).get("/api/instance/settings/general");
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.getGeneral).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("rejects non-admin board users from updating general settings", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "user-1",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
companyIds: ["company-1"],
});
const res = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/general")
.send({ censorUsernameInLogs: true, keyboardShortcuts: true });
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateGeneral).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("rejects agent callers", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "agent",
agentId: "agent-1",
companyId: "company-1",
source: "agent_key",
});
const res = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/general")
.send({ feedbackDataSharingPreference: "not_allowed" });
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateGeneral).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
describe("executionMode floor on cloud-managed instances", () => {
const adminActor = {
type: "board",
userId: "owner-1",
source: "cloud_tenant",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
companyIds: ["company-1"],
};
beforeEach(() => {
process.env.PAPERCLIP_CLOUD_TENANT_SERVER_TOKEN = "test-server-token";
});
afterEach(() => {
delete process.env.PAPERCLIP_CLOUD_TENANT_SERVER_TOKEN;
});
it("rejects a write that changes executionMode", async () => {
mockInstanceSettingsService.getGeneral.mockResolvedValue({
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
keyboardShortcuts: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
executionMode: "kubernetes",
});
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const res = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/general")
.send({ executionMode: "any" });
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(res.body.details).toMatchObject({ code: "execution_mode_platform_managed" });
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateGeneral).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("rejects pinning executionMode when the platform left it unrestricted", async () => {
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const res = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/general")
.send({ executionMode: "kubernetes" });
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateGeneral).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("allows a same-value executionMode echo so full-object settings forms keep working", async () => {
mockInstanceSettingsService.getGeneral.mockResolvedValue({
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
keyboardShortcuts: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
executionMode: "kubernetes",
});
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const res = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/general")
.send({ executionMode: "kubernetes", keyboardShortcuts: true });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateGeneral).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
executionMode: "kubernetes",
keyboardShortcuts: true,
});
});
it("allows general-settings writes that do not touch executionMode", async () => {
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const res = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/general")
.send({ keyboardShortcuts: true });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.getGeneral).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateGeneral).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ keyboardShortcuts: true });
});
it("keeps executionMode writable on self-hosted instances", async () => {
delete process.env.PAPERCLIP_CLOUD_TENANT_SERVER_TOKEN;
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "admin-1",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
});
const res = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/general")
.send({ executionMode: "kubernetes" });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateGeneral).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ executionMode: "kubernetes" });
});
});
describe("operator-hidden settings floor", () => {
const adminActor = {
type: "board",
userId: "admin-1",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
companyIds: ["company-1"],
};
afterEach(() => {
delete process.env.PAPERCLIP_HIDDEN_SETTINGS;
});
it("rejects a write that changes a hidden general field", async () => {
process.env.PAPERCLIP_HIDDEN_SETTINGS = "instance.general.censorUsernameInLogs";
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const res = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/general")
.send({ censorUsernameInLogs: true });
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(res.body.details).toMatchObject({ code: "settings_operator_managed" });
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateGeneral).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("allows a same-value echo of a hidden general field", async () => {
process.env.PAPERCLIP_HIDDEN_SETTINGS = "instance.general.censorUsernameInLogs";
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const res = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/general")
.send({ censorUsernameInLogs: false, keyboardShortcuts: true });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateGeneral).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
keyboardShortcuts: true,
});
});
it("deep-compares hidden backupRetention echoes instead of rejecting them", async () => {
process.env.PAPERCLIP_HIDDEN_SETTINGS = "instance.general.backupRetention";
mockInstanceSettingsService.getGeneral.mockResolvedValue({
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
keyboardShortcuts: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
backupRetention: { dailyDays: 7, weeklyWeeks: 4, monthlyMonths: 1 },
});
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const echo = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/general")
.send({ backupRetention: { dailyDays: 7, weeklyWeeks: 4, monthlyMonths: 1 } });
expect(echo.status).toBe(200);
const change = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/general")
.send({ backupRetention: { dailyDays: 14, weeklyWeeks: 4, monthlyMonths: 1 } });
expect(change.status).toBe(403);
expect(change.body.details).toMatchObject({ code: "settings_operator_managed" });
});
it("rejects a write that changes a hidden experimental toggle", async () => {
process.env.PAPERCLIP_HIDDEN_SETTINGS = "instance.experimental.enableEnvironments";
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const res = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/experimental")
.send({ enableEnvironments: true });
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(res.body.details).toMatchObject({ code: "settings_operator_managed" });
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("allows writes to non-hidden experimental toggles while others are hidden", async () => {
process.env.PAPERCLIP_HIDDEN_SETTINGS =
"instance.experimental.enableEnvironments,instance.experimental.enableServerInfoDebugView";
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const res = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/experimental")
.send({ enableIsolatedWorkspaces: true });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
enableIsolatedWorkspaces: true,
});
});
it("floors every experimental toggle when the whole Experimental page is hidden", async () => {
process.env.PAPERCLIP_HIDDEN_SETTINGS = "instance.experimental";
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const res = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/experimental")
.send({ enableIsolatedWorkspaces: true });
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(res.body.details).toMatchObject({ code: "settings_operator_managed" });
expect(mockInstanceSettingsService.updateExperimental).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("keeps every field writable when the env var is unset", async () => {
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const general = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/general")
.send({ censorUsernameInLogs: true });
expect(general.status).toBe(200);
const experimental = await request(app)
.patch("/api/instance/settings/experimental")
.send({ enableEnvironments: true });
expect(experimental.status).toBe(200);
});
});
describe("task drain", () => {
const adminActor = {
type: "board",
userId: "admin-1",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
companyIds: ["company-1"],
};
const nonAdminActor = {
type: "board",
userId: "user-1",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
companyIds: ["company-1"],
};
const idleStatus = {
draining: false,
startedAt: null,
expiresAt: null,
activeRuns: 0,
pendingWakes: 0,
quiescent: true,
};
afterEach(() => {
// A drain the mock left active must not carry over into an unrelated
// test, so every test starts from the idle status again.
mockHeartbeatService.getTaskDrainStatus.mockReset();
mockHeartbeatService.computeTaskDrain.mockReset();
mockHeartbeatService.applyTaskDrain.mockReset();
mockHeartbeatService.stopTaskDrain.mockReset();
});
it("returns the idle status", async () => {
mockHeartbeatService.getTaskDrainStatus.mockReturnValue(idleStatus);
const app = await createApp(nonAdminActor);
const res = await request(app).get("/api/instance/task-drain");
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(res.body).toEqual(idleStatus);
});
it("writes an activity record for every company, then applies the same drain values, in one transaction", async () => {
const drain = { startedAt: "2026-08-29T00:00:00.000Z", expiresAt: "2026-08-29T06:00:00.000Z" };
mockHeartbeatService.computeTaskDrain.mockReturnValue(drain);
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const res = await request(app)
.post("/api/instance/task-drain")
.send({ ttlMs: 21_600_000 });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(res.body).toEqual(drain);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.computeTaskDrain).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ ttlMs: 21_600_000 });
expect(mockDb.transaction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
for (const call of mockLogActivity.mock.calls) {
expect(call[0]).toBe(TX_SENTINEL);
expect(call[1]).toMatchObject({
action: "instance.task_drain.started",
details: { startedAt: drain.startedAt, expiresAt: drain.expiresAt },
});
}
// The mutation applies the same values the audit rows already carry,
// and only after the shared transaction commits.
expect(mockHeartbeatService.applyTaskDrain).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.applyTaskDrain).toHaveBeenCalledWith(drain);
expect(mockPublishActivity).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
});
it("starts an indefinite drain when the caller sends no ttlMs", async () => {
mockHeartbeatService.computeTaskDrain.mockReturnValue({ startedAt: "2026-08-29T00:00:00.000Z", expiresAt: null });
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const res = await request(app).post("/api/instance/task-drain").send({});
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.computeTaskDrain).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ ttlMs: null });
});
it("writes an activity record for every company, then stops the drain, using one wasActive value throughout", async () => {
mockHeartbeatService.getTaskDrainStatus.mockReturnValue({
draining: true,
startedAt: new Date(),
expiresAt: null,
activeRuns: 0,
pendingWakes: 0,
quiescent: true,
});
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const res = await request(app).delete("/api/instance/task-drain");
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(res.body).toEqual({ wasActive: true });
expect(mockDb.transaction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
for (const call of mockLogActivity.mock.calls) {
expect(call[0]).toBe(TX_SENTINEL);
expect(call[1]).toMatchObject({
action: "instance.task_drain.stopped",
details: { wasActive: true },
});
}
// The mutation runs only after the shared transaction commits.
expect(mockHeartbeatService.stopTaskDrain).toHaveBeenCalledWith();
expect(mockPublishActivity).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
});
it("does not apply a drain when the company list read fails", async () => {
mockInstanceSettingsService.listCompanyIds.mockRejectedValue(new Error("db unavailable"));
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const res = await request(app).post("/api/instance/task-drain").send({});
expect(res.status).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(500);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.applyTaskDrain).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("commits no activity record for any company when one company's audit write fails", async () => {
// company-1 succeeds, company-2 fails. A real transaction rolls both
// back together; here we prove the route puts both writes in the
// SAME transaction (rather than firing one independent write per
// company) and never publishes a record for the company that did
// succeed before the shared transaction rejected.
mockHeartbeatService.computeTaskDrain.mockReturnValue({
startedAt: "2026-08-29T00:00:00.000Z",
expiresAt: null,
});
mockLogActivity.mockImplementation((_db: unknown, input: { companyId: string }) => (
input.companyId === "company-2"
? Promise.reject(new Error("activity insert failed"))
: Promise.resolve({ id: `activity-${input.companyId}` })
));
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const res = await request(app).post("/api/instance/task-drain").send({});
expect(res.status).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(500);
expect(mockDb.transaction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
for (const call of mockLogActivity.mock.calls) {
expect(call[0]).toBe(TX_SENTINEL);
}
expect(mockPublishActivity).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("does not apply the drain when the audit transaction rejects", async () => {
mockHeartbeatService.computeTaskDrain.mockReturnValue({
startedAt: "2026-08-29T00:00:00.000Z",
expiresAt: null,
});
mockLogActivity.mockRejectedValue(new Error("activity insert failed"));
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const res = await request(app).post("/api/instance/task-drain").send({});
expect(res.status).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(500);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.applyTaskDrain).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("still reports the started drain when publishing its committed audit record fails", async () => {
// The audit row already committed by the time publish runs, so a
// publish failure must not turn the response into a false failure:
// the caller asked to start a drain, and the drain did start.
const drain = { startedAt: "2026-08-29T00:00:00.000Z", expiresAt: null };
mockHeartbeatService.computeTaskDrain.mockReturnValue(drain);
mockPublishActivity.mockImplementation(() => {
throw new Error("live event bus unavailable");
});
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const res = await request(app).post("/api/instance/task-drain").send({});
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(res.body).toEqual(drain);
expect(mockDb.transaction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.applyTaskDrain).toHaveBeenCalledWith(drain);
});
it("does not stop the drain when the company list read fails", async () => {
mockInstanceSettingsService.listCompanyIds.mockRejectedValue(new Error("db unavailable"));
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const res = await request(app).delete("/api/instance/task-drain");
expect(res.status).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(500);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.stopTaskDrain).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("does not stop the drain when the audit transaction rejects", async () => {
mockHeartbeatService.getTaskDrainStatus.mockReturnValue({
draining: true,
startedAt: new Date(),
expiresAt: null,
activeRuns: 0,
pendingWakes: 0,
quiescent: true,
});
mockLogActivity.mockRejectedValue(new Error("activity insert failed"));
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const res = await request(app).delete("/api/instance/task-drain");
expect(res.status).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(500);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.stopTaskDrain).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("still reports the stopped drain when publishing its committed audit record fails", async () => {
mockHeartbeatService.getTaskDrainStatus.mockReturnValue({
draining: true,
startedAt: new Date(),
expiresAt: null,
activeRuns: 0,
pendingWakes: 0,
quiescent: true,
});
mockPublishActivity.mockImplementation(() => {
throw new Error("live event bus unavailable");
});
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const res = await request(app).delete("/api/instance/task-drain");
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(res.body).toEqual({ wasActive: true });
expect(mockDb.transaction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.stopTaskDrain).toHaveBeenCalledWith();
});
it("still publishes the second company's record when the first company's publish fails", async () => {
// Each committed audit record publishes independently, so one
// company's publish failure must not stop the rest from publishing.
const drain = { startedAt: "2026-08-29T00:00:00.000Z", expiresAt: null };
mockHeartbeatService.computeTaskDrain.mockReturnValue(drain);
mockPublishActivity.mockImplementation((publication: { companyId: string }) => {
if (publication.companyId === "company-1") throw new Error("live event bus unavailable");
});
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const res = await request(app).post("/api/instance/task-drain").send({});
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(res.body).toEqual(drain);
expect(mockPublishActivity).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
expect(mockPublishActivity.mock.calls.map(([publication]: [{ companyId: string }]) => publication.companyId)).toEqual([
"company-1",
"company-2",
]);
});
it("queues an overlapping DELETE behind a POST whose audit transaction is still pending, so the audit order and the live state always agree", async () => {
// Model the real drain state instead of a canned return value, so
// this test can prove the applied state, the audit rows, and the
// response all agree even when the earlier request's transaction
// resolves after the later request's would have.
const liveState = { draining: false };
mockHeartbeatService.computeTaskDrain.mockReturnValue({
startedAt: "2026-08-29T00:00:00.000Z",
expiresAt: null,
});
mockHeartbeatService.applyTaskDrain.mockImplementation(() => {
liveState.draining = true;
});
mockHeartbeatService.stopTaskDrain.mockImplementation(() => {
const wasActive = liveState.draining;
liveState.draining = false;
return { wasActive };
});
mockHeartbeatService.getTaskDrainStatus.mockImplementation(() => ({
draining: liveState.draining,
startedAt: liveState.draining ? "2026-08-29T00:00:00.000Z" : null,
expiresAt: null,
activeRuns: 0,
pendingWakes: 0,
quiescent: true,
}));
// The POST's transaction call blocks until the test releases it. The
// DELETE's transaction call, if it is ever reached, commits at once —
// so if the route let the two requests race, the DELETE would commit
// its audit row, and reach stopTaskDrain, first.
const transactionCalls: string[] = [];
let releasePostTransaction: (() => void) | undefined;
let sawFirstCall = false;
// Resolves the instant the first (blocked) transaction call starts.
// The test then waits for this real event, not a fixed duration.
// Under CPU contention the event loop can take far longer than any
// fixed budget to reach this call, so a timer would flake here.
let notifyFirstTransactionStarted: (() => void) | undefined;
const firstTransactionStarted = new Promise<void>((resolve) => {
notifyFirstTransactionStarted = resolve;
});
mockDb.transaction.mockImplementation((fn: (tx: unknown) => Promise<unknown>) => {
if (!sawFirstCall) {
sawFirstCall = true;
transactionCalls.push("post-start");
notifyFirstTransactionStarted?.();
return new Promise((resolve) => {
releasePostTransaction = () => {
transactionCalls.push("post-commit");
resolve(fn(TX_SENTINEL));
};
});
}
transactionCalls.push("delete-start-and-commit");
return fn(TX_SENTINEL);
});
// Each route handler awaits listCompanyIds as its last step before it
// enters the task-drain transition queue, so a second call proves the
// DELETE passed authorization and reached the queue — not merely that
// it has not arrived yet.
let listCompanyIdsCallCount = 0;
let notifySecondListCompanyIdsCall: (() => void) | undefined;
const secondListCompanyIdsCall = new Promise<void>((resolve) => {
notifySecondListCompanyIdsCall = resolve;
});
mockInstanceSettingsService.listCompanyIds.mockImplementation(async () => {
listCompanyIdsCallCount += 1;
if (listCompanyIdsCallCount === 2) notifySecondListCompanyIdsCall?.();
return ["company-1", "company-2"];
});
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
// supertest only sends a request once something calls .then() on it,
// so force the POST to send now instead of waiting for the final
// Promise.all below to do it.
const postPromise = request(app).post("/api/instance/task-drain").send({});
postPromise.then(() => {}, () => {});
// Wait for the POST's transaction call to start before the test sends
// the DELETE. At that point the POST already called listCompanyIds,
// already entered the task-drain transition queue, and sits blocked
// inside the mocked db.transaction call — the POST holds the queue.
// Only a real event proves this; a fixed wait would not, because the
// event loop can take far longer than any fixed budget under CPU
// contention. Sending the DELETE only after this event fixes the
// request order by the queue, not by which socket the operating
// system happens to service first.
await firstTransactionStarted;
const deletePromise = request(app).delete("/api/instance/task-drain");
deletePromise.then(() => {}, () => {});
// Wait for the DELETE's own listCompanyIds call. It proves the DELETE
// passed authorization and reached the transition queue behind the
// POST — not merely that it has not shown up yet.
await secondListCompanyIdsCall;
expect(transactionCalls).toEqual(["post-start"]);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.applyTaskDrain).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockHeartbeatService.stopTaskDrain).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
releasePostTransaction?.();
const [postRes, deleteRes] = await Promise.all([postPromise, deletePromise]);
expect(postRes.status).toBe(200);
expect(deleteRes.status).toBe(200);
// The DELETE's transaction only starts once the POST's has committed
// and the POST has already applied its drain — audit order matches
// application order.
expect(transactionCalls).toEqual(["post-start", "post-commit", "delete-start-and-commit"]);
// The DELETE observed the drain the POST applied, so its audit row
// and its response correctly report an active drain, and the live
// state ends idle — not stuck "draining" from a stale POST that
// applied after the DELETE that was meant to be the final word.
expect(deleteRes.body).toEqual({ wasActive: true });
expect(liveState.draining).toBe(false);
});
it("rejects a board actor without instance admin rights", async () => {
const app = await createApp(nonAdminActor);
const res = await request(app).post("/api/instance/task-drain").send({});
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.applyTaskDrain).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("rejects a ttl above the maximum", async () => {
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const res = await request(app)
.post("/api/instance/task-drain")
.send({ ttlMs: 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000 + 1 });
expect(res.status).toBe(400);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.applyTaskDrain).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("rejects a zero or negative ttl", async () => {
const app = await createApp(adminActor);
const zeroRes = await request(app).post("/api/instance/task-drain").send({ ttlMs: 0 });
expect(zeroRes.status).toBe(400);
const negativeRes = await request(app).post("/api/instance/task-drain").send({ ttlMs: -1 });
expect(negativeRes.status).toBe(400);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.applyTaskDrain).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});
});